This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Nuclear Expert: "Fukushima Has 24 Hours To Avoid A Core Meltdown Scenario"

Tyler Durden's picture




 

In an interview with Mark Hibbs, a Berlin-based senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a nonprofit think tank, Newsmax magazine asks - what happens next at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant. The answer according to the nuclear expert, is that as Fukushima is now well on its way to a full core-melt nuclear accident, a worst case scenario could possibly lead to the same results last seen in 1986 Chernobyl.

Below we present a brief overview of the Fukushima plant from Wikipedia:

The Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant (Fukushima I NPP, 1F), often referred to as Fukushima Dai-ichi, is a nuclear power plant located in the town of Okuma in the Futaba District of Fukushima Prefecture. With six separate units located on site with a combined power of 4.7 GW, Fukushima I is one of the 25 largest nuclear power stations in the world. Fukushima I is the first nuclear plant to be constructed and run entirely by The Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO).

Fukushima II Nuclear Power Plant, 11.5 kilometres (7.1 mi) to the south, is also run by TEPCO.

Unit Type First Criticality Electric Power
Fukushima I - 1 BWR March 26, 1971 460 MW
Fukushima I - 2 BWR July 18, 1974 784 MW
Fukushima I - 3 BWR March 27, 1976 784 MW
Fukushima I - 4 BWR October 12, 1978 784 MW
Fukushima I - 5 BWR April 18, 1978 784 MW
Fukushima I - 6 BWR October 24, 1979 1,100 MW
Fukushima I - 7 (planned) ABWR October, 2013 1,380 MW
Fukushima I - 8 (planned) ABWR October, 2014 1,380 MW

So what happens next? First, Hibbs explains precisely what already has taken place:
“What happened in Japan is very alarming because it would appear . . . that about 2:30 this afternoon Japan time, when the earthquake struck . . . three of the reactors that were operating were disenabled because of a loss of offsite power that was caused by the earthquake.”

The Japanese situation appears to be roughly analogous to the Three Mile Island incident in the United States, where authorities struggled for days to contain an improperly cooled reactor core but were able to avert a widespread release of nuclear material.

“We were in a situation as I recall then very similar to where we are now, where we were told by news media in 1979 that there was a core melt accident unfolding, we didn’t know how serious it would become, and what would happen,” Hibbs tells Newsmax.

At least one of the reactors in Japan, and perhaps more, “ are on the path of a core-melt accident. It’s called a loss of coolant accident. . . . And it’s up to the Japanese authorities, together with the industries in that country, to find a way to stem this problem,” he said.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton confirmed that the United States is trying to help alleviate the situation. "We just had our Air Force assets in Japan transport some really important coolant to one of the nuclear plants," Clinton said, according to the Associated Press.

The Japanese reactors are designed to drop neutron-blocking control rods into the core as soon as the plants detect a seismic disturbance. These controls apparently functioned normally. But even after the procedure, scientists say a base level of heat continues to flow, and coolant is needed to constrain those temperatures.

Unfotunately, Japan does not have much time:
Asked how long Japanese scientists have to correct the problem to avoid a core meltdown, Hibbs tells Newsmax that it depends on system design, adding, “it could be a day, plus or minus 10 hours.”

“After a while, with the heat building up in there, and lack of coolant, you’re going to see damage in your fuel, the cladding, the metal container around the nuclear material, begins to buckle or balloon or break, and after a little while you’ll get a situation where the fuel falls apart, melts, and falls into the core, and then you’ve got a classical core melt accident like you had in Three Mile Island that you had in the United States in '79.”

Hibbs spoke with Japanese government officials who told him the force of the tsunami was so severe that the water may have flooded the reactors,  power generators, and cooling mechanisms, disabling the equipment. "Which means they have to resort to basically a military-type exercise, to rush in to the devastated site equipment that they can quickly hook up to the reactor to get power in there and start this emergency equipment, to get cooling water into that core and prevent that fuel from overheating.

“And if they can’t do that,” he told Newsmax, “then you’re going to have this meltdown.”

They have 24 hours or so to avoid a core meltdown, he says. But if one occurs, two scenarios could follow: The good outcome would mirror what happened at Three Mile Island, while the bad one could involve what he called a “Chernobyl scenario, where the damage to the reactor was such that the integrity of the structures were damaged.

“There was an explosion and other things happened in there, that opened up the reactor so the inventory of radioactive material . . . went into the atmosphere and generated this deadly plume that we know happened in Chernobyl.

“So that is the ultimate worst-case scenario. Nobody is saying that’s going to happen. Nobody is even saying we’re going to have a core meltdown. But we have a window of time now. We don’t know how much is left — but the Japanese authorities and the government and all the agencies that they can muster are working overtime to get cooling systems on that site powered and working.”

