More Democratic Votes Against Bernanke On Deck, Is Activism The New Conformism?

Tyler Durden's picture

Your rating: None

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Thu, 01/21/2010 - 19:58 | 201478 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

They are going to buy something that will make them alot of money.

And they are going to let Mary Schapiro run it and buy hundreds of cabanna boys with the cash.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:06 | 201487 AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

Hallelujah Obama is back

He was captured by an evil cabal immediately after the inauguration and programmed to do the bidding of the banks, but late Tuesday evening he escaped and has been deprogrammed. We once have change that we all can believe in.


Thu, 01/21/2010 - 23:25 | 201775 Gold...Bitches
Gold...Bitches's picture

good luck with that.  prepare for disappointment, once again.

Fri, 01/22/2010 - 04:54 | 202005 Problem Is
Problem Is's picture

"Hallelujah Obama is back... He was captured by an evil cabal immediately after the inauguration..."

ANONY, have you been doing coke with Kudlow again... or is this a Cramer the Clown three day meth high side band ramble?

Coke with Kudlow... I think I just invented a new CNBC show...

Fri, 01/22/2010 - 10:06 | 202074 CrazyCooter
CrazyCooter's picture

This idea has merit!

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:02 | 201488 casino capitalism
casino capitalism's picture

Up to today, I would have said it's not worth blocking Bernanke because we will end up with someone worse (i.e. Larry Summers).  Now I'm not so sure.  I think, if he gets blocked, there is a real chance to get someone good to move the Fed in the right direction.  It really is time to move in a completely new direction.  I'm sure Paul Volcker could recommend a very good replacement.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:58 | 201591 deadhead
deadhead's picture

Then please contact your 2 US Senators and voice your opinion.  it's 2 quick emails and it only takes a few moments.  thank you.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 22:34 | 201697 basehitz
basehitz's picture

Agreed. I have. Only one acknowledged but will back him. November is coming.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 22:40 | 201711 Dirtt
Dirtt's picture

My Senators and I are like oil and water.  But maybe just maybe...


I took your lead and wrote to them.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:05 | 201493 Rainman
Rainman's picture

The only foreseeable blunder I see for the Dems ( and they are experts at blundering ) is that by dumping Ben now they would not have him around to take the arrows when the proverbial shit hits the fan.

Why bring in a new trooper now ........only to die in a hail of poisoned arrows.

Naw....they couldn't be THAT stupid.....< gulp >

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:16 | 201507 Handle with care
Handle with care's picture

They would be well served by bringing in someone now, so when the shit hits the fan they can say, "Well we're still cleaning up the mess left by that idiot Bush put in place.  We got rid of him, but its going to take a long time to clear up the mess left by Bush and his appointees that we inherited and kept in place to avoid ruffling the markets during a very critical time." 


If they keep Bernanke they essentially accept ownership of the mess

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:36 | 201546 Rainman
Rainman's picture

Obama already gave the guy a kiss on the cheek. But it could mean he ends up in the river anyway.

Maybe they bust out the banking con on " new disclosures " and sacrifice Ben and Timmy too. But that's a dream I had last night.

At least I'm sleeping good. The Critters are up all night wondering if the sheeple finally sniffed out two wolves that have been picking them off one by one. 

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 21:02 | 201597 deadhead
deadhead's picture

If they keep Bernanke they essentially accept ownership of the mess

Amen.  I am most confident this has been discussed at the highest levels.

Your assessment of the political situation is absolutely spot on correct.   

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 23:28 | 201780 Gold...Bitches
Gold...Bitches's picture

Yeah, exactly.  I mean, who else gets slapped with the saying "snatching defeat from the jaws of victory" but democrats.  just look at what happened in Mass.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 23:47 | 201811 deadhead
deadhead's picture

"snatching defeat from the jaws of victory

I've seen the NY Giants do it more often than the Dems over the past 30+ years.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:08 | 201498 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

Change? You mean fiat money is dead, and the government is going to operate within the bounds of the Constitution now?

Oh, wait. Never mind. They're just rearranging the deck chairs to block the view of the oncoming iceberg.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:22 | 201503 AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

Don't forget, the lessons of W's re-election in 2004 have not been lost on Axel and Rham. The American public is easily fooled and if dressing up in populist clothing for a few months can help to restore the 60 person majority in the Senate then little real harm will be done to the #1 supporters of the administration.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:31 | 201533 lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

The American public was easily fooled because their day to day lives (o/s of air travel) were not disrupted by the War on Terror.  Moreover, WS bonuses didn't seem so offensive (or worthy of notice) when one had a job and the value of one's house was doubling. 

This time, (the un/underemployed have time on their hands to get educated), their lives are being decimated, with no end in sight.  At this point, a couple months of mere populist rhetoric is not likely to get the presentation administration very many votes.

“Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential”

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:42 | 201557 AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

The American public was easily fooled because their day to day lives (o/s of air travel) were not disrupted by the War on Terror.

