This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

On The New York Fed's Editorial Influence Over The WSJ

Tyler Durden's picture


One of last year's key pieces of financial reporting was Jon Hilsenrath's disclosure that then-Goldman Sachs and FRBNY director Stephen Friedman was in possession of Goldman Sachs shares while holding inside information that the Fed was willing to bailout Goldman et al forever and ever, even as a waiver to allow Friedman to buy was still in process with no formal outcome, and the Goldman/FRBNY director was loading up on even more shares. As the WSJ's Hilsenrath and Kate Kelly reported, "while it was weighing the request, Mr. Friedman bought 37,300 more
Goldman shares in December. They’ve since risen $1.7 million in value." Not a shabby profit for someone who knew the system would never put him at risk of having to disgorge ill-obtained profits while in a position so conflicted, even a Chrysler-addled supreme court justice would have no problem figuring out just how blatant the systemic abuse was. Sure enough, the reporting was of sufficiently high caliber that it garnered a finalist place in this year's Gerald Loeb Awards (and seeing how ARS' "Too Big To Fail" chronology-of-events-from-the-perspective-of-Wall Street won a Loeb, it tells all you all you need to know about this particular award, and we'll leave it at that). Yet going through some of the recently made public e-mails produced on behalf of Stephen Friedman, we had a few questions as to the full independence of the WSJ when it comes to "editorial" suggestions from the Federal Reserve Board Of New York. As the below email from Fed EVP of the Communications Group, ala media liaison, Calvin Mitchell to the WSJ's Kate Kelly demonstrates, and as the final product confirms, the Fed was quite instrumental in what quotes, tangents, implications, and story lines the WSJ was allowed and not allowed to use and pursue in framing the problem of not only Friedman's conflict of interest, but that of the FRBNY board of directors itself. And seeing how Kelly and Hilsenrath caved in to every FRBNY editorial demand, one wonders just what the (s)quid-pro-quo for this particular form of alleged media capture may have been.

We present FRBNY-TOWNS-R1-191200/1:

We may be a little too far removed from the traditional way media is editorialized, but last time we checked we had the impression that the "independent" media would not follow the guidelines of the Federal Reserve on what is and isn't publishable, especially in the context of a piece that could easily end up having very damning implications for Goldman, the FRBNY, a "respected" director of both entities, and the entire regulatory process that allows these kinds of conflict of interest to be waived retroactively with an ex-post facto waiver, such as the case was here.

Since Zero Hedge has little risk of ever being in the FRBNY's good graces (ha ha ha), we would like to present the very quotes that the FRBNY thought may have been a little too sensitive for public consumption.

To wit:

  • On the general attitude of the NY Fed Board:

"In fact the ultimate approval for the things that get done, basically, get done by the full Fed board in Washington and our board has what I've called a blanket recusal. We might get briefed that something... problematical is happening this weekend... but we not only don't get involved in that stuff, we don't want to ratify it and we don't want to get involved in it because we don't want to have a perceived responsibility that exceeds our authority." I'D SUGGEST NOT

  • On [Friedman's] involvement/awareness of what the NY Fed was doing with AIG from last September on:

"The audit committee... focuses on how the Fed staff has geared up to handle its responsibilities, and this is something they take very seriously and report on to the full board, and I have on occasion audited the sessions... That's administrative or ministerial as opposed to matter of policy." I'D SUGGEST NOT.

  • On [Friedman's] feelings about the candidate to succeed Geithner and the fact that he didn't want the person's past job(s) to be a distraction:

"We were very sensitive to what organization that person had come from." I'D SUGGEST NOT

[Geithner's replacement, Bill Dudley, came over from Goldman Sachs, and was previously in charge of the Fed's notorious "Liberty 33" Markets Group, better known in other circles by various less politically correct acronyms]

It is easy to see why the Fed was staunchly against any of these "insinuations" making the final Hilsenrath/Kelly article. Yet we would like to pick up on Ms. Kelly's line of questioning, and push this formerly confidential email out to the public, to make it clear just what are the questions that the Fed would prefer to not see discussed in a broader public arena. We do also wonder, just why it is that the WSJ journalists dropped pursuing these lines of investigation upon the merest frown of disapproval by a lowly Fed clerical worker. Just how much power over "established and independent" media does the WSJ have? Also, just how much information is the Fed feeding to publications that are in its "white list" in exchange for perpetuating a cordial relationship where the media side of the equation never discusses more than is politically acceptable (also makes the Loeb committee award to Mr. Sorkin that much more understandable).

To be fair, it appears Hilsenrath did manage to get on the Fed's nerves at least once prior to the abovementioned smackdown.

