This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Market Now Just 15% Above 666 Lows, 22% Off 2010 Highs, When Priced In Gold

Tyler Durden's picture




 

It may come as a surprise to some that when the market's performance is expressed in the opposite of infinitely dilutable paper, we are currently just barely 15% higher than the generational S&P low of 666. As the chart below demonstrates, the S&P expressed in gold is plunging, and has dropped 22% from its 2010 highs, down 18% from the beginning of the year, and just 15% higher than March 5, 2009. As Russia and GLD have been demonstrating so aptly over the past 5 months, gold is not dilutable, and can not be contaminated with various Greek sovereign bond holdings. It is, in summary, pure, and is immune from that strain of 100% lethal, and printerborne, Central Banking syphilis where one's paper rots off. Which is why the Dow may easily pass 36,000. The issue is that at or about that time, the Dow to Gold ratio will be 1. Note also, the downward channel in the SPX/Gold index: each day this channel is not broken, is another day that Bernanke pops a few extra Ambien.

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:28 | 444744 MaxVernon
MaxVernon's picture

Man I love reading your notes, Tyler.  Keep it up!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:33 | 444764 Slash
Slash's picture

halp us ppt!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:47 | 444818 troublesum
troublesum's picture

So if the IMF is lowering its gold holdings and everyone (countries) are all loading up and forgive me but the IMF may as well be the evil incarnated upon humanity destine to rule us all then why does everyone think that when all is said and done you wont be buying SDR's (future world currency) for your worthless gold when the game is up.. Am I the only one thinking this?

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:51 | 444831 Shameful
Shameful's picture

Because the ultimately if the dollar goes so does the IMF, will be hard to get funding after all.  The IMF is just a tool of the US establishment, a way to obfuscate imperialism (and it's totally visible now).  The world hates them and when the dollar goes and the US is a shattered broken husk, why would anyone want to do business with the now powerless IMF?

The IMF can sell gold because J6P does not put two and tow together that the IMF selling gold = the US selling gold.  Even J6P would eventually have to ask why is the US selling gold.  Remember a lot of normal peopel out there still think that the dollar is gold backed.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:00 | 444872 troublesum
troublesum's picture

Maybe im confused then becuase Im trying to understand what entity it is that will at some point try to assume control via new world currency. Are they selling gold? And if so why would we buy it?

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:14 | 444937 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

There are more players than you probably assume.  Bulk gold sales are not commonly known nor accounted for.  All we fleas can do is hope to get a ride along on the dog.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:18 | 444951 Charley
Charley's picture

The movement of gold is etching the death of money in our social consciouness, not merely the death of the dollar. I don't mean to be dramatic about this, but that is what is happening. No institution (government of otherwise) will be left to pick up the pieces...

Seen Steve Keen's latest paper at DebtWatch - he has some (but not all) of the clues.

 

Here: http://tinyurl.com/2fn3rc2

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:14 | 445120 Shameful
Shameful's picture

Oh I think we will see a world currency in the next generation.  It will likely either be gold, oil, or carbon credits.  Naturally those in power now would prefer carbon credits.  It's basically more fiat, and a control freaks dream.  Oil is a possibility because of the worlds strong desire for energy, and would fit the system reasonably well.  Gold exists as a possibility because many of the old big money players have it, central banks have it, and it's etched in humanities memory to use as money.  Gold would be the most natural progression to move back to either gold as a currency or a world currency with a gold backing.  This would be welcome by the banks, after all we know they are willing to leverage gold to the moon as seen in the gold standard periods.  However I will not discount the other two as possibilities.  It all depends on how the US dies.  If the US engine of destruction and death can rattle forward another decade or more  I'm likely to think it may be carbon or oil, if not probably gold.

The IMF will of course want to hold the world currency.  See that plan going back to Keynes and Bretton Woods.  However the epic fallout of the fiat (dollar) crash will burn people.  It will burn them the same way the Wiemar episode burned Germany.  It will take generations to be able to move back to a fiat currency.  The IMF now is not trying to establish the world currency, they are trying to save the dollar.  In reality the dollar is the world currency.  The IMF is trying to save the dinosaur system from going extinct.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:59 | 444860 SuperDollaR
SuperDollaR's picture

Yes - gold, silver, other PMs are the only money

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:29 | 444992 Charley
Charley's picture

Before you say that, try charting the GDP of the United States and the global economy by the price of an ounce of gold since 1933 and 1971 respectively...

I am not sure you want to see what it tells you.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:09 | 445108 Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo's picture

Of course everything is down relative to gold, since gold is overvalued.

Try pricing anything in 2008 oil, or 2001 askjeeves.com stocks, and you see the same thing as well!

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 18:39 | 447787 Charley
Charley's picture

Don't chart it against the current price of gold, silly. Chart it against the annual price of gold for each year. In 1929 the gold was pegged to 20.67 dollars. Watch what happens to GDP when the peg is devalued and then allowed to float in 1971

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:20 | 444954 Whizbang
Whizbang's picture

how has the market moved relative to pork bellies?