The April 1986 Chernobyl disaster cost an estimated 4,000 lives. More than 330,000 Russians had to be relocated because of contamination.

But Hibbs says, “A lot of worst-case things would have to happen for us to get that far.”

Hibbs said the Japanese right now are fighting the clock to contain the heating.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:57 | 1043078 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

Its too bad they never really go together that much. They are both old now but the voices still are there. Charlie Sheen could learn a thing or two from the possum......I am very surprised he lived to talk about it..........

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:45 | 1043146 cosmictrainwreck
cosmictrainwreck's picture

unfortunately "what it takes" cannot be learned or taught [trust me]. most folks, high or low, die before they get the "aha". odds are: slim & none

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:10 | 1043196 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5drmBXSM-HM&feature=related

another nice one. modern country music has gone to hell imho. it just stinks....the young girls are pretty and all have nice voices. but they all sound the same. and there is no individualism. everything is homogenized cookie cutter country now.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:08 | 1043585 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Ok you made your point. I hunt tully elk. I like a self loaded 7mag. 30odd6 is good but the speed of a seven mag is awesome. Teflon jackets. 223 swift is fun also.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:21 | 1043223 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UC9pc4U40sI

Donovan, Universal Soldier.

here is one from the early 60's. we all listened intently but we never did anything and so now we pay for it.......nothing has changed.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:28 | 1043028 Marvin
Marvin's picture

Totally inaccurate conclusion.

 

The Russion reactor was moderated by graphite, had no containment building, and was set on fire during the course of the accident. It burned for weeks afterwards.

 

The Japanese reactor is liquid cooled and moderated. It may melt to slag if the emergency cooling malfunctions, but it wont burn like the Russion reactor.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:38 | 1043047 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Look at the SAT photo. Feed uptake is on the bay opening! It's French anyways.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:33 | 1043036 fijisailor
fijisailor's picture

I'm an electrical engineer not a nuclear engineer but seeing that compensation is crap for engineers in the US I would guess the same is true in Japan and that they have a real problem like we do attracting competent engineering talent to solve problems.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:38 | 1043048 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Good comment!

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:13 | 1043206 Eally Ucked
Eally Ucked's picture

Engineers are unemployed now, you have to be sales rep or bullshit teller to make any money.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:36 | 1043039 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

It ain't over til the fat lady sings. Our government should be issuing warnings right now. Instead they are worried about who built those pieces of SHIT! If that complex goes! A cloud of matter will hurt the Pacific North West. I tap your you-tubes H.P.D.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:38 | 1043043 Tail Dogging The Wag
Tail Dogging The Wag's picture

Fukushima might be worse than Chernobyl. We have a few hours to prevent the meltdown. The rest of the world can hope for the best.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:46 | 1043058 CitizenPete
CitizenPete's picture

Why would it be worse? Cherbobyl was a fire (the core burned) with radioactive particulate from a graphite core - not a BWR LOCA.  Kind of like a dirty bomb concept.  This is totally different type of reactor and I beleive it will be a different type of disaster if it happens. 

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:42 | 1043052 CitizenPete
CitizenPete's picture

Typically BWR reactors have a "kill switch" built in - not certain these do (These are MOX design?).  The kill switch (IF it is included in this design) is a last resort as it destroys (poisons) the reactor internals.  Older GE Mark BWRs have a BORON injection system that is pressurized and the pipes going into the reactor have exploding valves.  (Literally a small charge i n the guts of the valve that get blown out).  Needless to say you only open these valves once.  My understanding is after that you can just about fill the building with concrete since the boron will be in the Main Steam, RHR, etc...

 

I could be wrong totally about this particular design, but I will check.  I just can't beleive they would have a true core "melt" like a TMI, due to a runaway reaction or LOCA (Loss of Coolant Accident)

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:48 | 1043064 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Thanks please reply. Boron is just a heat agent for sodium build up on intake. This seems to be a break down of systems and a really serious problem. The containment vessels are linked. No outer shielding, or cooling!

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:53 | 1043073 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

I'm assuming these are now light water reactors? low enrichment levels. Plutonium by product.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:16 | 1043104 CitizenPete
CitizenPete's picture

My understanding as well. 

 

Nothing like a graphite reactor (without any containment) -- that everyone keep comparing this to.  TMI would be closer example -- partial core melt. 

 

This is also a BWR so they can circulate though the Turbine condenser, right?  I'm pretty certain they have an Aux power source to circ the feedwater pumps, don't you think? 

 

Or the RHR system, if present? 