This can be seen in the following email from Mitchell to FRBNY General Counsel Thomas Baxter (FRBNY-TOWNS-R1-101195):


Because heaven forbid someone should "impugn the integrity of Friedman or the Fed because of the so-called Goldman connection." We wonder just what high level talking-to resulted as a consequence of this almost-published scandal. Key word here being:almost. While absent additional email disclosure from Mr. Friedman, and his public production seems surprisingly sparse, we would be the last to challenge the WSJ reporters' professional integrity to pursue a story to its core, this kind of ultra-high level intermediation by none other than the Federal Reserve does bring up some rather uncomfortable questions.

PS. for those wishing to do some additional due diligence, we suggest a brief perusal of Bates 195712


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 07/05/2010 - 21:45 | 453682 King_of_simpletons
King_of_simpletons's picture

Why go to NYFED when Rupert Murdoch owns WSJ.....WSJ is filled with propaganda these days...

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 21:47 | 453687 Testicular Cancer
Testicular Cancer's picture

He also owns Faux News. Hmmm?

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:29 | 453709 Buzz Fuzzel
Buzz Fuzzel's picture

I'm wondering how many of the mental midgets who use the term "Faux News" have ever watched more than 30 seconds worth of Fox News. 

Fox is more likely to pickup this story than any other so called news reporters.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:34 | 453716 pan-the-ist
pan-the-ist's picture

Guess again.  Not if it casts news corps 'WSJ' in a bad light.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:38 | 453724 Anarchist
Anarchist's picture

Mental midgets? Anyone who thinks Faux News is anything but the personal mouthpiece of Rupert Murdoch and his Kleptocratic cohorts is beyond stupid. The same for anyone who believes the corporate media in the US always acts in the best interest of the American public. You probably believe we are in Iraq and Afgahnistan to spread Democracy. That kind of stupid cannot be fixed.


Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:09 | 453757 Muir
Muir's picture

"Fox is more likely to pickup this story than any other so called news reporters."




More likely (in order of likelihood)

1. Comedy Central

2. Bloomberg

3. PBS


Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:31 | 453837 drwells
drwells's picture

Or Rolling Stone or the NY Post.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 02:06 | 453913 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

this, and homer below, remind me of the harvard study of the use of the word "torture" to describe  waterboarding as reported at the nyt and the washpo ("liberal" according to the benighted sector of the right).  for decades the practice was "torture" (when other nations did it).  as soon as the bush administration said we're doing it and it's not torture, the language changed to "harsh interrogation practices used since 9-11" or some such newspeak.  partisan politics is used to confuse and divide.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 04:30 | 453950 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

Jeff - It's just a dunk in the water according to deficits don't matter Dick Cheney and the aforementioned "news" organizations.. Most especially the Wall Street Urinal.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 05:08 | 453960 UncleFurker
UncleFurker's picture

>Fox is more likely to pickup this story than any other so called news reporters.


Of course it is, dear. And I have a 14 inch cock.


Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:02 | 453750 homersimpson
homersimpson's picture

Why is it you libbies call Fox News "Faux News" when all CNN/NBC/MTV/Comedy Central/(insert leftist news station here) does is just have a bunch of libbie blowhards constantly discuss news from a leftist point of view?


Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:11 | 453760 Muir
Muir's picture


If it feels comfortable, let it fall where it may.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:31 | 453788 CD
CD's picture

Please feel free to come up with derogatory/playful monikers for these as well. MSNBS/NBS/CNBS seems to be the term of choice for the peacock-logoed broadcasting phenomena here on ZH.

I think the broader point is that ALL mainstream outlets, be they left/right/"independent" are hopelessly beholden to and captured by the very entities/interests they are supposed to report on - at least to a certain extent. There are (generally individual journalist) exceptions, and there are degrees of capture (perhaps?), but the spin is ever-present. Fox is perhaps more obviously agenda-centric, but that may be a personal taste coupled with lack of exposure -- I only watch a few clips online here and there, my TV is strictly for DVD/VHS.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 01:31 | 453887 Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

Frankly, I enjoy the BBC, CD. And they are more likely than anyone to pick up this story, but who cares?

This is not directed at you CD--this is for you newbies. Stop infighting like a bunch of kindergardeners with the lefty/righty/junking nonsense. Don't you get it? That's the illusion, the plan, the way to keep you under control. Once you accept that there is no left or right--only control--you will truly get off the FC porch.

You are captured if you are wasting your brain cells thinking about who will pick up the story, etc. Use what is left of your captured brain to think deeply about what is happening and the context of the post. If you don't, then TPTB have you right where they want you so you won't see the bigger picture. Divide and conquer. Perhaps Cognitive Dissonance will address this issue.


The story is what is important here. This is outfuckingstanding journalism.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 08:32 | 454005 Rick64
Rick64's picture


Tue, 07/06/2010 - 09:37 | 454017 grunion
grunion's picture

A little too sanctimonious for a positive rating.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:39 | 453792 UGrev
UGrev's picture

Well, shit. If I had known Comedy Central was THEEE place to get my daily data in the form of comedy over information... daaaaaaamn.. thanks guys!!  /end sarcasm



Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:50 | 453863 suckapump
suckapump's picture

Heh heh. "Problematical."

