- advertisements -
This is just a political stunt so they don't have to comply with a full audit.
"The Federal Reserve recognizes the importance of transparency to its financial stability efforts and will continue to review disclosure practices with the goal of making additional information publicly available when possible."
I wonder how much Ron Paul had to do with that recognition...
I agree it is to appease Ron Paul. So, are these just holding companies then? LLC. No shit.
I knew the Fed was directly buying individual stocks to prop the market up. This was undisclosed to investors and is a violation of Securities law. This is a felony. All those like myself who purchased Puts or short positions when this information and the information that the Bank of England was also secretly funneling... money to prop up the banks was defrauded. Also, all those within the banks that were privy to this info are guilty of insider trading. Ben Bernanke, Paulson and Geithner and the rest of the tribe should all be in jail by morning….
Bank of England tells of secret £62bn loan to save RBS and HBOShttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/6646923/Bank-of-England-tells-of-secret-62bn-loan-to-save-RBS-and-HBOS.html
Bank of England advisers not told about secret £62bn loan to HBOShttp://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/dec/03/bank-england-secret-loan-hbos
Bank gave RBS and HBOS 'secret' £62bn loanhttp://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/banking_and_finance/article6929451.ece
Fed Refuses to Disclose Recipients of $2 Trillionhttp://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=apx7XNLnZZlc
Fed Fights Request To Disclose Who Got $2 Trillion In Bailoutshttp://www.istockanalyst.com/article/viewarticle/articleid/3775032
Good luck with that! (BTW I'll join in if you get something going)
I second what zenon said.
There are lots of lawyers looking for work right now. Find one willing to start a class action lawsuit.
class action lawsuits are curious beasts.
hey, O/T i am worried about deadhead. haven't seen him since that open sunday forum about where the hell everybody is in this here, today's economy. he exposed himself and haven't seen him since. he cares a lot about the old timer's on this blog.
also where is, I need more cowbell.
these are significant and important avatars, star atars, hotars, bitars.
Agreed. Throw the wolves some meat so they don't go after the herd.
Interesting timing. On the last day of the quarter and the last day of Fed MBS purchases ( for now ). No conclusion, just suspicion about why they are tipping over these trash cans today.
On your point, begs the question as to how long can they can use this event to delay providing either new information or an update.
Keep your eye on the other hand. The magician is up to something...
The other hand is picking the taxpayers pocket in some insidious fashion.
Explains the recent articles questioning why Goldman has so much cash under management.
Wow, the Fed is even owed money by Hilton Hawaiian Village. What would Cricket Blake have to say about that?
Book 'em, Dan-O.
I wonder how they price the swaps, in paticular the CDSs and the interest rate swaps?
A dart board in the Yale Club.
Same way they did in South Park. Watch the episode Margaritaville.
Best episode ever. Well worth the watch
Naw, Scott Tenoman Must Die was the best episode.
The Maiden Lane vehicles were unconstitutional in the first place, but my first reaction to reading this was, "Why would a central bank that sets interest rate policy ever enter into or purchase interest rate swaps?" Seems kinda like Superman runnin' a book on black market kryptonite.
I believe they justfified this under the heading of unusual and exigent circumstances, but I could be wrong.
Under what legal authority is the Fed allowed to acquire non-agency MBS? The 1913 Act might be stretched to cover GSE-backed mortgages on the theory they have (especially since Dec. 24, 2009) the full faith and credit of the Treasury behind them. But how can they own ordinary mortgages Constitutionally?
"As part of extending support to specific institutions, under section 13 (3) of the Federal Reserve Act, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in 2008 authorized the New York Fed to facilitate lending to three limited liability companies—ML, ML II and ML III."
A frustrating wall of fictional words.
From the Fed's webpage:What securities are eligible for purchase under the program?
Only fixed-rate agency MBS securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae are eligible assets for the program. The program includes, but is not limited to, 30-year, 20-year and 15-year securities of these issuers. The program does not include CMOs, REMICs, Trust IOs/Trust POs and other mortgage derivatives or cash equivalents. Eligible assets may be purchased or sold in specified pools, in "to be announced" (TBA) transactions, and in the dollar roll market."
Maybe the Board of Governors decided unilaterally to go outside the Fed's 1913 Charter, but the question remains: is the legal authority there for holding non-Agency MBS?
What "program" are they referring to?
Section 13 (3) of the Federal Reserve Act, at least the way the Fed interprets it, is pretty broad and open ended. Sort of like the Martial Law of central banking....
Zero Hedge knew those maiden thingies were stuffed full of shit and boy where they right! Congrats!
If the Fed were to take Maiden Lane public, no doubt, it would be 300% oversubcribed and could be the hottest IPO of 2010.
Right now, there is an unprecedented demand for junk, garbage, and/or anything else perceived to be at "rock bottom"...
Too late to buy the bombed out retail stocks, they have already had 300% - 500% runs.
So the speculators will be looking into other garbage bins for bargains.
leveraged speculators perhaps?
great idea robo!
I wonder what they had on the books before they were released today? i.e. this is the positive spin; what is the reality? Somebody's arm must be tired from all the erasing.
shades of Enron
By law, the Fed isn't allowed to buy assets -- it can only lend, as lender of last resort. That was a problem for the Bear Stearns bailout, because JP Morgan said it would only buy Bear if someone else assumed responsibility for the crap. Fed came up with this idea to start a shadow company, called a special purpose vehicle (SPVs were how Enron operated, creating "Chewco" and the like named after Chewbacca - the New York Fed called their SPV "Maiden Lane LLC" for name of the street the NY Fed is located on in southern Manhattan). The deal then was JP Morgan put $1 billion into Maiden Lane, the Fed put $29 billion in cash into it. Maiden Lane paid Bear Stearns $30 billion, which went straight back to JP Morgan as this deal happened simultaneously to JP's purchase of Bear. So Morgan got $30 billion in cash ($29 billion net) and the Fed got stuck owning the crap, but was legally only making a loan to Maiden Lane, who was the legal owner (Maiden Lane was incorporated not in NYC, but in Delaware to avoid paying taxes). By the Fed's own accounting - which is very different from a real company's accounting - Maiden Lane has lost $5 billion between its creation and today.
But who owns Maiden Lane LLC? I don't see how the Fed could say they're not buying assets, even if it's through a subsidiary company. It's insane.
Or like how repo 105's are really "sales"
Emergency powers can be quite creative, yah ??
Im dissapointed that the fed didn't use more appropriate discriptors like EATSHT_07, URFKD_06, RIPOF_06
Hey ZH Thank you for letting me in the club.
I will be quiet now.
It's official, the usa is a criminal org.
Wait wait wait. Do you hear that? Turns out the world is not collapsing into a neverending pit of dispair and civil unrest. So let us just audit the rest of the fed. It's not going to change what's already been done. An audit never does. If it makes you feel any better, we'll wait 6 months before telling everyone what you've done.
Pay the man Shirley.
Nice of them to leave off the key info. Like these assets are worth 50% of a non-performing loan.
ok..so the Irish Government took out its problem banks mortgage portfolios at 53 cents in the Euro today..so on this basis the $156bn in ML is worth around 80 bn..hmmm..i guess if you are the Fed with rigged accounting its not a loss of 76 billion at all..GS market cap is 90 billion...just saying..whats the rate on an overnight tri-partite collateralised repo actually worth if the mark to market is like this?
GMTA vote libertarian...wait..who are you? :)
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertise With Us
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
How to report offensive comments
Notice on Racial Discrimination.