Nic Lenoir Interprets The Oracle's Words

Tyler Durden's picture

From Nic Lenoir of ICAP

Yesterday was yet another sad day for capitalism and the United States. Rewind the clocks a little bit. When the Fed started moving rates towards 0% some observers criticized the policy warning of a repeat of earlier in the decade when low rates fueled the housing bubble. The fed's response at the time: it is not the level of rate that is dangerous, it is when expectations build that they will stay low for an extended period of times which leads to excessively low volatility and credit spreads. What was that again??? Yesterday's statement and the monetary largesse it announced were crafted ONLY to best suit the expectations that had been built in the market. The Federal Reserve has engaged in a positive feedback loop process where it builds up expectations via speeches and leaks and then delivers them to the markets in order to smooth out volatility and encourage excessive lending that can only lead to excessive compression of credit spreads. In fact before this round of QE the Fed asked bank executives what they deemed an acceptable amount of money to best achieve their goal which we discuss below. I don't think anybody really thought banks would encourage the Fed to deliver less liquidity than expected given that just like in every other sewer, you need water to keep the crap floating. In that aim, I suppose yesterday's delivery was an astounding success: most people expected $500Bn to $1Tr so the Fed delivered $600Bn, and since that could have been a slight disappointment, they quickly added that interest re-investment would amount to another $250 to $300Bn which is closer to the upper range, but not so much as to upset too much the inflation hawks. More and more, the Fed is wishy washy trying to kill volatility and ramp the market up quietly, not too fast and avoiding pullbacks. Talk up the economy when people are worried, talk it down when it's good to justify further printing, and most all keep printing... I congratulate the Fed. Not because I agree one bit with their policies, but because they plan and executed their plan to perfection to smoothly achieve their goal. That certainly required a lot of clever orchestrating. Sadly the same great minds planning all this are incapable of understanding the most obvious flaws in the policies they are implementing. Dogma is dangerous because it replaces rational thinking, and in this case the Keynesian theory being implemented is almost a religion for Fed officials who have lost any form of critical thinking ability.

Someone actually pointed out recently [ZH: see here "Niall Ferguson Explains Why Keynesian Policies Are Dooming The World Economy To Round After Round Of Asset Bubbles"] that Keynes himself understood that his theory worked mostly in a "closed economic system". With politicians having pushed free trade for the past 40 years it is hardly the case for the US economy. In fact our economy has pretty much never been more open. No amount of money will solve the structural imbalances, and in my opinion propping up asset prices on a very fragile underlying economic tissue is the best way to inflate a bubble which when it bursts will make 2008 look like a fun afternoon at the pony ranch. Sadly the goal seems hardly to improve the economy here, but rather prop up prices. The Fed chairman makes it clear in his op-ed in the Washington post today:

Alan Greenspan did get a little heat for admitting that higher stocks is the best way to drive economic growth, though in my opinion not nearly enough, but he was retired when he said it. That is in my opinion the one mistake made by Bernanke in the implementation of his evil plan. Coming out and making that unnecessary statement will draw political backlash from all those who criticize his policies precisely for their very direct consequence: boosting asset prices while having little impact on the economy. Doctor Bernanke goes to extrapolate that higher stock prices will lead to second hand spending... so as I said the other day high-end hair salons will offer free manicures while you get your hair done so you can drop a nice $20 tip to your hand-massage therapist on your way out. Meanwhile the next sign of trouble in the economy all those jobs disappear and we will revert to the structural unemployment rate which keeps getting higher by the minute. Amusingly the Fed Chairman does mention that the Fed alone cannot control the economy. I can't wait for the tea-party fanatics to put a bounty on him slapshot-style.

More technically, the one surprise in the announcement yesterday was the fact the average maturity of the purchases will be between 5 and 6 years. A lot of observers including myself had come to expect more buying in the long end. The Fed removed the 35% limit of ownership it can have of any given Treasury issue, which in theory opens the door for them to buy longer dated bonds since they are the one in more limited supply and that the Fed owns a solid share already. However it does not seem they will make that much use of this additional freedom they gave themselves. I felt that was a bit of a curveball, and as a result the 10s30s curve has gone vertical. The bear conditional flatteners we had recommended and that were in the money quite a bit last week are now under-water, but if you did not take profit, you will probably end up flat since both puts will likely expire out of the money and no premium was paid to enter the trade (that was one of the major drivers behind our rational for the trade).

