Mike Krieger Interviewed

Tyler Durden's picture

You read his weekly articles on Zero Hedge, now here if your chance to listen to Mike Krieger interviewed by Future Money Trends. Among the now topical issues discussed are the debt ceiling, QE3, geopolitical instability, US and global economies, $100 silver (as well as the recenty take down of the metal), market manipulation and much more, as well s Krieger's several proposed scenarios for the future.

Part 1

Part 2

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Ecoman11's picture


(Reuters) - European clearinghouse LCH.Clearnet confirmed on Saturday it has received a string of offers from exchange operators interested in pursuing some form of business tie-up but said talks were still at an early stage.

Offeres were made by NYSE Euronext, Nasdaq OMX Group and London Stock Exchange Group. LCH.Clearnet regulates margin rates for HKMEx, LME and OTC Gold.

It's going to be a rough ride if this deal goes through.

pton09's picture

Didn't krieger support obama?

Why are we supposed to listen to this guy?

The_Euro_Sucks's picture

Because he makes lots of sense in this interview. Listened to it?

Thomas's picture

Yup. Judge the argument. BTW-Aristotle is credited with stating that an educated man can entertain an idea without endorsing it (so be careful even about judging the argument).

samsara's picture

Why is that point lost on so many Thomas?


People think everyone has to be a hundred percent right or what they say is useless.  

The insight one gets, is your own internalization of what someone says.  NOT the fact that the person was 'Correct' or not.

goldfish1's picture

People think everyone has to be a hundred percent right or what they say is useless.

Perhaps we have become jaded by the certainty that most pundits speak to enrich their own kind. So caveats like "he's a obama supporter" is a factor one may wish to consider when deciphering the information offered.

Rynak's picture

Trust does not make something true or untrue... it's just a tool to estimate the probability of something being true, if you cannot verify something yourself. If you can verify something, trust is irrelevant to truth.

pton09's picture

Yes, I can think for myself but I question why ZH pushes krieger so hard?

He isn't all that insightful and doesn't have a great feel for things.  He is an egomaniac, but if we are going to have an egomaniac plastered everywhere might as well be a smart egomaniac like Peter Schiff.

Rynak's picture

I have no answer to your question.

Transformer's picture

And I have nothing to say to your reply.

Dejean Splicer's picture

"why ZH pushes krieger so hard"?

Answer: It's pay to play on the hedge. He who pays the most, gets the most attention unless of coarse you want silence.

I hope Goldman understands this. Silence is Goldman.... Silence is gold man.

~D'jean Splicer

cosmictrainwreck's picture

answer: because he's a trained mathematician (PhD), and LA lawyer (intellectual property) big in the whole internet-wars thing, a key hot-button at ZH. As to Mr. Schiff, yes, he's an egomaniac, and also a jerk-off. You never hear about how much money he lost for his clients (neighborhood of 80-90%) on the lame excuse (this is a quote) "well - eventually, I'll be proved right" [emphasis mine]

Banjo's picture

Clearly they were the clients that didn't diversify into gold and silver. Do you have any specific examples to cite? Can you elaborate as to what percentage of clients lost 80-90% and wat percentage of their portfolio was hit? That statement outright defamation and slander.


A more rational argument would go something like this X firm has 1000 clients. During the year of the GFC.

z number of Clients invested in 100% gold made 5%

p number of Clients with 50% in gold and 50% european shares lost y%

q number of Clients with 30% exposure to Lehman.


Point is blanket statements like yours are factually incorrect and portray a business in a negative light without accurately backing up your claims. I know this story of Peter Schiff losing his clients money was big new in 2009 as the video Peter Schiff was right was doing the rounds.

