• Leo Kolivakis
    07/30/2010 - 17:29
    In the first quarter, the US economy grew by 3.7%, revised up from an originally reported 2.7% increase. But growth estimates all the way back to the start of 2007 were revised lower. Moreover, the level of real GDP in Q1 was revised down by $100 billion. Does this mean the secular bull market in bonds will continue? And are Treasuries the "last diversifier left"?
  • Vitaliy Katsenelson
    07/30/2010 - 13:51
    The Japanese economy operates on the assumption, soon to be proved false, that the government will always be able to borrow at low interest rates. As internal demand evaporates, the government will have to start hawking its debt outside Japan — in a more realistic world, where interest rates are a lot higher.
  • Phoenix Capital Research
    07/30/2010 - 09:55
    Dear Mr. President, You don’t know me, but I was one of the millions of Americans who voted for you in the last election. I have since been fairly critical of your Presidency largely because I, like many others, feel betrayed by the policies you have enacted upon winning said election.

The Meltup Cometh

Tyler Durden's picture




Bloomberg's chart of the day comes courtesy of proud "TARP 4eva" badgeholder Bank Of America. Basically it says to expect another 40% rally in the markets (yes on top of the 50% witnessed already) simply because America is now the same basket case economy that Japan was in the 1990s (and continues to be today), even though as everyone will attest the connection between economic reality and market stupidity ended long ago. 

According to Bloomberg:

A “melt-up” rally in the U.S. may be triggered by central bankers keeping interest rates near record lows, an economic recovery or an undervalued dollar, Bank of America strategists wrote in an Aug. 26 report.


“Even in economies overcoming credit booms, rallies can be powerful and last much longer than you think,” Bank of America’s Sadiq Currimbhoy, Arik Reiss and Jacky Tang wrote. Should the similarity between the U.S. and Japan persist, the S&P 500 will keep rising, partly because of gains in the dollar, the Hong Kong-based strategists said.


“If there is one persistent similarity between Japan and the U.S., it is they both seem to be fighting a debt problem by producing more debt,” they added. “So, for equity investors, if these relationships were to repeat themselves, the risk for the U.S. market is that like Japan, the stock market ends up with big rallies and then sell-offs.”

Granted the fact that the Nikkei subsequently tumbled to new lows is somehow lost, but courtesy of HAL9000 which only cares for reading and replicating charts, the possibility of the fabled melt up will likely soon become a self perpetuating truth, as everyone starts expecting, nay demanding, another 40% run up in stocks just so that the HFT can extract their last several hundred million for providing liquidity in 4 financial stocks, then call it a day and buy that much needed 8th summer villa in Monaco.

4.48387
Your rating: None Average: 4.5 (31 votes)



by mgarrett84
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:23
#52175

HA,  That was real timely commentary ( if we got it 5 months ago)

by AN0NYM0US
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:18
#52323

I think TD provided a similar comment back in early March if my memory serves me correctly, if I find the link I will post it. (I definitely know that Rosenberg in a commentary a couple of months ago postulated a melt up to S&P 1200.)

by AN0NYM0US
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:14
#52370

and here is the link from June and an excerpt:

 

"

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Equity Market Observations From Rosenberg Posted by Tyler Durden at 10:11 AM

In his morning update piece, following up on his CNBC interview and providing much more clarity on the themes he touched upon, Rosenberg gives his explanation on the four factors currently in play in the market, which include i) technicals, ii) fund flows/market positioning, iii) valuation and iv) fundamentals. It is a tale of two cities, with the first two indicating a disconnect from reality as the market has likely more potential upside, while the underlying valuation/ fundamentals representing a market that has rarely been as rich.

On the technicals, Rosie sees a possible break through all the way to 1,200:"

http://zerohedge.blogspot.com/2009/06/equity-market-observations-from.html

 

by D.O.D.
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:46
#52410

Tyler is that you hiding under the bag?

by maximus
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:24
#52179

Whatever comes out of these gates, we've got a better chance of survival if we work together. Do you understand? If we stay together we survive...

by thegreatsatan
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:39
#52202

this isn't Left 4 Dead.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:48
#52288

How about Gladiator?

by Missing_Link
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:22
#52382

I take it you never watched Gladiator.  That would explain the commenter's name  ...  and his picture  ...  and his post.

by PenGun
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 21:54
#53162

Pity.

by eggy123
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:05
#52490

The cake is a lie.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 22:46
#52659

Now THAT IS a DEEP REFERENCE!

