• Steve H. Hanke
    05/04/2016 - 08:00
    Authored by Steve H. Hanke of The Johns Hopkins University. Follow him on Twitter @Steve_Hanke. A few weeks ago, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) sprang a surprise. It announced that a...

Latest Fukushima Headlines

Tyler Durden's picture




 
0
Your rating: None
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Sun, 03/27/2011 - 23:12 | 1107395 Rhone_Ranger
Rhone_Ranger's picture

Even Homer wouldn't touch this....Who's next?

Sun, 03/27/2011 - 23:32 | 1107462 Ras Bongo
Mon, 03/28/2011 - 08:00 | 1108070 Chumbadumba
Chumbadumba's picture

Fuck you, commie!!

LOLOL!!

I AM CHUMBADUMBA!

Sun, 03/27/2011 - 23:56 | 1107524 homersimpson
homersimpson's picture

I get an unlimited supply of donuts and Duff Beer if I work overtime at the nuclear plant?!?! COUNT ME IN!!!

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 00:32 | 1107599 Pool Shark
Pool Shark's picture

 

Way to go "fishbulb"

 

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 00:36 | 1107609 Mr. Mandelbrot
Mr. Mandelbrot's picture

"Kar?shi (????), which can be translated literally from Japanese as "death from overwork", is occupational sudden death."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kar?shi

Chernobyl - 650,000 "Liquidators" needed to clean it up

Fukushima/Onagawa - Only 50 "Karoshis" needed to clean it up?!


Mon, 03/28/2011 - 00:40 | 1107617 Mr. Mandelbrot
Mr. Mandelbrot's picture

The "?" in the word should be an "o."  What a fitting name for the unfortunate heroes so bravely (blindly?) working to subdue the mighty subatomic particles . . .

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 06:44 | 1107958 ColonelCooper
ColonelCooper's picture

Because Fukushima is only .00000762% as bad of a disaster when compared to Chernobyl. 

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 09:00 | 1108237 SteveOoooo
SteveOoooo's picture

Cite your sources.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 09:18 | 1108276 ColonelCooper
ColonelCooper's picture

Apologies.  I would have thought the ridiculousness of the number achieved when figuring the number of plant workers as a proportion would have made it unnecessary to use this: </sarcasm>

 

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 09:52 | 1108384 SteveOoooo
SteveOoooo's picture

I forgot the little winky thingy... ;-)

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 12:22 | 1109014 glenlloyd
glenlloyd's picture

Chernobyl reactor was running when the explosion(s) occurred, which is worse than the incident in Japan. How much worse it is will have to wait until this is over.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 01:13 | 1107678 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture

URGENT: Radioactive water at No. 2 reactor due to partial meltdown: Edano

TOKYO, March 28, Kyodo
The government believes highly radioactive water detected at the No. 2 reactor of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant is due to a partial meltdown of fuel rods there, its top spokesman said Monday.

http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/81431.html

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 02:15 | 1107764 trav7777
trav7777's picture

is there like anybody left around here who didn't already know as of at least a week ago that we had melted fuel rods?

And if discharge water has zirconium in it, that's as good a fingerprint as you're gonna get

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 02:41 | 1107790 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

I'm cunfused? The guy with bullet holes was my friend?  Can I count on you?

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 08:20 | 1108116 Judge Judy Scheinlok
Judge Judy Scheinlok's picture

I think you meant; "I'm cuntfuzed?", right Alice?

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 04:04 | 1107872 Hoezit
Hoezit's picture

Is there a quick chemical test to check for zirconium or zirconium dioxide?

 By the way I still find your zap sign offensive every time I look at it, I guess that is part of its intention.

 

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 06:46 | 1107961 ColonelCooper
ColonelCooper's picture

If that actually offends you, you must be a real treat at parties.

Junked for being hypersensitive to life.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 08:55 | 1108225 SteveOoooo
SteveOoooo's picture

Junked for excessive junking.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 09:41 | 1108354 ColonelCooper
ColonelCooper's picture

By the way, New Guy: I didn't junk you. 