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:10 | 445111 Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo's picture

LOL.  Exactly my point.

I say we pick another arbitrary overvalued asset to compare the market to.

I say canned ham, since it's obviously worth more than fiat dollars...

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 01:36 | 445873 TGR
TGR's picture

And exactly how long have central banks and the establishment been hoarding pork bellies as wealth and/or money?

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 03:42 | 445909 dnarby
dnarby's picture

JB seems to be unaware that the cost of things relative to other things (other than gold) has continually dropped due to increases in productivity.

Less energy, labor and materials to produce a product means you can buy more of it, for less.  Thus the reason gold seems "overvalued" to him.

 

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 03:52 | 445916 Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo's picture

No, gold seems overvalued to me because it has risen 500% in a period of deflation with no fundamental basis based on retail speculation by people who do not know their asses from their elbows.

That and the mining cost is 400 an ounce.

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 14:00 | 446996 akak
akak's picture

#1: Deflation is a myth and a lie being propagated by a corrupt and sociopathic power elite, with NO fundamental reality to the average person or his continually RISING cost of living.

#2: The average production cost of mining one ounce of gold is far above $400 --- you need to stop reading and believing the anti-gold disinformation of Jon Nadler.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:28 | 444747 Running on Empty
Running on Empty's picture

Seriously can this thing just break one way or another. It's like watching a fucking basketball game and the only thing that counts is the last 15 minutes.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:36 | 444774 -1Delta
-1Delta's picture

just watch volume- no need to watch price

 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:41 | 444789 firstdivision
firstdivision's picture

It just broke.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:29 | 444749 LoneStarHog
LoneStarHog's picture

Hey, Douchinger, what ya got to say?  How about a Guest Post here at a REAL forum?

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:42 | 444791 Temporalist
Temporalist's picture

He'll get junked as he types it.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:44 | 444801 MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

(Douching's Answering Machine)

Hi and thanks for calling. I am too busy whining about all the illegal activities that keep happening yet nothing ever gets done. Big banks walk free, government lies, etc. Like a broken record, I have little else to say and if you say something less than positive about my Genius you will be banned from my forum.

I am God and have decided you can not leave a message at the sound of the beep because you have not paid me money to join my Double Secret discussion board.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:47 | 444819 LoneStarHog
LoneStarHog's picture

And the irony is that if you do join you can be either a GOLD or SILVER member !!!!!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:32 | 444998 akak
akak's picture

I BAN YOU!

BAN BAN BAN!!!

AND WITH MULTIPLE GRATUITOUS REFERENCES TO ANAL SEX!!!

BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN!!!!!!!!!

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 03:45 | 445911 Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo's picture

JUNK JUNK JUNK!!!!

MOMMY, HE SAID BAD THINGS ABOUT GOLED!!!  KILL HIM!!!!!!

Wasn't it just you that was advocating to ban other anti-gold people not long ago?  Crying that you were going to "tell tyler" on him and what not?

What was that fellows name again?  He was funny.  It's sad that he isn't here anymore.

Still, you're a total hypocrite for making this post.

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 14:02 | 447004 akak
akak's picture

Apparently, you are as blind to irony as you are to the truth about gold.

My post was mocking Karl Denninger's arrogance and intolerance, and had nothing to do with gold at all.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:57 | 445207 MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

And the irony is that if you do join you can be either a GOLD or SILVER member !!!!!

 

So true... Bwaaaahahahahahahahahahah!!!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:30 | 444754 Yikes
Yikes's picture

Look out, there goes the SPX below 1040.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:30 | 444757 ZeroPower
ZeroPower's picture

WHOA. Didnt think 1033.25 would break.

Lets leave some lows for the friday jobs report guys come on!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:39 | 444785 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

It was leaked. 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:43 | 444796 LoneStarHog
LoneStarHog's picture

Leaked to the priviledged few and Friday will be dumped on the masses.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:46 | 444815 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

Look; only an absolute moron would go long SPX with ADP private coming @ 13K. Whoever went long on that deserved whatever loss he/she incurred.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:51 | 444829 Muir
Muir's picture

LoneStar

"Leaked to the priviledged few and Friday will be dumped on the masses."

 

JUNE 30, 2010, 11:10 A.M. ET

WSJ

"Private-sector jobs in the U.S. increased by 13,000 last month, according to a national employment report published by payroll giant Automatic Data Processing Inc. and consultancy Macroeconomic Advisers.

Economists had expected ADP to report a jobs gain of 60,000 for June. "

 

__

Leaked to planet Earth 6 hours ago. 

The truth is that this market just wants to go down.

(and say "bitches" while doing so)

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 19:04 | 445360 Geoff-UK
Geoff-UK's picture

MUIR:  The leak he's referring to isn't the news article you cite, but rather the Non-Farm Payroll report officially coming out on Friday.

And yes, I believe the big players got notified ahead of the little people like us, so they could sell before we heard about it.