Valve YOU!

by Sabibaby
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 00:37
#52712

get ready for the hored!

by NoBull1994
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:25
#52180

I don't think that S&P chart is accurate.  Plus, there are no corresponding dates on the X axis.  The recent bounce is much larger than the bounce illustrated here.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:46
#52215

Agreed. I think it might be the $NDX (??) not the SP500.

by where is my mind
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 19:02
#52435

It looks like the SPX is inflation adjusted and the Nikkei is a nominal chart.

But, like the above poster said...could be the NDX

by GTC71
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:32
#52190

If you compare charts of the last few years against the great depression era ... this 50% rally appears done and we're headed for a big decline soon.

in this bizarro "market" I'm not sure what are the apples and what are the oranges?!

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:58
#52236

But that doesn't factor in Ben's liquidity--we were on the gold standard in the '30s. Take a look at ZH's liquidity bubble article today...

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 16:32
#52948

Ben's liquidity just sits around as excess reserves.

by TumblingDice
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:37
#52193

In other news, NASDAQ Composite has completed a 50% retracement of its move from the 2007 top.

by Shell Game
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:38
#52337

AND a concurrent 23.6% retracement from 2000 high.

by VegasBD
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 21:17
#52579

hahahah great post! very clever. hows that goin for ya? being clever...

by paydirt (not verified)
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 16:35
#52822

whole market way overvalued

good articles; good articles 4 slow news day ..http://www..
hat tip: finance news & finance opinions

by andrew123
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:36
#52195

I know this is totally off topic, but I want to suggest this one more time and then I will shut up.  Electronic billboard with smiling Ben Bernanke's face and waving his arms throwing away dollar bills.  Times Square if you can raise enough donations.  This would engender more public discussion than 1000 bloomberg stories.  I will donate and I am sure hundreds of others will too.  I am typing this out of frustration at not being able to do anything about all of the curruption.  This blog is very informative but extremely frustrating for those of us powerless to do anything.  Tyler, if there is a more constructive way for us little guys to put pressure on congress to address the issues that you highlight every day, please let us know.  Thank you.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:51
#52223

Good idea. I would donate too.

by Rex Crotch
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:28
#52270

I would donate as well. I love the idea.

by ghostfaceinvestah
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:32
#52271

I'm in, open a special tip jar for this and I will donate.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:59
#52307

I think you have to be part of the problem to get billboard ad space. You think your money buys free speech or something?

by percolator
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:00
#52309

Count me in as well.

by Bolweevil
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:15
#52321

Recruit graffiti artists to do it, they'll put them everywhere.  You'd be supporting the arts, maybe its a write-off?

by AN0NYM0US
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:32
#52331

sort of like the Obama Joker Poster contest that had them posted everywhere -- nice idea - Zero could have a contest with various poster templates - here is the vid of the Joker contest winner

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmbOIF8AJ7E

 

 

by D.O.D.
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:27
#52386

Thanks for the link ANON, that was an awsome video. 

This is much more project Mayhem style.  ZH, you've got to think of something to make your audience a part of the solution, then you will have a movement not just a sounding board...

 

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:41
#52403

What is so unnerving is that the conspiracy crowd are making more and more sense - take for example the headline on Drudge right now about the Internet - meanwhile the MSM is non-stop Ted Kennedy, I even heard William Kennedy Smith interviewed today; it's like Teddy is a latter day Mother Theresa as opposed to the drunken whoremaster that he was.

by Sqworl
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:02
#52484

They left out maslaughter!!! Mary Jo was a living person.

by lynnybee
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 21:11
#52571

yes.   thank you for saying that.    funny how it's all just overlooked.      sincerely......

by SteveNYC
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:02
#52238

I'm in!! Bernanke in a helicopter, big, shit-eating grin, dropping dollars on lower Manhattan.....that will do it for me!

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 00:53
#52721

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rq0Ez7DZSnI

by Shell Game
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:44
#52343

Yep, count me in too. But can you use this picture of him crying please?

http://static.soxfirst.com/soxfirst.com/imgname--the_bernankeobama_dance...

by loki
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 22:56
#52666

eeeeeeeeew.   Needs a manicure.  Badly.