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 10:27 | 1108476 malikai
malikai's picture

No, but I just did.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 05:11 | 1107906 MSimon
MSimon's picture

I131 is even better. And I134? Well let us just say:

Tokyo we have a problem.

 

http://powerandcontrol.blogspot.com/2011/03/worst-case-scenario.html

 

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 05:38 | 1107922 Chumbadumba
Chumbadumba's picture

Trav trav, you racist piece of shit, shouldn't you be worried about debunking any claims that anything whatsoever is out of the ordinary near the reactor, or are you flip-flopping again (as is your racial genetic heritage)???

LOLOLOLOL!!

I AM CHUMBADUMBA!!

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 08:48 | 1108184 Matt
Matt's picture

Is there any risk of the control rods melting or otherwise failing to work anymore? What kind of temperatures can they hold up to?

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 03:07 | 1107812 StychoKiller
StychoKiller's picture

Partial meltdown of fuel rods believed to be temporary: Edano

WTF??  Are the fuel rods gonna somehow UNMELT themselves??  Quick, thread the film backwards thru the projector!

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 04:21 | 1107877 TerraHertz
TerraHertz's picture

Probably they meant their admission the rods are partially melted is believed to be temporary.

So next week they will either deny the rods melted at all, or admit they are not partially melted, but are in fact totally melted.

 

It's hard to parody insane liars. There's no way to beat them at their game.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 10:10 | 1108426 Urban Roman
Urban Roman's picture

Sure it's temporary. Everything is temporary, the fuel rods will be in some other state later on.

Such as a gas. Or perhaps another sort of solid.

Or, in a Japanese science fiction film, they just might reassemble themselves and get back into zirconium tubes, which reconstitute themselves from the smoke they made when they burned up last week.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 11:41 | 1108829 Crumbles
Crumbles's picture

Or perhaps another sort of solid.

AEROSOL - a colloidal suspension of a solid in air.   As in capable of flying around the planet for a looong time - if a lot of the melted fuel rods should become a glob of mercury-like fissile atoms at 2,000 degrees C, what's to prevent explosive atomization turning tons of fuel rods into an aerosol ??

We're maybe so - catastrophic word of your choice - is this TEOTWAWKI ?????????

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 04:50 | 1107896 Arch Duke Ferdinand
Arch Duke Ferdinand's picture

SO WHERE IN THE WORLD IS IT SAFE?

tia

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 05:30 | 1107917 Popo
Popo's picture

Wall Street

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 06:02 | 1107941 msamour
msamour's picture

I would say New York near ground zero. They won't attack there twice in 10 years. /sarc off

Sun, 03/27/2011 - 23:14 | 1107399 steveo
steveo's picture

Fukushima story is a great time to bust out the "Ellipse of Doom"

Long Term S&P "Egg" aka Ellipse of Doom
This submitted by a reader.   Wow.
The incredible Egg.

http://oahutrading.blogspot.com/2011/03/long-term-s-egg-aka-ellipse-of-d...

Sun, 03/27/2011 - 23:25 | 1107442 Goldtoothchimp09
Goldtoothchimp09's picture

Hello fellow waver!  Yes, it is absolutely fascinating to watch social moods play out in realtime in one of the most fascinating times in history!  I am continually shocked by the complacency shown by my fellow humans - huge understatement!!

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 04:59 | 1107902 slewie the pi-rat
slewie the pi-rat's picture

troll alert! keep yer eyes on this gold chimp!

"fascinated by social moods playing in realtime and shocked (!) by other's complacency"!

if he doesn't get to something Real on his next post, hospitalize him!

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 06:47 | 1107962 ColonelCooper
ColonelCooper's picture

Exclamation point much?

Junked for over enthusiasm.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 08:51 | 1108197 Urban Roman
Urban Roman's picture

Temporarily junked for being attitude police.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 09:20 | 1108284 ColonelCooper
ColonelCooper's picture

Good lord, we all seem to have woken up on the wrong side of the bed and donned our "literal" caps this morning.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 19:42 | 1110721 Urban Roman
Urban Roman's picture

It was because I woke up puking radioactive water this morning.