Anyone playing at ANYTHING in this market, is picking up nickels in front of a turbocharged bulldozer with a broken accelerator pedal, with a drunken Ben Bernake at the wheel.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 19:07 | 445367 Muir
Muir's picture

Thank you.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:50 | 444824 Zina
Zina's picture

It's droping like a stone!!! WTF???

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:52 | 444836 Muir
Muir's picture

Surprised?!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:17 | 444944 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

I think the 3 exclamation marks was a dead give away.  How anyone would be surprised at anything (other than a meteor hitting Los Angeles) is beyond me.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:27 | 444983 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

LA, not surprising.  Fort Knox....well that would be 'too convenient'....

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:31 | 444999 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

Ah, but that is the beauty of the precious metal. It would survive.

I'd be there along with many others picking up the molten little souvenirs.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 19:09 | 445371 Eternal Student
Eternal Student's picture

That assumes that there's gold in Ft. Knox  to begin with, of course. :)

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:34 | 444760 pan-the-ist
pan-the-ist's picture

I'm confused - does this mean that most are deflating at the same rate?  (I say most goods because obviously some prices have increased.)

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:38 | 444782 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Most things are deflating in terms of gold.  Who knows with the dollar (and I would posit who cares?--you should be in PMs already anyways).

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 03:47 | 445912 Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo's picture

Correction: gold is inflating in terms of irrational speculation based on poor economic outlooks from amateurs.

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 21:47 | 448124 akak
akak's picture

Then what accounts for the concurrent and similar percentage rise in the prices of silver, platinum and palladium since 2001 as well, each of which is largely or mostly an industrial metal, with both platinum and palladium in particular having only a minuscule percentage of investment demand relative to annual production or overall stocks?

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:13 | 444927 Alethiometer
Alethiometer's picture

When you say "goods," are you referring to precious metal prices?  As of April 6th (3rd quarter fiscal year), the DJIA has dropped approx. (10.74)% since the new fiscal year, and the S&P has dropped (13.58)%.  Ag has risen 28.57%, and Au +30.71%.  Neither of these markets are showing any sign of reversing their trends either.  Other more utilitarian commodities, such as oil, have increased by about 44.23% (since April '09).  I won't get into inflation adjustment, as there is only a trival difference between the adjusted and nominal prices given only one fiscal year. 

 

tl;dr

The faux markets are deflating at approx. the same rate (around -12%); with precious metals gaining about 29%.  I believe that the more necessary commodities will continue to inflate, vis a vis the whole inflation and delation paradox; we have indexes and cash losing value, but low (almost zero) stagnent interest rates.  1982 this is not.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:35 | 444765 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Looks like it'll be a huge flash crash into the close......

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:36 | 444775 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

No?  Wow, PPT, wow.......

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:37 | 444777 Rusty Shorts
Rusty Shorts's picture

 - she's going down.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:41 | 444790 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

PM support is all still in line....still.....

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:48 | 444810 Rusty Shorts
Rusty Shorts's picture

WTF

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:52 | 444835 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

Platinum stick save.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:07 | 444904 sheeple
sheeple's picture

=.=

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:14 | 444933 Alethiometer
Alethiometer's picture

You think the PPT is going to allow a crash before November?

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 18:00 | 445218 MarketTruth
MarketTruth's picture

Yes they will. Need to paint a bad picture to tell congress about martial law and such so QE2 passes. The con is that QE2 will be sold as a way to make voters happy and avoid the next leg down... plus the UK and EU need QE2 as well. A unified QE means all major currencies devalue at the same time.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:35 | 444770 anarkst
anarkst's picture

OTOH, the market is 55% higher as compared to left-handed, blonde, Aborigine prostitutes' hourly wage (weekdays, before 5pm). 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:18 | 445126 KevinB
KevinB's picture

But when she uses that left hand - the Coriolis forces - oh, my...

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 19:07 | 445365 Geoff-UK
Geoff-UK's picture

...and the 2010 award for Best Pornographic Use of the Coriolis Effect is...

<opens envelope>...

KEVINB!!! 

 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:35 | 444771 Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson's picture

Don't expect to see these charts show up on CNBS anytime soon.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:36 | 444773 ReallySparky
ReallySparky's picture

OMG, we broke 1040.  Burn baby burn.  Short party after market close.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:39 | 444784 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

PPT must be buying every single piece of crap that GS sells into the market for it not to have broken down completely.  This is the ugliest manipulation on both sides of the same coin...

F*** your coin, Bernanke!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:07 | 444899 AccreditedEYE
AccreditedEYE's picture

lol

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 19:01 | 445357 scratch_and_sniff
scratch_and_sniff's picture

Deutsche bank on commodities;

 

 


In our view, the complex has been susceptible toan escalation in European sovereign concerns and fears of a double dip recession.


 


We believe such fears are overdone as the scale of Spanish sovereignand bank redemptions slow rapidly from next month and for as long as the S&P500 can remain close to current levels. According to our US Equity Research team, the S&P500 would need to fall to 975 to signal a disruption to the US economic recovery.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:37 | 444776 carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

The only index going up is the volatility.

