You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Might AIG Escape Prosecution for (Allegedly) Cooking the Books?

Marla Singer's picture




It is pretty clear that officials and the likes of Tim Geithner were directly involved in editing documents that would eventually become public disclosures by AIG in the form of SEC filings.  To the extent these filings were knowing material omissions or misstatements of fact Tim, along with executives at AIG, should be heading to jail, right?  Well, not necessarily.  As we wrote two months ago, there is at least one little hitch that permits firms to cook the books and skate off after the fact.  Enter 15 USC 2B § 78m(b)(3)(A):

With respect to matters concerning the national security of the United States, no duty or liability under paragraph (2) of this subsection shall be imposed upon any person acting in cooperation with the head of any Federal department or agency responsible for such matters if such act in cooperation with such head of a department or agency was done upon the specific, written directive of the head of such department or agency pursuant to Presidential authority to issue such directives. Each directive issued under this paragraph shall set forth the specific facts and circumstances with respect to which the provisions of this paragraph are to be invoked. Each such directive shall, unless renewed in writing, expire one year after the date of issuance. (Emphasis added).

We thought we were just being paranoid when we wondered in print if this provision had been used.  That's not looking so paranoid anymore.  We wonder, did the President grant such authority?




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 11:53 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:57 | Link to Comment Let them all fail
Let them all fail's picture

Poorly, too bad the world is all filled up, no "new world" to move to this time in order to flee the corrupted nation...

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 11:53 | Link to Comment Zexe
Zexe's picture

i don't even care anymore...everything is rigged right now

 

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:05 | Link to Comment Daedal
Daedal's picture

Eff it, let's go bowling.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:18 | Link to Comment Cindy_Dies_In_T...
Cindy_Dies_In_The_End's picture

Ever watch Lets Bowl on Comedy Central? Bowling Grudge matches with silly prizes should solve every thing.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:46 | Link to Comment Zexe
Zexe's picture

am more concerned right now with the swine flu conspiracy...this is where governments and pharmaceutical companies want to have total control of us...make them fearful and sell them the vaccine...and guess who pays...the taxpayer...now that is wealth transfer...

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 16:02 | Link to Comment Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

Swine Flu is simply a $40 Billion welfare check from you the tax payer to the Pharma industry for a vaccine no one needed.

Nothing to see here. There is no unemployment. Everything is fine. Go shop. Buy a house. We have a tax credit for you. Soon you can buy a new washer with "cash for ____." Just fill in the blank.

It's all good...

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 11:55 | Link to Comment alien-IQ
alien-IQ's picture

It's official: We are now a Banana Republic.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:04 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 15:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:44 | Link to Comment lsbumblebee
lsbumblebee's picture

The answer to that is a big N-O.

I'm sure, however, that the silence from the whores in congress will be deafening.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:10 | Link to Comment bugs_
bugs_'s picture

He's so transparent.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:15 | Link to Comment Tomified
Tomified's picture

That stuff about democracy, rule of law and free and open markets was just talk.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:17 | Link to Comment D.M. Ryan
D.M. Ryan's picture

Yes, sir, Tim Geithner will never go to jail. Sovereign immunity, delegated.

That's all you need to know if you're a financial-company executive that's looking for a shield.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:17 | Link to Comment waterdog
waterdog's picture

Looks like the Supreme Court is going to have to rule on the definition of national security.

 

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:18 | Link to Comment Nathan Smith
Nathan Smith's picture

 

From previous post about Giethner:

The whole part discussing this in the December 24, 2008 SEC filing was eliminated under Geithner's instructions:

From 15 USC 2B § 78m(b)(3)(A):

head of any Federal department or agency responsible for such matters

TTT wasn't sworn in as Treasury secretary until Jan 26, 2009.  Unless one could count the New York Fed as a governemntal agency described in the 15 USC 2B § 78m(b)(3)(A):

It seems like he wouldn't be able to be covered by the above law until after he was sworn in.  Or maybe I've smoked to much crack this morning.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:21 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Pedantic questions:

1) Is the Federal Reserve Bank a federal department or agency, within the meaning of this law?

2) Is the FRB of New York a separate federal department or agency (separate from the overall FRB), within the meaning of this law, such that its head (Geithner at the time) would be deemed to be an agency head thus potentially fitting within this exception?

3) Accordingly, can Geithner based on his position at the time be treated as a head of a federal department or agency?  (And not merely a deputy or senior officer other than the head, which would seem correct if you consider the entire FRB system to be one federal department or agency.)

4) Is the FRB of NY an entity "responsible for such matters" with respect to the potential noncompliance with the securities laws?  Does a FRB have any jurisdiction over securities laws, particularly when involving an entity that is not a bank?

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:56 | Link to Comment Keep It Simple ...
Keep It Simple Stupid's picture

There's nothing "federal" about the federal reserve. It's a private company owned by the member banks.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:08 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Yeah, I know that argument, and mostly agree with it.  But it does have a sort of federal government sponsorship.  My questions were phrased carefully.  Hopefully some other lawyer-types will chime in their responses.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:20 | Link to Comment BorisTheBlade
BorisTheBlade's picture

With respect to matters concerning the national security...

