This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Nicholas Colas On Why The "Keith Richards" Stock Market May Presage A Return To Old School Investing

Tyler Durden's picture




 

BNY's always informative and entertaining Nicholas Colas has a habit of seeing the silver lining, when others only see a putrid and radioactive mushroom cloud. And in this case, we do tend to agree with him... somewhat: when looking at the transformation currently gripping stock markets, instead of taking either extreme, Colas takes the Keith Richards path: adapt and survive (instead of fading away). And in surviving, the market may just return to that “old school” model of stock picking, and thus, fundamentally based stock trading, something which all investors and market participants lament and remember fondly as a bygone era before the Fed decided to take control of the entire capital market. However, where we are far less sanguine, is that for Colas' prediction to come true, it would necessarily (and sufficiently) require the removal of the Fed and its tentacular influence on stocks. And thus the question: can the existing stock market model survive an overhaul in which the underlying economic model reverts back from a central banking primed fiat system, to some "other" form of sound monetary decision making. That, we do not know.

From BNY ConvergEx:

Keith Richards and the "Death" of Stock Trading

Summary: U.S. equity volumes have been in decline since the volatile days of the 2008 financial crisis and October saw some of the slowest days of the year. That’s an outcome, we argue in today’s note, of the slow growth U.S. economy and monetary policies put in place to dampen economic volatility. Yes, segments of the market still create trading volumes higher than a few years ago – high frequency trading and exchange traded funds lead the charge here. But to reignite interest in  fundamentally driven trading we’ll either need to see much better economic growth (unlikely) or a significant change in the way money managers operate. There’s plenty of opportunity on that front and such changes would also make for a better functioning capital market.

Back in 1973, the British music magazine New Music Express put Keith Richards on their annual list of “Rockers Most Likely to Die” in the next year. Keith (or “Keef”, as the British press and fans like to call him) remained on the list for ten years straight. During that time he did pretty much everything possible to make that prediction come true, but despite a decade’s epic consumption of heroin, acid, and alcohol as well as sleeping with a loaded pistol, Richards managed to stay above ground. NME eventually gave up and retired his name from consideration, which pretty much means that Keith Richards is immortal. That’s about right, in my book.

Lately it’s felt like U.S. equity trading might replace Keith Richards on that “Likely to Die Soon” list. Consider the following data points:

  • Trading volumes in S&P 500 names run about 4.5 billion shares/week at the moment, down 10% from the typical rate in January 2010.
  • Volumes during the early March 2009 lows were 7.5 billion/week for the same names, or 40% higher than current volumes.
  • We are essentially back to early 2008 volume levels, but October saw some of the lowest volume days of the year. The trend  is not the friend of trading volumes at the moment.

There are many root causes for this phenomenon. Here are a few of the major ones:

  • The lurching volatility of the last three years must have pride of place, of course. Nothing scares away capital like mind numbing volatility.
  • Sharing the spotlight is the long hangover of the tech stock bubble of the late 1990s, which took major stock indices to unsustainable levels. The S&P 500 is still some 22% below the levels reached in March 2000. Stocks stopped being the 8-11% annual return investment vehicle expected by a generation of market participants. That has encouraged capital of all stripes to look elsewhere for return, as I will touch on in a minute.
  • All the recent talk of increased savings rates aside, the current period of domestic recession and jobless recovery does little to provide extra capital for investment. As we have noted in previous reports, October saw one of the lowest rates of  tax/withholding receipts to the U.S. Treasury since the 2008 financial crisis. There just is not much “extra” money in consumers’ pockets to invest. The same goes for corporations with underfunded pension plans, where holding onto cash is the priority of the day.
  • Alternative investments to U.S. stocks have performed better. Whether we’re talking about precious metals, rare sports cars,  commodities or foreign stocks, investors are always going to be drawn to the “New Highs” list long before considering investments in lagging categories. U.S. stocks fit all too neatly into that latter category, aside from a few high profile technology, consumer and industrial names.

But, like Keith Richards, it is too soon to put U.S. stock trading on the endangered species list.

