You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Latest DTCC CDS Update (Week Of July 31)

Tyler Durden's picture




Due to popular demand, Zero Hedge is happy to bring back the weekly DTCC CDS gross/net open interest recap. The primary reason we dropped coverage of CDS data over the past month was/is our belief that both fundamental and technical analysis, in the face of a rapturous market is pointless, and the only thing that matters is the ticking sovereign debt timebomb, as indicated by various Federal Reserve disclosures such as the H.4.1, H.3, and Z.1. If you don't believe me, please call any fundamental analyst at either a sell or a buy side firm at 4:00:01 pm. Nine out of ten times you will get voicemail (which, all else equal, is better than a vibrating dildo). Nonetheless, for the sake of completeness, it is useful to see what this formerly very useful data point from the world of CDS indicates: so here is what the latest out of 55 Water street says.

Not surprisngly, mega poundage in financials with almost $100 billion in net rerisking over the past week on just over 13 thousand exchanged contracts. New trades for $344 billion were offset by full terminations of $445 billion - traders couldn't trade this sector fast enough. It is as yet unclear if the motivation was to hedge long equity positions via CDS purchases, or Cash-CDS cap arbitrage.  Another squeezed sector was consumer services at $37 billion. The remainder of industries were mostly noise

In single names, rerisking dominated derisking. The most notable non-sovereign derisking names were Arrow Electronics, Banco Espirito Santo, ILFC, ArcerlorMittal, Disney, TCE, Holdings, Target,GMAC, and Glencore.

On the other side, Deutsche Bank was the safest credit in the world in the prior week based on open interest changes, followed by Barclays, DT, GECC, BofA, MS, Unicredit, Rio Tinto, Tyson, Kerr-Mcgee, UBS, Limited, Ford and a bunch of other zombie companies.

Total Gross CDS outstanding was at $26.6 trillion, a far cry from the $60 trillion or so a year ago. This consisted of $15.2 trillion in single names, $8.1 trillion in indices and $3.3 trillion in tranches, all of which were about 85% held by dealers. Non-dealer to non-dealer transactions were minute (About 0.1% of total), so all the hopes of the Agriculture Committee to curb this side of the CDS business might need a bit of a reevaluation.

As always, good luck making heads or tails out of this market in which the only thing that matters is whether or not some SPARC array has accidentally blown a fuse at 9:29:59 am, or whether Sky Net has attained sentient status.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:03 | Link to Comment Project Mayhem
Project Mayhem's picture

My question is does there exist any sort of data -- outside what BIS publishes -- regarding Interest Rate Swaps (IRS), another source of trillions in OTC derivatives.  I think outstanding amount of IRS actually exceeds CDS.

http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/images/2009/Mar/Rob_Kirby_clip_image004.jpg

 

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:06 | Link to Comment Daedal
Daedal's picture

And by 'vibrating dildo' do you mean Dennis Kneale?

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:13 | Link to Comment ShankyS
ShankyS's picture

LOL - shouldn't you be "Anonymous" with that pic by your name?

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:11 | Link to Comment ShankyS
ShankyS's picture

Posting on any reported number is hazardous and can only be viewed in the category "for what it is worth". The shit only gets deeper the more you dig. We'll never know half the truth about anything. GSEC vibrating Dildo? LOL.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:29 | Link to Comment My cognitive di...
My cognitive dissonance's picture

I'm glad it's back TD. Thanks.

Time to refocus.

 

Is ShankyS above me?

What are the odds? That's the second time that's happened.

 

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:42 | Link to Comment ShankyS
ShankyS's picture

LOL confused me for a second - BTW - I want your eclipse with a H in the middle on a t-shirt - would make and awesome OH design in black. Mine is the O shit takeoff of the W bumpersticker.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:23 | Link to Comment RobotTrader
RobotTrader's picture

I have no clue how to follow CDS pricing, derisking, re-risking, etc.

I'm just curious if the "pricing" of these lotto tickets tracks SPY, oil, gold, EUR/USD, on a tick for tick basis.

