• Reggie Middleton
    02/09/2010 - 05:12
    The levered assets of the banks in many Euro-sovereign nations easily outstrip those nations' GDP's. So when the nations' banks get in trouble from bad banking practices (and a very large swath have), the nations themselves are helpless in attempting to truly save the banks (and instead only institute a bait and switch wherein private default risk/insolvency potential is swapped for public manifestations of the same).
  • madhedgefundtrader
    02/09/2010 - 07:22
    The rug may about to be pulled out from under the market. The onslaught of contradictory news coming out of Washington is wearing the market down. An exclusive interview with Andrew Horowitz of The Disciplined Investor.

The Next Volkswagen

Tyler Durden's picture




Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you: AIG

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (6 votes)



by D.O.D.
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:19
#49909

Wow, AIG is obviously a well run company, good to know the Fed's policies are working.

by lsbumblebee
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:32
#49942

My thoughts exactly! Give me a piece of that action!

by in debt we trust
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:22
#49915

short squeeze on AIG?

by MountainHawk
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:22
#49916

can you elaborate on teh VW similarities a bit more... please...

by Gilgamesh
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:25
#49923

They will end up taking over the US Gov't, instead of vice-versa.  The later will have to declare its hedge fund bankrupt.

by in debt we trust
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:26
#49929

VW was heavily shorted earlier this year before ramping up suddenly in a few days.  I don't remember exactly what the catalyst was but I believe it was a German court order. 

 

Some people believe that GS was a major participant at the time and was forced to cover at insanely high prices.  Coincidentally (or not), GS share price fell <$60. 

by asdf
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:38
#49954

it was an announcement by the Porsche Holding SE that they already own XX% (a large aamount, don't remember the number) of the VW-shares via options. 

by in debt we trust
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:42
#49960

thanks for the clarification

by sunbringer
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:39
#50119

Porsche had announced that they effectively controlled 75% of VW shares either outright or through options and since the state of lower Saxony owns 20%, it doesn´t take much math to figure out that tradable shares were in short supply. The most massive short squeeze in history, up to now of course, ensued, and VW shot up to over 1000 euro a share and became the most expensive company in the world measured by market cap for a short time. Adolf Merkle, a pretty famous billionaire German businessman, ended up throwing himself in front of a train because of the losses he incurred as a result.  

by Gilgamesh
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:08
#50030

Einhorn got burned on that one too.

by SWRichmond
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:24
#49919

Wow, the company whose FP group wrote CDS against everything, was bailed out by the taxpayer in excess of $100 Billion, now trading over $45 a share!  How's THAT for justice!

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:41
#49957

It's easier for it to be $45 dollars since it did a 20 for 1 split. So AIG is back at ~2.20.

by wwtdd
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:25
#49921

this is going to be my retirement fund...i just can't wait to get short this! ;)

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:31
#49940

the question is: Will they let us short it... or will they ban shorting on it.

by Cheeky Bastard
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:26
#49925

its so good to see that Benmosche is doing such a good job from his villa in Dubrovnik. 

by Sqworl
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:31
#49941

CB: There should be a retirement rule for revolving door CEO's...Nobody over 60 should be appointed.

by Cheeky Bastard
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:35
#49949

bingo; and Benmosche is in serious conflict of interest when it comes to his position as AIG CEO; he has in option to buy another 2.1 million shares of MetLife; and already holds 500 000 shares; That; to me is a conflict of interest.

by Sqworl
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:42
#49959

Agreed and Im wondering who shredded his non-compete contract from MetLife?

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:42
#49961

Get's appointed, goes right out on vacation, and declares that it doen't matter how much they owe, they will make money. Case in point he's already made 7 million and all he's done is go on vacation. Someone really needs to go to jail...I don't care if it's one of the AIG mailboys, just please send someone to jail.

by SloSquez
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:25
#49926

I've been pounding that all morning.

by lizzy36
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:29
#49935

Seriously, what is driving this thing? 

Has to be more than a short squeeze?