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 03:50 | 445914 Johnny Bravo
Johnny Bravo's picture

I've been saying it all along...

VXX is the shit, yo.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:38 | 444779 jkruffin
jkruffin's picture

Na Na Na Na.......Na Na Na Na... hey hey hey   GOOD_BYE!!!!

This market is wrecked, not even Benny Boy can save it.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:39 | 444781 Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson's picture

Yesterday's ES low was at 3:30 @ 1030.25.

In a stunning development, today's low is amazingly, 1030.25.

So far...

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:44 | 444803 jkruffin
jkruffin's picture

ES now at 1027  YIPEE!!!!  I had $50k that I put in Futures Trading acct last week, and after shorting ES at 1112, I know own a proud $152k. Hello GOLD bars!   BOOYAH JIM! lol

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:46 | 444812 Slash
Slash's picture

so far..........ppt save us!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:47 | 444814 Temporalist
Temporalist's picture

It's lower now.  But that was interesting.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:38 | 444783 PeterSchump
PeterSchump's picture

You think they'll let er close below 1040? I don't think they have a choice.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:47 | 444816 Dingleberry Jones
Dingleberry Jones's picture

I think so.  It will be very close.  Still think we hover until Friday.  Then kaboom.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:50 | 444827 Slash
Slash's picture

phew, here they come. Don't worry folks, nothing to see, green shoots still abound!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:39 | 444786 Muir
Muir's picture

How about the DOW measured in breadsticks?

Seriously, inflation-adjusted DOW went hyperbolic just twice in 1929 and 2000.

Otherwise, $100 in DOW stocks in 1920 would have bought about the same number of breadsticks in 1950.

 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:42 | 444792 Lux Fiat
Lux Fiat's picture

Saw a story 10-15 minutes ago about Merkel's candidate for President passing.  Market reaction started immediately - it no likey.  "Strength" earlier in the day coincided with story about 1st round failure.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:43 | 444793 Yikes
Yikes's picture

It's collapsing.  And still twenty minutes left.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:42 | 444794 Running on Empty
Running on Empty's picture

 Are you fucking kidding me there's 20 minutes in this market it's a lifetime

for it to correct itself back to 1040.

 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:46 | 444811 Yikes
Yikes's picture

Don't think there going to pull it out today.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:43 | 444800 carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

Just broke yesterday's lows...

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:44 | 444805 Temporalist
Temporalist's picture

No PPT recovery for S&P today!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:44 | 444806 LoneStarHog
LoneStarHog's picture

Ruh..Rho...Watch out if the DOW closes below 9800, also!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:03 | 444882 Rusty Shorts
Rusty Shorts's picture

closed 9,773.49

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:45 | 444808 lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

Q2 2010 Gold +11.7%

Q2 2010 S&P 500-10.5% (with 15 mins left in quarter).

One wonders if Bernanke is still confused about what is going on with gold?

Who would have thought that an economist with a Ph.d could be so easily confused when a mere blogger has explained the movement in gold, with such ease (if not a touch of hyperbole). Perhaps the explanation is why the Fed is working to discredit all those without a Ph.d?

 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:57 | 445068 Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

"One wonders if Bernanke is still confused about what is going on with gold?"

Bernank-ster is confused because his tried and true Gold suppression tricks just ain't workin' like they used to...

Damn near makin' him scratch the hair right off of his head...

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:29 | 445146 russki standart
russki standart's picture

Lizzy36, ever consider that shalom Bennie understands gold very well, but is trying to bullshit the masses? A Central Banker lie...Never!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:45 | 444809 Dr. Acula
Dr. Acula's picture

"It is, in summary, pure, and is immune from that strain of 100% lethal, and printerborne, Central Banking syphilis where one's paper rots off"

LMFAO

 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:46 | 444813 Absinthe Minded
Absinthe Minded's picture

It looks like they're not waiting for after hours to bring gold down, lost $3 in the last 10 minutes, PPT working the other side of the fence now.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:47 | 444817 godfader
godfader's picture

As a counter excercise, why not look at the CRB spot index priced in gold ounces over the last 30 years. Much more insightful.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:49 | 444823 MaxVernon
MaxVernon's picture

now that's amazing.  what a turn down. 

 

as per usual; "Gold Bitches"...

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:50 | 444826 PeterSchump
PeterSchump's picture

I'm calling 1040 resistance now.

 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:51 | 444828 firstdivision
firstdivision's picture

Relax folks, someone tripped over the network cable at 3:30 and we just got it plugged back in. 

-Squid

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:01 | 445086 Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

PPT just fumbled on their own 30 with 1:48 to go... Bears can run out the clock...

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:51 | 444830 Temporalist
Temporalist's picture

Maria B. was talking central banks and gold as long play.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:51 | 444832 Zina
Zina's picture

PPT has 10 minutes to bounce it back.

BUY bitchez, BUY!