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 03:18 | 453938 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

i junked you by accident trying to click on your link.  sorry.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 10:07 | 454080 The Rock
The Rock's picture

If you click it again he will be "un-junked"

Thu, 07/08/2010 - 00:35 | 457854 suckapump
suckapump's picture

No offense, but I was amused by the fact that someone junked your how-to-un-junk post. It's almost like getting a gold medallion with a picture of you with a gold medallion.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:47 | 453805 Red Neck Repugnicant
Red Neck Repugnicant's picture

On the topic of Fox News, please give my opinion the respect and authority that it deserves. Fox News is like a bad-ass Camaro with flames stenciled on the side - you can't fuck with that sort of power. It cuts through, clarifies, takes no shit and separates the men from boys, like a Z28 ripping up the track.  Damn, I've got goose bumps just talking about that shit.  

The only news I watch is Fox News.  I'm a Christian conservative red neck, who doesn't want his news filtered through the liberal, homosexual, socialist agendas that one finds on NBC, CNN, and NPR.  If Fox News is a Camaro, those other stations are nothing but bitch-ass tricks, driving Civics with rainbow stickers on the back. 

I've been listening to the giants like Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity for the past two years, which in turn, has opened my eyes to the corruption that runs rampant throughout the Democratic party.  Graph after graph after graph on Beck's chalk-board has proven that Obama is a pagan, racist terrorist, who panders to the illegals and homosexuals (the only ones dumb enough to vote for him).  Obama has a socialist, grand plan to transform this country into a Mars-like colony where everyone is a homosexual, everyone is named Jose and everyone has insurance.  Try changing my name to Jose when you've got a shotgun pointed at your face, bitch!  

Obviously, I'm probably one of the smartest and most cultured (I wear Brut after-shave) posters on this forum, and I exclusively rely on Fox News for my opinions.  I don't know much about economics or that faggot named Keynes, but I know a lot about God, guns and various groups of people who aren't welcome in my backyard.  

That being said, Fox News fits my agenda.  

And another thing, if this country had a Republican in the White House, we'd never be in this mess.

Palin/Jesus 2012


Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:02 | 453816 Jim_Rockford
Jim_Rockford's picture

If you people would spend half the time digging through the treasure trove of documents that Tyler hath provided linked goodness to instead of hurling insults at each other, we might all come together and teach the world to sing.  Now git to work dammit! 

  >>>CLICK HERE<<<

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:05 | 453819 Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden's picture

good places to start: 194933 and 195712

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:15 | 453828 CD
CD's picture

Far be it from me to shirk homework, but the structure is laid out by member names, and the gentlemen mentioned in the quoted emails are NOT in their respective folders. Could you mention keywords/names?

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:52 | 453866 CD
CD's picture

This was way over my head to start with, but R1-21553 (contained in folder for Sarah D.) is a printed version of a spreadsheet that seems to list a lot of AIG deals (CDS, TRS, 2a7) by counterparty, with the following details:


Position Number, Deal Name, Counterparty, Currency, Type, MS/Arb/RegCap/Other, Collateral Type, Current Balance, Date of call, Counterparty Call Amount (redacted in all but a few cases), Sept 20 AIG marks, Blackrock stress price (or average), Dollar loss with additional above points, Loss on termination, Incremental exposure if AIG is downgraded to BBB+, ATE Below X rating, Rating based ATE, .

Whoever archived it did not have a lot of experience with printing Excel, did not have time or possibly did not mind creating a jigsaw puzzle for whoever was looking at it.



Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:32 | 453830 Jim_Rockford
Jim_Rockford's picture

I was looking through some emails and buried in one, there are tables of  the Maiden Lane III Purchase Price Schedule that take up 16 pages or so.  There are approximately 40 distinct CUSIP numbers on each page.  So out of the 500 or so CUSIP numbers, why is 4371 ODAD4 the only one that has it's associated data redacted?

Also, an interesting email exchange in which the french dude from SocGen is willing to hop on a plane and fly to NY on the weekend in order to sign.  Gee ya think?

Lots of wading but you can find that stuff here:

then third sub directory: FRBNY production to S+

then :  emails and attachments part 2 of 5.pdf 

page 138 for the schedules

page 88 for the French connection

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:50 | 453865 lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

There might be a reason tyler told you to LOOK at those specfic emails. 