It's possibly partially temporary.

Sun, 03/27/2011 - 23:13 | 1107400 DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

I am amazed at the overall incompetence of how TEPCO and the .gov of Japan are mishandling this.  Although they have had a sloppy safety record, mostly minor in the past.

Poor Japan, may God be with them their hour of need.

Sun, 03/27/2011 - 23:21 | 1107414 TheGreatPonzi
TheGreatPonzi's picture

 

Why be amazed? 

A new Chernobyl would mean the evacuation of nearly a third of Japan, and thus a systemic financial shock which would bring down the whole ultra-leveraged Ponzi. 

The important thing for the Japanese government is to be able to continue to refinance itself at low rates, not that some peasants may suffer from radiation poisoning. 

The Fukushima disaster will continue to be played down, and we'll learn the truth 10 years later. Wash, rinse, repeat.

 

Sun, 03/27/2011 - 23:36 | 1107481 Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 Not to be outdone by the liars in Japan, EPA's RADNET used to have click-able count/radiation data.Now, instead of any data they simply say that the radiation is thousands of times lower than any conservative cause for concern.

  So, they scrubbed the data and substituted a reassuring statement.

 THE FUCKING BASTARDS!!!!Thanks for your tender concern .gov.

 This is ominous...and worthy of it's own story Tyler.

  When they are trying to be reassuring is when blind panic is more helpful....

Sun, 03/27/2011 - 23:51 | 1107513 TaxSlave
TaxSlave's picture

EPA are global warmers.  Data will be chosen to fit the model, or obscured.

Sun, 03/27/2011 - 23:54 | 1107521 majia
majia's picture

I called the regional EPA office in San Francisco on Friday to complain about the change in the webpage I had book-marked. I was very frustrated also. The regional official was upset too, as he hadn't been appraised and he promised to convey concerns.

Magically the original page is up again

https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/monitorView.do

I don't know whether it will again disappear or not. The EPA official recommended checking with any local or state public health (not federal) agencies for reliable data.

I'm still monitoring the Enviro-Reporter's data in LA, since I'm in AZ

http://www.enviroreporter.com/2011/03/enviroreporter-coms-radiation-station/

However, the EPA data have shown more fluctuations--especially in beta counts--than the Enviro-Reporter's monitor.

My concern is really that radiation would get into the fresh produce in CA and AZ. I have no idea how valid that concern is but the film The Battle for Chernobyl and the current estimates of radiation releases from Fukushima make me worried...

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 00:08 | 1107553 damage
damage's picture

No offense... but are you an idiot?

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 00:44 | 1107630 tmosley
tmosley's picture

No offense, but shut the fuck up.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 02:15 | 1107767 trav7777
trav7777's picture

you shut the fuck up.

Let the experts talk.  That means "not you."

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 06:26 | 1107949 AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Elitism is good, especially when the experts have proven their unproficiency.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 07:07 | 1107976 snowball777
snowball777's picture

Egalitarianism is good, especially when the non-experts have proven they haven't a clue what they're talking about.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 08:59 | 1108232 Bicycle Repairman
Bicycle Repairman's picture

Ah yes.  No one should speak except the experts.  From now on I am going to begin my posts with: 'I am a nuclear power worker' or 'I am a Naval nuke'.  Then you should all read glassy-eyed while I spew out pro-nuke trivia or propaganda.

Mon, 03/28/2011 - 05:31 | 1107915 geekgrrl
geekgrrl's picture

Majia expresses what seems to me to be legitimate concerns. I am concerned as well.

Ad hominem attacks don't exactly constitute a counter-argument, so what is your point? That radiation is good for us? I see radioactive shills making that point on blog comments related to the Fukushima nuclear disaster on many diffent sites, and it is clear that the nuclear industry has recognized the real threat to it's continued existence, and has pulled-out all the stops to sway public opinion, here and many other places.

Get this: You are done.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!