 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:52 | 444834 jkruffin
jkruffin's picture

Someone must have gotten the jobless claims early that will be reported tomorrow.  Must be Goldie shorting the hell out of the market.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:58 | 444861 keepmydollar
keepmydollar's picture

Probably means the numbers are good and they are shoving it down so they can get long for Friday.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:52 | 444837 Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Get your $0.01 "flash crash" bids ready folks...

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:53 | 444839 UGrev
UGrev's picture

Rolling brownouts will occur as the stick save cranks into Turbo and Overclocked CPU's start to melt. 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:54 | 444845 amarshall
amarshall's picture

thank god the PPT intervened.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:56 | 444854 jkruffin
jkruffin's picture

30 yr now at 3.89%

10 yr now at 2.94%

Can you say inverted yield?

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:49 | 445191 KevinB
KevinB's picture

Um...

Inverted yield" refers to situations where shorter term maturities have higher yields than longer term maturities.

Thanks for playing, though.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:58 | 444863 ozziindaus
ozziindaus's picture

The Fed cares not for the equities. It's the dollar it's trying to save. Uptrend intact.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/quote?ticker=dxy%3Aind

I'll even venture to say that it will play a part in destroying the markets as it prepares it's member banks to gobble up the lot at depressed prices.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:37 | 445015 akak
akak's picture

"The Fed cares not for the equities. It's the dollar it's trying to save."

And such an excellent job of saving it they have done, too! 

Why, they've managed to save around 50% of it since 1990, and almost a full 4% of it since 1913!

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:48 | 445046 ozziindaus
ozziindaus's picture

Dollar for dollar, your standard of living has also increased 25x since 1913. I will also argue that it has probably doubled since 1990 with the advent of computers, cell phones and wireless comm. I can also bet your productivity has double in 20 years.

PS. I was the last guy in 1997 to send an inter-office note within the company.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:13 | 445105 akak
akak's picture

I would argue, in contrast, that the American standard of living has not materially increased during my lifetime, and for a given age bracket has decreased since probably the later 1960s, and certainly since the 1970s.  My father, a public school teacher, could comfortably support a family of five, with summer-long vacations traveling around North America in a travel trailer for 12 consecutive years, on his income alone.  I dare you to show me such an individual, or family, today.

Do not mistake technological progress with a standard of living --- that is the most vulgar and crassest of materialistic nonsense.  Is the average American 25 times happier than in 1913?  Do we have 25 times more free time to enjoy life since 1913?  Is our society and are our families 25 times more healthier than in 1913?

And you failed to address the key point of my comment: the 96+% loss in the value of the US dollar since 1913.  Just think of the VAST amount of real wealth and savings that have been stolen from the American public via the ongoing devaluation of the US dollar ---- cumulatively, it would have to be in the hundreds of trillions of dollars.

PS: Cell phones are a net subtraction from one's standard of living, and one of the most socially-corrosive inventions of the last 50 years.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:23 | 445137 WaterWings
WaterWings's picture

+1

Yeah, our busted GM cars, morbidly obese figures, cable teevee; sure are happy about our quality of life.

Wonder what would happen if the printing press stopped. Hmm. Standard of Dying?

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:40 | 445160 akak
akak's picture

I have generally found that those who try to argue that our standard of living is so many multiples higher than it was 20 or 40 or 80 years ago almost invariably come across as the type of person (today the overwhelming majority of Americans, sadly) who focuses strictly on quantity as opposed to quality.  I will fully admit that for me, the equation is almost always tipped towards quality over quantity (e.g., I would rather eat one meal in a fine restaurant than 10 meals at McDonalds) (Well actually, I would not want ANY number of meals at a McDonald's, as I categorically refuse to eat such swill.)

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 18:22 | 445260 fiddler_on_the_roof
fiddler_on_the_roof's picture

I don't understand why you consider McDonalds to be unhealthy. My 4 yr old daughter loves the $1 Big Hamburger ar Carl's Junior more than the burger I make at home from scratch. Anything in moderation is good even McDonalds.

The S&P move is making me look like a fool for now. I am long UNG and BP since last week. .  Will wait and cut and take the loss for now. I was expecting a S&P crash after the US mid-term election. Long  Physical Gold since 2006.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 20:05 | 445462 Eternal Student
Eternal Student's picture

I take it you're not familiar with the beef production process. I wouldn't touch McDonald's with a ten foot pole.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 23:12 | 445726 Kali
Kali's picture

www.counterpunch.org/rosenberg02012010.html  I dare you to eat a commercially processed burger after reading this (unless you raise your own beef or know who does).  and you should be thrown in jail for feeding it to your daughter.

Mon, 07/12/2010 - 19:32 | 465349 fiddler_on_the_roof
fiddler_on_the_roof's picture

Thanks for the link. I have to rethink my Fast Food Burger health rating.

I buy my Beef/Chicken from Halal Muslim market. They bid for these live animals in live auction and skin them with their butcher. Also my Butcher do not sell Beef but they sell Veal. Wonder if these animals are also effected by these Hormones

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 20:14 | 445482 ZeroPower
ZeroPower's picture

There are so many things i want to internet-yell at you for in big CAPS that it makes me question whether or not this was a sarcastic post.

