You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

The New Wall Street Reality

Tyler Durden's picture




Compliments of j-dub

GM chapter 11 = PRICED IN
125K+ jobs lost from GM chapter 11 = PRICED IN
unemployment @ 9% = BETTER THAN EXPECTED
unemployment @ 10% = DOW SOARS
unemployment @ 11% = GREEN SHOOT RALLY
unemployment @ 12% = ALREADY FACTORED IN
unemployment = 35% = DOW DROPS 100 POINTS
housing price =1% = RECESSION ENDING
housing collapses = GREEN SHOOT
Housing falls 20% = STABILIZATION
Government spends 1 trillion of OUR dollars = STIMULUS
North Korea fires nuke = RALLY
Israel bombs Iran = 30 MINUTE END OF DAY RALLY
world explodes = ASIA RALLIES
PMI crashes = HUGE RALLY
No jobs are created = RECESSION ALMOST OVER
U.S. debt overwhelming = TOO BUSY RALLYING TO CARE
Consumer stops spending = RETAIL RALLY
Banks are insolvent = SIGNS OF STABILIZATION
American auto industry BK = GOOD THING
Banks pass scam stress tests = HUUUUUUUUGE RALLY
Banks "only need 75 billion = OUT OF THE WOODS
Banks pass a real stress test = NEVER WOULD HAPPEN
Banks pay back tarp = LATE DAY SURGE
Banks can't pay back TARP = EARLY MORNING SURGE
12% mortgage delinquency = GOOD FOR STOCKS
Hundreds of thousands of mortgages underwater = HOUSING BOTTOMED
Dollar rises = RALLY
Dollar crashes = RALLY
Inflation = BULL MARKET
Deflation = BULL MARKET CONTINUES
REFLATION = MASSIVE SHORT COVERING RALLY
Gold rises = STOCKS RALLY
Gold falls STOCKS RALLY BIG
Banks' fake earnings = SIGNS OF STABILIZATION
CRE stabilizing= 1000 POINT RALLY
CRE CRASHING = STOCKS SHAKE IT OFF TO RALLY
CONSUMER INSOVENT = CONSUMER IS SPENDING
OIL @ 50 = BULL RALLY
OIL @ 60 = GREEN SHOOT
OIL @ 100 = IMPORTANT RECOVERY SIGN
OIL @ 20 = TAX BREAK

And the one we should all interpret correctly:
NO ONE IS BUYING STOCKS = BILLIONS ON THE SIDELINES

 




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 01:59 | Link to Comment SilverIsKing
SilverIsKing's picture

My one criticism is no mention of Goldman Sachs.  Other than that, perfect!

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:32 | Link to Comment ptoemmes
ptoemmes's picture

..or mustard seeds.  Gotta tweak Kudlow.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:01 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

lol ... priceless ... thanks for an early morning/late night dose of laughter ..

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:07 | Link to Comment cbxer55
cbxer55's picture

I don't know whether to laugh or cry!?

So I guess I'll laugh! :-)

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:09 | Link to Comment BorisTheBlade
BorisTheBlade's picture

I think you just published that secret sauce from Goldman, bet they have it as part of their fancy algos.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:14 | Link to Comment Altan311
Altan311's picture

That is the funniest fucking thing I have read in some goddamn time. Don't forget the all imporant, Bill Clinton gives KJ a BJ = MASSIVE RALLY ON AMERICAFACE.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 07:31 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:26 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

i have posted the link to that article numerous time on the comment board here, and never have i yielded one single response ... its a shame, that his large scandal has gone under the radar ...

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:44 | Link to Comment agrotera
agrotera's picture

I've mentioned the site, and i have seen it a number of times mentioned here.  I particularly love what they report about wikipedia.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 03:43 | Link to Comment Apocalypse Now
Apocalypse Now's picture

An understanding of naked phantom shorts, pump & dump schemes, and narco dollars is essential for seeing the underbelly.  I understand they are finally going to ban naked phantom shorts, that's a good thing if it is enforced.

