This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Japan Nuclear Crisis Update

Tyler Durden's picture




 
  • Radiation levels at the quake-stricken Fukushima Daiichi
    complex have varied wildly, with a reading of 11,930
    microsieverts at the main gate of the plant at 0000 GMT, up from
    596 microsieverts as of 0630 GMT.
  • Elsewhere at the plant, levels reached as high as 400,000
    microsieverts an hour (or 400 millisieverts an hour).
  • The government gave no update on the status of a steel
    container surrounding the core of the plant's No.2 reactor,
    deemed by observers as most at risk of a meltdown.
  • An explosion on Tuesday at the No.2 reactor had caused
    some damage to its suppression pool, which helps to cool and
    trap the majority of cesium, iodine, strontium in its water.
  • Later, there was a fire and explosion at the complex's No.
    4 reactor and this is likely to have contributed to rising
    radiation levels.
  • The No. 4 reactor had been shut down for maintenance ahead
    of the quake, but a spent-fuel cooling pool associated with that
    reactor caught fire, causing the explosion.
  • The No.4 reactor's cooling pool, where spent nuclear fuel
    is stored, may be boiling and the water level may be falling.
  • Radioactivity at the cooling pool is high and Tokyo
    Electric cannot make checks at the site or determine what has
    burned.
  • Radiation leakage from complex is likely to spread after a
    fresh explosion at the plant.

Via Reuters

A blast, the third in the past two days, ripped through the Fukushima
1 Nuclear Power Plant in northeastern Japan, escalating concerns about a
possible nuclear disaster in the country devastated by a powerful
earthquake and subsequent tsunami.

World news agencies reported earlier that a spent fuel storage pond
was on fire and radiation leaked "directly" into the atmosphere. The
Japanese Transport Ministry declared a no-fly zone within the range of
30 km from the blast-hit station "because of detected radiation after
the explosions."

CNN said that radiation levels measured at the troubled plant's front
gate dropped to 596.4 microsieverts per hour at 06:30 GMT on Tuesday,
with the highest reading of 11,930 microsieverts per hour registered at
0:00 GMT.

Temperatures have also been rising slightly in units Five and Six, raising concerns that more reactors may overheat.

Third blast reported

A fire was extinguished on Tuesday at the 4th reactor of Japan's
quake-hit Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant, Kyodo news agency reported
early on Tuesday. The agency also reported that the 4th reactor was also
hit by a blast, caused by the build-up of hydrogen.

Reuters later said that a spent fuel storage pond was on fire and radiation leaked "directly" into the atmosphere.

Japan's Prime Minister Naoto Kan urged all people residing within 20
kilometers (13 miles) of the nuclear power plant to immediately leave
the zone due to increased radiation levels.

He also advised those living more than 20-30 km (13-17 miles) from
the NPP to stay in their houses, to shut their windows and doors and not
turn on air-conditioning or heating systems.

Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary Yukio Edano confirmed the blast at
the 4th reactor and added that the radiation level near the 3rd reactor
of the plant is very high and poses danger to health.

The French Embassy in Japan said earlier in a statement on its
website that the radiation leak is likely to reach the country's
capital, Tokyo, in 10 hours with the current speed of the wind, but
later withdrew its statement only advising French citizens to remain in
their houses and shut all their doors and windows firmly.

Radiation in Russia 'normal'

Radiation levels in the air around the damaged nuclear power plant
rose after the explosion at the 2nd reactor at around 6:10 local time
(22:10 GMT Monday).

Reuters reported, citing the plant's operator Tokyo Electric Power
Co., that the radiation levels had risen fourfold at the reactor. The
agency added that the blast damaged the roof and steam was seen rising
from the nuclear complex.

Monitoring revealed no excessive radiation levels in Russia's Far
East, a spokesman for the office of the presidential envoy in the Far
East said on Tuesday.

A spokesman for the local emergencies service dismissed media reports
of growing radiation levels in the Far Eastern Primorye Territory. He
said exposure rates in the region stood at 12 micro-roentgens per hour
on Tuesday. Exposure rates of up to 30 micro-roentgens per hour are
considered "natural."

"We have enough resources and equipment to tackle possible radiation
pollution in the federal district. But there is no threat to the
population at the moment," he added.

Stock indices plummet

The nuclear accident reports sent Japanese stock indices down
9.5-10.5% at the end of a trading day on Tuesday, their lowest since the
2008 international financial crisis, exchange data showed.