I do not subscribe to his view on EUR v USD. I certainly believe in diversification and am a HUGE fan of metals Gold and Silver. I think Peter Schiff is dreaming if he thinks he will get into politics and make a difference.


cosmictrainwreck's picture

the losses occurred on mining stocks when they (and all stocks) hit the abyss. Diversify into gold & silver? He's Mr. Gold himself, ain't he? I could give a shit about "slander". Fuckin' rumors fly every day...half the shit on the web is bogus.

Sophist Economicus's picture

I agree.   I think the guy is a putz!   He never says anything that hasn't been said by somebody else before.   I don't get it either....

I think he wants to be the Grand Poobah for 'Enlightened Sheeple'...



Sorry Mike, you suck and your objective is  transparent

Id fight Gandhi's picture

Meh. I'll think fer myself. Why is this on zh?

dark pools of soros's picture

then fuckin turn off ZH since the same shit has been said forever and ever since gold was used to buy pussy

Shell Game's picture

Kreiger's human, not a moron. I'm thinking he's not happy with his choice at this point.  Just like he wouldn't be happy if he'd voted McCain.

Dejean Splicer's picture

I hope he's disparaged enough to eat a little Ricin. If you know what I mean. Voluntary consumption avec une note de suicide.

Shell Game's picture

Pretty angry for a molecular biologist..

tarsubil's picture

I once saw a presentation from the FBI talking about Ricin cases and one involved a retarded man. No kidding. The agents were thankful he labeled the ricin jars with "ricin, do not eat - poison".

dark pools of soros's picture

and that shows you who the cops can catch... and if Tyler keeps these damn auto start video ads this place will go to the shitter

Dejean Splicer's picture

Woops my mistake. I thought I read Krugman. The thread starter was talking about the author while I mistaken thought he was talking about Krugman.

Anyhow, how about some Ricin for everyone! Ricin-Krispies maybe.

Youri Carma's picture

There were a lot of what are regarded as 'well thinking people' who supported Obama cause they were ill informed. They didn't listen to Webster Tarpley http://tarpley.net/

btw Good point Krieger "Central Banks don't have Silver" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkJFPZIAfp8#t=11m25s

Yits and the Yimrum's picture

the statists will support their latest prophets, and drink freely their idiot kool-aid, and not give up their dreams of fiat utopia

those that are already feeling the jackboot ramming them in the head will be undergoing a virtual, spiritual experience, and hence the homelandt security matrix will deal with their disappointment as required

anybody tells me they are are demo or rethug, I write off as a dumb ass

baby_BLYTHE's picture

Tarpley is the shit. He is the type that would have lead geo-political/economic conversations in the first class smoking room on the Titanic

Tater Salad's picture

"Tarpley is the shit. He is the type that would have lead geo-political/economic conversations in the first class smoking room on the Titanic"


You act as thought there's something wrong with that...

Dirt Rat's picture

Tarpley used to post here on ZH under the user name "geopol". He must have deleted his account because the only place I can find him here is from google search results.

pops's picture

OK, he was an idiot for voting for Obama. 

How would voting for McCain have made him any less the idiot?

"Paper or plastic?"

trav7777's picture

what makes you an idiot is your false dilemma

baby_BLYTHE's picture

Anyone with a sub-standard IQ could see-through the BS surrounding Obama mania going all the way back to his election as Senator of IL.

Rynak's picture

I think what trav was hinting at, was that the premise of voting for ANY of both, is bullshit. It's not "either vote for A or vote for B". If both are shit, don't vote or vote for some minority you like even if it has no chance of winning.

pops's picture

Paper or plastic?   Dem or Repub?  Left or right? 

Same-same water buffalo.



Plata con Carne's picture

I think it was someone here who said When faced with having to choose between the 'lesser of two evils,' why choose any evil?  

bbq on whitehouse lawn's picture

You don't get elected by telling people things they don't want to hear. Obama just told all the boomer things they wanted to hear.

I don't blame Obama for doing what he did to get elected i blame him for not using the opportunity to do somthing exceptional.

Few are given the task of being entrusted with the dreams of a nation; fewer are willing to act on those dreams.

