You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

More Posturing Or Actual Threat? Iran Warns It Will Deliver A "Punch" To Stun The West On February 11

Tyler Durden's picture




While Iran is second in posturing only to North Korea, adding a geopolitical threat to an already simmering liquidity fire is certainly never a good thing to a market engrossed by yet another short squeeze. The Telegraph reports that Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has said that the country was set to deliver a "punch" that will stun world powers during this week's 31st anniversary of the Islamic revolution.

"The Iranian nation, with its unity and God's grace, will punch the
arrogance (Western powers) on the 22nd of Bahman (February 11) in a way
that will leave them stunned," Khamenei, who is also Iran's
commander-in-chief, told a gathering of air force personnel.

The
country's top cleric was marking the occasion when Iran's air force
gave its support to revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, a
key event which led to the toppling of the US-backed shah on February
11, 1979.

His comments came as Iran said it would begin to produce higher
enriched uranium from Tuesday, in defiance of Western powers trying to
ensure the country's nuclear drive is peaceful.

This year's
anniversary is expected to become a flashpoint between security forces
and supporters of opposition leaders Mir Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi
Karroubi, who charge that the June re-election of President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad was rigged.

In the meantime quant programs continue to lap up any and all shares, with the only catalyst being Trichet's flight itinerary, which despite numerous claims to the contrary, has been assumed to indicate that moral hazard is now truly global and various rolling bailouts are set to start. We wish SkyNet the best of luck in their ongoing attemt to subjugate "efficient" capital markets on 0 nanosecond latency responses to the first letter of various thesis affirming headlines (now easily "readable" by machines).




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 11:49 | Link to Comment Going Down
Going Down's picture

 

Wild Guess

 

Iran prices its oil in gold.

 

That or some other bombshell.

 

 

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:05 | Link to Comment dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

I agree..  or atleast some basket value of PMs

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:36 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:49 | Link to Comment FreddyInBangkok
FreddyInBangkok's picture

i thought they did already ... doesn't everybody ...

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 16:03 | Link to Comment jmc8888
jmc8888's picture

The Queen likes to gloat early

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 20:35 | Link to Comment Missing_Link
Missing_Link's picture

I doubt it would take that long.  If Iran sends missiles on Thursday, the US will most likely flatten the joint entirely.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 11:53 | Link to Comment GlassHammer
GlassHammer's picture

Is it a Falcon Punch?

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 11:54 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

He better not punch too hard. Obama's looking for a bail due to plunging approval polls. He could be dusting off W's "smoking gun" playbook any day now.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:11 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Sadly, +10

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:06 | Link to Comment Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

BO would love a reason right now.  Not that Iran is bluffing, but BO WILL call down.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:41 | Link to Comment carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

Good Point. Especially since the current administration has begun to adopt Cheney's anti-terror policies.

http://online.wsj.com/articl/SB10001424052748704022804575042112185849380...

 

 

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 17:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 11:54 | Link to Comment Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

 

*Hic*...mmmmore....punch......pleeeeeease.....must.....keep.....party.....going.....

 

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:00 | Link to Comment Nathan Smith
Nathan Smith's picture

Where the hell is Project Mayhem??  I would have thought he would have been all over this story. 

Come to think of it, he hasn't posted in anything in awhile.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:22 | Link to Comment Keyser Soze
Keyser Soze's picture

Undercover in Tehran

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 16:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:01 | Link to Comment John McCloy
John McCloy's picture

I will say I have seen more police/military prescence here in the Manhattan subways the past month on a level not seen ever. I noticed a similar jump in December prior to the airline attempt. There is evidently chatter

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:40 | Link to Comment Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

TY for the intel!  My first thought is that of the days before 9/11, when FEMA was setting up for a "standard exercise" in NYC....in Manhatten....at the financial center....