From RIA Novosti

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:11 | 1054746 Ethics Gradient
Ethics Gradient's picture

At that rate of exposure, how many working hours has Japan got left to use there given they only have a certain number of technicians who can each only take so much of a dose?

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:14 | 1054753 flagg707
flagg707's picture

Not many and dropping.  The men and women staying behind to try and control the situation are taking significant dose.  Slight damage to white blood cells begins at 10 rem (100 msv).  It gets worse from there.

See this for reference: http://bit.ly/bRheP6

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 09:31 | 1055257 Cindy_Dies_In_T...
Cindy_Dies_In_The_End's picture

50.

 

Kyodo breaking news: They can't pour water into #4

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 08:01 | 1054846 VinniPukh
VinniPukh's picture

this is what I'm waiting for...the evac. call on the personnel currently there. Heroics aside they're obliged to make that call if it does get too hot, so to speak. You could probably mark that point down as the point in time all sense of control of the situation was lost.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 08:17 | 1054893 sushi
sushi's picture

The workers at the site are not attending to the SFP in unit #4 due to the radiation hazard. The SFP is approx 40 ft x 40 ft x 20 ft and once the water boils away there will be another fire/explosion/radiation release.

In a matter of days that site will become so hot they will pull all the surviving personnel.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 08:23 | 1054919 VinniPukh
VinniPukh's picture

Thanks Sushi,

where are you getting that data on?

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 09:27 | 1055222 Ident 7777 economy
Ident 7777 economy's picture

 Sushi was extrapolating and seeing things that weren't there several days ago, although  what's projected here is not too far off the mark ...

 

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:11 | 1054749 flagg707
flagg707's picture

This is bad news.  Things continue to deteriorate.

FYI, for those scoring at home, 1 sv = 100 R.  For reference, a rad worker in the US is limited to 5 R per year.  With a reading of 400 mSv/hr at the plant, that means a dose of 40 R per hour.  Won't be this bad as it disperses, but they can't seem to get a handle on things.  Bad, bad news.

Earlier, I thought ZH was going overboard on this issue.  Not now.  We are deep in the woods here.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:18 | 1054759 Theta_Burn
Theta_Burn's picture

TY

Deep shit were in for sure.

what is the delay at this point, for a world wide plea for assistance?

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:31 | 1054775 Ethics Gradient
Ethics Gradient's picture

Hopefully someone with more knowledge than I will be able to tell you what assistance the rest of the world could possibly provide.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:48 | 1054814 cossack55
cossack55's picture

FRNs and Euros. Add enough paste and they make fair-to-middlin' walls. Can use for roofs if in Sahara.  

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:26 | 1054771 cossack55
cossack55's picture

Any to clue to the half-life of these various emission objects?

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:33 | 1054780 Ethics Gradient
Ethics Gradient's picture

I believe they range from a few seconds for some of the gases to 24000 years for the Pu. It depends what gets released and how. No-one knows at this stage.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:57 | 1054841 flagg707
flagg707's picture

First priority is to worry about the short-lived stuff like radioactive iodines.  I-131 has a half-life of roughly a week.  There is a whole soup of other fission products that could be coming out now - we just don't know.

Second priority comes with the longer-lived stuff like cesium-137 - this has a half-life of roughly 30 years and can get into the food chain.  We'll know more about how much got out once they (finally) get these reactors (well, piles of molten goo at this point) stabilized.

The others, like plutonium are toxic and do last a very long time, but frankly that is a very minor worry compared to the mess we have right now.

One good analogy is that radiation is like fire - if it burns hot (short half-life) it is generally more immediately dangerous, but it will decay out quicker.  The stuff that "burns" slow (long half-life) is generally less hazardous, but can be a pain in the butt for the clean-up phase.

 

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:32 | 1054781 Boilermaker
Boilermaker's picture

I was wondering if you were going to take a pie to the face after your bullshit tirade on ZH yesterday.

These fuckers lied all the way while this was getting worse and worse.  Typical spoon-feeding of awful news to the public.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:52 | 1054825 flagg707
flagg707's picture

You are spot on.  I totally blew it yesterday.  I never would have thought it would get out of hand like this.  The numbers I was seeing did conform to gas venting.  Shit has hit the fan.  I was wrong and painfully so.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 09:36 | 1055276 Cindy_Dies_In_T...
Cindy_Dies_In_The_End's picture

Don't worry about it. It hardly matters at this point.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 08:45 | 1054991 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

Earlier, I thought ZH was going overboard on this issue.  Not now.  We are deep in the woods here.