  • First of all, part of the problem in considering the current volumes is simply a matter of where you want to start the clock. Yes, against the last two years volumes are down substantially. Measured against the first half of 2007, however, when S&P 500 volumes were closer to 3 billion shares/week the current rate is still respectably higher. If you happen to be a broker/dealer, you have felt the pain of price compression in commissions of course. But overall volumes aren’t that bad.
  • There are, in fact, growth areas of stock trading over the past five years. There are 20% more exchange traded funds now then at the beginning of 2010, for example. ETF product development is an evergreen process, and I have no doubt that the number of ETFs on offer will double long before major stock indices do the same. After all, they have the flexibility to pursue investment opportunities across almost any asset class. As one famous market commentator likes to say, “There’s always a bull market somewhere,” and the ETF world will invariably create products to track them.
  • Thanks to significant changes in market structure over the past decade, there many more places to trade stock than in the 1990s, generating large amounts of new volume. Yes, the NYSE and NASDAQ still exist, but there’s also BATS, Direct Edge, Liquidnet, and broker-owned dark pools. As the number of trading venues grows arithmetically, volume seems to expand logarithmically. One popular slam against the old exchange structure was that “Five guys named Vinnie” touched your trade as it made its way to the floor for execution, creating opportunities for information leakage. Now, there are more like 5,000 computers we’ll playfully call HAL constantly involved in 5,000 stocks simultaneously (one of which is the name you are trading). This dynamic has taken overall volumes from the 1-2 billion shares traded daily in the early 2000s to anywhere from 7-8 billion today.

Where things get more problematic is when you consider the future of “old school” single stock trading, where the investment decision to buy or sell is fundamentally based. It is worth remembering that capital markets have two functions:

  • Incorporate all available knowledge about the fundamentals of an investment into a price for that security.
  • Provide as much liquidity as possible for those who want to buy or sell so their orders don’t overly distort prices.

Changes to market structure in the last decade mean that liquidity now comes with lots of high frequency trading – up to 70% of all trades according to a variety of sources. At the same time it is hard to argue that HFT brings anything to the party on the other function of capital markets: fundamental price discovery. Even if there are fundamental inputs into certain HFT strategies – high speed reading of news headlines, for example – their seconds/minutes long holding periods don’t reflect any confidence that these decisions have lasting value.

To close out this note I will offer up a list of short list of factors I think will reignite interest in that “old school” model of stock picking and, by extension, fundamentally based stock trading.

  • Accelerating economic growth. Stock picking is about finding stocks that will do better than their peers by a wide margin. This process justifies everything from active managers’ fees to the institutional allocation of capital to this strategy. The anemic growth we’ve seen in developed economies since the financial crisis doesn’t give as much of a tailwind to excellent companies as faster economic growth would engender. Most fundamental portfolio managers will tell you in moments of candor that much of their performance in good years stems from a few great ideas. Everything else tends to cancel out. The better the economic backdrop, the more chance for those big ideas to generate truly outsized returns.
  • Less government involvement in the economy. Look at the financial sector for proof of this point. As wrenching as a deeper crisis in this industry might have been in 2008, it would have created a much more dynamic recovery than the “Too big to fail” policy has allowed. Government intervention of all types kept this from happening. The same goes for the current activist Federal Reserve policy of Quantitative Easing. Pumping hundreds of billions of dollars into a moribund economy while keeping interest rates at zero seems to maintain a tired status quo more than it offers better-run companies a chance to excel.
  • Merger of HFT and fundamental strategies. The current U.S. market structure essentially features three types of players with almost nothing in common. In one camp are the indexers, who allocate capital to passive indexes such as the S&P 500. The second group is active managers, who employ fundamental analysis to find winning investment to buy and underperforming ones to short/underweight. Then there is high frequency trading, which dominates trading volumes but acts more like a market maker than investor.

There is nothing, aside from preexisting investment policies, preventing fundamental managers from incorporating HFT techniques into their own approaches to investment. The cost to trade U.S. equities has fallen close to zero, so trading around existing positions with HFT strategies is a viable area of incremental alpha to traditional managers. Yes, it will up their turnover dramatically, but that is a small price to pay for increased performance in a sluggish market.

Keith and the rest of The Rolling Stones are alive and touring today because they adapted. Fewer drugs, more antioxidants, and a savvy tax strategy (more on that in another note) all contributed to that success story. Better returns through creativity are a hallmark of capital markets as well. Traditional managers will adapt, since it is hard to see how the economic backdrop will change any time soon. Adapt, or as the Stones sang, “Fade away.”