I think there was a bit of impact for those who had family involved in Iraq.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 23:33 | 201787 Gold...Bitches
Gold...Bitches's picture

yes, but thats exactly the point.  Theyve reduced the amount of individuals that actually have to suffer from the effects of war by all volunteer military and private mercenaries.  Effectively they have sanitized society from having to feel remorse or really any emotion besides the same one you get when your football team scores a TD or makes a fumble.


Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:14 | 201504 Fritz
Fritz's picture

Yes - lets see if Congress can grow a pair, do the right thing, and shit-can Bernanke.

Then, let us hope that Geithner does the right thing and resign.


Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:45 | 201566 ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

speaking of timmay

don't think these stories are leaking out by accident, that is not how DC works.  Someone wants that guy out of there, he should take the hint and resign gracefully.


WASHINGTON/NEW YORK, Jan 21 (Reuters) - President Barack Obama's newest Wall Street crackdown was met with hesitation from Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who voiced concern that politics could sacrifice good economic policy, according to financial industry sources.

Geithner is concerned that the proposed limits on big banks' trading and size could impact U.S. firms' global competitiveness, the sources said, speaking anonymously because Geithner has not spoken publicly about his reservations.

He also has concerns that the limits do not necessarily get at the root of the problems and excesses that fueled the recent financial meltdown, the sources said."

Fri, 01/22/2010 - 00:21 | 201844 Assetman
Assetman's picture

Timmy can go straight to hell.  Well, after he hands in his resignation.

Fri, 01/22/2010 - 03:18 | 201984 skippy
skippy's picture

I've got a better outcome, try reincarnated as a gerbil that finds its self inserted into a toilet paper tube on Friday night and in a bath house somewhere down town ;)

Fri, 01/22/2010 - 05:02 | 202007 1984
1984's picture

Uh, I think you're getting Bahney's Fwank all excited...

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:15 | 201505 Chopshop
Chopshop's picture

incumbents out like never before seen.  period.

let's start a poll on what stinky BO will be doing the day after the 2013 presidential inauguration cause he ain't even running in 2012.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:26 | 201525 Rainman
Rainman's picture

....indeed. Sweep out 100 % and you get all the guilty. And the innocent will be with us here at ZH......if not already. It will be a very, very small group of newcomers.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 23:37 | 201793 Gold...Bitches
Gold...Bitches's picture

wait a minute.  if we get rid of all of them and the new guys start actually doing the right thing I might have to actually sell my gold.  It is kind of nice knowing how it will do so long as BB is in there printing away.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:21 | 201513 Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

BS should not be reconfirmed for the fact that he is absolutely and unbelievably incompetent on every level of logical reasoning.  It would serve better to have a child as Fed Chair.  However, if he is not reconfirmed, we will not be able to see him sweat when the rest of 'Merica finds out what we know.  The economy is on it's last breath.

Change you can believe in.  I believe, do you believe?


Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:29 | 201530 andrew123
andrew123's picture

If everyone that voted against Bernanke in the recent Zerohedge poll would take a few minutes and call their Senators, I think we could really accomplish something, (or at least you would know that you did the right thing). The link below lists the D.C. phone numbers of every Senator.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:35 | 201544 ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Where was Zimbabwe Ben today, did anyone see him at the press conference.  After all, isn't he the bank's main regulator?  Maybe he was there and I missed him.

Fri, 01/22/2010 - 00:24 | 201851 Assetman
Assetman's picture

Zimbabwe Bend had a prior speaking engagement at the Bridge Club of Madison County.

Hey, you think the man makes sufficient take-home pay at his current gig? ;)

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:36 | 201547 john_connor
john_connor's picture

Something did change recently, and that was Scott Brown winning the election heard round the world.  There are greater forces at work here, but those forces are greater than the Fed, the President, a bought Congress, and a system defined by corruption and regulatory capture.  It's funny how one little ripple in the galaxy can bring down an infinitely complex system where people put blind faith in the "authorities", "the Fed", or just "them."

Now that incumbents are feeling the heat, specifically dems, look for fireworks to begin soon.

Today is just barely an opening act.

What does this mean?  It means that any senator who votes for Bernanke's confirmation will be subject to an avalanche of national rage on Nov. 2, 2010, and will summarily lose their job.  How do we do this, you say?  You donate to their opponents, call your friends in their respective states, call everyone you know, and SPREAD THE WORD.  The word is that they are traitors, and a threat to the national security of the United States, just like the Fed itself has been since 1913.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:42 | 201554 ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Any senator who votes for Bernanke and is up for reelection this cycle will see their opponent receive a donation from me.

I donated to Scott Brown's campaign, not because I particularly like the guy, but because it was the least I could do to send the message that things need to change.  I will gladly support any senatorial candidate running against any senator who votes for Bernanke.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 21:23 | 201583 john_connor
john_connor's picture

Amen.  I donated to and supported Brown as well, without even knowing ONE thing about him, aside from the fact he would help thwart Obamacare, cap-n-trade, bailouts, etc.