I await your confirmation.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 18:35 | 445222 ozziindaus
ozziindaus's picture

Is the average American 25 times happier than in 1913? 

Happiness is a state of mind. Americans are by far NOT the happiest people on earth. By contrast, it's the nations that are highly taxed and socially dependent with the government in all of their business that seem to be the happiest. That's what the ZH community opposes, right??

Do we have 25 times more free time to enjoy life since 1913? 

Probably. I don't really have time to pick turnips or wrap rubber around wooded spokes. A trip back home every year would have taken me 25x longer. More than enough rotten ale I can consume on a ship before I go bonkers. 

Is our society and are our families 25 times more healthier than in 1913?

Maybe but you're talking to a guy who's anti prescription drugs and GMO foods so their advancements are questionable IMO. 

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 00:44 | 445824 Burnbright
Burnbright's picture

Ozzy your point is completely idiotic. I can just as easily claim that the FED destroyed capital and competition within the market making our present day worse than a present day with out such things as the FED. The FED did not contribute to the quality of life as it pertains to current day inventions and products.You are making connections that do not exist. Fiat money did not invent the light bulb, the car, the computer, phones, tv's, radio's...etc.

AKAK's point about lower standard of living has everything to do with purchasing power. Just because in the last 100 years their have been many inventions that have improved lives has absolutely nothing to do with how much purchasing power a person has, and you can not deny the fact that we have far less purchasing power, or that it takes more work per hour to pay for the cost of living. That was his only point. All you have to do is look at the savings rate to realize that people do not make enough money (or rather purchasing power).

Further more the cost of all those luxuries that have improved lives over the years would cost less if it were not for fiat money. You should be asking yourself why a lot of things do not cost less when innovation and industrialization of products reduces their cost. Instead we have had nearly flat or slight increases of costs for appliances when in fact they should be decreasing.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 23:07 | 445718 Kali
Kali's picture

Agreed, akak.  Our standard of living has dropped a LOT in my lifetime.  And it's gonna keep dropping.  I just want to give a heartfelt thank you to ZH and posters for educating me in the financials, not my area of expertise.  It gives me a better view of when its time to hit my bug out bus and go live in my cave with my goats and shotgun. : ) 

Fri, 07/02/2010 - 17:32 | 450054 honestann
honestann's picture

You are quite correct, except you're understating the magnitude of the backslide in the standard of living.

The most important --- and troubling --- fact is, this backslide happened while technology HAS indeed moved substantially forward.  To understand what is happening, we must ask and answer the following question:

How can these two facts be reconsiled?

The answer has many parts, most of which are massively revolting, but I'll just mention a couple here.

To begin, understand how huge the backslide has been.  Your example is a good start, but is only half complete.  Consider the actual, visible, physical, existential "standard of living" that your neighbor enjoys if he borrowed a million dollars ten years ago and has been spending $100,000 per year of that loan each year in addition to his $50,000 income.  The obvious answer is, his existential (measured) "standard of living" has exploded to the upside!  Every year he spends 3 times as much as before.  But actually, it is (or appears) even better than that.  Most of his $50K income was consumed by "basic expenses" like rent, utilities, car, gas, taxes and so-forth --- leaving only $5K to $10K for "enjoyment spending".  Now he has $110K per year to spend on non-necessities, an increase of 11 times!  How wonderful is that?  And how visible to the neighbors?  Plus, it's even better than that, because he pays taxes on his income, but the loan is not taxed - because it's not income.

So far so good --- because all the benefits and enjoyment of this insane "party-time" behavior happen "up front", very visibly so.  But later comes the "hangover" --- when the rest of the consequences come due.  Except the party-time behavior was so extreme in this case, the appropriate consequence is "massive, terminal overdose" instead of merely "painful hangover".

Thus, those folks who simply OBSERVE millions of people like your neighbor described above can "honestly" point at the world and say "look how much our standard of living has risen"!  Of course, they must keep their intellect disabled, otherwise they'd realize the obvious, even during the party --- that this behavior necessarily leads to death by overdose, or at best, a horrific long term hangover.  In fact, "long term" almost certainly means "the rest of his life".

But this is only one part of the point --- the part that explains why some folks can point to observations that imply "the standard of living is rising" when in fact, it most certainly is NOT.  Not when ALL things are considered.

Another important point is this.  This phenomenon (the accumulation of insane levels of debt) has provided the perfect cover for the elitist criminal gangster predators-that-be (government, central-banks and mega-corporations) to misdirect far, far more than ALL the very substantial gains in efficiency introduced in past decades by the private sector.  Since people were living high by borrowing against the fictional value of their homes, they didn't notice this massive, overt theft.

Make no mistake.  The standard of living has dropped MASSIVELY since the USSA abandoned the last shred of link between the dollar and gold.  But that was masked by the scams I describe above, which are finally obvious to every honest human at this point, since the music has now stopped, and the overdose-hangover symptoms are becoming too painful to ignore.