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:05 | Link to Comment Going Down
Going Down's picture

 

Posturing

 

"People in the West forget that Iran continues to have the plutonium that the US delivered to Iran in the late 1960s for this reactor in Tehran that is under IAEA safeguards. Iran's record, which shows it has not misused this ... is under appreciated," the Tehran expert said.

Indeed, Tehran has been in possession of weapons-capable resources for many years without any report of diversion to weapons purposes, so why is there concern now? The answer may lie less with Iran's nuclear intentions but with a US desire for power projection in the Middle East and Persian Gulf.

 

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/LB09Ak01.html

 

 

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:06 | Link to Comment 10044
10044's picture

Well, the opposition is set to erupt on thu, no more mercy. They're tired of it. Coincidentally, Bahman means avalanche

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:07 | Link to Comment jplotinus
jplotinus's picture

Speculation about what, if anything, Iran will announce during its Festival Day says nothing whatever about Iran, and only discloses the perspective of the persons posting such speculation.

As Iran has stated over and over and over and over, again, its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.  Accordingly, it is here speculated that Iran's announcement will be one that will further the ideal of world peace and world cooperation.

For those who may have taken a look at the content of Iran's pronouncements, it seems fairly clear that they consistently speak out for peace and cooperation and for an end to Western hegemony, arrogance and dominance.

Do posters agree?

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:11 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

I think you can find the Iranians saying whatever you want them to say by selective quotation.

Want them to be terrorist war mongers?  There are plenty of quotes for that.  Want them to be peaceful misunderstood Persians?  Plenty of quotes for that too (only if you omit the prior set of quotes.)

This isn't unique to Iran, although their warmongering quotes are far off the deep end somewhere just shy of North Korea.

Certainly, Iran could be even more violent than it is, but it's not exactly Sweden.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:17 | Link to Comment Cow
Cow's picture

is there an app for that?

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:25 | Link to Comment jplotinus
jplotinus's picture

Ah, the voice of moderation.  Thank you for your comment.  It has been several centuries since Iran attacked another country, so they may not be that far removed from being like Sweden.

Also, here's the quote that apparently gave rise to the translation using the word "punch."  Mind you, "telling blow" can, in fact, give rise to the appearance of a threat.  I admit that:

'Iran will deliver telling blow to global powers on Feb. 11'

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad says the nation will deliver a harsh blow to the "global arrogance" on this year's anniversary of the Islamic Revolution.

"The Islamic Revolution opened a window to liberty for the human race, which was trapped in the dead ends of materialism," Ahmadinejad said during a cabinet meeting on Sunday.

"If the Islamic Revolution had not occurred, liberalism and Marxism would have crushed all human dignity in their power-seeking and money-grubbing claws. Nothing would have remained of human and spiritual principles," he added.

http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=117545&sectionid=351020101

However, when the headline is read in conjunction with the actual quote, it seems to me that the overall statement references a clash of ideas or of ideologies.  Thus, the issue is one of dialectics, rather than war mongering as I see it.

Others may disagree, of course.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:40 | Link to Comment Meridian
Meridian's picture

"Others may disagree" ...and they do. You are really grasping at straws. Obviously it's an ideological clash, but equally obvious is that Iran would support their power base with whatever means they can muster. More importantly, however, they have a revolt seething, Obama is losing his grip, and Isreal would love to lob a few missle's at Iran. It's a win-win-win for the power brokers - let the games begin.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:43 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

You seem to be an admirer of Iran.  I am simply someone trying to see what it really is, without the fog and deception of the press and politics.

Perhaps Iran isn't developing nuclear weapons; I don't know.  Maybe it's not quite the aggressor that it has been portrayed to be.  Certainly, it is in a rough neighborhood.  But there are some highly distasteful things that today's Iran certainly is.  A place where relatively mild dissent is crushed violently, with organized and officially endorsed raping of some of the protestors.  A place where teenage boys are executed for alleged homosexual actions.  A place where unruly girls are occasionally executed for disrupting the conservative social view.  A place where, despite the country having a Jewish population (well tolerated from what I understand), the leader of the nation vows to destroy Israel, and claims the Holocaust never happened.

