John Mack: A Study In Denial And Status Quo Perpetuation

Tyler Durden's picture

Earlier today, John Mack was interviewed by Fox Business' latest addition Charlie Gasparino, as well as Brian Sullivan. And where we discussed in the prior post how absolutely nothing has changed between the days right before the credit bubble burst in 2006, as exemplified by the Bear Stearns Credit Conference notes, and today, John Mack is living proof that if left on their own, bankers would simply revert to the old failed model, keep getting paid tens of millions per year, and wait until the next taxpayer bailout some time in late 2010, early 2011 (we are now on an accelerated schedule - just as the bounce from the lows has been torrid, so the collapse will be amusingly fast), only to hit restart courtesy of whoever is Fed chairman at that point and do the rinse/repeat cycle one more time. In a nutshell, Mack sees no risk, not a hint of danger on the horizon. In fact, it was nobody's fault. And next time it will be nobody's fault all over again.

On agreeing with Tim Geithner's non-dead body.

SULLIVAN: Is the U.S. at risk of losing its AAA credit rating?

MACK:  No, I don't think so.  No.

On there being no bubble whatsoever:

SULLIVAN:  Companies have refinanced debt, they've issues new debt.  We've had months that have been greater than recent years in corporate debt issuance.  But somebody is going to have absorb that in about three years.  Is there a corporate debt bubble? 
MACK:  Again, if you look at the liquidity in the market today, it's larger than anything I have ever seen.  I think I just saw last week that in money market funds alone, they just ticked slightly below $3 trillion.  So you take that much liquidity in the market and then there is liquidity whether it's in CDs, liquidity overseas, sovereign wealth funds, I think the money is out there...I am pretty confident that if you look at corporate balance sheets, they are in good shape.  They have the ability to defer some of this debt raising.  I think there's huge appetite still for equity, so you can always raise more equity if that is one way of improving the balance sheet to sell more debt. 

On the denial of MS losing billions in prop trading and had to spin off its prop trading desk. Also, on why banks desperately need to keep on frontrunning their clients to be profitable:

GASPARINO:  Now, where do you think -- so, you obviously don't agree with the Volcker Rule. 
MACK:  I don't agree.  I think -- I think risk management should be handled by requiring specific amounts of capital vis-a-vis with each business you are in.  More risky business, prop trading, let's say, you should have more capital behind it. 
GASPARINO:  Right.  I mean, the financial crisis, I believe, was caused -- I mean, people lost money proprietary trading.  Morgan Stanley lost money, Goldman Sachs maybe lost some money, but most of it was from the customer side where they were packaging CDOs for customers and they weren't buying it, they were holding it on their books.  That said, does this Volcker Rule make it in some way? 
 MACK:  Again, some ways, very broad.  I don't think it makes it in the way he has put it forward, but I do think we will end up having higher equity capital requirements to some of our businesses where we take a lot of risk and prop trading would be one of them. 

On working out:

GASPARINO:  Although, how do you get -- I mean, do government programs actually help tell people to go work out?  I mean I've been working out my entire life.  I didn't need the federal government telling me that.
MACK:  Yes, true.  But you're unusual, Charlie, in many ways. 

On why blaming God's worker and colleague Blankfein is just plain wrong:

GASPARINO:  Does Goldman Sachs deserve to be the poster child for everything wrong with Street? 
MACK:  Well, again --

GASPARINO:  You're happy it's not you guys, I know that.
MACK:  Listen, it's topical for the press to put them out the way they do.  I don't think they are the right firm, it's an industry issue.  And look, we all have done some things or said some things we wish we hadn't of said, and I think that got him kind of catapulted over --

On why the death of US capitalism and its resurrection only at the sacrificial altar of the US middle class is really nobody's fault.

GASPARINO:  Was that a failure of federal regulation or state?  I mean, there's a controversy whether the New York state insurance commissioner, who is now running for attorney general -- former New York State Insurance Commission Eric Dinallo (ph), now running for New York state attorney general -- whether he kind of dropped the ball.  Now, he would come back and say, well, we didn't directly regulate that.  But it seems like nobody is like, look, watching the store.  Everybody's pointing -- it's like "Reservoir Dogs."
 MACK:  Right, right. 
Well, Charlie, again, everyone had a piece to play in this.  I don't think you can point the finger at one regulator, either state or federal, and it's very broad and the whole movement of doing these insurance products was accepted.  Now the question is, if we had had an exchange or a clearing house for derivatives, some of this would have been alleviated.   But that is just one piece of it.  I think we need a fundamental change in our regulatory framework on financial service and it should be part and parcel of it.  