Agree.  Time to leave.

With truck access to the plant and an entire world to help you, how did it get this far?

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 12:49 | 1056148 Bicycle Repairman
Bicycle Repairman's picture

"how did it get this far?"

No sense of risk management among other things.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:28 | 1054764 Yes We Can. But...
Yes We Can. But Lets Not.'s picture

black swan, unfortunately...didn't see it coming Friday morn when I learned of a quake in Japan....didn't realize 10's of thousands already dead, nuclear disaster to follow...wow, these are days we'll never forget

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:35 | 1054786 Boilermaker
Boilermaker's picture

I stayed up most of the night following the story.  Even though I'm tired as hell as I head out for work, I assume(d) I am watching history unfold.  Sad history, terrible in nature, but history nonetheless.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:50 | 1054817 cossack55
cossack55's picture

Phook going to work, it only encourages the scum to tax you more to keep the fraud/ponzi going.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:24 | 1054767 Tulli
Tulli's picture

My prayers and thoughts remain with the people of Japan.

May God's blessing be with them in this ordeal.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:34 | 1054788 Boilermaker
Boilermaker's picture

Someone junked this...twice?

LOL, man, there are some sick-ass wierdos here now.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:49 | 1054820 cossack55
cossack55's picture

Not as many as reside in Lafayette.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 08:31 | 1054944 Boilermaker
Boilermaker's picture

WEST Lafayette....we didn't mix it up with those Eastside scumbags...

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:39 | 1054796 Crumbles
Crumbles's picture

Kyodonews seem to be a reliable source - 

 

Status of quake-stricken reactors at Fukushima nuclear power plants

TOKYO, March 15, Kyodo

The following is the known status as of Tuesday evening for each of the six reactors at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant and the four reactors at the Fukushima No. 2 plant, both in Fukushima Prefecture, crippled by Friday's magnitude 9.0 earthquake and ensuing tsunami.

Fukushima No. 1

-- Reactor No. 1 - Cooling failure, partial melting of core, vapor vented, hydrogen explosion, seawater pumped in.

-- Reactor No. 2 - Cooling failure, seawater pumped in, fuel rods fully exposed temporarily, damage to containment system, potential meltdown feared.

-- Reactor No. 3 - Cooling failure, partial melting of core feared, vapor vented, seawater pumped in, hydrogen explosion, high-level radiation measured nearby.

-- Reactor No. 4 - Under maintenance when quake struck, fire caused possibly by hydrogen explosion at pool holding spent fuel rods, pool water levels feared receding.

-- Reactor No. 5 - Under maintenance when quake struck.

-- Reactor No. 6 - Under maintenance when quake struck.

Fukushima No. 2

-- Reactor No. 1 - Cooling failure, then cold shutdown.

-- Reactor No. 2 - Cooling failure, then cold shutdown.

-- Reactor No. 3 - Cold shutdown.

-- Reactor No. 4 - Cooling failure, then cold shutdown.

Yesterday, I believe, there was a single mention of "criticality concerns" but nothing since - 

This would beg the questions:  Is there sufficient fissile material in a melt-down pool to reach a critical condition? This would mean an atomic explosion at the plant site.  How big?

Or do we get a 'China Syndrome" where the melt pool just sinks into the earth?

Concerned People Want To Know ...

 

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 08:02 | 1054823 Ethics Gradient
Ethics Gradient's picture

A nuclear explosion is rather hard to achieve. You need to keep all the material in one place - and it doesn't want to be there.

In a basic atom bomb you need a large focused conventional explosion to keep everything together (strange as it may seem). For some of the larger thermonuclear devices you actually have conventional explosives setting off a nuclear explosion and it's that pressure wave from that which sets off further nuclear explosions. Please see the Tsar bomb.

I wouldn't worry about the China syndrome thing. Assuming it did burn through the earth's crust (and I had to suspend disbelief to even write that sentance), the fuel would get mixed up in the magma to very little effect.

edit:

I would have thought that having a situation with four cores on fire releasing hundreds of tons of hideously radioactive and toxic waste into the atmosphere is the worst case scenario. Unless they can stop it, it will pump out radioactivity almost endlessly. But how do you stop it if people are receiving fatal doses within minutes?

There is only one way. Nuke it. You stop the reaction, but there might be some fallout....