So what does QE 2.0 means for financial markets? Well short term it's simple: higher stock prices, lower volatility, lower USD, and higher commodity prices, while bonds keep going up (hard to sell for now if you have an $850Bn buyer in the open and positionning had been trimmed). Swap spreads in the US are being paid aggressively today as Libor is floored but Treasury yields keep dwindling. The only viable strategy is to trade around the government's flows at this point. That is all there is left. Front-run P.O.M.O. and collect pennies while you can. All that will last until something perturbs this unsustainable dynamic. That can happen next week, or next spring... most likely it will happen when there is no one left long volatility and the market will implode as the first "sell market" order of more than 500 mini S&P futures leads to a flash crash that will slam all the circuit breakers out there. Here is the list of the most likely culprits that will end our monetary teenage dream:

1) Trade wars and protectionism as the rest of the world throws the towel and cannot accept anymore liquidity from the Fed flooding their markets. This is a trend that we have long warned about and is in its infancy but could rather rapidly gather steam

2) Europe accidentally withdraws a bit more liquidity than they should have from their system and it leads to some failures which forces the market to acknowledge what is currently happening out in the open without being priced in at all: bankrupt governments, sovereign spreads making new highs, riots in the streets... Note that it would not take much for it so snowball into a disaster. The ECB knows it and that's why they are buying PIIGS bonds while withdrawing liquidity (which is rather schizophrenic)

3) Inflation chokes the recovery. The Fed has pretty much committed to buying bonds until CPI hits 2% (or rather PCE which they prefer) or unemployment hits 6%. However CPI is useless and its definition has been changed and abused so much over the years that we can have flat readings when health care costs rise 9% a year, same for education costs, oil is up 100% YoY, and every other commodity is through the roof as well. So what is more likely is that we will run into an inflationary wall while the CPI is still showing a happy +0.6% reading YoY. Prices at the pump is something that will strike a public nerve and has always led to recessions. I have contended for a while that all that liquidity is going to find its way abroad and ramp up commodity prices more than anything. That will happen, guarantied, the only question is when does it become too much?

4) Domestic political backlash: I guess we will soon know what the recent tea-party candidates put in office are made of. Showdown between Bernanke and Paul anyone?

I left out the mortgage mess since at this point the market has decided to fully ignore this and you can count on Washington to push whatever law/accounting measure/magic spell required to make it disappear... at least on paper! The one thing that becomes obvious is that when the party ends, the next sell-off will most likely be a systemic rejection of the current policies in place, and it will be a lot more violent than people expect. Until then, expect volatility to trade very low while most markets have 2/3% intraday gyrations, setting up for the more and more inevitable 40% down day. Good job Ben, good job...

Good luck trading,


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Turd Ferguson's picture

"Dogma is dangerous because it replaces rational thinking, and in this case the Keynesian theory being implemented is almost a religion for Fed officials who have lost any form of critical thinking ability."

This is true but it is not the root cause.

Keynesianism is in its final throes. Predictably, at the end, the entire ponzi goes exponential and parabolic. HellyBenny and his minions obviously believe all their Keynesian BS but at this stage they have no other choice. 

Its an interesting paradox. Only through Keynesianism does more-and-more = less-and-less.

Again, the end of the Great Keynesian Experiment is upon us. Prepare accordingly.

tamboo's picture

bah, they know it's just another joo flimflam ripoff in 'academic economic disguise',

they most certainly dont believe their own bs.

fiat money = abracadabra hocus pocus it has value cuz i said so.

whatsinaname's picture

post election all those "election" jobs are going to be gone for atleast 2 years now..

RockyRacoon's picture

Keynesianism has suffered the same fate as the traditional gold standard.  They are good ideas that have been whored-up by the establishment in such a way as to have been detrimental to the entire society.   In their pure form they are fine notions.   Go to any bookstore and you'll find hundreds of books on weight loss.  All of which are fine, and nearly all of which include (somewhere in the back or in footnotes) the basics of a balanced diet.   It's the diet that is the key, not the gimmick of the title of the book.   The word "diet" means habitual nourishment, meaning it is a way of life, not a fad.  These economic fads are the death knell of any society.  The true gold standard is the equivalent of an economic diet in its elemental definition.

Caviar Emptor's picture

On the one hand we got the runaway Fed, on the other we'll get a GOP/Tea Party backed Austerity plan. 

Now THAT'S what I call biflation! 

Costs will rocket, incomes employment and retirements will plummet. Makes sense. 

centerline's picture

Really great post.  Will have to print this one out and tape it to the wall.

MeTarzanUjane's picture

Exactly, to what end? Another bubble, falsely inflated without substance or true value. Openly confirming manipulation without fear of RICO.

Welfare for the investor class.

spamghod's picture

Want to win back America? Start by getting rid of all the fucking jooz in government, the media and Wall St. America's REAL enemy is in Tel Aviv!

BigJim's picture

Do we get rid of all the Jews in medicine, technology, the arts, etc, etc, too? What about the Jewish teachers, firemen, sewage workers, librarians, and physiotherapists?

Jews aren't the problem. Zionists are certainly a problem, but let's remember that it was the WASP establishment that instituted the Satanic (as the Mogambo guru so amusingly calls it) Federal Reserve.

