Jones Day's Chrysler Charge To Taxpayers: $12,702,190.19

Tyler Durden's picture

Your rating: None

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 07/19/2009 - 12:08 | 9929 Bubby BankenStein
Bubby BankenStein's picture

A blended billing rate of $457 per hour!

Sun, 07/19/2009 - 12:13 | 9932 lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

TD, any CIT update?  They going to file tomorrow?

Sun, 07/19/2009 - 12:17 | 9934 Will Profit
Will Profit's picture

You didn't include the addendum invoice:  paper clips   $150,000.00

Sun, 07/19/2009 - 12:44 | 9935 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Just imagine when we start billing the Gov't (taxpayers) for health care:
"Right there on Page 16 (of the 100+ page doc) is a provision making individual private medical insurance illegal."

Sun, 07/19/2009 - 12:46 | 9937 Anonymous
Sun, 07/19/2009 - 12:47 | 9938 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Goldman Sachs in Talks to Acquire Treasury Department

In what some on Wall Street are calling the biggest blockbuster deal
in the history of the financial sector, Goldman Sachs confirmed today
that it was in talks to acquire the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

According to Goldman spokesperson Jonathan Hestron, the merger
Goldman and the Treasury Department is “a good fit” because “they’re
in the business of printing money and so are we.”

The Goldman spokesman said that the merger would create efficiencies
for both entities: “We already have so many employees and so much
money flowing back and forth, this would just streamline things.”

Mr. Hestron said the only challenge facing Goldman in completing the
merger “is trying to figure out which parts of the Treasury Dept. we
don’t already own.”

Goldman recently celebrated record earnings by roasting a suckling
over a bonfire of hundred-dollar bills.

Elsewhere, conspiracy theorists celebrated the 40th anniversary of
NASA faking the moon landing.

And in South Carolina, Gov. Mark Sanford gave his wife a new diamond
ring, while his wife gave him an electronic ankle bracelet.

Sun, 07/19/2009 - 12:58 | 9942 Amy Girl
Amy Girl's picture

Hah, wait until the financial advisors bill shows up with its bonuses!


A Single Serving Friend

Sun, 07/19/2009 - 13:16 | 9945 Will Profit
Will Profit's picture

Hey Anonymous,  Re your comment: "Goldman Sachs in Talks to Acquire Treasury Department" How about giving credit to "The Borowitz Report " when you reprint/steal, word for word, his blog posts. 


Sun, 07/19/2009 - 13:16 | 9946 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

A bargain at even twice the price!

Sun, 07/19/2009 - 14:04 | 9951 Anonymous
Sun, 07/19/2009 - 14:15 | 9956 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

so many people out of work, there is no good news, the govt is just trying to create a positive feedback look with mkt manipulation!!!

Sun, 07/19/2009 - 14:26 | 9959 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture


Sun, 07/19/2009 - 14:35 | 9964 Will Profit
Will Profit's picture

Immelt, is that you?

Sun, 07/19/2009 - 14:43 | 9969 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

sir, i have instructed our employees to ignore all bad news and harp on any ounce of good news. fyi,Kernan is getting a bonus this year

Sun, 07/19/2009 - 16:29 | 10009 tcopeland
tcopeland's picture

$1175 an hour for Mr. Plainer's time for "Business Restructuring & Reorg".  My goodness.

Sun, 07/19/2009 - 18:38 | 10019 frankous
frankous's picture

TARP and stimulus cost tax payers 2 trillion so this is kinda peanuts, but still annoying

good afrticles...ttp://
Tell a politician about a problem and he or she will derive a way government can fix it. Tell a Wall Streeter about a problem and he or she will derive a way to profit from it.

Mon, 07/20/2009 - 06:20 | 10182 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

$135 for reading a document for 30mins. Nice work if you can get it.

Mon, 07/20/2009 - 07:37 | 10187 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Now I'm no lawyer, but some of the "research charges" seem to be for items that most lawyers should know already

Lexis Charges for research regarding legislative history of bankruptcy code or research regarding section 101 of the bankruptcy code? Did they charge for their time in law school too?

Mon, 07/20/2009 - 08:43 | 10195 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

That's likely legitimate. They're not trying to find out what section 101 says; they're trying to find a case or a piece of legislative history that frames it in just the right way to support their point. There's no way to just know that offhand. You need to comb through the cases and the Congressional records to find it.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!