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 03:37
#52751

This is not especially effective. Instead, I would have a pit filled with common-looking folk, sweating and shoveling piles of money up to a stage where Tim Geithner stands. Then Geithner hands it to Bernanke, who bags it, and then hands it to a gathering of suited men smoking cigars and drinking champagne.

by Ned Zeppelin
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 07:07
#52771

Write your Senators and Congressman - email works fine.  Ask for passage of the Audit the Fed act. Tell them they are nuts to even think about carbon credits. Tell them to leave healthcare alone until we figure the rest of this mess out.  Tell them to stop authorizing social welfare programs for individual industries. Write, call and write again. 

by deadhead
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 09:31
#52800

agree with you Ned.  I've done same. My congressperson is a sponsor and he sits on Barney's committee.....downside is he is a freshman and a true Pelosi suckup. 

by ZerOhead
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:37
#52198

"Bank of America strategists wrote..."

I think they meant "wished" or "dreamt" ...

These are the same "strategists" that ran BOA into the ground... or did they find some new ones?

by PBS
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:39
#52199

Regardless of the accuracy of the call, you have to appreciate analysts who have the hubris to come out and say that even if, like Japan in the 90s, our real economy is nothing but a monumental, debt-driven, highly leveraged shitstorm, at least you can play it for some short-term market gains.

by passive_lurker
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:39
#52200

This is a perfectly logical and sound analysis. What's my broker's number again?

by PBS
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:43
#52207

917-BEN-DOVR?

by passive_lurker
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:47
#52218

Ah yes, there's the number, right there on the floor...let me reach down and pick it up.

by MountainHawk
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:51
#52292

you did a funny..hahah

by TwoJacks
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:39
#52201

and now that the comparison is available for public consumption, it will play out completely differently.  The only thing you can count on is that the price will move left to right, but I'm sure the liquidity providers are working on solving that little dilemma as we speak.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:40
#52203

ZH finally bullish. Can only mean one thing.

by nope-1004
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:41
#52280

As Barney Frank would say:

"Thweet comment."

by MinnesotaNice
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 21:22
#52583

Yep... the market finally heads down on Monday, now that every bear has morphed into a bull... thank god... its about time!

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:40
#52204

That chart can't be accurate since the 2007 top took out the 2000 highs...that chart must be inflation adjusted which would invalidate the comparison.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:41
#52206

They forgot to mention that the whole rally is based on QE which is being setup for removal this fall. Bernanke should not fear a depression as much as a trashed dollar.

Who cares if your portfolio is back up to a million if it doesn't buy anything. He can't be that stupid.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:45
#52210

The GAME IS RIGGED---

If you arent one of Ben Bernanke's Insider's Club, GTFO!

by dza
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:46
#52211

Damn, that is spooky. "It's like a copy of a copy of a copy."

 

by snorkeler
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:53
#52227

It really is spooky. 

 

It would be really interesting to see how many other factors from the same 2 eras correlate.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:46
#52214

THE GAME IS RIGGED!!!!

If you aren't part of Ben's Crony Insider's Club or getting insider tips from GOVERNMENT SACHS, then GTFO!!

Starve the BEAST!

by ghostfaceinvestah
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:33
#52274

Starve the beast indeed.  Take you money and business away from the Stress Test 19.

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 00:32
#52711

I don't think you understand the game. If you *are* getting tips from Goldman Sachs, get out. Goldman bankers treat their clients as adversaries, they would cut a man's throat to take a dollar from his pocket.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:47
#52217

Anyone care to comment on today's preposterous close?

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:16
#52256

Last week of August, many on vacation, more on vacation thru Labor Day.

Next 10 days will be effectively meaningless, like a politicians promise, a lover's sigh, or Ted Kennedy's life.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:49
#52221

This graph seems wrong. The top of the SPX was in 2007 not in 2002. Is there someone who can replicate this diagram?

