You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Matt Taibbi Retorts To Goldman's Retort

Tyler Durden's picture




Round three of the Taibbi - Van Pragg welterweight death-match will be brought to you compliments of the MGM Mirage (in exchange for 3 bond coupon waivers).

In the meantime, here is Matt's Round 2.




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 06/30/2009 - 14:20 | Link to Comment Jim B
Jim B's picture

Good article and retort from Matt.... Since Goldmans CDS's with AIG have been made good, I suppose the US Gov will let AIG crash and burn. LOL

Tue, 06/30/2009 - 14:32 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 06/30/2009 - 15:01 | Link to Comment Jim B
Jim B's picture

I don't see where you have disputed any of the claims made in his article.....

PS. If it wasn't for the Goldman CDS exposure to AIG, major portions of AIG would be in the same trash heap as Lehman Brothers. Never hurts to have the GS alumni running the FED and Treasury.

Tue, 06/30/2009 - 15:09 | Link to Comment Woodshedder
Woodshedder's picture

Wow, did GS give you permission to read ZH while on their time?

Tue, 06/30/2009 - 14:43 | Link to Comment zeropointfield (not verified)
Tue, 06/30/2009 - 15:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 06/30/2009 - 15:38 | Link to Comment agrotera
agrotera's picture

Matts article perfectly illuminates what is an unbelievable problem for us here in America--trying to dispell 'conventional wisdom". I think it was sociologist Joel Best who said that getting rid of a bad statistic was, "harder to kill than a vampire." And this vampire notion completely applies to the myths out there about the federal reserve and their agents of which goldman sachs is their first born.

Conventional wisdom and group think give a beginning explanation as to why so few people know that the Federal Reserve is a private corporation. Yes, the Federal Reserve Act gave this privately held corporation with 300 shareholders the right to print our country’s money, and to charge for doing so, and to rebate the United States Treasury for all profits minus their operating expenses.

Bloomberg reported on June 5, 2009 in the article “ Fed Intends to Hire Lobbyist in Campaign to Buttress It’s Image” , that the Federal Reserve was hiring one of Enron’s previous lobbyists. On May 6, 2009, US representative Alan Grayson questioned the Inspector General of the Federal Reserve, Elizabeth Coleman, if she had any idea where 9 TRILLION dollars of off-balance sheet transactions for the Federal Reserve were located—she had no idea. Structured investment vehicles (SIV) were the method that Enron used to manage the off balance sheet transactions that caused so much hurt to so many people, and it is also, SIV’s that the Fed is using for this 9 trillion dollars. Since both the Federal Reserve and Enron use SIV’s, perhaps an x-Enron lobbyist will help the private Federal Reserve Corporation navigate the bad press that seems likely to follow, when the public understands these details.

Problem is, with the cunning audacity that is used to overlook all accusations, and a whole system that is designed to protect these overlords, it doesn't matter what the public understands until/unless big daddy's power is revoked by congress.

Tue, 06/30/2009 - 18:23 | Link to Comment whacked
whacked's picture

"it doesn't matter what the public understands until/unless big daddy's power is revoked by congress."

I agree and it will never change. Even RP audit bill on the Fed, if it is passed by the Senate it will be revoked by your President.

As regards GS and that situation:-

"Mancur Olson, the American economist, in his books (The Logic of Collective Action and The Rise and Decline of Nations), speculated that small distributional coalitions tend to form over time in developed nations and influence policies in their favor through intensive, well funded lobbying. The policies result in benefits for the coalitions and its members but large costs borne by the rest of population. Over time, the incentive structure means that more distributional coalitions accumulate burdening and ultimately paralysing the economic system causing inevitable and irretrievable economic decline."

http://www.wilmott.com/blogs/satyajitdas/index.cfm/Bank-Management

Tue, 06/30/2009 - 18:35 | Link to Comment agrotera
agrotera's picture

Thank you for the article! The power of the "finance-government complex" doesn't appear to have an achilles heel, but i see no choice but to continue to look for it.

Tue, 06/30/2009 - 19:48 | Link to Comment Shaza (not verified)
Tue, 06/30/2009 - 15:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 06/30/2009 - 16:50 | Link to Comment Shaza (not verified)
Tue, 06/30/2009 - 15:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 07/01/2009 - 17:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 06/30/2009 - 17:27 | Link to Comment thinkinghardwil...
thinkinghardwillkillya's picture

Would anyone have a theory how FRC's SIVs work? There is much talk about them but no trace... The thing with SIVs is that they should leave at least some equity or guarantee residual somewhere on the books and I have seen none. When commenting on FRC's balance sheet no one to my knowledge ever said or suggested that X dollars of SIVs equity are burried within line item Y. Or anything of similar sort. Any thoughts?

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!