Understand this:  If anyone had taken a loan for $100K, or even $10K in 1913... they too could have enjoyed a much higher "standard of living".  The reason they didn't was... humans were not nearly as insane, intellectually corrupt, vastly removed from reality, and mentally disabled by endless lies, confusion and propaganda from mainsteam media.  Nobody in their right mind would carelessly lend GOLD to people in 1913.  And sure enough, nobody would carelessly lend their GOLD to people today either.  But the predators-that-be know perfectly well that "federal-reserve-notes" have ZERO value, and can be created by them at zero cost.  Which is why they are free to utterly manipulate everyone willing to accept their totally bogus, fake, fiat, fraudulant federal-reserve-note green-and-brown toilet paper (and computer bits).

Yup.  Humans can ignore those parts of reality they prefer not to acknowledge... but the reality exists nonetheless, and eventually they have consumed all the benefits from "the totality of consequences"... and have nothing left but nasty consequences.

And THAT is the legacy of debt.  Which applies to entire societies just as inescapably as to individual humans.

The only game that remains - now that the music has stopped - is the craven game of "consequences shifting".  This is where the masses of irresponsible debtors (and "printers" AKA "predators-that-be") become willing to do ANYTHING to stick the nasty consequences on those few who were responsible - and avoided the party.  They want to enslave or destroy the frugal folks who purposely lived a LOW standard of living for decades so they could afford to honestly and responsibly enjoy a "better life" after they earned it.

That can't work, of course, because far, far, far, far, far too few folks were honest and responsible enough to live the frugal life.  But that won't matter, because humans behave just like a swarm of locusts --- they don't care one bit that far too few crops exist below them to feed the entire swarm.  They will devour until everyone and everything is destroyed.  That is the future of mankind.

The only honest and responsible folks to survive will be those who prepare very carefully and very diligently - and who have a substantial measure of luck.  Only those who accumulate gold and hide it extremely well will have real spending power.  And only those who move to the boonies and establish as much self-sufficiency AND invisibility as possible will have much of a chance.

In other words, the standard of living of mankind is headed over a steep cliff.  Better get ready... NOW.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:10 | 445106 Alethiometer
Alethiometer's picture

+1.

You've harped on the true, and only really tangible denominator: standard of living.  Whether you wish to measure it qualitatively or quantitatively, society and the economy have made seemingly unfathomable leaps since the turn of the century.  Forget the nominal indexes, they are meaningless in the grand scheme of things.  In my opinion, this recent "depression" is akin to the last turn of the century's hiccup before prosperity and innovation rained down.  All that technology isn't going to disappear or regress a la the Dark Ages, it's still there, compounding daily; providing REAL gains unlike the numerology cult following Keynes's ancient text of Sorcery and Magic.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:23 | 445135 John McCloy
John McCloy's picture

Ozz you make a good point and here is the only side of the Keynesian argument I can get behind. 

  If we can invent a form of paper used as money that is used a tool to increase productivity and temporarily lessens the impact of poverty or in our case the impact of a modern day depression have we not achieved something? 

   If we use this paper to keep innovation and civility in line and have been able to speed up our technological advancement and the creation of technologies that increase our overall standard of living than is this debt truly such a horrid thing and would we not have grown as a civilization as quickly? 

  Only on this point that I do not think the Keynesians even consider can i possibly agree with since we cannot undo the technology we created. The rational side of me says however all this wonderful advancement is no different than any debt accumulation and when you pull forward productivity the laws of supply and demand tell me we are incredibly overdue to pay the piper since this debt still exists and resources are finite. What I am saying is that like kicking the can this debt will inevitably lead to the most horrific modern war in global history and one which will leave the political structure and geopolitics of the world as we know it today unrecognizable in 20 years. 

    This kind of event could easily sterilize or mute standard of living and technological advancement. Basically we may due for the mother of all global depressions and wars.

Or simply put even steven.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 15:58 | 444864 nwskii
nwskii's picture

is she gonna bust that 1030 hyman???

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:00 | 444868 RRA_223
RRA_223's picture

history in the making.   Brilliant to be looking at it from the inside out.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:00 | 444873 Dreamwalker420
Dreamwalker420's picture

How do you sway a society so deeply ingrained into deficit spending?  The idea that debt is good is so widely held that the argument isn't about debt ... but instead, at what point do we stop digging the hole?

Paper and ink does not feed your children.

You can't eat gold either.

Government isn't going to disappear ... rather morph to the new environment.  The bank holiday under Obama demonstrated that the powers that be recognize that no matter what, don't let the sheeple understand.  Each time the system has neared literal bankruptcy, the sharks have swarmed around each other to protect the cluster of the Big 5 Mega Banks within the Federal Reserve System.

Politicians promise stability.  Yes, slavery provides stability.  No, it isn't stable.

Survival has become a difficult thing to manage.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:22 | 444965 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

Careful...

You can't eat gold either.