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:56
#52301

This chart is wrong... here is the reproduced chart.

http://tinyurl.com/n6zshf

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:49
#52222

Regarding the Methup Cometh: Consider the source of who wrote it before engaging in such hypotheticals, and trading upon it. Generally, analysts who pontificate and theorize, rarely trade their own money. If they did, there would be a lot more money for us to make and share.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:51
#52224

I FEEL LIKE A CHIMPANZEE, BUT THE AUTHORS ARE SAYING:

the S&P 500 will keep rising, partly because of gains in the dollar, the Hong Kong-based strategists said

EXCUSE ME, BUT THE LAST TIME I CHECKED THE DOLLAR WAS NOT RISING, AND EVERYBODY AND THEIR MOTHER WAS PREDICTING A DOLLAR SELL-OFF

SEEMS LIKE THE US DEFICIT HAS BEEN TOTALLY IGNORED IN THIS ANALYSIS

NEXT WEEK'S ANALYSIS TO READ: DOLLAR TO SELL-OFF AS DEFICIT BALLOONS AND EQUITIES TO STILL RALLY

MAN THESE ECONOMISTS CAN'T SEEM TO AGREE ON THE DOLLAR

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:54
#52229

Market up will require a lot more QE. Don't see it.

by Andy Dufresne
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 15:58
#52237

The S&P chart does not look kosher, is in in yen, inflation adjusted or what? The October 2007 high was above the 2000 peak by a little (on the chart it looks very different)...

by Shell Game
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:46
#52345

me thinks its the NDX rather than the SPX...

by Andy Dufresne
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:50
#52347

the NDX did not take out the 2002 low

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:04
#52239

hey snorkeler --

you asked for some more...how about this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_history_of_Japan

Start reading in the section titled "1990s to present" -- striking similarities, IMO.

Steve

by walküre
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:06
#52241

Expect the unexpected.

Ben will surprise everyone by raising rates .50 points to fund the deficit.

Stronger Dollar, higher purchasing power and better bond yields is what this economy needs and will get.

The propaganda about recovery and green shoots etc is aimed at defining the bottom for interest rates. A supposedly growing economy can afford better interest rates and higher taxation levels.

Days of cheap credit are over.

 

 

by lookma
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:15
#52255

Ben will surprise everyone by raising rates .50 points to fund the deficit.


How does raising the FED Funds rate fund the deficiet?  

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:23
#52264

I think he meant that bond yields will go higher and more attractive to buyers, thus funding the deficit.

Quantitative easing cannot go on forever and thus saying the economy is on solid footing allows us to ease off the throttle. BB really has no choice.

by walküre
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:44
#52282

The budget deficit that's covered through continued bond sales.

 

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:48
#52412

Another, lesser, way it funds the deficit is by producing higher taxes from increased dividend income from fixed income investors. I realize that there is additional longer term costs by issuing at higher rates, but it least it starts to move the cycle in the proper direction. A Zero Interest Policy, while appearing to be stimulative, is actually a super strong deflationary black hole. Fixed income investors panic because their income gets decimated. What they do then, in addition to stupidly chasing yield far down the quality spectrum, is go into a spending bunker. Everyone stops spending because their incomes have been shut off. If you start letting people's savings provide them with more of a boost it could assist it returning things to normal.

by PBS
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:20
#52258

And how does a strong dollar, that only worsens the trade deficit, help our over-consumption problem?

by walküre
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:51
#52293

China needs American consumption of their goods.

If the Dollar slides further, US consumers will tighten their belts further. Purchasing power needs to be stabilized at some level. Lending is not the issue anymore.

A .50 increase will send a strong message and bring confidence back to the Dollar.

It's more important than a stock market on steroids.

Unless the propaganda changes from "recovery is around the corner" back to "standing at the abyss and facing collapse" there's no political will to fund more bailouts or rescue programs.

There's no risk of inflation imo.

Inflation preceded this economy which is why everything was completely off the charts and out of shape. Deflation is healthy and with a restored purchasing power and stable income levels, the economy will improve over time.

If the Dollar goes kaboom as some predict it might, then you will see armies of $8/hr workers rallying against Washington.

$8/hr at current price levels is slave labor. Can't reduce the purchasing power of that important segment of American culture any further. Cheap credit helped these people for a while but that train has left the station. 

 

 

 

by RatherBFlying
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 06:07
#52764

Let me fasten the strap on my tin foil hat for a moment. And by the way, this is my favorite hat lately,  because when I think this way the madness that is the stock market  makes a lot more sense.