 

 

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 08:08 | 1054869 Crumbles
Crumbles's picture

Thanks, I guess.

God help us all.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:51 | 1054824 cossack55
cossack55's picture

Both. Neither. It doesn't matter. Just BTFD. BOOOOYAAAAA

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 13:17 | 1056283 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

Zero chance of nuclear explosion. "Criticality" in this circumstance means enough fissile material gets together to cause increased output of (mainly) gamma radiation. The fuel in the rods does not have the required purity, and achieving a nuclear blast requires some serious geometrical shaping, various materials interfacing, and a way to produce a lot of neutrons in a hurry.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 15:36 | 1056897 SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

Nuclear devices can be crudely described in terms of their "frequency response."  Weapons, by design, have a very high frequency response, burn fuel at a very high rate and consume large amounts of it before the thermal and nuclear effects separate the pieces into a non-critical mass that ends further reactions.  Power reactors, being almost infinitely lower-frequency devices, are not capable of achieving this.  Even a prompt criticality at a power reactor such as that at Chernobyl produces a large thermal event and a mechanical explosion of sorts, but not a mushroom cloud.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 16:39 | 1057140 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

That is generally correct. There are more dissimilarities between a nuclear reactor and a nuclear weapon than there are similarities.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 07:54 | 1054832 prophet
prophet's picture

Christian Science Monitor reports that older reactors that depend on electricity for cooling need to secure their primary and secondary electrical supply sources.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 09:31 | 1055248 Ident 7777 economy
Ident 7777 economy's picture

Well .... YEAH

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 08:02 | 1054849 flagg707
flagg707's picture

This is a link to some .pdfs that give a synopsis of the damage at the reactors at Fukushimi: http://www.jaif.or.jp/english/

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 08:30 | 1054937 sushi
sushi's picture

I don't believe that info is up to date as it conflicts with other reporting.

The SFP on unit #4 is reported to have low water level with ongoing water injection (via fire hose?). Other reporting on BBC is that the SFP is boiling and the crew are unable to attend to it due to the present radiation hazard.

If the BBC report is correct we should get a report of further fire and explosion in unit #4 within the next 24 hours.

[edit: the SFP on units 5 and 6 is reported to show increasing temps. With no coolant flow these will also boil off resulting in further fires and explosions. ]

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 09:20 | 1055164 flagg707
flagg707's picture

I agree that the chart is not immediatley up to date. 

How the f*ck can the pumps be failing at the SFP?  Call the US Navy, tell them to drop in diesels and fuel on pallets and keep the power going from that.  I know I am not on-scene, but there are resources they could be tapping.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 09:39 | 1055285 Cindy_Dies_In_T...
Cindy_Dies_In_The_End's picture

No there isn't. In any event, its too late.They might minimize the damage, but it is unlikely.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 10:52 | 1055626 divide_by_zero
divide_by_zero's picture

The response of both Tepco and the Japanese government has puzzled me from the beginning. Seems like if a nuke plant in the US had no power the govt would have the military dropping diesel generators right and left on the place within hours, and not relying on firefighting equipment to cool the reactors. At one point the workers allowed the lone surviving pump to run out of fuel(though I'm sure contamination was a fear even then) causing the fuel rods in No2 to get fully exposed a second time. There's probably no remaining gear that can do the job.

MSM in full denial last night still running the; "This is no Chernobyl" stories.

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 13:25 | 1056321 jmc8888
jmc8888's picture

That's basically what I thought and posted yesterday.  I even went as so far as to suggest pulling backup pumps from non-effected reactors in safe zones AND calling up the manufacturer. (and I'm sure hundreds of other ZH-ers thought it)

I mean these things are just common sense, and the Japanese as with anybody, have a lot of it.  So I just don't get it. 

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 09:12 | 1055113 trendybull459
trendybull459's picture

People get together,anyone who cares about basic problem of our existance FED invited to vote in our poll and read out latest comments on yahoo FED article about QE3:

http://trendybull777.blog.com/2011/02/21/hello-world/

Voting poll is waiting for you click,take 5sec to make your choice,we must to reach critical level to be recognised by others to tove too!Thank you and keep all us together regardless government effords,we appreciate if you link us to other polls,blogs,sites to let people or your friiends to vote FED existence

Tue, 03/15/2011 - 09:29 | 1055241 Ident 7777 economy
Ident 7777 economy's picture

 

This would be the PERFECT opportunity to field some robots to do the 'dirty work' ... so, where are they?

 

 

.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!