With CEO's like this, never willing to acknowledge it really was all their fault, the system will never be changed, let alone fixed. In fact, the only piece of reform that has actually passed since the GSE's collapse after Paulson's bazooka ended up being a water gun, has been the limitation on short sales: gotta keep the Ponzi going after all. With the criminals on TV denying they had anything to do with the final failure of capitalism as Keynesianism enters its terminal stages, why anyone will still participate in this broken market is simply beyond us.

One of the three Fox Business clips with Mack below. The other two can be found here and here.


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

If the definition of insanity is doing the same thing time after time and expecting different results, what do you call doing the same thing time after time and expecting the same results?

Capitalism, New World Order style.

DavosSherman's picture

Actually it isn't insanity it is though the definition for neurosis. 

Ich bin ein whatever's picture

And once again, no one will be able to see it coming...

Especially the "talent" at CNBC, which seems to be shrinking on a daily basis.  If they could only make Steve LIESman disappear...

TheGoodDoctor's picture

I wish the guys from South Park would skewer the bankers as they did the "sex addicts" in last weeks episode about the Tiger Woods scandal. "We've got a turd in the punchbowl!"

Dirtt's picture

Big Ben....ouch.  The Rooney's are sooooooo not happy about that.

TheGoodDoctor's picture

That is exactly what I thought. Plus they made him out to be a doofus.

Captain Willard's picture

The world as he knew it has vanished. He cannot fathom the changes. The model of which he was a Paladin has blown up.

In an odd way, he is among the more honorable of the TBTFs. He has taken no pay for several years. I have to admit that I watched this interview live and felt an odd pathos. He truly feels righteous. I tried to hate him for it, but couldn't manage much more than pity mixed with a little contempt.

A middle-class guy, he struggled, got to Duke, got to MS, climbed the ladder, did everything the System asked of him. He lost a Byzantine power struggle, was banished, but came back like Ali. Is he an egomaniac? Sure; they all are.

Now he tries to vindicate a crooked system, but it's the system that made him what he is. He can no more separate himself from this system than he could separate himself from his lungs and guts.

Should he know better? Probably. Could it be that I'm a sucker, and he just has a great act? Maybe.

But in the end, Blankfein knows better - that's what makes him so evil and sickening. In the case of Mack, you cannot help but think he really believes. It's sad for him and sad for us.

Metal Guru's picture

I don't see much of a difference between Mack and Blankfein. And I don't think either of them are either evil or sickening - that seems overly simplistic.


anony's picture

No they're not evil or sickening. 

Morality and nausea have nothing to do with what they are.

Vigilantes could show us precisely what they are and they would get some justifiable results. Like both their heads on pikes at 85 Broad.

Adjectives really cannot accurately convey the smegma these men are and the catastrophic damage they have done to the world financial system, the investments of hundreds of millions of people along with their accomplices like geithner, orszag, bernanke, summers, paulson, greenspan, rubin, friedman, fuld, frank, thain, dodd, mozillo, o'neal, cox, prince, cassano, shapiro, friedman, kashkari, yellin, gensler, madoff, dimon, sanderson, rainieri, fink, and other self-aggrandizing monsters at AIG, Goldman Sucks, Ernst and Young, jpMorgan Chase, Citi, B o A, Merrill, Bear Stearns, Lehman, and the Bank of England.


Dirtt's picture

I wonder who is going to be the one to light the match.

Zombies On Toast's picture

If you keep feeding the zombies blood they will continue their rape and pillage. You have to cut off their heads to stop them. 

Handle with care's picture

18 months ago, according to the Treasury Secretary, the US was just days away from catastrophic collapse and social disorder with tanks in the street.


If that had happened it would have been the single most catastrophic event to have ever hit the United States.  Worse than 9/11.  Worse than Pearl Harbor.  Worse than the Great Depression.


Yet despite being on the very brink NOTHING has been done to prevent the country returning to the brink!  NOTHING!


Its as if after 3 mile island they all shrugged and said that since it didn't actually explode there's no need to change the design and monitoring of nuclear power stations

mrhonkytonk1948's picture

Let's ask Gary Aquire for a backgrounder on Mack, whaddayasay?  Mack and many others should probably be wearing orange jumpsuits and walking funny.

Blithering ORSA's picture

When you pay someone a bonus for failure, he will continue failing in exactly the same manner he just got paid to fail.

sweet ebony diamond's picture

There will be a great book written about these times.

Paulson, Blankfein, Bernanke, etc. will be the icons.

Everybody will have the cue-ball look.

Everybody will grin-fuck.

mark456's picture

ucvhost is a leading web site hosting service provider that is known to provide reliable and affordable hosting packages to customers. The company believes in providing absolute and superior control to the customer as well as complete security and flexibility through its many packages. windows vps Moreover, the company provides technical support as well as customer service 24x7, in order to enable its customers to easily upgrade their software, install it or even solve their problems. ucvhost offers the following different packages to its customers