When Mack Daddy said in March that the stock market was "like an opinion poll", I think he stumbled on to something profound (profound for someone who aspires to destroy what is left of a free-market economy and replace it with a czar infested fascist system.) I think what he  figured out is that a rising stock market puts to sleep a segment of the population that needs to be asleep for him to pass his most damaging legislation, the government takeover of the US Health Care system. Once that's done, everything else will roll his way in time. So he says to Ben "Kite the stock market." Ben says "You know... eventually I will have to save the dollar, and once I do the market will crash back down to earth." MD says "Just keep it up long enough for me to get the legislation done, which will be no later than the August recess."

Is this anymore tin hat thinking than believeing that Bernanke will crash the USD and send us in to Zimbabwe-like hyperinflation? He is (probably) not an idiot. A political tool, yes... but idiot? Probably not. He knows he has to do what you say above... eventually. He just gets to fuck with us for a little while before that.

by Ned Zeppelin
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 07:15
#52774

This makes alot of sense. A campaign to support the equities market and pronouncements of mission accomplished as far as the Great Recession is concerned end with a (largely symbolic) rate increase by $.50.  Dollar rally follows, with a corresponding reduction in equity prices. Treasuries esp the 10 yr begin to drop as rates go to 4, 5% and the funding of the deficit becomes easier since yields are attractive.  Where's the hitch in this?

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:09
#52247

It looks to me that the analyst was not trying to match dates of the chart rather he was looking for a match in patterns regardless of the dates of the match. Why this has any bearing to anything beats me. If I were in charge at BofA the head count of analsysts would be down by two tonight. First the analyst would be fired and secondly I would fire myslef for permitting such "junk" to be printed. Obvioulsy, there is no need for either of us. In reality this is what corporate america is finding and in the discovery they are getting rid of people who cant function regardless.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:07
#52314

Look at the names of the analysts - I bet they're all fake. You have to say them out loud to see the joke. They do this a lot at bloomberg. Someone's got to make up the news. And I wouldn't put my name on it.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:09
#52248

Bloomberg article states chart is adjusted for currencies...

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:11
#52250

ZH... could you please address the S&P500 chart? As others have pointed out, it doesn't look accurate at all.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:21
#52261

Nikkei companies are exporters, Japan ran a huge trade surplus in those years, while the rest of the world grew stronger. The savings rate was strong among the japanese and Japan was a creditor country

by Thoreau
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:41
#52340

Exactly; great points.

by Joeman34
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:21
#52262

This chart is ridiculous.  Classic case of data fitting...let's take some line graphs, superimpose them over one another and move along the x-axis until some type of relationship is apparent.  What a joke...

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:23
#52265

I can imagine you guys are all Barney Frank fans. Prepare for cognitive dissonance...

http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/08/28/rep-frank-house-will-pass-ron-pauls-audit-the-fed-bill-this-year/

by Bonesetter Brown
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:23
#52266

It's Nasdaq, and it does match

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:33
#52273

Dear Bonesetter...the graph clearly states that it's showing the SP500...

by Bonesetter Brown
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:45
#52285

I'm saying it is a typo.  That graph is the Nasdaq.

by Bonesetter Brown
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:45
#52286

I'm saying it is a typo.  That graph is the Nasdaq.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:36
#52278

The comparison between indexes is based upon adjusting for currencies.

We can certainly count on the Fed keeping the interest rate low, not so sure about an organic recovery at this point (but the synthetic, QE-based recovery has created a nice spike), and whether the dollar remains devalued . . . well, that will depend upon news out of the September 22nd Federal Reserve meeting. If the Treasury portion of QE actually ends, then the dollar should go bullish. If they change their minds and decide to extend, well . . . don't fight it, ride it!

by paydirt (not verified)
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 16:35
#52824

Mainly due to dollar devaluation.

good articles; good articles 4 slow news day ..http://www..
hat tip: finance news & finance opinions

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:46
#52287

Japan rose in the late 90's because they had customers for their products in the rest of the world during the TeleCom/DotCom bubble. I don't much of a parallel this time around in the fundamentals as the US doesn't have anyone who can be a customer for their products who is experiencing their own asset bubble.