I do not wish to tar Iran with false accusations, but neither do I wish to ignore its demonstrable crimes.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 18:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 19:23 | Link to Comment boiow
boiow's picture

"He talked about wiping Israel from the map,"

he never said that. that was the interpretation that the western media gave to discredit him.

look up his speech on utube.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 19:50 | Link to Comment perchprism
perchprism's picture

 

Don't be a punk--he said they'd wipe Israel off the map.  Off the map, get it?

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 18:28 | Link to Comment fxguy
fxguy's picture

Has Iran ever invaded another country? With the exception of the war with Iraq, where they most likely crossed into Iraq, have they ever launched an invasion??? Anywhere?

Contrast to Israel or the US .... either directly or indirectly ( contras etc ) 

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 18:31 | Link to Comment fxguy
fxguy's picture

Perhpas Israel should launch yet another pre-emptive strike..
You know, nothing quiets loud mouth like a 500 lb bomb.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:12 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:28 | Link to Comment DoChenRollingBearing
DoChenRollingBearing's picture

Iran?  No Master, all Bates.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:51 | Link to Comment Master Bates
Master Bates's picture

Yeah, they need somebody like me to get them on track.

Why, if the gold bitchez crowd had listened to me, they wouldn't be down on their investments.

Now it's time for Iran to get some MB advice to right their erroneous ways.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 15:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:15 | Link to Comment bugs_
bugs_'s picture

Only one punch will satisfy.  They must set off
their cut&paste AQ Kahn Syrian North Korean
newkyouler bomb.  Some scientists better hope
it goes off and doesn't fizzle - if it doesn't
then some scientists will have a very bad day.

It will need to leave an unquestioned seismic
signature otherwise it will be considered yet
another photo-shopped missile launch.

The punch of the detonation will be to lay bare
the Israeli threat, to lay bare the threats of
the west, and to reveal to the other middle
eastern powers their dire position.

It will be crunch time for the soccer moms, both
male and female.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:17 | Link to Comment Gordon Freeman
Gordon Freeman's picture

Yawn...just play the markets.  Long or short, only price pays.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:19 | Link to Comment Edna R. Rider
Edna R. Rider's picture

With the price of oil dropping it makes sense for the powers that be in the Mideast to start wagging the dog a bit.  At least that's how I'm positioned.  It's like Apple threatening to cut off the supply of iPhones.  Horrors.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:20 | Link to Comment msorense
msorense's picture

This was also posted on Clusterstock.  I'll paraphrase a couple of really good comments I saw:

1.  Iran disband it's theocracy and calls for free and fair democratic elections

2.  Iran announces that 25% of its oil output will go to China for the next 20 years in exchange for their $2T reserves.  Iran becomes Americas largest creditor.

Either of these would sure stun the West.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:22 | Link to Comment ratava
ratava's picture

or a nuke in space

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 16:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:21 | Link to Comment ratava
ratava's picture

man i hope he sends a secret service guy who punches obama in the nuts

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:55 | Link to Comment E pluribus unum
E pluribus unum's picture

Obama doesn't have any balls. How could anyone punch them?

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:27 | Link to Comment waterdog
waterdog's picture

The last time I was stunned by a punch was in 1972, at a party, when someone put LSD into the mix. I sure hope these idiots are not going to the Daytona 500 party this weekend.

I mean, that is what they mean by a punch that will stun the world powers isn't it?

 

 

 

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:52 | Link to Comment Master Bates
Master Bates's picture

LOL.  I bet that was a fun night.  Did you at least know that it was there once you started tripping?

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:43 | Link to Comment John McCloy
John McCloy's picture

Market just reversed to the upside. Did someone just buy all the SPYs again lol

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:51 | Link to Comment nonclaim
nonclaim's picture

They also announced a uranium negotiation/deal (sort of) with Brazil which was promptly denied by Brazilian authorities. The denial wasn't very convincing though.

http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100203-719352.html?mod=WSJ_latesth...