See what is contained therein.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 01:03 | 453876 Jim_Rockford
Jim_Rockford's picture

Tyler tells me to do stuff but I ignore him.  I'm too busy listening to my neighbors' labrador retreiver.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 01:17 | 453881 CD
CD's picture

[sigh] I cannot bring myself to take advantage of the opportunity presented here, but whoever does, RECORD IT plz.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 01:45 | 453902 Jim_Rockford
Jim_Rockford's picture

Hilarious.  A Brooksley Born soundboard should drive Viniar batshit crazy.  You were right, the other number was for Turbo, not Friedman (bad doggy).  I wish I had all the numbers in Turbo's phone logs.  Could sell them to a DC Madam and retire in style (no offense to you Spitzer).

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 01:12 | 453885 Jim_Rockford
Jim_Rockford's picture

LOL ... TD you won't believe this but my neighbors' labrador retriever just whispered Vinier's home ph number in my ear.  Then the son of a bitch gave me Friedmans number too!

- High Five

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 01:27 | 453890 CD
CD's picture

Are you sure it wasn't Timmay's? BTW, you may want to keep hanging out with that retriever, it may have friends around the block who know... friends of the above fine gents.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 02:02 | 453909 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

Check your e-mails from Jul 3. 

Fri, 07/09/2010 - 17:17 | 454201 velobabe
velobabe's picture

Fri, 07/09/2010 - 17:18 | 455033 velobabe
velobabe's picture

I fought with my twin, that enemy within
’Til both of us fell by the way
Horseplay and disease is killing me by degrees
While the law looks the other way

b. dylan - II

this stays, maybe can help someone else be spared.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:15 | 453827 lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

Well Palin/Jesus have my vote. 

IF and ONLY if Jesus shows to debate biden.  Then i am on board.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 01:08 | 453878 Jim_Rockford
Jim_Rockford's picture

btw, aren't you Canadian eh?

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 04:42 | 453954 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

and you work in southern Cal and live in a mobile estate..  right?  At least there can be no question as to where you garner your dollars...

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:33 | 453839 drwells
drwells's picture

Well done.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 05:10 | 453953 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

Still slopping the gerber eh homer?  The logo doesn't matter when the goal is disinformation and fracturing society to keep the heard moving as the oligarchs want.  Try a different flavor since you seem to be full of the "it's all THEIR fault" crap.  WE ALL are the society you deride since the copy at WSJ, NYT, FOX, CNN & CNBC is all written by the same folks who write for MTV's The Hills... and your favorite networks biggest cash cow.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 06:33 | 453976 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture


Happy belated Zero Hedge one year anniversary. According to the ZH Gods, you are one ZH year old.

Happy birthday Miles.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 21:46 | 453686 brushfire
brushfire's picture

this is fantasic journalism. thank you ZH.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:32 | 453712 pan-the-ist
pan-the-ist's picture

Indeed.  A TD original and a fine example of why everyone here stays tuned.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:35 | 453719 zaknick
zaknick's picture



ZH is THE site I get my biz/life info from; used to read FT and even the Alphaville team are drunk on that kool-aid.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 08:11 | 453985 Scooby Dooby Doo
Scooby Dooby Doo's picture

Oh I don't know.... One day you're calling out the WSJ's connection to the Fed but on a previous day you try to convince the readership that Santelli is a superhero who has CNBC backed into a corner and has free will, "you can trust this guy. CNBC is good".

How about digging into CNBC's relationship to the Fed and how Immelt is also on the presidents recovery team responsible for pumping the story.

Half truth's, they'll keep you safe but still controversial(maybe they'll invite you to the club just to shut you up wink-wink). If I recall NYU Law School has a class devoted to the topic of "Silent Fraud", no? Did someone ace this class?

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 21:52 | 453688 Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 Capture.Obey or lose access to the "insiders".

  Disgusting non commitment to what function the press is supposed to have.

 And this is rampant.

  Thank God for ZH and the other good journalists out there....until they are outlawed for national security reasons.


Tue, 07/06/2010 - 08:00 | 453999 trav7777
trav7777's picture

Personality journalism.

The faces and personalities are more important than the facts.  So, you have to have access to "high profile" people.  It's like you're measured by the size and prestige of your rolodex and press people worship who you know and rub elbows with.

If you want truth, you've got here, RT, and Al Jazeera.  Pains me to say this but the network of the terrrists has a higher veracity than US media.  The system here is a big social club.

I mean I got video of Tim Russert (RIP) putting my son up on the Nats' home dugout during the 7th inning stretch.  He was at the game with Jim Carville.  How impartial can a journalist be when he is off-screen buddies with a frequent commentator?  He's gonna nail his friend to the wall?

It's ALL fucking theatre.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:06 | 453694 Overleveraged_a...
Overleveraged_and_Impatient's picture

This is great journalism indeed....

We've gotta figure out what we can actually "do" about all this instead of just be pissed off on a comment board.

I for one plan on leaving the country as soon as i get rich enough.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:23 | 453707 illyia
illyia's picture

Good luck with that leaving the country thing.

You sound overleveraged.