The comparison to Japan's Lost Decades is optimistic. The US and rest of world are having a mainly coordinated debt deflation demand destruction situation.

The only possible exceptions will be in some of Latin America, Africa and SE Asia where they already had their debt blow ups and civil wars in recent decades/generations, so they don't have similar crippling levels of debts. On the other hand, their foreign markets are evaporating, so they will have to become self-reliant and/or regionally integrated, and then possibly be a market for rich nation's goods.

And even this addition to global aggregate demand would be small because wages in the Global South are kept low through the internal and international race to the bottom pitting workers and peasants against one another.

so i highly doubt there will be much further rallying to the S&P and expect it to skip through this melt up and continue the inexorable deflation of asset values down to long term trendlines of PE ratio with an extra ugly corrective of overshoot past the trendline so that Reversion to the Mean is accomplished over the longer term. Ie SP500 PE ratio based even on the gamed "operating earnings" has to fall down to 5 to 7 from the current level of 24.

SP500 = 2000 by 2012

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 21:06
#52562

You raise some good points. During the past 20 years (and more, really) Japan has been a producing nation and a nation of savers. They run surpluses by and large, not deficits. The US is largely the opposite -- consuming, saving little, and running constant (and now astronomical) deficits. Yes, this is painting the picture with a big brush, but it is a generally accurate portrayal. It is not difficult to see the path the US has taken, both in the public and private sectors, is unsustainable, regardless of what similarities certain charts may have. The US indebtedness is a millstone around its neck that Japan really never had.

by Sam Clemons
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:58
#52303

Also, Japan was most likely able to feed off the massive tech bubble and beginnings of a real estate bubble in 97, 98.  What are we able to feed off now? 

by D.O.D.
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:38
#52401

Soilet Green.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 16:58
#52304

Do we die from inflation or deflation? Dat is da question.

by eggy123
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:10
#52499

Does it matter when you're dead?

by mblackman
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:12
#52305

Tyler;

The Bloomberg chart of the SPX from 1990 to present day versus the Nikkei225 from 1980 to present doesn't make sense or at least is very different that my charts. The 2007 SPX peak was higher than the 2000 peak which is not shown on the Bloomberg chart (which shows the 2007 peak to be substantially lower than the 2000 high).

If Bloomberg has done a currency or other adjustment to get the desired result, don't think it is valid unless both markets are priced in the same unit like say... gold. But if you do that, the correlation between the two drops substantially as to make them not really comparable at all...

 

Am I missing something?

by D.O.D.
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:37
#52400

Justice?

by gmrpeabody
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:02
#52311

That's right. The chart has been adjusted to reflect the difference in currencies, the phases of the moon, and to the different points of pressure applied to the pencil while drawing the lines.

by bullwinkle
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:02
#52312

Homer's investment advice:

Mmmmmmm..........forty percent melt up........mmmmore cheeeeese.......buy.........more.

Six months later:

D'oh!!!

by Rollerball
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:51
#52349

LOL+

by Joe Sixpack
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:08
#52315

I pointed this out on the liquidity bubble article, but,

The Zimbabwe stock market skyrocketed in 2007, with acceleration starting in 2005-2006.

by walküre
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:17
#52322

Funny./not

America is not Zimbabwe.

Zimbabwe never had, never will have a "world reserve currency" and a large arsenal of nukes.

 

by alien-IQ
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:09
#52316

Maybe I've been watching the wrong DOW and the wrong S&P and the wrong dollar, but the one's I've been watching seem to show me that every time the dollar goes up...the market goes down...and vice versa. So, needless to say, when I read comments like this "the S&P 500 will keep rising, partly because of gains in the dollar, the Hong Kong-based strategists said." from the so called experts, I'm led to believe that either:

a) I'm watching the wrong Dollar, DOW and S&P

or

b) This so called expert is utterly full of shit.