Rumors - other than greenberg coming back to "help the company" ?

by SloSquez
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:37
#49952

Pre-split reality - Not that big of a deal.

by pigpen
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:34
#49945

Who is on the second circuit as FED Ben is appealing like a baby.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aAOhgVw78e3U

by MountainHawk
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:43
#49963

I have a bad feeling the fed will get their way...i hope i'm wrong..

by vanquished
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 15:15
#50337

Look at the average bid/ask spread, and think about whether they would be wider or more narrow if the computers were shut-off....

good articles; good articles 4 slow news day ..http://www..
hat tip: finance news & finance opinions

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:34
#49946

what the hell is going on with this thing...is there really no news of any sort?

by Marla Singer
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:54
#49996

Apparently the new CEO made a comment to Reuters yesterday that he didn't favor a fire sale all their assets and that in a year people would say AIG was performing well. OBVIOUSLY it's time for a 30% morning rally in the stock.
by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:15
#50053

Makes perfect sense...it's all so rational I don't know how I missed it. So, people really are that stupid.

PS...not surprising they don't want a fire sale...but what about the tax payers that actually own the joint? Did they actually say the really important thing -- that they don't need anymore more money of any kind from anyone?

by SloSquez
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:22
#50071

I assume the comment was made around 3:45 est yesterday.

by zeropointfield
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:34
#50105

Benmosche was feeding the algos via the news channels, I guess.

http://www.ravenpack.com/services/index.htm

 

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:38
#49955

OK, it has now literally gone off my chart, wow...

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:45
#49971

In Die Hard 4 (or 5?), Bruce Willis' character will fight off a group of Wall Street bankers who acquire and merge and acquire again in order to make themselves "Too Big to Fail", and then they call the Fed and demand $300 billion of they'll "blow up the entire financial system".

I wonder, though, in the fantasy Hollywood screen version does the Fed pay, or does Willis' hang glide into a Broad Street highrise and pump a full 15 shot clip on his Glock into a Lloyd Blankfein look-alike's bald head?

Can you imagine the audience applause.

by FoolMeTwice
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:46
#49976

I mean come on. Even as a non-finance person I can see the reason behind this. It is trading close to its pre reverse split levels 40-50. People heavily shorted it after reverse split thinking it is easier to short a $30 stock than a $1.5 stock. Any guesses what will happens when lots of shorts pile on it thinking easy money?

by CD
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:08
#50031

Pre-split equivalent pricing was around $23. YTD high was $40. You are right about the extreme fragility of the current price level, is not sustainable.

by Green Sharts
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:11
#50046

According to Yahoo Finance, there are 134.57 million shares outstanding.  The gov't owns 80%, so that leaves 26.9 million shares in other hands.  According to Yahoo Finance there were 21.9 million shares sold short as of July 28, or over 80% of the free float (really more than that when insider holdings are considered).  The stock traded 75 million shares this morning in 2 1/2 hours, almost 3X the non-gov't shares outstanding.

It will be interesting to see if we hear of any hedge fund pain in the next few days as there was with Volkswagen.

by Green Sharts
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:16
#50059

It's hard to imagine that the AIG CEO didn't have this short squeeze in mind when he asserted that AIG would pay back all its debt to the government and provide some return to shareholders, then followed it up a few days later by saying that he would consult with Hank Greenberg.

The government should insist that this criminal bastard take 100% of his compensation in restricted stock of AIG which cannot be sold until 5 years after he is no longer CEO.

by anastos
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 15:20
#50590

The government's 80% is through preferred shares, not common.  That 134mm shares is out there to be churned over and over and over again. 

by Green Sharts
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 16:22
#50732

The government's initial investment in AIG was via preferred but that was exchanged for common equity:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h5A4mmDrBYrp2lBaxKOxf...

"Under the new plan, the government will convert its preferred shares -- which are akin to a loan with high dividend payments -- to a form of common stock, which puts the taxpayer funds at more risk if AIG fails.

Robert Brusca at FAO Economics said the new government rescue is "a bid to bolster the battered insurer, but its plan will expose US taxpayers to more financial risk. The new deal, the government's fourth for AIG, represents a nearly complete reversal from the one first laid out in mid-September."

