You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Moody's Butchers Cramer's "All Good In Dubai" Call, Prepares To Nuke Government Related Issues

Tyler Durden's picture




On one hand you have Jim Cramer, saying "As painful as it might seem to those who wanted to use Dubai as still
one more pillar to the bear edifice, the story just doesn't have legs.
It was sexy -- Middle Eastern bubble blown up. It has global intrigue.
Will the UAE bail them out? Will fundamentalist politics play a role? The sizzle, though, didn't have a lot of steak to it. Another borrower
blows up; yawn. Another bad loan by RBS; those guys should have been
nationalized. Another black hole that Citigroup walked into. But that's about it. "

On the other hand you have Moody's set to destroy Dubai's rating, even as Nakheel bonds take out all time bottoms, and as Dubai CDS surging once again to 605bps, 58 wider from yesterday. Just released note from Moody's pointing out it is about to kneecap Dubai government-related issuers.

DIFC, December 09, 2009 -- Moody's Investors Service has placed the ratings of government-related
issuers (GRIs) in the UAE on review for possible downgrade. This
includes all GRI's that are owned by either the federal UAE government,
or the government of Abu Dhabi.
The review was prompted by a need
to re-validate, and possibly reconsider our support assumptions
following Dubai's recent decision to explicitly segregate its direct obligations
from those of its GRIs, following which a decision was subsequently
made to pursue a debt restructuring at Dubai World.

 

The ratings under review currently benefit from very high implicit government
support assumptions and assume that even in most potential stress scenarios
the government will not make a distinction between servicing its direct
obligations and those of its state-owned companies.

 

Issuers whose ratings were placed on review for downgrade include the
following:

 

- Abu Dhabi National Energy Company (TAQA) issuer and debt ratings:
Aa2 / on review for downgrade. The Prime-1 short term ratings
were affirmed.

- Mubadala Development Company (Mubadala) issuer and debt ratings:
Aa2 / on review for downgrade. The Prime-1 short term ratings
were affirmed.

- Tourism Development & Investment Company (TDIC) issuer and
debt ratings: Aa2 / on review for downgrade

- International Petroleum Investment Company (IPIC) issuer and
debt ratings: Aa2 / on review for downgrade. The Prime-1
short term ratings were affirmed.

- Emirates Telecommunications Company (Etisalat) issuer ratings:
Aa2 / on review for downgrade

- Dolphin Energy (Dolphin) long term debt rating: Aa3 / on
review for downgrade

- Aldar Properties (Aldar) issuer and debt ratings: A3 /
on review for downgrade

 

As part of the review process, we will continue to engage in discussions
with the respective government officials and issuers regarding their policies
and positions on each of the issuers to assess whether these ratings continue
to be positioned appropriately. Assuming that we conclude that
support assumptions should remain high, we would only expect moderate
adjustments to ratings, though it could be multi-notch in
particular where baseline credit assessments are low. Moody's will
also be publishing a Special Comment in the coming days outlining the
criteria we are applying in determining the support assumptions as part
of the review and to provide broader guidance to the market on the key
areas of focus. We expect to conclude the review over the next
three months.

 

Moody's last rating actions on each of the names placed under review
was on 17 October 2007 (TAQA, assignment of provisional guaranteed
bond ratings), 27 April 2009 (Mubadala, assignment of bond
ratings), 1 October 2009 (TDIC, assignment of bond ratings),
27 April 2009 (IPIC, initial rating assignment), 22 July 2008
(Etisalat, initial rating assignment), 29 July 2009 (Dolphin,
assignment of bond and bank debt ratings), and 19 May 2009 (Aldar,
assignment of bond ratings).

In the battle of the two worst predictors of anything, the question who ends up right may have well become moot.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 12:35 | Link to Comment Overpowered By Funk
Overpowered By Funk's picture

But then again, as far as lunatics go JC is one of the smartest.

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 14:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 12:39 | Link to Comment bugs_
bugs_'s picture

I wish we had one of them "Doomsday machines".

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 12:46 | Link to Comment aint no fortuna...
aint no fortunate son's picture

Its actually not Cramer's bullish call. He's just the garbageman for Goldman... when they want to dump he screams buy buy buy. I think Goldman would call it "risk transfer" or "risk aversion". Skeptics might call it pump and dump. Did we forget his call on CIT already?