Only time will tell I guess...

by What_Me_Worry
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:34
#52334

Long Kool-Aid Sep calls

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 17:35
#52336

No correlation at all. Tyler is fishing on this one. This might be the top now that Tyler has capitulated......

by AN0NYM0US
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:19
#52379

I was thinking that myself - but  we'll first need to see the sequel to this article

by D.O.D.
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:35
#52397

LOL! I just noticed your avatar!!! That totally rocks, I mean... raps...

by dza
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:00
#52358

FYI: the chart is accurate. Look at the % delta.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:20
#52381

It's like giving a machine gun to a monkey .....

by D.O.D.
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:44
#52407

If the chart has been adjusted for currencies, have they also accounted for inflation I wonder?  I'm guessing this last up move WAS the final 40%, since I don't see taking the dollar to 60 is much of an option, but what do I know, I wear Affliction t-shirts... Anyway I can't find the original article on bloomberg, anyone got a link?

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 18:57
#52428

>>another 40% run up in stocks

The first 40% runup is bot even visible in the chart. Something is seriously wrong with the stated definition of what this chart is.

I agree with all the commenters who think the author had better define EXACTLY what this is supposed to be a chart of.

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 19:16
#52446

This chart comparing US to Japan is invalid in that US has a lot more debt, both private and public sectors.

by Hephasteus
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:04
#52485

That chart does make some perfect sense. Think about. America is the number one economy, Japan is the number 2. Japan has been parked for years. Drained of money and put into mild perma recession. Do that to america and you've parked 1/3 the economic activity on the planet. The same thing has to be being done in europe. Just becasue everyone is talking and yacking about quantative easing doesn't mean it's happening. All we are seeing is huge bonds. A bond is a IOU a promise to pay it serves the banks. A bill (currency) is a debt instrument it serves the people. Talking about huge stimulus and talking about quantatitve easing doesn't mean it's happening as we think it is. America is getting drained of money there's little economic activity. The bank bailout is bullcrap. They are freaking banks. They can get money electronically created and loan it out 10 times to fix thier balance sheet. DOING that stimulates the economy which is why they are taking it from the taxation side. The bailouts are in fact draining the economy. Quantatitive easing is just being quantatative it's not easing. It's piling up huge debts and then ratioing the currency out to match it. Which is why the currency markets seem to keep pegging out against each other.

The world is getting encased in concrete and anything that moves won't happen unless it comes straight out of the central banks. It'll decide who is flushed with cash and who isn't. 

by eggy123
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:16
#52511

Well said. That cuts right to heart of the matter. Look at tax reciepts, there is no stimulus. Look at retail sales number, there is no stimulus.

The world is a Banana Republic; the Puppet in Chief decides who gets all the bananas (hint: it's not you).

by Hephasteus
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 22:07
#52623

All the debt to pay off debt bonding is rediculous. They should fire up a printing press and get thier squid on. Sometimes you just gotta ink a bitch. Just replace all those promises to pay with payment.

 

 

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:08
#52494

So now analysts are saying dollar strengthen = equities rally? I thought it has been dollar weakness = equities rally until now? So heads ->equities rally, tail-> equities rally then? Sounds good we can make money right?

So low interest rates by Mr bean, somehow the US$ will rally? Then what happens when Mr bean raise interest rates? US$ rallies again?

Common, what is the combined age of these BAC analysts in Hong Kong? Shouldn't they be spending some time watching the Shanghai index instead of calling up-melting in US? Or maybe they are making a last desperate pitch, like Andy Xie mentioned in his latest piece, these"experts" want to talk up the market to stall the inevitable plunge coming your way in Shanghai (and then the world) in the fourth quarter?

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:25
#52522

dough cass will look like an ass then

generational bottom call earned respect, lose it all on the recent short

by Anonymous
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 20:33
#52529

Even an amateur statistician in high school can tell you what's wrong with the chart - the 30 years of Nikkei data is squeezed into a 20 year time frame to "chart-fit" the S&P curve. That has the effect of removing 30% of "undesirable" data that doesn't illustrate the authors' story. For example, prior to the current rough from which they predict a 40% upmelting, the Nikkei showed 4 peak-to-troughs movements of between 30% to 50%. The authors conveniently ignored these Nikkei moves. Sell-side research has descended to levels of shockingly crude "curve-fitting".

by Hephasteus
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 21:15
#52576

I thought the market worked on fibionacci sequences. Ya in a time compression viewpoint this would only be valid if it were a 34 year chart squeezed into a 21 year chart.

by Ghettomedic
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 22:51
#52664

Please. This is America. We do shit bigger and faster than some island full of short people. We pummel the markets 10 years faster. We do it hardcore.

by AN0NYM0US
on Fri, 08/28/2009 - 21:28
#52588

and here is the link to the origninal Bloomberg story and graphic

S&P 500 May Surge 40% in Duplication of Japan: Chart of the Day

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=aKzgH4hvhh.g

 

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 05:49
#52762

Look,
I don't care about any of this crap. All I want to know is; How do effectively bankrupt myself and get to keep all my stuff? Seriously... I'm tired of playing by the rules my whole life and ending up the 'chump'.