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:20 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Llehman had tons of yellow cake uranium on it's balance sheet when it imploded. LOL

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 12:56 | Link to Comment E pluribus unum
E pluribus unum's picture

Maybe they're gonna buy California?

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 14:54 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

How would you be able to tell?

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 15:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:00 | Link to Comment Transor Z
Transor Z's picture

This is the same country that had its hands full fighting the mighty Iraqi army (pre-daisy cutters). Be afraid. Be very afraid. GMAFB.

I predict the opening of a line of Iranian thrift superstores to compete with Walmart and satisfy our passion for quality goods at low, low prices. That will be a punch the West will not soon forget.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:02 | Link to Comment dot_bust
dot_bust's picture

Iran is thinking of Hawaiian Punch. Great drink but way too many calories.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:22 | Link to Comment the grateful un...
the grateful unemployed's picture

Let's accept the brilliance of Desert Storm, the economy was in collapse, Bush was fighting with Democrats, and his own party. There was no way he could have pushed through a fiscal stimulus package, so he created a man made disaster, fiscal stimulus by executive decree. The stock market went from 6000 to 14000 in a few years. I mean that was f**king brilliant. Now Iran is an even bigger plum because reparations and consolidation of power will a lot easier. Iran has nuclear energy, (and don't worry our flyboys won't touch those plants one bit) which means all that oil heads out to the west. With US boots on the ground in Afghanistan, and in Iraq, Gen Betrayus only has to give the word, and the biggest pincer movement in history will lay waste to the remnants of the Persian Empire. HC is on aboard, she was singing a duet with McCain, 'bomb, bomb, bomb Iran'.Afterwards she gets Geithners job (as a reward for keeping the populist anger down to mere rhetoric, and not action, and a future seat on the board at GS ( because they will be shorting Iran all the way to the bank). There's nothing like a fit of populist anger to distract the American press away from your policy failures.

I have always wondered what kept Bush from going through with it? Maybe he decided to leave something for the next guy.

And if you're short the market when the bombs fall, baby you don't want to be.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:34 | Link to Comment Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

ok, but Magog had the doelar...BO does not.  If he tries for a war the Doe will get smashed in the headlights of an M1 Abrahms.  However, I would not put anything ahead of the military industrial comlex.  Those guys are the biggest idiots around...you too CIA!

Own bullion either way.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:55 | Link to Comment Master Bates
Master Bates's picture

Never without the plug for the gold bitchez!

No matter what happens, buy gold until you're out of money.

Buy housing too!

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 15:49 | Link to Comment THE DORK OF CORK
THE DORK OF CORK's picture

I seem to remember reading a military blog some time ago where a strategist envisioned a American armoured thrust into Iran from Iraq and it getting bogged down somewhere near the Caspian because of long supply lines and limited reserves.Iran is a big country with rough terrain and land forces that are trained to fight a asymmetric war.The shock of fighting againist motivated aggressive fighters may be too much for soldiers who believed that their army was invincible such as what happened to the Isrealis in lebenon a few years ago.Remember these guys have been watching how western forces have fought battles since 1991 and they will not play to their enemys strength the way Saddam did in 1990 ,they have their own agenda.

People have to understand that the US military may have a technological advantage but the mass of the Armed forces have been seriously degraded since the end of the cold war.

It has no reserves to fight multiple front battles since the above scenario would invite the Chinese and their North Korean allies to engage in battle on both the Korean Peninsula and Taiwan.

The US navy would have to take up most of the slack as the bulk of the land forces would already be committed.The anti -submarine component of the navy has been run down rapidly since it has been reconfigured to fight expeditionary war against inferior opponents and even a few Russian hunter killers and Chinese diesel subs in inshore waters would do serious damage.