And it's the great mass of unawakened voters that perpetuate the Matrix. So let's leave the Jews unsoaped, huh?

spartan117's picture

Nic is still short?  Good lord, Nic.  It's going to be QE to the moon.  Everything is going up, except for the US Dollar.

centerline's picture

Thinking that retail buyers will suddenly rush in thinking that the stock market truly only goes up as long as the Fed is running the show like this.  Will have to watch around me for "average Joe" type folks who suddenly start talking about putting their money to work for them in the stock market!  That is usually about the point that the door is slammed shut and the fire is started.

slyhill's picture

Cart pullin' the horse.

Lord Peter Pipsqueak's picture

No more short the ES recommendations for a while then??

CONners's picture

"Making investment decisions based on information published on Zero folly."

nonclaim's picture

I only saw short term speculative bets posted here, no investment advice. Anyway, investing as we used to know is dead, doesn't matter who posts it.

homersimpson's picture

Really? Then let's follow those pumpers on CNBC then. You first.

CONners's picture

Zero Hedge is a financial news and information site, not an investment advisor.  Making investment decisions based on information published on Zero Hedge, or any internet site for that matter, is more than unwise, it is folly.

Everybodys All American's picture

Fundamentals no longer matter.

Sherman McCoy's picture

This guy Lenoir, isn't he the bozo who said "Sell" a while back, this is the top? Isn't ICAP just a bond broker? Personally, I'd rather know what Dan Dorfman's thinking.

99er's picture

Nic's a gal.

And rather than provide snide remarks, perhaps you could offer up something substantive. Thanks.


CONners's picture

Your link is not substantive.

You are welcome.

jdrose1985's picture

No, Nic's a dude.

With a girlfriend if you read the rant post a couple of months ago

Bill Lumbergh's picture

For anyone following the technicals of the S&P 500, we broke through the upper BB and now have a RSI of 75...the similarities of this move to the move from February to May are rather eerie.

firstdivision's picture

We are only a few points away from April's high, and volume is a bit up over the 50DMA.  This could get interesting very quickly, but it will not crash since now the circuit breakers will trigger even if it is legitimate selling occurring.

apberusdisvet's picture

In my gut I have the suspicion that we are being set up, yet again.  How many trillions stolen from the sheeple in housing?  How much more when the market becomes unsustainable?

Thunder Dome's picture

SPU 1200+.  Can't even entertain shorting this bitch til at least 1220.

JuicyTheAnimal's picture

There's some truth sort of to this.  I'll take profits on precious metals options and then...  My shopping list:  2 Assault rifles, 2000 rounds, dry food supply, junk silver bag.  It's not Ipads but it's still discretionary spending.  I'd rather be buying a nice mountain bike, a gourmet kitchen and a vacation but such is life and spending is spending.   Or rather, I'd prefer to be investing in some long term growth stocks and looking forward to a retirement but that's out of the picture.  This kind of shit tells me to "get some defense for tomorrow and then live for today".  There won't be a USA as we knew it when I hit retirement age.

...maybe a couple cases of decent wine too

maximus's picture

Whatever comes out of these gates, we've got a better chance of survival if we work together. Do you understand? If we stay together we survive...

TeresaE's picture

As divided as we are, then we are screwed.  Totally screwed.

Vampyroteuthis infernalis's picture

I am with you Maximus. All of these survivalists want to go live off the land for extended periods of time. Wait until those around you find out you have food and shelter and come knocking at your door armed in mass. Your house will be burnt to the ground and your family riddled with bullets. We need to organize for survival.

SwingForce's picture

"I left out the mortgage mess since at this point the market has decided to fully ignore this and you can count on Washington to push whatever law/accounting measure/magic spell required to make it disappear... at least on paper!"

I would like to add this, then, please, as Exhibit #5) on the Dreamlist, as the least likely event would also (by nature) be the least likely to be hedged against, therefore inflicting the greatest damage. 

RockyRacoon's picture

I don't think anybody really thought banks would encourage the Fed to deliver less liquidity than expected given that just like in every other sewer, you need water to keep the crap floating.

Now this is putting things in terms I can understand!

Charley's picture

"Keynes himself understood that his theory worked mostly in a 'closed economic system'".

The world market is a closed economic system. If the aim of the Fed is create inflation everywhere, not just the US, and if it can actually be done, the Fed alone has the capacity to do this.

cheap uggs for sale's picture

Welcome to our website-- , we are making the promotion for many uggs now.Here is a chance for you that you want to buy good ugg classic boots by cheap price.At present our hot sale snow boots has :
| UGG Delaine Boots
| UGG Gaviota Boots
| UGG Gissella Boots
| UGG Evera Shoes
| UGG Upside Boots