It provides the US government a 77.9 percent stake in the company and reduces the financial burden on AIG from the dividend payments on its preferred shares."

by Sqworl
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:57
#50000

Blood bath..this screams of insider rigging...

by TumblingDice
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 10:59
#50003

Wait for it...wait for it....yes, I saw it! It was definitely there. The price definitely has the capacity to go lower! I just saw it do that, I swear.

by vanquished
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 15:15
#50341

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:03
#50019

Just went long Sept 20 puts. Ticker AI-GUT. Love it.

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:05
#50022

Short % of Float (as of 28-Jul-09)3: 18.60%

with such data it must be happening.

by OldCodger
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:08
#50035

If the Yahoo figures are true, it had one days' trading vol. ~ 22mil shs on short. And it's already done over 74mil, shouldn't the shorts be covered by now? 

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:10
#50036

AIG is going to pay off the US government. So it should continue to go up. Wonderful fundamentals.

by OldCodger
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:10
#50041

Sep 20 puts? With the govt backing? That $$s gone.

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 16:03
#50681

Really......If you want to throw it all away, try shorting C, BAC and GS too.

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:16
#50057

@old codger,
Delta and Gamma should increase more than enough to offset time decay. Not planning on holding till expiration.

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:17
#50062

Perhaps AIG has the goods on the Fed? If Bloomberg is successful their bluff gets called.

by Digital Gunfire
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:21
#50070

Omg 'we are long AIG' 100 to 300 usd target.
Vickers(? tbc) on CNBC

Exactly like VW. Short interest was higher than the free 
float due to Porsche accumulating quietly a +/-71% position through
derivatives, and the share went from 180 euro to 954 euro
in a matter of days...

 

by Andy Dufresne
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:24
#50080

hey, yaaaalll...(gotta work on my southern brawl)

If it was not for the reverse split, I don' think TD (or anyone here) would be that impressed... AIG is doing absolutely the same as FNM and FRE. Absolutely the same... That's those crispy QE dollars looking for value, and finding it!

by Dr Hackenbush
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:28
#50087

I was just about to point this out too.  if the SEC wanted to do their job, which they don't, they'd  trace the plan for this squeeze back to the reverse stock split, which made AIG margin-able, and part of a grander scheme .
  

by Andy Dufresne
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:30
#50094

gotta have margin, god forbid otherwise you might have look at the AIG income statement, or worse, its balance sheet. Oh, the horror

by Dr Hackenbush
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:43
#50129

by marginable, I meant 'shortable' (>$5.00) by the average retail trader, who probably did look at the balance sheet and was stomped on for doing so.  

by Green Sharts
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:43
#50131

I looked at the Yahoo Finance message board for AIG which was in a frenzy as you can imagine.  The front page was filled with posts from the last 2 minutes and under.  Saw some guy complaining that TD Ameritrade wouldn't let him buy AIG on margin.

by Digital Gunfire
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:29
#50091

Value ? I don't see it.
By the way Vw ended up tumbling back from 954 
to now +/- 139 once the dust settled.

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:30
#50095

Just wait for the official news to come out and the words insider,leak, and front running will be the answers to all of our questions.

by kujo
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:31
#50098

The only thing to do now is buy calls now, then puts when it hits 100. Logical thinking will only get you in trouble in bizzarro world.

by Digital Gunfire
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 11:40
#50115

*must trade it* can't resist the urge. ;-)
93M shares traded.
It would be funny to know how many times the same 
share goes around and around and ... you get it.

by vanquished
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 15:15
#50330

Official market makers are allowed to do this because when a stock spikes up and they are providing liquidity to

good articles; good articles 4 slow news day ..http://www..
hat tip: finance news & finance opinions

buyers.

by Digital Gunfire
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 13:40
#50359

All right now even Cramer joins in...

short are amateurs blablabla 

should have their belts and pants taken away...

errr.... no that would be unacceptable for the children
we can't have that on cnbc.

 

by Anonymous
on Thu, 08/27/2009 - 21:19
#51208

Another 20 days of 25% rise and AIG's market cap would be $520b. The new CEO would then pay the US government back in kind, about 35% of its shares, and the new CEO retires with a $1b bonus. QED.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This problem is intended to determine if you are a machine- or not sufficiently intelligent (or determined) to participate at Zero Hedge.
32 times equals 128
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".