If phantom shares for the purpose of shorts can "exist", I wonder whether phantom shares for the purpose of simply trading can "exist".  In this case, prices could easily be manipulated if the number of shares is "flexible" and your cash going in would not be going out to another individual, but would be new cash directly to a potential market maker.  Who reconciles the total number of shares in aggregate accounts at any given time now that we don't receive the certs?

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 03:53 | Link to Comment plongka10
plongka10's picture

Why, the NSCC and DTCC. I've mentioned before that the DTCC is the banks' black box. Its totally corrupt and the one reason why the US cannot pull out of its nose-dive.

I've been a big fan of Deep Capture for over a year. Those guys are doing a great job pulling back the curtain. Their contributor, Jim de Costa, has it nailed IMO.

 

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 11:16 | Link to Comment Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

It's been brought up quite a few times in the comments section; some responded to and some not.

 

IMO, it's better to not take the focus away from ZH's more immediate goal(s).  True, DTCC has been the topic of a few posts - but that was more about certain relations to neighbors/co-tenants.  Hopefully the "rabbit hole" eventually tunnels sideways once the target depth is reached, but I have to resist the urge to fire buckshot at every sound in the forest.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 03:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:30 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

Uh huh.  That's why some stocks have/had been on the REG SHO list for over a year.  Because there was/is no naked shorting/stock counterfieting problem.  And you can't buy all the shares of a company and still watch shares being traded, that just can't happen!

 

 

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 10:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 14:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 09:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:34 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:40 | Link to Comment CD
CD's picture

Choking with laughter and wheezing for breath brings its own unique kind of
(much needed) adrenaline rush... thanks, that truly was priceless

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 02:41 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 03:09 | Link to Comment Marla Singer
Marla Singer's picture

Irony is not always funny.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 03:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:41 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

Who to go to war with?  Iran?  Please.  Bomb their electric and petroleum facilities, and they're back in the 1920's.  NK?  Probably the best thing that could happen to NK (quick demise to their gov't), but that would take about 10 days.  China?  LOL.

 

Ain't even a good candidate to start a war with any more!  What are we going to doooooooo..!?

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:47 | Link to Comment zeropointfield (not verified)
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 10:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 15:03 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 15:13 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

you are absolutly right on every single point, except for this one 

 

 And there is a high probability that the such a war would not be kept in the cofines of the middle eastern theater.

 

I hate Israel, but this is not an expansionist war, nor a war to secure geopolitical positioning. If Israel and Iran go into conflict ( and they probably will ) the war will be led in a small area, not all over the world. Russia, China and the US will surely get involved,but not in a conventional manner, but something like the CIA did in Afghanistan during the 80s, but there will be no global war, just a war with global consequences ( high oil, massive depression etc ) but there wont be a war like WWII.

Furthermore, if Israel uses nuclear weapons on Iran i can guarantee you it will be wiped from the face of the Earth by Syria, Lebanon who will get, make no mistake, Russian nuclear bombs. Again, the only thing that needs to worry us is the global economical consequences of that kinda of war, not the consequences of the war itself ( destruction, refugee question, expansion etc )

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 18:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 04:07 | Link to Comment BorisTheBlade
BorisTheBlade's picture

You really need a drama to demonstrate the process? Why redistribution of wealth always leads to World Wars? Neither 1st nor 2nd WW were started because of the wealth redistributions. Far from that.

 

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 04:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 06:11 | Link to Comment BorisTheBlade
BorisTheBlade's picture

"When small men attempt great enterprises, they always end by reducing them to the level of their mediocrity" (c)

With such a mentality you never likely to wage a proper WWIII, money is just a tool, paper, you need it for war, lots of it, but it is never something nations are fighting for, no more that they are fighting it over bullets or cannons.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 10:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 10:30 | Link to Comment BorisTheBlade
BorisTheBlade's picture

Clearly you just don't get it.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 10:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 10:59 | Link to Comment BorisTheBlade
BorisTheBlade's picture

Well, even wikipedia less clueless than you are: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_World_War_II

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:18 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 10:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 10:29 | Link to Comment D.O.D.
D.O.D.'s picture

Historically a war has always followed a market plunge > 50%....yes ww3 is on the way, should be no problem for oil to hit 100$ in that enviroment...

