• Reggie Middleton
    02/09/2010 - 05:12
    The levered assets of the banks in many Euro-sovereign nations easily outstrip those nations' GDP's. So when the nations' banks get in trouble from bad banking practices (and a very large swath have), the nations themselves are helpless in attempting to truly save the banks (and instead only institute a bait and switch wherein private default risk/insolvency potential is swapped for public manifestations of the same).
  • Chopshop
    02/09/2010 - 02:41
    Derivatives trading volumes in January 2010 were stronger, with European derivatives volumes increasing 32.4% and U.S. options trading volumes increasing a whopping 102.4% y/o/y. Cash equities trading volumes were mixed, with European cash transactions increasing 4.1% and U.S. cash equities trading volumes declining 23.7% from Jan '09. Total interest rate products ADV of 2.7 million contracts in January 2010 increased 37.8% from January 2009, and increased 50.5% from December 2009. Total interest rate product ADV is at the highest level since March 2008 !

Lending? What Lending? Excess Reserves Really Take Off, Hit New Record Of $1.06 Trillion

Tyler Durden's picture




Bank excess reserves increased by $71 billion over the past two weeks, and $140 billion in the past month, to $1.06 trillion. Banks adamantly refuse to lend even one cent and continue hoarding cash instead, investing in safe and risky assets alike without prejudice. After all if anything breaks, Uncle Ben will fix it, and Aunt Jemima will make even the toxicest crap taste mmm, mmm good.

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (2 votes)



by cougar_w
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 19:04
#121547

The consumer middle-class is a risky investment. Why don't they invest in some of those?

If slavery were legal, I bet they would. If they could own you, you'd be a tangible asset, you would. $15K per kidney, some places. Lots more for your liver. Your lifetime bent at the wheel... priceless.

Human rights; regulation that's hurting the markets.

by Anonymous
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 22:02
#121747

tangible or a fungible asset; either way a commodity.

by spanish inquisition
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 19:21
#121562

So I guess this is a variation on the Swedish negative fund rate? So it could be used to calculate how long we will be in a recession based on the Taylor rule?

by Tyler Durden
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 19:24
#121566

At last check per Taylor we are at -7%

by Anonymous
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 19:45
#121586

"...investing in safe and risky assets alike without prejudice."

How can that be if the cash is on deposit at the reserve? If it's at the reserve, it's not being circulated. What am I missing?

by spanish inquisition
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 20:33
#121656

Thank you. I did some digging and found this from Taylor.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601110&sid=aagcZb2nSg10

I would like to ask a question. If the Fed is lending at 0% and the banks are reinvesting 100% in treasuries at 3%, this would create a net (-3%) Fed rate. It seems to me that we are now below the new target rate and fueling inflation much like the full GDP version that he discusses. If my hypothesis is correct, the Fed is working off the wrong rate and we could face a liquidity ramp up bubble like Leo K has described. (This assumes the world is run through incompetence and not some all knowing new world order). Anyone know Taylor, so we can bounce this off him?hehe

by Anonymous
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 19:45
#121589

"...investing in safe and risky assets alike without prejudice."

How can that be if the cash is on deposit at the reserve? If it's at the reserve, it's not being circulated. What am I missing?

by Anonymous
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 20:08
#121620

You are correct. Banks dont lend out reserves.

Loans in fact create deposits: Step 1. Loan application approved then 2. loan documents put in file cabinet then 3. borrowers account balance credited on the computer...

There is ever decreasing demand for loans right now. Who wants to leverage to buy assets that are decreasing in value? Fed is pushing on a string. Excess reserve levels are a meaningless accounting exercise.

by Stevm30
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 20:13
#121625

I guess because their excess cash could cover any bad bets - so they're more risk seeking.

by jules from aus
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 22:03
#121748

banks doing two things:

a) hoarding unprecedented and staggering amounts of cash, and

b) accumulating Treasuries with plenty of long dated in the mix

 

10 year a paying bugger all, about 3.5%

and the Fed pays bugger all on reserves

so why all the accumulation?

I can only think of what happens when things go south:

a) triggers require more cash to be posted, and

b) triggers require more collateral to be posted (think under collateralised RMBSs and CMBSs)

- so all I can see are US banks readying cash and collateral for calls that are to come

all of this is to way off any historical norm or precedent to be called 'business as usual'

- Tyler, I feel a distrubance in the force...

 

good luck

by Anonymous
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 22:28
#121769

Within 9-12 months, Mugabe Jr. will nationalise the big banks and the lending will start flowing like a river in late spring. Even Deflation Mish will be shocked. Get ready.
PS. I am one of those lucky guys who has seen more paper money used in toilets that toilet paper.

by curbyourrisk
on Thu, 11/05/2009 - 23:43
#121838

Velocity of money continues to slow...deflation continues to grow.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This problem is intended to determine if you are a machine- or not sufficiently intelligent (or determined) to participate at Zero Hedge.
28 times equals 728
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".