You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Mark It Zero!

Marla Singer's picture




As if on cue, Blogger informed Zero Hedge today that it had received six takedown notices. Six. Blogger helpfully provides the following detail:

We are asking that you please remove the allegedly infringing content in your blog. If you do not do this within the next 3 days (by 7/19/09), we will be forced to remove the posts in question. If we did not do so, we would be subject to a claim of copyright infringement, regardless of its merits. (Emphasis ours).

So very polite. Far less polite is this:

Please note that repeated violations to our Terms of Service may result in further remedial action taken against your Blogger account.

U-S-A! U-S-A!




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 14:33 | Link to Comment Moe Speeks
Moe Speeks's picture

censorship 

Born in the USA

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 14:34 | Link to Comment phaesed
phaesed's picture

Well to be fair, you guys do post a lot of copyrighted content... although thank god for it!

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:30 | Link to Comment Steak
Steak's picture

Its control through information.  Many of the materials posted here are from firms and organizations that make endless statements about what the public and their customers should be doing with their money...but the research and reasoning behind their views are copyrighted.  

 

Every time t3 says "its complicated" to an inquiring pubic the soul of an honest fiduciary cries.  If these pubic servants and CEOs can understand it, then they can take the time to explain it to the rest of us.  We have time, and they can submit their answers in writing.

 

Casting a vote is the ability to make a choice, but it means so much less if it cannot be an informed choice.  We all appreciate you posting these things that we otherwise would not see.  So keep pimpin, pimpin   

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 14:36 | Link to Comment svendthrift
svendthrift's picture

Fuck em'. You have the new site up and running. I say repost the stuff they want pulled down. Repost it in bold, underlined and in bright blood red font.

 

 

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:40 | Link to Comment rigger mortice
rigger mortice's picture

x2

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 16:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 14:39 | Link to Comment agrotera
agrotera's picture

Would you pls tell us which six items?

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 14:42 | Link to Comment lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

fuck, didn't the house of dimon just say that commercial real estate was cursed (i know td you have been saying that for months) and WTF if SPG isn't up 2%?

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:13 | Link to Comment Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

You must have missed the counter-arguement:  "CIT news is bad for retail"

 

The smart ones doubled down today!  Except on KIM, which continues to underperform by 3-4% per day.

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 14:46 | Link to Comment lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

Marla, GS probably leaning on DOJ to start enforcing copyright laws

Either that or dennis kneale having a busy day at work calling up all the people who's posts you have pasted from, asking if they had given Sero Hedge permission to publish their material.

 

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 14:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 14:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 14:59 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

Fair use with a link...  after all, you're not on an AP client contract... Are you?

 

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:08 | Link to Comment lettuce
lettuce's picture

mark it 8, dude!

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:13 | Link to Comment capitalisa
capitalisa's picture

I can't recall seeing anything in your posts that would violate copyrights.  What did I miss? 

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:18 | Link to Comment Strom
Strom's picture

I would also be interested in knowing which items they claim are copyright violations...so that I can download and/or save them before they're removed...

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:29 | Link to Comment ShankyS
ShankyS's picture

Does that mean I have to erase my brain content?

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 16:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:38 | Link to Comment troublesum
troublesum's picture

So can anyone please explain why roubini now says the worst of the financial crisis is over??

 

http://www.cnbc.com/id/31947275

 

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:44 | Link to Comment Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

The remaining strong bears are starting to topple.  Not all of them will, but this is starting to be the sign of the top of the first strong rally (end of B wave, or whatever to call it).

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:52 | Link to Comment economessed
economessed's picture

A quick search of Bloomberg using the phrase "Roubini" shows that he has been consistent in making this recovery call since May of this year.  Why it is making news now only underscores the faulty memory of the marketplace -- that, or it became a convenient excuse to conduct some mob-behavior rally riot.

 

In the first quarter of this year, Roubini was calling for the S&P to end 2009 at around 400.  Which just goes to show -- Roubini is another two-handed economist ("....on the other hand....") who adores the attention he gets.

 

I don't know if he's right this time or will be wrong.  Either way, I don't act on his vascillations in outlook and will continue to stay out of this market.

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 16:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 15:56 | Link to Comment Robert Paulson
Robert Paulson's picture

Which blog post(s) received specific complaints?

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 17:36 | Link to Comment silencedogood
silencedogood's picture

Roubini just stated his comments were taken out of context.

-Silence

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 17:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 19:00 | Link to Comment Comrade de Chaos
Comrade de Chaos's picture

Now can we have juicy details on exactly what articles are involved? It would be interesting to see who is beneficiary in terms of PR?  So we can draw a conclusion on what is the motivation.

Are those related to the FED, or the ridiculous prospect to buy some tanking RE without appropriate disclosure of potential risks. Even worse, there could be misrepresentation of facts. If pawn realizes, it might sue. 

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 19:00 | Link to Comment ptoemmes
ptoemmes's picture

Invite them to Paper Street to discuss.

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 19:42 | Link to Comment whacked
whacked's picture

On queue..

 

Amazing.

 

Yes love America ,,, as much as I love the blood sucking squid ..

 

Congratulations citizens..

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 20:49 | Link to Comment whacked
whacked's picture

have to laugh at this one..

 

ZH in firing line of FTC?

 

"New guidelines, expected to be approved late this summer with possible modifications, would clarify that the agency can go after bloggers — as well as the companies that compensate them — for any false claims or failure to disclose conflicts of interest.

It would be the first time the FTC tries to patrol systematically what bloggers say and do online. The common practice of posting a graphical ad or a link to an online retailer — and getting commissions for any sales from it — would be enough to trigger oversight."

"If you walk into a department store, you know the (sales) clerk is a clerk," said Rich Cleland, assistant director in the FTC's division of advertising practices. "Online, if you think that somebody is providing you with independent advice and ... they have an economic motive for what they're saying, that's information a consumer should know."

 

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/06/22/ftc-go-after-blogg...

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 21:46 | Link to Comment agrotera
agrotera's picture

marla, please at least repost all 6 and tell your readers here are the articles that we have to take down by such and such time...and all the comments have to go too?

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 21:54 | Link to Comment spate
spate's picture

So how long before they go after Google Reader for allowing people to read the RSS feed from the new site?

Thu, 07/16/2009 - 22:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 07/16/2009 - 22:39 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Fri, 07/17/2009 - 01:18 | Link to Comment Ben_the_Bald
Ben_the_Bald's picture

Why does this matter anymore?

 

Your Swedish host provider will protect you, right? Just shutdown the Blogger site.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!