It could take a while to sort that out...

Consider taking it to the streets, instead?

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:51 | 453739 Overleveraged_a...
Overleveraged_and_Impatient's picture

It's kinda my thing, im out to represent 95% of you.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 09:46 | 454028 grunion
grunion's picture

Seems a bit low on courage. Instead, why don't you stay and try helping restore the Republic?

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:09 | 453695 GoinFawr
GoinFawr's picture

Nice work TD, and real work it must have been to find those needles in that haystack...



Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:37 | 453723 Jim_Rockford
Jim_Rockford's picture

Nice Haystack!  195712 (and might I say, nice dir structure as well.)

WOW ... Thanks TD!  (Thanks SIGTARP!)

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:09 | 453696 Bear
Bear's picture

One caught ... 999 to go

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:12 | 453697 trillion_dollar...
trillion_dollar_deficit's picture

Just when I thought the level of corruption couldn't get any worse. Excellent work TD. 


Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:44 | 453728 Hansel
Hansel's picture

+1, this is all wrong.  The incredulous attitude of the leaders, that they are immune to laws, is disgusting.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 04:46 | 453955 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

This process is called judicial exclusion and has been summed up by Cas Sunstein...

Prosecuting government officials risks a “cycle” of criminalizing public service, [Sunstein] argued, and Democrats should avoid replicating retributive efforts like the impeachment of President Clinton — or even the “slight appearance” of it.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:13 | 453763 Muir
Muir's picture

"Just when I thought the level of corruption couldn't get any worse. Excellent work TD. "


Aahh, speak for yourself!

Corruption has no limits.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:38 | 453845 drwells
drwells's picture

As it happens, I'm reading "American Empire: The Victorious Opposition" (a rather workmanlike alternate history of fascism in America). Then I read this article and I think Mr. Turtledove is going to have to start writing something more farfetched if he wants to stay in business.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:19 | 453702 Village Idiot
Village Idiot's picture

I look forward to see how the msm will respnd to this.  Was there ever a time that a story with potential magnitude like this would have been picked up and put on the front page of, let's say,  the business section?  I can't remember. (sarcasm off)

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:20 | 453703 Circumspice
Circumspice's picture

I am not a journalist, but I was unaware that you had to "clear" quotes with your source. If someone even speaks to someone they know is a reporter—much less gives an interview—that's the whole damn point: they're speaking on the record and you can use what they say. You have to explicitly grant them the ability to speak off the record.

Of course, then you'd lose access to the FRBNY's fabulous house parties.

I said that they can't impugn the integrity of Friedman or the Fed because of the so-called Goldman connection. What are the rules and did we follow them.

Like they weren't making up the rules as they went along regarding AIG.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:07 | 453755 Apostate
Apostate's picture

It depends on the reporter, the editor, and the news organization.

Some consider it an ethical violation, and others don't.

In my opinion, it depends on the context. In this case, there was clear corruption. 

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:28 | 453775 GoinFawr
GoinFawr's picture

Sophist! Apostate I think you should change your moniker to 'Lysias' with all your 'depends' and your 'contexts'.

Spot on Charlie Brown.


Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:33 | 453789 Apostate
Apostate's picture


Ordinarily, I'm not so nuanced. If the story concerns a technical issue, it makes sense to get the story checked out. Any mainstream story on science or technology tends to send actual engineers and scientists into apoplexy as it is - that's when it's better to pass the story story for review before publishing.

If you're writing a political article, however, then passing quotes by the source before publishing is shoddy behavior. 

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:22 | 453706 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

Widepsread looting aboard Titanic.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:36 | 453720 Eric Cartman
Eric Cartman's picture

Gah Dammit!

I tried to contact this bitch but her email is invalid. WTF? I was hoping to get Tyler another bitch besides Goldman Sacks. 

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:37 | 453721 pan-the-ist
pan-the-ist's picture

This Stephen Friedman who is the current Chairman of the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board?

Small world.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:04 | 453722 tom a taxpayer
tom a taxpayer's picture

TD - Excellent work!

By the way, these slimeballs always like to use the phrase "appearance of conflict of interest". But it really is gross, gargantuan "conflict of interest". Friedman is the poster child for Conflict of Interest.

In the federal government executive branch, "conflict of interest" is not just "ethics". There are federal criminal conflict of interest statutes. Criminal conflict of interest statutes and some related statutes are listed at this Office of Government Ethics website.

Unfortunately, these criminal statutes have not been enforced against Hank Paulson and other GS moles in government. As for the "Federal Reserve Bank of NY", they appear to be above any law...a power unto themselves. 

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:51 | 453725 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

While it tickles our romantic sense of justice to think that the main stream media (MSM) has always been free and only recently subverted, in reality the MSM has consistently promoted and protected the powers that be and political class. Of course, part of the illusion was and is the occasional gutting of an unfortunate patsy to engender the notion that the MSM is on "our" side, upholding truth and justice for all. My what big muscles you have Superman.