America has nearly always fought wars where its supply was secure and has been piss poor without massive resupply - its tooth to tail ratio is very unbalanced so when you cut into its tail it will not function.

The fundamental strategic mistake of deploying all of its land forces would have been made.  Any chess player would be wary of committing all of his pawns as it would force  his queen and rooks into the battle and once the Queen is deployed you can kiss goodbye to any future civilisation for a long long time.

In short America needs the draft in order to win wars without the use of a few supers as that would leave the Genie out of the bottle and he won't want to go back in.

 

 

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 20:21 | Link to Comment Wondering
Wondering's picture

Ok, but now lets re fight the war without a single US soldier moving an inch.

Day One first four hours : Cruise Missiles and Predators eliminate the radar (which is two levesl down from the most advanced Russian radar destroyed in Syria two years ago)

Day One second two hours: Cruise missiles destroy all known oil and gas terminals, pielines, tank farms and fields

Day One: 6Am Announcement by Sunni Saudi that they will raise output by Irans total for two years. Kuwait follows.

Day One 8Am: Cruise Missiles and B52's take out electricity and bridges into Tehran and eliminate all docks on the Straights of Hormuz

Day One: 830Am: Iraq announces it will allow even more investments by Oil Companies. CEO's line up to fly to Baghdad

Day One 9Am: Russia protests

Day One 9:30AM: China protests

Day One: 10 Am: Israeli airforce mops up targeting the corporate holdings of the IRGC

Day One: 10:30Am: Obama announces he will be glad to talk to a "representative cross section of Iranian leaders who were not already in the government"

Day One 12PM: Obama indicates that based on a conference call with Iranian leaders prepared to give new "Hope" to Iran he will ask Congress to announce a new Marshall Plan for Iran

Day One 2PM: CEO of Exxon and Chevron announce $100B contract to modernize Iran's oil industry

Day One 2:30PM: Obama nominated for second Nobel Prize

Day One 2:45 Dollar and Treasuries auctions explode as all known money flocks to the winner

Day One 3PM: ZH all pissed off because gold did not break $1500

Day Two: Flights from Los Angeles to Zurich overbooked as "Persians" head back to Tehran

My point in that fantasy above is that our military is not stupid and supply realities is one of the first things they will design around. the accuracy and power of the airforce in the decade since you last saw it in 2002 and the two decades since Gulf War 1

Iran is surrounded by airbases in Turkey, Afghan, Diego Garcia, Saudi, Jordan, Eygpt, Pakistan, several Stans, Kuwait and aircraft carriers and throughout Iraq.

They are not in a good place and they do not have a good set of cards to play.

Yes there will be terroristic blowback from them down the road...but the weight and the size of the damage and likely regime change is like 80 to 1.

Why would we ever take land in Iran to win? Win does not mean the flag in Tehran..it means the economic destruction of the IRGC (of which Ama Dinner Jacket is the nominal CEO passing out the vig)

Anyway...just another way to look at what may happen. Neither of us knows and it being war...it will not be as planned

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 20:59 | Link to Comment THE DORK OF CORK
THE DORK OF CORK's picture

True enough neither of us know and as you said a plan does not often survive  contact with the enemy.

If I was a betting man I would still bet that USA would win a conflict - but not my money on US paper

What I was trying to drive at is there seems a certain overconfidence within certain western military circles that opponents will play a predictable game where technology is the most vital component  - the concept of mass seems to have gone from western military thought.

China will play to its strengths until it has bridged the technology gap and may also try to neutralise your advantage through simple but effective means that we  may not be aware of.

Consider the tactics of Hezbollah forces in 2006 - they adapted to their foes strengths and exploited its weakness - the first American gulf war was a shock to other militaries around the world and the acceptance of inherent weakness can be trans formative to the doctrine of armed forces - look no further then the conflict in Western Europe during 1940 where the wehrmacht had a numerical inferiority but adjusted their war plan accordingly

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 21:17 | Link to Comment Wondering
Wondering's picture

Good points Dork of Cork.