It was a no-brainer for me considering what was at stake.

Fri, 01/22/2010 - 01:43 | 201934 MrPalladium
MrPalladium's picture

I usually contribute four figures to the NRA PVF each year, largely because they are the one PAC willing to attack incumbents. But lately the incumbent Dems have become such sluttly little liberal whores that most have caved on gun issues and have A ratings, and so the NRA endorses them (puke!).

So what's an endowment member to do? Used to be that the gun issues had a high correlation with lots of other issues I care about, but recently that correlation has broken down. The friggin bozos at NRA are forcing me to do my own research, and I'm pissed that my nifty one-stop political shopping has run into the ditch!!

Perhaps I should call the brass and demand that they include "audit the fed" this year!! :-(

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:42 | 201560 Chartist
Chartist's picture

I do believe a serious healthcare reform program will pass going into Obama's re-election campaign.....HMOs may have threatened to layoff a lot of employees had the white house offered a public option...However, I think HMO investors are whistling past the graveyard if they ignore populism.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:45 | 201564 AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

The sense I am getting is that pragmatism has taken hold of the left, right and center with a belief that even if President Obama's motivations are suspect that he can be trusted. 

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:53 | 201581 ArkansasAngie
ArkansasAngie's picture

Does anybody know who the 13 Senate Democrats were who voted against tarp?  I'm trying to track what Blanche Lincoln does. 

She's either with us or against us.  Her position on Ben will speak volumes.  Here in Arkansas, she might as well go ahead and quit now if she doesn't get on the Independent band wagon.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 21:01 | 201595 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

She voted for it.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 22:56 | 201732 economessed
economessed's picture

This site is the Zero Hedge equivalent of fact finding when it comes to voting history:

An awesome resource for truth.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 20:54 | 201585 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

“I’m looking at both sides of the argument, but I haven’t made any decisions,” Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) said Thursday.

Her mind will be made up when she finds out if her vote will be THE vote that forces Bernanke out. This is how she plays the game. She needs to be sure it is decided by more than 1 vote before voting down benny. Otherwise, she has no guts.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 21:02 | 201598 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

So who is the best candidate?

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 21:03 | 201599 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Max Keiser on Intelligence Arbitrage--and
Ann Minch of Debtors Revolt...

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 21:14 | 201611 deadhead
deadhead's picture

I would recommend that all of us go back and re-read Tyler's remarks and think about the tone and what the underlying suggestion is, keeping in mind that we are all Tyler Durden.  The last line is unlike any that I've seen on ZH:

"And now, we open up the forum to the myriad of ensuing comments how nothing can possibly ever change."

It looks like things are changing and moving in a direction that very many of us have been advocating for.  I will contact my 2 US Senators again and urge a vote against Bernanke (maybe, just maybe, Obama will yank the nomination back and perhaps that is the hope of change that I believe Tyler is referring to).  Keep in mind that one of my Senators is Chuck Schumer and he is certainly beholden to the banks and the street.  However, Chuck will eat his own if he thinks for one minute that he will get the Massachusetts treatment.  Continued pressure is the only way to get Chuck and his peers to recognize that they might be the next incumbent to lose their seat.

Thanks again to all at ZH for fighting the good fight and not giving up.



Fri, 01/22/2010 - 01:34 | 201928 Kayman
Kayman's picture

A raging inferno starts with a single spark.  The "American Dream" has blown up in the faces of Middle America.  And the arsonists are collecting bonuses.

To unashamedly quote Churchill, " this is not the end, nay, it is not even the beginning of the end, but, it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning."

My unreserved thanks to all ZH'ers.


Thu, 01/21/2010 - 21:16 | 201614 glenlloyd
glenlloyd's picture

I emailed my senators (again) about this and reminded them that people will remember the disservice when election time comes unless they vote no to reconfirm the current Treserve Chairman.

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 21:41 | 201640 deadhead
deadhead's picture

For those that may have not seen it, from RAN Squawk:

 Senator Dodd declines to say if Bernanke has enough votes for approval

Just saying.....

Thu, 01/21/2010 - 21:47 | 201645 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

It's pretty clear that Bernanke is finished now. Obama is re-asserting control. He will clean house. Timmy and Ben have too much baggage to be kept on now. You can bet Summers, being the most cunning, is engineering the whole thing.

Volcker will be used as a Cincinnatus to be the front-man for Obama's "reforms" and for this housecleaning. The Democrats now understand that they must distance themselves from this bailout mess or risk being crushed in the mid-terms. I fully expect a darkhorse like Alan Blinder to come back to run the Fed.

Obama realizes he must fight a decisive domestic battle and win to salvage his presidency. He is going to take on Wall Street because it is an obvious and deserving target. This will not go away.


Fri, 01/22/2010 - 04:40 | 201947 Assetman
Assetman's picture

I sure hope you're right, Spanishmoon.

We've heard the bark from Obama many times before.

We are still waiting for the bite.

BTW, all my reps from the great state of Colorado got got their e-mails this evening.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!