Now that we have passed over into full frontal fascism, while the effort will still be made to enable our self delusions, we need a double or triple dose of denial to swallow the blatantly obvious groveling of the MSM at the feet of the powers that be. You know, while I'm down here kissing your feet, it looks like the floor could use a good waxing. Want me to take care of that boss? 

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:52 | 453742 Village Idiot
Village Idiot's picture

 "I can't remember. (sarcasm off)"


Might explain why I can't remember.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:37 | 453796 GoinFawr
GoinFawr's picture

"Now that we have passed over into full frontal fascism..."

Pure poetry CD. I know, 'cuz a connoisseur of the finer things in life once told me that real art will either turn you on or disgust you.

Now, I know that I should be nauseated by the quote above, and yet strangely....


Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:50 | 453862 LeBalance
LeBalance's picture

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years... It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
- David Rockefeller, Bilderberg Meeting, June 1991 Baden, Germany

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 02:43 | 453927 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

if the bilderberg meetings are closed to the press and under "chatham house rules" (no quotations) how exactly was this obtained?  seems a little tooo perfect a quotation.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 07:45 | 453992 LeBalance
LeBalance's picture

The theme of this quote is not something that is hidden.  It is very open, in fact, here is a GHWBush Speech before Congress on (gasp) 9-11-1991 (ungasp):


Tue, 07/06/2010 - 02:45 | 453928 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

not that the media mentioned aren't notorious cia fronts.  seriously.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 09:50 | 454040 grunion
grunion's picture


Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:47 | 453732 Akrunner907
Akrunner907's picture

In the realm of the world, this doesn't matter to the small people...hence it is not news.  Only when their pensions funds are on the last stage of life support will people begin to wonder what happened to the American dream.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 02:24 | 453916 Cheeky Bastard
Cheeky Bastard's picture

Do you really think this is a blog for "small people"? Small people can chose to "get" all this or chose not to "get it". 

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 04:53 | 453956 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

Even messages from such "small" people as myself get rejected for "exceeding size limitations" on occasion...  So, keep 'em grinnin' .. and dare to ask.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 07:40 | 453988 Scooby Dooby Doo
Scooby Dooby Doo's picture

Someone hires a few pissed off Lehman boys who were wondering the streets after the implosion and they think they "get it". Flawed logic.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:56 | 453741 williambanzai7
williambanzai7's picture

You know the practical side of this is if you don't do this you get cut off. The WSJ has always been a Wall Street shill so what would you expect? Having sais that, I have noticed that the WSJ and the NYP often breaks stories the squids would care not to see. The NY Fed is not going to enjoy Spitzers TV show.

The squid board is a nest of insider trading. Their MO is insider trading is ok on advice of counsel.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:02 | 453817 Apostate
Apostate's picture

As far as I can tell, the main purpose of the public financial press is to facilitate insider trading.

It would be very tough to pull off significant insider trading without the influence of the SEC speech control regime.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:55 | 453746 MGA_1
MGA_1's picture

Shoot, I wonder where the rest of the $2 trillion dollars went ?  Gold bullion somewhere ?

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:07 | 453820 mcguire
mcguire's picture

are you referring to the $2 trillion dollars that was announced "missing" on the day before 9/11 by rumsfeld???

or a different missing $2 trillion??

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 22:55 | 453747 pan-the-ist
pan-the-ist's picture

That second one is a 'Bitch' email.  It would be important to know who's email address was redacted on that.  Probably someone high on the food chain so as to 'subtly' bring it to their attention.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:10 | 453759 Akrunner907
Akrunner907's picture

The parties on the inside already know who that name is under the blacked-out section.  I guess this is way of being outed.  LOL..........

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:05 | 453752 Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

Complete and utter lawlessness on all levels.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:05 | 453753 Muir
Muir's picture

TD-Hey, do me a favor, would you? 

If I ever make it onto your shit list, give me a call.

Give me a chance to apologize.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:08 | 453756 homersimpson
homersimpson's picture

I guess I wasn't wrong in cancelling their subscription last year. Too much cheerleading lately in the WSJ when there should've been more news with what's going wrong in the economy.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:20 | 453774 DonnieD
DonnieD's picture

And the feds want our tax dollars to prop up this industry. No wonder.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:33 | 453791 Misean
Misean's picture

OMFG!  NO WAY!  The ignorant suck up scribblers who copy and paste press releases from the powerful ARE ACTUALLY COPYING AND PASTING PRESS RELEASES FROM THE POWERFUL! 

Next someone is gonna tell me that rain is friggin' wet.

What's this world comming to?