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 14:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 16:31 | Link to Comment Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

Cramer maybe The Village Idiot... but he is OUR Village Idiot.

And as aint no points out, maybe Goldman's Idiot also. Does that also make him a solid contrary indicator?

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 12:45 | Link to Comment SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

Dear Dubai: 

All your Sharia-compliant base are belong to us.

Love,

Western Banks

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 12:46 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Didn't the equity markets initially rise in the weeks after Lehman collapsed?

Just saying.

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 12:59 | Link to Comment lsbumblebee
lsbumblebee's picture

Moody's should merge with Cramer. Call it Crudey's.

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 13:03 | Link to Comment Cursive
Cursive's picture

Could Moody's just butcher Cramer?

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 14:07 | Link to Comment MsCreant
MsCreant's picture

Just released from Moody's

Ratings placed on review for downgrade:

  • Cramer

 

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 15:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 15:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 15:32 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 16:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 12/10/2009 - 02:11 | Link to Comment The Rock
The Rock's picture

"UNLESS 1000 SLAVE WORKERS DO THE MAINTENANCE."

+1000

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 16:32 | Link to Comment Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Who gives a fuck about Moody's (not that I give a fuck about Cramer either)?

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 17:16 | Link to Comment RockyRacoon
RockyRacoon's picture

I've been waiting for someone to say this.  What's all the hand-wringing about?

Dancing around the issue doesn't change the complexion of the problem.

Thanks for the direct analysis Gordon.

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 16:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 16:57 | Link to Comment emsolý
emsolý's picture

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HGKh4pTCDcg

 

"That all sounds pretty glamorous, but it's business as usual at Kramerica..."

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 17:29 | Link to Comment carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

Hey guys... good news.

One of Nakeel's execs told UAE's National:

The Palm Jumeirah is not sinking into the sea, contrary to speculation in recent days, a Nakheel executive says. “The proof is in the pudding,” said Shaun Lenehan, the head of Nakheel’s environment department. “The Palm is intact. If there were subsidence, you would see cracks in the buildings, windows popping out. We have no evidence of that happening.”

There were reports earlier this year of villas showing structural defects - cracks in walls

He was responding to claims from a landscape surveyor speaking at a conference in Qatar, who was quoted as saying that the Palm Jumeirah was sinking by an average of 5mm a year and might flood in the future if ocean levels rose.

The engineer cited satellite images of the island taken periodically over the past few years. Fugro NPA, the satellite mapping company where the surveyor works, yesterday said its findings were taken out of context and that the island was going through a natural process. “Settlement is a normal occurrence following construction,” the company said.

“No conclusion can be drawn about the long term. “The point displacements measured at Palm Island in the first few years following construction [less than 1cm per year] are well within the expected natural settlement range for such a large structure and such settlement would be factored into the engineering design of the island.”

So there you have it: the island is sinking, but only in line with expectations.

LOL!

http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2009/12/09/88026/the-palm-is-not-sinking...

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20091208-706067.html

http://www.despair.com/marketing.html

 

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 18:28 | Link to Comment jawadqas
jawadqas's picture

Moody's is putting pressure on Dubai to support "Guarantee" its GRI's. Including Abu Dhabi based companies to put pressure on Abu Dhabi to support "Guarantee" Dubai.

With time, everyone will be guaranteeing everyone else is some way or another. 

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 19:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/09/2009 - 19:29 | Link to Comment Rick64
Rick64's picture

Moodys? Aren't they the ones that rated the MBS? Yea I should really pay attention to anything they have to say.

Wed, 12/09/2009 - 23:34 | Link to Comment Fidel Sarcastro
Thu, 12/10/2009 - 00:27 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 12/10/2009 - 02:24 | Link to Comment The Rock
The Rock's picture

CRAMER IS THE WORLD'S BIGGEST CON ARTIST.  HE DESERVES TO BE THROWN INTO THE LOWEST LEVELS OF HELL!!!

Thu, 12/10/2009 - 05:26 | Link to Comment aus_punter
aus_punter's picture

does anyone in their right mind think that Cramer knows the first thing about Dubai ? I just read some "macro" research from Macquarie Bank (anonymously penned of course) saying that all is well and Dubai is a "sandstorm in a teacup".... so something must be up

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!