If so, then they are useless hedging instruments, since they are marching in lockstep like Red Chinese soldiers to the "inflation" or "deflation" theme.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:45 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

i know i should not only focus on one non-sovereign entity, but the the CDS evaluation for ArcerlorMital is very concerning, taking into observation that ArcerlorMittal is the worlds largest steel producer. If the value of AccelorMittal CDS has gone up by that much, the only possible conclusion is that there is no recovery in sight + AM has its internal labor problems and problems with cutting costs and operation re-definition and restructuring. I have been watching closely at this company for the last couple of months and it has been my main indicator of the size of the economic downturn which has happened, and future economical conditions. It is my belief that metal, utility and oil sectors are main indicators of how the economy is doing, and judging by the recent Q2 earnings reports by all these sectors the picture we are looking is gonna be ugly ass hell when in finally unravels

EDIT:

i know this is old knowledge, and a well known fact about this economy, but i just wanted to put it into perspective and validate it with arguments based in this data ... 

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:32 | Link to Comment Sqworl
Sqworl's picture

Read Fool's Gold by Gillian Tett...all details of Mad Cow disease of shadow banks...

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:09 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

oh believe me when i say that they are not being altruistic; they do it a) because they " don't want to be the guys who presided over the next Great Depression " or b) they have an employment gig from some big WS bank after they leave office. It has nothing to do with saving the economy, just kicking the can down the road ( god i hate cliches, but this one is so suitable ) ... They have no plan, no vision no nothing, the only thing they have is a leg strong enough ( the FED, GS, the Government, advance technology ) with which they can kick the can ( the economy ) further down the road ( economic cycle, presidential term ) ...

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:14 | Link to Comment Sqworl
Sqworl's picture

People do not understand what a great revenue economy is.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:23 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

definitely quote of the day

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 00:53 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:23 | Link to Comment Project Mayhem
Project Mayhem's picture

That is a hard trade to decide, because another round of deleveraging could clobber everything except USD. 

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:31 | Link to Comment Gubbmint Cheese
Gubbmint Cheese's picture

Any thoughts from anyone on what may happen if (okay.. "when") the FDIC has to tap into the Fed's $500bn line o' credit? Is the already busy auction schedule prepared for that? Or will the Chinese be pissed at hearing about yet ANOTHER plea for funds?

anyone? bueller? beuller?

 

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:42 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

i don't think the Chinese will be pissed off, because the funds for FDIC bailout were already allocated and secured. And there is a speculation ( which I'm not found of ) that the FDIC is down to their last 800 mil. So, one can expect the Sheila will need to go down on her knees and say pretty please, and then will she get the money she needs. Just imagine if the FDIC does not get a bailout, there would be a run on the banks not seen since the great depression, and all the foreign capital would leave in minutes and the Dow would go to 200 and  SPX to 2 ..

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:52 | Link to Comment Gubbmint Cheese
Gubbmint Cheese's picture

I didn't realize the funds were already allocated and secured - I thought it was kept safely behind glass with a small hammer and a 'break in case of emergency' sign on it. Doubt after all we've seen the Gubbmint (the real one, not me) would let the FDIC dangle given everything else they've done to keep this crazy party going. The name of the game is 'convince everyone that the U.S. is okay'.. at all costs.

Failure is not an option until its an inevitability..

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:57 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

well, it has not been announced publicly, but you can bet your house and your wife/husband that those funds are allocated and secured. in this case the Gubbmint ( not you ) will not risk anything, let alone something so systemically important as FDIC

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:37 | Link to Comment Comrade de Chaos
Comrade de Chaos's picture

Well, I pretty sure that when one fuses a vibrating dildo with a body of T-100, it's first words would be: "Try SELLING some hope for a chance..."

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:00 | Link to Comment buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

What a fuzzball of complexity. It must be nice to be able to just make shit up as you go.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 06:05 | Link to Comment chicagopwj (not verified)
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 09:45 | Link to Comment PragmaticIdealist
PragmaticIdealist's picture

There is no historical precedent for the amount of de-leveraging we are experiencing and bound to experience as the US consumer taps out after decades of profligance.

It's either progressive debt monetization or complete system rehaul or partial default from here on in.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 09:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 09:28 | Link to Comment curbyourrisk
curbyourrisk's picture

Any one know why Arrow Electronics was featured so prevalently here?????

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!