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:57 | 453811 GoinFawr
GoinFawr's picture

You may have missed the 'needles in a haystack' analogy Misean...Certainly, in a rainstorm every drop is 'friggin wet', but in a maelstrom of prestidigitation it can be tough to tell exactly which drip is benefitting from the sleight of hand. So, hard evidence as a result of onerous 'delving' is appreciated. Capiche?


Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:24 | 453833 Misean
Misean's picture


Would you have preferred I say "I'm shocked! SHOCKED!"  In what way do I even come close to denigrating the "delving"?


Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:36 | 453795 grunk
grunk's picture

Germany had its Nuremberg.


Where will the U.S. hold its war crimes trials, Mr. Blankfein?

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 08:08 | 454001 trav7777
trav7777's picture

same way kleptocracies always turn over, by the guillotine or Napoleon.  One wrinkle is that the near monoethnicity of the finance elite may revisit us with cries of Reinhard should it come to that.  Lack of diversity was never a problem coming, but sure evidence of persecution going.

Mon, 07/05/2010 - 23:44 | 453803 palmereldritch
palmereldritch's picture

Seriously. The NYFED and the WSJ is interesting but what about the FED and the WaPo ?

Sometimes ancient history can be as intriguing as current revelations...if you consider...

(Nah....Probably just another paranoid coincpsirance):


"Eugene Isaac Meyer (October 31, 1875 – July 17, 1959) was an American financier, public official, publisher of the Washington Post newspaper. He served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1930 to 1933. He was the father of publisher Katharine Graham."

Ahhh.... how nature ensures that, unopposed, the seeds of destruction will flourish from the bitter fruits of the tree of knowledge....


Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:01 | 453813 realitybiter
realitybiter's picture

If Martha Stewart had to do time for making $40k on insider trading, this should be at least a couple of capital punishments, no?  (Two for good measure)

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:46 | 453857 drwells
drwells's picture

She was one of the unfortunate patsies referred to above (used to show that the law is still "working"). Of course it doesn't seem to have hurt her too much - what a surprise.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 02:53 | 453933 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

and she wasn't napped for insider trading but for lying to investigators.  if she had told the truth, in all likelihood she would have walked.  she sold because her broker told her the stock's ceo was selling.  that may or may not be inside information.  as far as was revealed, she asked no more questions and said sell, later concocting a limit order story.  the truth was ambiguous enough to prevent, imo, a successful prosecution.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:01 | 453815 realitybiter
realitybiter's picture

capitol (there has been enough capital punishment already!)

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:04 | 453818 mcguire
mcguire's picture



Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:28 | 453835 zeta
zeta's picture

Gosh, working at the FRBNY (or any FRB for that matter) must be one of the easiest jobs on Earth.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:31 | 453836 arnoldsimage
arnoldsimage's picture

ok... so another morsel of the criminal underbelly is exposed. and... what now? how long has this been going on? 50, 100, 150 years? they don't give a shit what is presented as evidence nor do the governing agencies. it's not going to change until we man up and from what i gather from reading the countless blogs, that ain't happening.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:41 | 453847 Apostate
Apostate's picture


Tue, 07/06/2010 - 01:02 | 453861 Village Idiot
Village Idiot's picture

"Let's Roll." It's been done before.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 08:23 | 454003 Sean7k
Sean7k's picture

The general population doesn't care. Never have and never will. Until a significant power group decides on change, revolution never foments. The American revolution was started by its' leading citizens- not the average man.

The German people went along with Hitler. They never questioned his actions. They believed what their eyes told them were lies.

The only people capable of organizing revolution in America are too beholden to the system that provides their wealth and lifestyle. The poor are useless until their anger can be harnessed and that will require the ability to first buy their allegiance. They only understand a fair trade that promises enrichment- whether it is true or not. 

We live in a fascist utopia where people are dependent on electronic media for information, forced into schools that teach prescribed propaganda and fed a steady diet of patriotism. 

Looking for another alternative? Doesn't exist. You can create a secluded harbor, but its' protection will never be sure. Still, we plan and hope.

By the way, I am an optimist. 

Liberty is the only currency of value. It's enemy is control and organization. Chaos or chains/slavery. Tough decision! 



Tue, 07/06/2010 - 00:49 | 453860 Jim_Rockford
Jim_Rockford's picture

Bill Dudley = former Goldmanite, now with FRB

Bob Dudley = BP point man on spill response.

 -- just sayin

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 04:00 | 453946 Dismal Scientist
Dismal Scientist's picture

Its Bo Diddley you have to worry about...