Obama has his chance to be a strong leader instead he became nothing but another weak one.

Nobility comes not with birth or title it comes from character. Either you choose to stand your ground and die or you submit to stronger forces.

The choice is you die for your belief or you find something else to believe in.

pops's picture

When Clinton and Obama sneaked off to meet with the Bilderberg bunch, they were probably shown a replay of the Zapruder film.

When the choice is payola or your brains in your lap, it's not really a choice.  Which would you choose?

samsara's picture

Yes, Pops,  I saved those new articles. 

<<<   The Bilderbergs were meeting in Chantilly Va at the same time.  .>>>     The press that had been traveling with Obama were not made aware of the secretive meeting until the plane that they assumed Obama would be present on was moving down the runway, prompting many angry questions from the press towards Obama’s spokesman, Robert Gibbs. One reported asked Gibbs, "Why were we not told about this meeting until we were on the plane, the doors were shut and the plane was about to taxi to take off?" to which he responded, "Senator Obama had a desire to do some meetings, others had a desire to meet with him tonight in a private way and that is what we are doing." This preceded another question, "Is there more than one meeting, is there more than one person with whom he is meeting?" Gibbs simply replied, "I am not going to get into all the details of the meeting." He again later repeated that, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20080609&articleId=9270
Tim White's picture

   Couldn't add alot to that comment...

Cathartes Aura's picture

. . . and Dubya didn't need any help in pattern recognition, since his daddy was head of the CIA, and they all came from a long line of successful overseers.

Dejean Splicer's picture

"Obama just told all the boomer things they wanted to hear."

Remember all the jews back then? They were like, OMG no I will not vote for Ohblackma. Then that big nose hideous Sarah Silverman comes out and strongly supported and that fuckface Seinfeld also. Comedians pull some weight with the joobies.

Anyhow, not that the joo vote matters but it's funny how that community flipped on a dime when the hollywooders jumped in.

NOTaREALmerican's picture

> Obama has his chance to be a strong leader instead he became nothing but another weak one.

The obsession with "The Big Kahuna" leader is why Americans are always so shocked SHOCKED when their political fantasies don't come true.

"The Big Kahuna" comes WITH the Party. The Blue Team was backed by the one group of multi-billionaires and Red Team by another. You vote for the advertised Big Kahuna you get all the assorted scum and sociopaths that infest the Party too, and the assorted scum and sociopaths make the decision NOT the advertised Big Kahuna .

dark pools of soros's picture

when TARP was voted down and BOTH canidates ran to the Senate to 'get those 12 votes' how did anyone not wake up at that point about the whole fake dem/repub 'choice' ??  Then to see the 12 repubs sell their votes for $130 bil or so, you had to think it was just theater of a decision already made at the Bildebergers...

theMAXILOPEZpsycho's picture

yes I see; he had no choice. Like a kiddy toucher saying, "well, that little girl had a pretty skirt on - but the other one had nice pig tailes; I went for one but I didn't touch the other; I had to chose one of them after all"

By your logic he's inocent

JW n FL's picture
by pton09
on Sat, 05/28/2011 - 14:11


Didn't krieger support obama?


did you want 4 more years of Bush?

McSame would have been handled differnet by the lobby how?

maybe abortion would be being discussed..

But Obama is Bush.. worse as a matter of fact and the reason he can be worse is becuase he is a liberal commie.. thats how he takes away more and more of our freedoms every fucking day..

So, tell me why.. you dont like Obama? you are a republican.. he has followed Bush's road map plus plus plus.. so what is it?


samsara's picture

For the life of me, I can't see why anyone with any brain can't see that he is indeed Bush III.  Extend the Patriot Act,  Give everything to the Corp's, continue the wars...

Only the blind fight of the battle of the false dichotomy of right/left, dem/rep.

I voted for None of The Above (wrote in Ron Paul), 

Correct as usual JW.