This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Latest Chinese Fraud May Cost Maverick Capital Nearly $200 Million

Tyler Durden's picture


For the most part Chinese micro fraudcaps, as most Chinese companies trading in the US are now affectionately known to most, have so far been small companies, with market caps topping at around $250 million. They have also been a veritable gold mine of P&L as short after short has generated massive returns, to the point where our proprietary ZH short basket has just hit a record low and has returned over 38%. Most have been happy as the SEC has continued to largely ignore the topic of Chinese reverse-merger (and other) IPOs on US exchanges, meaning free money would likely continue as many, many more such frauds would continue to be exposed by share sleuths armed with lots of time. All this is about to change, courtesy of the biggest Chinese (alleged) fraud to date: $1 billion market cap (said market cap will be a fraction of this number once LFC is unfrozen for trading), whose largest investors are not some mom and pop retail investors, but Fidelity, as well as investment "legends" Maverick and Tiger Global (and JPMorgan in 4th). And with Maverick standing to lose as much as up to $200 million, one can be sure the SEC is suddenly going to promptly move to pop the Chinese fraud bubble, after over 6 months of warnings by the likes of Zero Hedge, thereby finally removing the "market efficiency" function that speculative shorters (who are apparently the only ones who actually do their homework) truly provide in this case, as well as in all others.

Bloomberg recaps the Longtop story:

Longtop Financial Technologies Ltd. (LFT), a Hong Kong-based maker of financial software, said auditor Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Ltd. resigned and a U.S. regulator started a probe of the company’s financial reports.

Longtop, whose 2007 U.S. initial public offering was underwritten by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) and Deutsche Bank AG (DBK), said Deloitte and Chief Financial Officer Derek Palaschuk resigned because of “falsity of the company’s financial records in relation to cash at bank and loan balances (and possibly in sales revenue)” among other issues, according to a press release today. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission informed Longtop that it is investigating matters related to Deloitte’s claims, the company said.

The probe of Longtop, which has been suspended in New York trading since May 17 as it delayed filing its annual report, represents an expansion of regulatory scrutiny beyond smaller Chinese companies listed in the U.S. by reverse mergers. The SEC launched an investigation last year into the use of reverse takeovers, in which a closely held firm acquires one that’s publicly traded, enabling it to sell shares without the regulatory and investor examination of an IPO.

“We learned that there’s no such thing as pedigree anymore in the Chinese market,” said Andrew Left, Los Angeles-based founder and owner of Citron Research, who wrote reports questioning Longtop’s financials. “This company had Goldman at their IPO, Deloitte as their auditor, and major firms as their investors. You couldn’t ask for a better structure.”

Oddly, it took Deloitte a few years to figure out what was blatantly obvious to several focused "speculators":

Deloitte said in its resignation letter from May 22 that it found falsehoods in the company’s financial statements and experienced “deliberate interference by certain members of Longtop management” in the audit process, including “unlawful detention” of audit files, according to the statement from Longtop.

Deloitte said its previous audit reports cannot be trusted because the auditor can’t rely on management’s representations and “declined to be associated with any of the company’s financial communications in 2010 and 2011,” according to the statement.

The company defended itself valiantly: The CFO "said on a call with analysts April 28 that Citron had
compared Longtop’s profit margins with firms that aren’t
“direct competitors” and that the company would defend itself
against “these absolutely baseless allegations.” Longtop also
said on the call that it would double a share buyback."

The CFO resigned on May 19.

Alas, that will not help the likes of Maverick and Tiger, which are now holding shares that have been halted for almost a week, and which will probably reopen (in a few months if ever), with a .PK suffix.

Ironically, Maverick was adding all the way in:

Something tells us the same cautious VWAP algo used to accumulate over the past 2 years will be promptly jettisoned in favor of a market Sell order when and if the shares finally reopen.

In the meantime, the performence of the Zero Hedge proprietary China short basket is doing just as expected.


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 05/23/2011 - 16:41 | 1302972 TooBearish
TooBearish's picture

Who is on the other side of these trades?  Chanos?

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 20:09 | 1303574 asheylarry
asheylarry's picture

I've been trying to cherry pick a few good apples from the bunch. Serious mine field.

I can tell you that naked shorting is alive and well in this space.

there is a fine line between "research" firms doing their investigations and scumbag short price manipulators

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 16:39 | 1302975 tickhound
tickhound's picture

eh... $200 mil a drop in the bucket in bennie-bucks.