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 01:09 | 453879 bruiserND
bruiserND's picture

Like I said, there will be no election November of 2010

Never before -- since the creation of the Congressional budget process -- has the House failed to pass a budget, failed to propose a budget then deemed the non-existent budget as passed as a means to avoid a direct, recorded vote on a budget, but still allow Congress to spend taxpayer money.  
  By Online  Monday, July 5, 2010

Reno, NV – Today U.S. Senator Harry Reid’s campaign was forced to take down a website that falsely represented itself as his opponent  Nevada Senate Candidate  Sharron Angle’s campaign website and attempted to deceive Angle supporters into giving their personal information to the Reid campaign. Reid’s campaign received a Cease and Desist Notice complaining of “nefarious actions,” including the abuses of proprietary materials from the Angle campaign website and for potentially violating the privacy of supporters who may have been submitting personal information to be used for U.S. Senate candidate Sharron Angle’s campaign.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 10:01 | 454061 grunion
grunion's picture

That guy is the absolute epitome of sleaze.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 05:21 | 453957 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

Slam dunk the punks !!

Strike that.  Calling the actions of the WSJ "punk" is a major disrespect to the hard working punks confined at penitentiaries all across the nation.

BTW Tyler, it is good to see that the memory of Mark Pittman is is being kept alive and well by someone in the "New Media".  Thank you !!

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 05:42 | 453965 UncleFurker
UncleFurker's picture

FRBNY-TOWNS-R1-144 991





The relationships are important because we are able to successfully leverage our strong relationships to originate an attractive portfolio


We have grown our portfolio considerably over the last years. Our total leveraged exposure is approximately 4x that of the average institutional asset manager. We are one of the 2 leading European banks to establish a CDO program.


While we have been focused on growth it has not come at any cost. We have grown conservatively

And probably most importantly our disciplined approach to originating and managing our portfolio has allowed us to achieve an enviable track record


We have only experienced E12.8m of losses against 4 defaults on a portfolio of over $3bn




To know only if questioned




Leveraged Loan Stats Institutional  Euro-mm Reference

ICG 600 Promus IIdebt bk

ING 432 Copernicus I & II

BCAM 1465 Jub I pitch + Jub I + Jubll



NIB 1800 NIB pitch bk

AIB 3000 Galway Bay pitch bk

BOI 3000


  3.12 2600





Tue, 07/06/2010 - 05:47 | 453966 UncleFurker
Tue, 07/06/2010 - 05:52 | 453967 UncleFurker
UncleFurker's picture

Also in the whynott zip file,








Tue, 07/06/2010 - 06:00 | 453969 anony
anony's picture

Once again, if ever written or spoken about besides this forum, the "jewish control of media", will be treated as just so much anti-semitism.

Can it be anti-semitism and STILL be the truth? 

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 07:39 | 453986 dark pools of soros
dark pools of soros's picture

there's nothing wrong with the Jews..  just a million things wrong with everyone else.. 


and remember kiddies - all these MSM are just feeding their demographic which already has an established agenda... they do not need to come up with one themselves

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 08:09 | 453995 Scooby Dooby Doo
Scooby Dooby Doo's picture

Imagine how surprised you will be when you discover that ZH is owned by a jewish fellow who is trying to control the media.

Tue, 07/06/2010 - 07:33 | 453984 tom
tom's picture

As a former journalist who has been in similar situations to this, I have to say that there's not enough information in these documents for me to judge exactly what happened. But perhaps I can lend some insights.

It is not unusual for an investigative journalist to offer, or a subject of a journalist's investigation to demand, that he be allowed to clear his own quotes. This is ostensibly to protect the subject from being quoted out of context, but both sides know the real reason is to protect the subject from saying something he later regrets. It's like taking an interview off the record, with a tentative agreement that the subject will allow most of it to come on the record, after he's read it. Wealthy subjects or those working for big organizations will typically have a flack with them at the interview, whose job it is to tell him which comments he might regret, both while he's speaking and later when he's clearing the quotes. So effectively, such interviews are censored, often for the sort of organizational PR reasons that seem to be at stake in this case. I'm sure the WSJ reporter pre-agreed some kind of similar conditions for this interview. But it's not clear exactly what conditions. The flack's use of "I suggest" could mean several things: that the Fed/Friedman didn't get a 100% solid right to revoke anything they wanted; that the flack is not the final decision-maker on the Fed/Friedman side and is willing to bow to Friedman or someone else at the Fed; or that the flack is putting on a lenient pose by expressing at an early point in negotiations less than adamant disapproval, figuring that many of the quotes she marked would probably be cut for space reasons anyway, and relying on the journalist's reluctance to possibly waste time by pressing her side to clear some quote he figures ultimately won't be cleared anyway.  



Tue, 07/06/2010 - 07:41 | 453990 Andy_Jackson_Jihad
Andy_Jackson_Jihad's picture

ssshhh! They cancelled Seinfeld after Pat Buchanan ran his mouth last time.  Don't screw up 2.5 men for me too. 

Fri, 08/20/2010 - 10:26 | 532737 herry
herry's picture

Really  this is a great post from an expert and thank you very much for sharing this valuable information with us..................... windows vps | cheap vps | cheap hosting | forex vps

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!