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 03:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 03:55 | Link to Comment plongka10
plongka10's picture

Didn't daddy Rooseveldt shaft the Philippines?

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 10:47 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 03:23 | Link to Comment Apocalypse Now
Apocalypse Now's picture

The only logic to this market is to destroy all opponents (the resistance - individuals with brains) by moving the market in the opposite direction of reason and logic.  Meanwhile, they let their ilk know the inside scoop regarding support prices and direction.  Insiders profit on a taxpayer induced market pump, while opponents that believe in free market principles get left behind. 

Obama probably thinks he is saving the world by pumping while the bankers use the opportunity to line their pockets, their friends pockets, and pick-pocket yours.  Those that don't believe the HOPE message will be destroyed, this is just a test of whether you believe in him and trust him (now is a good time to go long).  This is raw unbridled political power and forces all to look back to the state. 

If you had a printing press, would you give your friends and family an unlimited supply of funding?  If you wanted to destroy opponents, would you defend the printing press and starve them out by reducing liquidity?  The Fed has a monopoly on the printing press, as long as you remain locked in this system nobody can compete and they always win.  The printing press is the ring of Soron.  Audit the Fed, let's see who they have given electronic 1's and 0's to.  If Barney Frank stalls it in committee, we'll have to remove his "frank" and replace it with disengenuous - never trust someone with two first names.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 07:41 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:29 | Link to Comment ptoemmes
ptoemmes's picture

Well played, well played...I think I might have punched him in the nose right then and there.

 

Pete

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 12:54 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Are you serious?  LMAO!  that is awesome.

He always storms off like a petulant child when someone asks him tough questions.

Congrats for having the balls to confront him.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 03:55 | Link to Comment bobby02
bobby02's picture

For more hilarity check out GMAC's results. Gotta love a $3.9b loss on $1.3b in revenue.

They vow to continue ResCap because it's in the shareholders' interests. Whodat? Treasury?

But it's all good. The FDIC would never guarentee their bonds if its wasn't a solid outfit.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 05:11 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 05:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 10:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 12:56 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

I think the former - he is dumb and is being played like a puppet.

I yearn for the Bush days too - he sucked, but at least you knew what you were getting.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 14:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 06:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 07:36 | Link to Comment Hangtime79
Hangtime79's picture

It would be funny if I wasn't crying because it is all true.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 07:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 07:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 08:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 09:02 | Link to Comment MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

That's what I was missing... the "manual" to deciphering the market... now I might be able to make some money.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 09:17 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 09:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 13:13 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Someone nailed it.  Here is what most people can't really grasp conceptually, because they work and invest their whole lives trying to obtain it, and think because of that it is a scarce commodity: our fiat currency is backed by nothing, and is being created at will by the Federal Reserve.

You work your whole life to earn, what, a few million over 40 years?  BFD.  The Fed is creating $1.25T out of thin air to buy every MBS created this year.  Today alone they created $7.5B to buy government debt.  This isn't money they "earned" or "borrowed", this is money that was created on the spot.

There is no limit to the amount of money they can create.  And it is all washing through the system.  And it will never be extracted, regardless of what Bernanke says.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 09:44 | Link to Comment Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

US GOVERNMENT = WORLD'S BIGGEST CRIME SYNDICATE

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 09:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 11:29 | Link to Comment Gilgamesh
Gilgamesh's picture

Seems that 'investors' are pricing them in as untouchables now; future beneficiaries of any and all Fed or Treasury actions.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 13:14 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

And they weren't two weeks ago?  I agree with the original poster, totally irrational.  that's the nature of cheap money, it washes around the system like water in a bathtub.

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 10:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 12:19 | Link to Comment Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

+1

Wed, 08/05/2009 - 14:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 08/05/2009 - 23:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!