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 16:45 | 1302989 plocequ1
plocequ1's picture


Mon, 05/23/2011 - 16:49 | 1302993 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

No surprise that the Chinese are smarter than Wall Street fund managers. Laughable.

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 16:48 | 1302997 dracos_ghost
dracos_ghost's picture

Jesus, are there any f&*ked up deals that Goldman isn't part of.

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 16:54 | 1303015 LawsofPhysics
LawsofPhysics's picture

Why these wall street "pros" don't simply set massive amounts of paper on fire is beyond me.  Seem like it would at least be more entertaining.

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 17:06 | 1303038 exaengr
exaengr's picture

Incorrect ticker of LFC in first paragraph, a 100B (?!?!) China Life Insurance outfit?  Hmmm, also a short/fraud candidate?

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 17:07 | 1303043 I am a Man I am...
I am a Man I am Forty's picture

what a bunch of punk ass dumb shit investors, LMAO at Fidelity, Maverick, JPM, and all the other fools and crooks involved in this shit stock

Goldman is slowly getting what is coming to them, starting to see it in their stock price, prison will come, but it will take a while

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 17:11 | 1303048 The Fonz
The Fonz's picture

The ZH short basket? I wonder where or how one could see what ZH recomends? I would be very interested :P

Also what is this program that Mr. Durden uses for all his chart work? I think it might be time for me to improve my resources if someone would be so kind :)

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 17:34 | 1303106 SolidSnake961
SolidSnake961's picture

there was a big post a while back where zerohedge created a basket of a bunch of chinese stocks that should have been shorted

Tue, 05/24/2011 - 02:11 | 1304285 ProdigyofZen
ProdigyofZen's picture

Uh? its called Bloomberg. it will set you back about 1850 a month. Well at least i know thats the group price. I couldn't imagine what the individual price would be.

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 17:09 | 1303049 topcallingtroll
topcallingtroll's picture

You would think maverick and fidelity would "do deligence" on their investments.

How can the little guys with virtually no resources uncover these things and the big sophisticated players cant?

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 18:29 | 1303238 Quantum Nucleonics
Quantum Nucleonics's picture

Though it makes me sick to do so, in defense of some of these managers (e.g., Fidelity) some of these investments are probably for index funds.

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 18:01 | 1303177 ml8ml8
ml8ml8's picture

"This company had Goldman at their IPO, Deloitte as their auditor, and major firms as their investors. You couldn’t ask for a better structure.”

You also couldn't ask for a more rich basket of future defendants in the securities fraud litigation sure to ensue.

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 18:40 | 1303272 DNB-sore
DNB-sore's picture

congrats Tyler!

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 18:51 | 1303312 monopoly
monopoly's picture

Partly because of Zero Hedge I have not bought 1 Chinese stock in the last 2 years. Did not know enough about the fraud companies to short but did not get hurt, not even once.

Thank you Zero Hedge.

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 20:06 | 1303556 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Should have gone to market watch. They would have hooked you up with 10 of them.

But to be fair. Zerohedge does have Leo "Buy Chinese solar stocks."

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 18:52 | 1303315 Stanley Lord
Stanley Lord's picture

What a minute, I did not see this LTF listed on any web site that touts what the hedge funds are buying (Market Folly, Guru Focus) you mean that hedge funds buy other thnigs without telling us? They buy other stocks besides Microsoft and P&G?



Mon, 05/23/2011 - 19:01 | 1303342 Dan The Man
Dan The Man's picture


Speculative Shorters... Power to the People !


Go get them all, you rock !

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 19:49 | 1303498 steve.stuart
steve.stuart's picture

Chinese fraud ... are they joking. How about the investment banks cheating the public by offering Linkedin IPO at more than 200 times PE

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 20:45 | 1303682 Ted K
Ted K's picture

You're not supposed to notice that Steve, or the fact that the exchanges and FINRA do nothing under the sun, except protect broker/dealers from real regulation from the SEC.  Before Mary Schapiro gets up from her desk to urinate she calls FINRA for permission.

Mon, 05/23/2011 - 23:34 | 1304120 PulauHantu29
PulauHantu29's picture

China is competing with Wall Street for the Biggest Fraud.

Is there a Nobel Prize for Fraud?

Tue, 05/24/2011 - 07:15 | 1304439 Hexus
Hexus's picture

Would be praised if they weren't Chinese for sound business idealism or some junk.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!