Magic phrase, use this as a pretext and you can get away with just about everything.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 16:07 | Link to Comment Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

Boris speaks truth. "National Security" means never having to say you are sorry for everything from torture to the theft of any public asset, any fraud any anything...

IF you are the ruling class.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 19:02 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Yes, if you have basic reading comprehension skills and can look up simple dates, maybe even do some basic arithmetic, then yes, Bush would the president who might (theoretically) have authorized the apparent lawbreaking.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:50 | Link to Comment Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

Seems time reveals that most things called "conspiracy theories" presently end up being revealed later as truth.  It just takes time. If we have any time left............

http://www.blacklistednews.com/news-6930-0-5-5--.html    

"33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True, What Every Person Should Know…"  I thought this was a good summary.

Cold comfort in the fact that the internet allows news to travel more quickly than ever. In the past you just had to shut up the mainstream media. Ah the good old days!

Please keep up the great work and most importantly keep the faith.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:52 | Link to Comment wang
wang's picture

What has become of the American nation? Conceived with the vision of liberty and justice for all, we have descended in the clutches of corporate and other special interests to a second world state defined by K Street instead of Independence Square. A “ballot box” pox on all their houses – Senators, Representatives and Presidents alike.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 12:55 | Link to Comment Anonymouse
Anonymouse's picture

This should let Ken Lewis off the hook as well

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:07 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:30 | Link to Comment pros
pros's picture

none

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:42 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 13:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 14:22 | Link to Comment Careless Whisper
Careless Whisper's picture

Wondering if the NY Fed gave the hush hush orders to the counterparties as well???

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 14:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 14:25 | Link to Comment max2205
max2205's picture

Icing on the cake...we all knew it though

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 15:02 | Link to Comment You Cant Handle...
You Cant Handle the Truth's picture

Silly me, I thought "National Security" actually meant preserving the nation.  You know, by protecting this whole "We The People" thing.

Now I realize that "National Security" just means protecting the entrenched power structure of the nation.  It's not "National Security" anymore -- it is "Political Security."

 

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 15:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 15:41 | Link to Comment Fish Gone Bad
Fish Gone Bad's picture

I sent Zero Hedge that tidbit of national security last year!  If it is in the national interests, a bank can cook its books as much as it likes.  This must be why FAZ is getting hammered today.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 17:38 | Link to Comment Paul Bogdanich
Paul Bogdanich's picture

The question is will anyone push it and make Obama own it?  Will they force the release of the authority granted by him to Geithner?  I doubt very seriously whether the congress or justice will do it so who wil? 

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 18:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 18:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 18:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 19:35 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

We wonder, did the President grant such authority?

The question should be how many Presidents have issued Executive Order/s and/or directives concerning the financial sector of various enterprises and when to include oral or written delegation of this authority to others under 15 USC 2B § 78m(b)(3)(A) or its predecessors?  When?  How?  Who?  And the prevailing circumstances in reference to long term strategic national interests.  This answers should be divided by those that are effected by various Defense Department R & D activities and all others, by each individual instance....

After all, this is a matter that has materially effected our nation and its markets for more than a generation of Presidents of the United States and their decisions.  This is one area that any President cannot say it was someone else's doing since they are all office holders and are constrained by the actions and omissions of previous holders of that office.  (The; "President of the US, Barack Obama" vs "Barack Obama, President of the US" paradigm) 

What is notable is how various Presidents have attempted to deal with this. Obama just says it is all Bush's fault.  Bush says he lost the records.  Clinton has copies of everything at Little Rock..  that pertains to their political peers and business shavings.  Bush, the Walker one had Jim Baker and Brent Scowcroft handle much of it.  Reagan's must take up a whole National Archive warehouse.  Carter's efforts were either handled by Zbigniew Brzezinski or left partially buried in the files of the various departments.  Nixon shredded all of his records, or so he thought.  Johnson's records management provided the foundation for Bush II.

 

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 21:11 | Link to Comment Unscarred
Unscarred's picture

Miles, the first paragraph of your response raises the best questions offered thus far through this thread.  For shits and giggles, I tried to research the section myself, but ultimately have no idea how to go about it.  My lawyer/good friend is going to have his intern pull the Congressional Minutes regarding this section, so as to at least decipher the circumstances and implied interpretation from when it was originally crafted and voted upon.

In the end, I suppose the results won't mean much, as government will do as government wants.  However, I always enjoy pointing out hypocrisy when it's so blatantly present.

On another note, any new thoughts on Black Gives Way to Blue?

Fri, 01/08/2010 - 13:31 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

http://thomas.loc.gov/

Sometimes the hardest thing to do is to drive on.  Even in a world dominated by those that would do it Again, even when all that is left for them is franchise value and for others another Love Hate Love realization.

Thu, 01/07/2010 - 20:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 21:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 01/07/2010 - 23:49 | Link to Comment Roscoe
Roscoe's picture

According to Treasury, Timmy wasn't involved anymore by that time:

"Geithner was "officially recused from matters dealing with specific companies" at the New York Fed after his nomination to be Treasury secretary on Nov. 24, 2008, and "began to insulate himself weeks earlier in anticipation of his nomination," said Meg Reilly, a Treasury spokeswoman."

Link: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/07/AR2010010703950.html 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!