 

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 11/01/2010 - 23:47 | 692405 gwar5
gwar5's picture

Keith Richards investing? Never trust anybody over 30 that looks 90.

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 00:01 | 692426 zen0
zen0's picture

He almost is 90

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 00:00 | 692425 zen0
zen0's picture

Uranium and alternative energy.

 

Bitch people.

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 01:47 | 692522 Trifecta Man
Trifecta Man's picture

In this environment you can still beat the HFT computers.  The computers are very short term oriented.  You got to think long term.  Where is the long term growth?  Where is supply limited or even declining?  Pick a few stocks in that sector.  Buy and hold.

Example, the Fed is going to keep printing money.  So supply of dollars will go up, a lot.  So the long term trend is dollar down.  What are alternatives to dollars?  (I figured that out in 2003.)  Gold and Silver for two examples.  Buy some good gold and silver stocks.

Knowing this, this summer I bought 2500 shares of Silver Wheaton SLW, at about $18 while the stock was just meandering sideways.   I have already made over 50% paper profits.  (By the way I am not selling.)

That's not long term for you?  Back in 2005, I bought 500 shares.  I have a 900% paper profit in them.  Still have them.

Just luck?  That same year I bought Silvercorp SVM.  Split adjusted I am up 1100% on those 4500 shares.  Still have them.

In a long term bullish sector, you buy the dips.

But it's my guess that gold and silver will soon explode higher, as the manipulation on the COMEX comes to an end.

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 02:33 | 692555 Buddha_Gorilla
Buddha_Gorilla's picture

The plural of anecdote is not data, and what you describe is most likely luck.   I thought Taleb's Fooled by Randomness was required reading here on ZH.  BTW, any reason you didn't "back up the truck" on SLW in 2008 when your shares were worth less than you paid for them?  

 

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 09:53 | 692940 Trifecta Man
Trifecta Man's picture

No, effort.  Any reason why you didn't?

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 07:31 | 692675 Xedus129
Xedus129's picture

1111_1111_1111_1111_1111_1111_1111_1111  oh shit.  

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 02:24 | 692548 halvord
halvord's picture

Never trust anyone who plays Vegas.

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 04:37 | 692603 Bartanist
Bartanist's picture

There are ways to fix the market for investors, if that is intent ... but fixing the market requires killing liquidity.

1. Run the market 100% through computer matching of orders. To make it efficient, ALL market participants must be able to see all orders on all exchanges so they can buy or sell without using market orders. Participants can only place orders with a fill price range and the computers must fill from the best price first. Make it illegal to hide volume on open orders and only display the best price, not the reserve price.

2. Eliminate ALL market making and specialist activity. Make market making illegal. Market making KILLS PRICE DISCOVERY.

3. Eliminate all ETFs and non-equity equities that are really just casino bets and not investments. This will return liquidity to the equities themselves and make stock picking more important.

4. Obviously all HFT computers need to be turned off and all manipulative techniques commonly used today to smooth markets and increase liquidity must be made illegal.

5. Make all shorting illegal because in a real market, all it does is distort supply and demand and allow market makers to function ... selling more inventory than they own. Without market makers, there will be no need for shorting in the market.

6. Set up a separate betting parlor for Wall Street outside of the stock market that allows then to bet on the color of Ben Bernanke's tie and other similar prop bets they are currently involved in, but make bets tied to stocks illegal.

But my guess is that making the market a REAL market instead of a crooked casino is not in the best interest of Wall Street and this will never happen. (sarcasm on) Why would they want the market to be a method to raise equity and to participate in the growth of companies? That would be like REAL investing and not casino betting ... kind of boring. (sarcasm off)

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 06:44 | 692655 aheady
aheady's picture

Ha! Am in the process of reading Mr. Richards' autobiography. Highly recommended.

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 07:33 | 692676 uberfinch
uberfinch's picture

How, exactly, do we return to the good old days of stock picking when, thanks to ETFs and HFT, the correlation amongst all securities is >0.9?

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 07:56 | 692694 Slartibartfast
Slartibartfast's picture

How about the Luddite Exchange (LUD-X)...no HFTs allowed?