I do think the shock of GWI was significant to other nations but they cannot catch up and their spending relative to ours had remained stable since that time.

One way both of our points can be merged into one "doctrine" (if you will) is through the idea that our technology pushes us into only having that advantage in really more all out conflicts...where massive air firepower brought against the economic infrastructure of an enemy is justified and proportional....and brings us closer to equally matched when we are on the ground and far from having a good supply line.

In sum, we are getting better at winning big all out firefights and others are creeping closer to even odds in small low intensity or contained firefights.

Anyway...lets hope we have less of each kind and that one side benefit of global economic constraints is everyone retracting their horns for awhile

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:27 | Link to Comment Mr Lennon Hendrix
Mr Lennon Hendrix's picture

First, for anyone who does not know, the mullahs are just as bad as achmadeemajawd.  The "Green" revolution would have brought havoc to the country.  Those bastards sent children to fight the Iraq war.  They are murderers.  Not that achmadeemajawd is  much better, he does think he talks to God.  Reminds me of the time W. said he talked to God....

Anywho, I bet it is a bluff.  However, if they do have something up their sleeve (like nude photos of Michelle and Bernanke) then look for a massive retaliation.  Like a war, or a bank holiday.

This is my bet; bank holiday Feb 12th...friday would be the most optimal day for one anyway.

Bye Bye Solar Doelarr!

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:42 | Link to Comment yabs
yabs's picture

hopefully he will take out Goldman sachs

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:50 | Link to Comment yabs
yabs's picture

well lets hope its aimed right at wall street

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 13:52 | Link to Comment CosmicCharley
CosmicCharley's picture

I've got it!  He's got Barky's real birth certificate!

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 14:23 | Link to Comment jplotinus
jplotinus's picture

As between and amongst the predictions thus far posted, the birth certificate one is the odds on favorite! :-)

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 14:55 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Nah, I'm going with the release of Star Wars Episode VII.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 19:29 | Link to Comment boiow
boiow's picture

+1

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 15:06 | Link to Comment jc125d
jc125d's picture

I hear Amadinerjacket got lamb kabobs included in the new reserve currency basket. Ka-Pow.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 15:12 | Link to Comment A tumor named Marla
A tumor named Marla's picture

Remember, this guy thinks he's the 12th imam...I don't think there's actually going to be much of anything happen or be said.  Whatever happens is going to be more like the introduction of the Segway....

That whole region is led by fools who suffer from serious delusions of grandeur; they threaten and threaten but never really back it up.  The only ones who actually deliver pain on any sort of scale are smart enough to sit quietly until the trigger is pulled.  Then they start yapping and nothing further comes of it.

This is hot air; on Friday everybody will be saying "that was it?"  Some punch...

 

 

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 16:15 | Link to Comment Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

+1 on the intro of the Segway. I have a feeling that event will actually seem fairly significant compared to the Iranian announcement.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 15:36 | Link to Comment Get_to_the_choppa
Get_to_the_choppa's picture

My guess is it will have to do with energy.  Few rumors going around that the Chinese or Indians (or both) have come up with something nifty and the US ain't gettin' none.  Given we just sold a few billion worth of arms to the Taiwanese, I'm guessing China is looking at Iran as a proxy to give us the big middle finger.

 

Or it could just be one in a series of 'mistranslations' in the anglo media.  After all most of our reporters and 'sources' never went to the school for kids who can't read farsi good...

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 15:55 | Link to Comment Going Down
Going Down's picture

 

How Do You Say "Punch" In  Chinese?

 

“Just like two people rowing a boat, if the United States first throws the strokes into chaos, then so must we.” Luo said Beijing could “attack by oblique means and stealthy feints” “For example, we could sanction them using economic means, such as dumping some U.S. government bonds,” Luo said.