That'll get ya junked around here.  It's true but irrelevant.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 20:17 | 445487 ZeroPower
ZeroPower's picture

Word

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:18 | 445129 aaronvelasquez
aaronvelasquez's picture

You can't eat bullets, bandaids, plowshares or fingernail clippers, either.  Good to have the appropriate amount of these things around anyway.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:48 | 445189 Lucky Guesst
Lucky Guesst's picture

I kinda consider bullets semi-edible because while you can't eat them, without them you might not eat.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:01 | 444877 Cursive
Cursive's picture

This is not going to resolve itself to the buy-and-hold crowd's satisfaction.  Hint:  if you still own equities, this is as good a time as any to bail.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:03 | 444884 thesapein
thesapein's picture

I would love to see the homes vs gold chart.

Just about anything looks worse when compared to gold's rebirth.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:24 | 444973 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

Your wish is my command:  Home prices in gold/silver:

http://www.sharelynx.com/chartstemp/USHLSPOG.php

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:05 | 445097 thesapein
thesapein's picture

Awesome. Thanks.

You're one of those friendly talking raccoons whose name looks misspelled just like mine.

Thu, 07/01/2010 - 00:39 | 445827 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

Misspelled on purpose.  Just my exercise in poetic license I guess.

Fri, 07/02/2010 - 16:32 | 449942 honestann
honestann's picture

Wow, what great charts (great information)!

How many people know the peak of the housing bubble was in late 2001?  Freaking wowie!  Thanks.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:03 | 444887 Charley
Charley's picture

Beautiful...now perform the same charting with nominal GDP back to 1933 and wet your pants...

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:09 | 444911 sheeple
Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:41 | 445021 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

Great piece!  Thanks for posting the link.

"We have tried spending money. We are spending more than we have ever spent before and it does not work... We have never made good on our promises... I say after 8 years of the Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started, and an enormous debt to boot!"

Henry Morgenthau, U.S. Secretary of the Treasury during the New Deal, May 1939

"The Budget should be balanced, the Treasury should be refilled, public debt should be reduced, the arrogance of officialdom should be tempered and controlled, and the assistance of foreign lands should be curtailed lest the Republic become bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."

Marcus Tullius Cicero, 55 BC


Fri, 07/02/2010 - 16:28 | 449934 honestann
honestann's picture

Great comment!  Thanks for posting the quotes.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:10 | 444920 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

Come on biatchez--Dow:Gold 1:1 @ 5,000 in 2012.

You know that you can do it...come on, ROGUE...let the value move to the groove....

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:13 | 444928 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

Wanna REALLY have a good time?  Make that chart linear instead of logrithmic.

 

OW.

Fri, 07/02/2010 - 16:26 | 449929 honestann
honestann's picture

I second that.  I find linear charts to be much more informative and intuitively comprehensible.  And I'll bet most others do too.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:17 | 444949 jkruffin
jkruffin's picture

ROFL 

S&P Warns Rival Moody's: We Might Downgrade You

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/SP-Warns-Rival-Moodys-We-cnbc-4178316918.h...

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:29 | 444991 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

Weird, huh?  Which one was the pot or kettle again?

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:09 | 445109 DosZap
DosZap's picture

jk,

yep, and we have a card game going, I raise you, and call.......NO!, I raise you & CALL.,BITCH.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:28 | 444987 GoldSilverDoc
GoldSilverDoc's picture

Tyler Durden:

May I implore you, please, to place, in a visible and obvious place on ZeroHedge, a metric demonstrating the value of various "things", including the SP500, the DJIA, the USD, etc., as priced in a real money (i.e., a money without a corresponding liability)?  Maybe more than one?

Gold?

And keep it there?  So that everybody, everywhere, becomes cognizant of the idea (at least) that "pricing" anyTHING in a manipulable, depreciable paper non-asset, is the wrong way to THINK?

Thinking correctly leads to correct conclusions, and proper observatory skills.  This would go a long way to helping everyone think.... differently.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:38 | 445019 MrTrader
MrTrader's picture

@Tyler Durden: Tyler, do you buy your daily dosis of coffee with gold ounces ???

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:43 | 445031 RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

Sure he does, and he wipes his butt with dollars.  As do we all.

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 16:58 | 445075 DosZap
DosZap's picture

RR,

Or, Roll & SNORT, as Bennie & Timmmay Are doing...............

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:53 | 445200 Lucky Guesst
Lucky Guesst's picture

both funny and sad at the same time 

 

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:02 | 445077 GoldSilverDoc
GoldSilverDoc's picture

Do you, MrTrader, drink your water from the tap? As was once commonplace (like use of metals for currency), fell out of use as "modern" things like bottled water appeared (like use of fiat currency) and is becoming common, now, again (as metals will) as people understand the wisdom of reducing their exposure to estrogen analogs in plastic bottles?

Or are you simply incapable of conceiving of anything beyond a very limited scope of knowledge, and therefore you drink only the Koolaid provided by your masters?

Wed, 06/30/2010 - 17:14 | 445119 Martel
Martel's picture

Thank you, sir, for the gold comparison charts. Keep 'em coming!

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!