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 08:19 | 692723 Revolution_star...
Revolution_starts_now's picture

Did someone take the check book away from Ben? until then, you are better off out than in. This will take 3 to 5 years atleast and wipe out just about everybody along the way.

 

In this case it's better to fade away, otherwise you will burn out.

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 08:36 | 692756 Chemba
Chemba's picture

An individaul can not out trade the HFT algos.  However, the pervasiveness of HFT trading creates investing opportunities as individual stocks diverge from intrinsic cash flow value.  The algorithms do not much care about valuation and to the extent they do are very simplistic.  That is what creates opportunity.  Plenty of recent examples, e.g. MSFT at $23

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 08:50 | 692783 americanspirit
americanspirit's picture

"the removal of the Fed and its tentacular influence on stocks" - I would prefer "testicular grip" to "tentacular influence".

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 10:18 | 693011 cowdiddly
cowdiddly's picture

Delusional. Like Keith Richards was rumored to need a blood transfusion for a heroin addiction, the author is indeed strung out on hopium. I like to view this market as more of a Led Zeppelin market, a bag of hot air waiting for a disaster of perhaps the Pink Floyd market where pigs fly. Rolling Stone? I don't think so.

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 13:21 | 693666 badnews...buyspus
badnews...buyspus's picture

Hey Colas, you stated;

The cost to trade U.S. equities has fallen close to zero, so trading around existing positions with HFT strategies is a viable area of incremental alpha to traditional managers.

The cost of trading equities are the profits that Getco, Citadel, GS and all the other HFT's make on that trade.

And, the gooberment will never get out of the economy.

 

Tue, 11/02/2010 - 14:26 | 693898 Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

Keith looks bad. Last time the Stones meant anything was Some Girls. Although Keith's solo efforts were worthwhile, and his turn with George Jones on "Say It's Not You" is a gem.

What was the question?

Wed, 11/03/2010 - 20:44 | 697724 cheap uggs for sale
cheap uggs for sale's picture

We have all cheap uggs for sale in our website http://www.salesuggs.org ! You can meet all your needs for UGG hot sale here and will certainly be satisfied with the top quality at low price. All UGGs on sale are made with the 100% genuine sheepskin from Australia and are hand-made in our own factory completely. So you need no to worry about the quality and the cheap UGGs for sale are all to be delivered in free shipping. Enjoy the large discount!
1.
UGG Amberlee
|UGG Kensington
|UGG Elsey
|UGG Langley
|UGG Roxy Short
|UGG Roseberry
|UGG Oliviya
|UGG Raya
UGG Brookfield Short

Thu, 11/04/2010 - 02:17 | 698630 cheap uggs for sale
cheap uggs for sale's picture
Many like to prefer this footwear for cheap uggs on sale. its stylish and comfort aspects that charms as well as eases your feet with utmost convenience. Earlier, people use to wear cheap uggs bootsto keep their feet warm in cold weather but now in modern time people prefer them to gain a great appearance.UGGS on sale.Such as:UGG Adirondack|UGG Bailey Button Triplet|UGG Brookfield|UGG Cardy|UGG Delaine|UGG Elsey|UGG Gissella|UGG Highkoo|UGG Kensington|UGG Knightsbridge|UGG Langley|UGG Mayfaire|UGG Roseberry|UGG Roxy|UGG Upside| UGG Amberlee| UGG Oliviya| UGG Gaviota|UGG Desoto|UGG Bailey Button |UGG Brookfield short|UGG Swell .
Fri, 11/05/2010 - 23:33 | 704611 cheap uggs for sale
cheap uggs for sale's picture

Welcome to our website-- http://www.ugghots.com , we are making the promotion for many uggs now.Here is a chance for you that you want to buy good ugg classic boots by cheap price.At present our hot sale snow boots has :
| UGG Delaine Boots
| UGG Gaviota Boots
| UGG Gissella Boots
| UGG Evera Shoes
| UGG Upside Boots

Tue, 11/09/2010 - 04:32 | 711178 shaoye
shaoye's picture

Find ugg and Australian sheepskinAuthentic Ugg boots, learn the history behind the Cheap ugg boots, and when and what to wear with Ugg boot, as well as cleaning and caring for ....we sell new style Ugg boots on sale,You can find the wholesale discount Ugg boots here.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!