 

http://ransquawk.com/articles/40362

 

 

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 16:10 | Link to Comment jmc8888
jmc8888's picture

I'll guess

long range missle test into English Channel

or

some sort of spilling the beans on TPTB

I hope it's the latter. Probably be neither.

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 17:28 | Link to Comment Racer
Racer's picture

Or nuke the commie b'stards (the USA of course.... which communist country do you think I meant?)

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 16:12 | Link to Comment Transor Z
Transor Z's picture

This is a HORRIBLE translation of the original Persian. The phrase, interpreted as "punch arrogance," is very nuanced in the original and means no such thing. The proper translation is "We are prepared to send the inhabitants of western nations flowers using our Molnar class-action proceeds from 1-800-FLOWERS.COM."

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 17:26 | Link to Comment Racer
Racer's picture

Ah, I thank you... and since the 'real' translation got into the market, it surged because they had misinterpreted the words, they send their thank you.

 

 

Tue, 02/09/2010 - 22:02 | Link to Comment J.B. Books
J.B. Books's picture

I don't want my kids to go to war.  I figure that's where we are headed and it brings tears to my eyes.  War solves so many problems for the folks in power.  Think about it, the draft would solve the unemployment problem of the 18 - 29 year olds.  With them off to boot-camp the jobs that come about because of the war goes to the unemployed boomers. 

ETC.

ETC.

It's all bull -- xhit.  Iran does not threaten us or anyone else. WE HAVE ALL THE BULLETS!!!! AND WE HAVE THE BIGGEST BULLET OF THEM ALL -- NUKES   But, a country, in order to survive, needs war - it part of our F'in DNA.

J.B. Books

 

 

 

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 01:50 | Link to Comment A tumor named Marla
A tumor named Marla's picture

Nothing more useless than an unloaded gun, except maybe a loaded gun you won't use.

Our empty-suit Pretendident wouldn't authorize nukes even if the mushroom clouds obscured the remnants of NYC....he'd be on the phone apologizing.

The Krazy Kids over in the desert, now that's another matter...

Wed, 02/10/2010 - 02:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 02/11/2010 - 12:09 | Link to Comment jplotinus
jplotinus's picture

Well, posters, it's now Thursday, so let's at least take a look at what Iran could have meant by the "punch" interpretation.  

On Iran's press tv website, there are the following stories:

 

Iran rejects US offer over medical isotopes

EU echoes US threats of sanctions against Iran

'Iran develops system to distract missiles'

Millions of Iranians mark victory of Islamic Revolution

Ahmadinejad unveils electric Samand

 

 

And, to be sure, there was also this:

Ahmadinejad says Israel inching toward annihilation

However, there was also this:

Iran's inflation rate falls to 12.2 percent

The UK Telegraph which I think was the source of the "punch" article is referring to the announcement of delivery of 20% enriched uranium as the big "punch."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/7213109/Iran-Mahmoud-Ahmadinejad-defies-world-over-uranium-enrichment.html

 

Mon, 04/19/2010 - 10:45 | Link to Comment Tom123456
Tom123456's picture

ucvhost is a leading web site hosting service provider that is known to provide reliable and affordable hosting packages to customers. The company believes in providing absolute and superior control to the customer as well as complete security and flexibility through its many packages. vps Moreover, the company provides technical support as well as customer service 24x7, in order to enable its customers to easily upgrade their software, install it or even solve their problems. ucvhost offers the following different packages to its customers

Mon, 04/19/2010 - 10:46 | Link to Comment Tom123456
Tom123456's picture

ucvhost is a leading web site hosting service provider that is known to provide reliable and affordable hosting packages to customers. The company believes in providing absolute and superior control to the customer as well as complete security and flexibility through its many packages. vps Moreover, the company provides technical support as well as customer service 24x7, in order to enable its customers to easily upgrade their software, install it or even solve their problems. ucvhost offers the following different packages to its customers

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!