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 17:22
#52976

First intelligent comment/question I've seen on this blog - though some are pretty amusing.

Watching everyone from the politicians and bankers to the financiers and "common people" run around like chickens with their heads cut off at an absolutely typical and predictable credit contraction is like being on a riverboat and watching the penny-ante players argue over which of the big time gamblers are cheating and how, while you notice the water on the floor from the giant hole in the hull of the boat and go get in your lifeboat.

by cocoablini
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 09:15
#52795

That timescaling is all Eff'ed up. A comparable point on that chart after a dramatic crash(ours just happened in 2008-a year ago) is the first or second rebound spike in 1990. We would have to go much lower before retracing that much on the correct timescale. Anyone can overlay 2 different timescale charts. A comparable timescale to the Nikkei chart he shows is a "recovery" in 2017 or 2018-it's %^*^$&%& 9 years from now.

People just don't get that the timescale for these events are long and you forget where you are in a bigger cycle. The Nikkei in that chart is in a secular bear market for 20+ years but 9 years after the 1989 meltdown it looks like a bull market that will run forever.

The result may be correct but the chart technical is compressed and expanded to fit a theory. 

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 09:31
#52799

If that is Bloomberg's " CHART OF THE DAY" i would hate to see the technical crap that didn't make the cut. That truly is an absurdly pointless POS.
My 7 year old Niece can draw a more relevant technical chart with crayons , glue and glitter.

by paydirt (not verified)
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 16:20
#52818

From time posted to when it hits the airwaves, this needs to be documented.

good articles; good articles 4 slow news day ..http://www..
hat tip: finance news & finance opinions

by AN0NYM0US
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 09:50
#52825

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 11:20
#52853

A collapse in demand will keep this S & P meltup from occurring. We're a shambles society compared to Japan. Their population is much more regimented by government design. They could afford a meltup because their demographics looked much better than ours.

The way it's different this time is, you're going to see a much more rapid collapse in demand, leading to a much more rapid collapse in prices. A horrible back to school plus a horrific Christmas will show the extent of demand collapse.

by Anonymous
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 17:53
#52999

it’s the kind of thing which really reinforces one’s belief in the wonders of data-fitting

http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/29/silly-chart-of-the-day-data-fitting-edition/

by crzyhun
on Sat, 08/29/2009 - 20:59
#53125

Not to be insensitive to the many of you out there downing the chart, BUT, go to BBerg and look at the chart and think it out.

I agree they did a bit of a cock-up in that the times are 1980=nikkei and 1990=s/p. The left axis is % and it is adj for currencies.

If this is 'true' and I have seen the comp. before the situation is not at all pretty.

by vicelord
on Sun, 08/30/2009 - 01:00
#53214

That's about as stupid a chart as I've ever seen.  Period.

by dot_bust
on Sun, 08/30/2009 - 15:47
#53441

The thing most economists choose to ignore is that there was a depression lasting from 1920 - 1921. Why was it so very short? It's simple. Neither the government nor the Federal Reserve intervened. Banks were not bailed out with public money. Thus, the nation's resources were not squandered for a select few.

This brings me to the inevitable conclusion, which is that there will be no economic recovery until the giant failed banks are allowed to go bust. It is simply criminal to bail out banks that took excessive risks.

Equally important is the idea of ending fractional reserve banking. No U.S. bank should be allowed to loan out more money than it has on hand. They cannot create excess credit if they must have a proportional amount of cash reserves. This brings me to the boom-bust cycle. Banks cause phony booms time and time again by issuing excess credit. They then cause subsequent busts by suddenly calling in the markers from the excessive loans.

But there's a big challenge. How do you explain to the average uneducated American that systemic collapse is necessary -- even vital -- for a return to economic growth?

 

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.