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:30 | 1043124 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Hense the boron (borite ) sodium reduction on valves. Looks like those turbines and valves are screwed pretty tight. TMI had containment and still failed. No follow thru though. Partial burns x4 could be really nasty! I'm guessing the backup feed is packed with junk from the waves. I like nuke ,but I like it built right!

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:10 | 1043091 CitizenPete
CitizenPete's picture

Hi,  I only worked on BWR and PWR and a bit on AP600/1000 Westinghouse designs.  So I am not familiar with the MOX (plutonium oxide core?) of these BWRs.  I don't know what the internals look like or anyling about the fuel bundles.  In a Mark 6 GE BWR there is a scram for safe shutdown -- this is a BORON injection.  In a previous life I have edited the drawings myself.  

 

I found this PFD which shows the simple design - see PAGE 3-9 (bottom).  Again this is a one time kill switch and I always understood that the reactor and the associated systems turned to crap. https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nrc.gov%2Freading-rm%2Fbasic-ref%2Fteachers%2F03.pdf

I have only been involved in  NSSS design and refuels and I am not involved in any operations (other than startup support).  

 

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:35 | 1043137 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Boron is directed into coolant, not the vessel core. Boron  reduces oxidation in high heat, relative to the sodium coolant around the reactor core. Physics are not on my pallete tonight. I hope it is contained sooner than later. I'm long usd/jpy and that 83.3 trend line held. I wish it was under better circumstances.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:09 | 1043095 CitizenPete
CitizenPete's picture

I would guess they have already had blow down and relief valves have gone off.  If this is a passive design the containment would be flooded at this point? Sooner or later they will have to release pressure (air water) to atmosphere? 

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:01 | 1043084 fragrantdingleberry
fragrantdingleberry's picture

After the BP blowout, some people were recommending that the well be nuked. Why can't they nuke a nuke plant too?

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:52 | 1043069 TuffsNotEnuff
TuffsNotEnuff's picture

The comments are a hoot.

Enjoy !

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 21:53 | 1043074 RmcAZ
RmcAZ's picture

Some guy posted this on the Reuters live feed:

Newest reports from NISA are talking about an 72x increase of outside radiation at the main gate of Daiichi, up from 8x. Current numbers:

MP6 (near the main gate) 0.07μSV / h 5.1μSV → / h (4:00 → 7:40)
MP8 (near the main gate) 0.07μSV / h 2.5μSV → / h (4:00 → 7:30)

No idea how legitimate this info is. But if it is legitimate, can anyone here with expertise in radiation levels comment on how serious this is?

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:03 | 1043087 fragrantdingleberry
fragrantdingleberry's picture

I wouldn't worry too much. You can't do anything about it anyway.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:05 | 1043177 Big Ben
Big Ben's picture

Wikipedia has an article on the Sievert:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sievert

To summarize, natural background radiation levels vary widely, but the average is around 2.4mSv/year. So at 5.1uSv/hour, it would take around 470 hours to pick up a yearly dose of background radiation.

It also says that when the radiation dose is received in one hour, 1 Sv typically causes nausea, 2-5 Sv can cause hair loss, hemorrhage, and possible death, and that with a 6 Sv dose survival is unlikely. At 5.1uSv/hour, it would take around 200,000 hours (22.3 years) to pick up a 1 Sv dose.

So while I wouldn't recommend hanging around there, even if you spent 5 hours there it would only amount to 1% of your yearly radiation exposure due to background radiation.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:09 | 1043189 robertocarlos
robertocarlos's picture

An expert on CNN said the present 1000 fold increase over normal background radiation poses no danger.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:23 | 1043233 Big Ben
Big Ben's picture

If normal background is 2.4mSv/year, that would be 0.27uSv/hour. So 5.1uSv/hour would be about 19 times the typical background rate.

However background radiation levels vary widely. There is a place in Iran where background levels of 260mSv/year have been reported. There are other hot spots in Brazil, India, Australia, and China.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:17 | 1043434 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Thanks for the half/life charts Ben.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:06 | 1043094 RmcAZ
RmcAZ's picture

Reuters - TEPCO is having difficulties trying to open valve to release pressure at Daiichi reactor: Kyodo

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:25 | 1043117 Lapri
Lapri's picture

Latest from Yomiuri Shinbun: Fukushima I and II Nuclear Plants were designed to withstand M.7.9 earthquakes. All emergency power generators stopped working within 1 hour of the earthquake.

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/03/japan-earthquake-nuclear-plants.html

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:24 | 1043118 CitizenPete
CitizenPete's picture

At 2:48PM on March 11th, the reactor of Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 (Boiling Water Reactor, rated output 1,100 Megawatts) shut down due to the impact of the earthquake. Make-up Water Condensate System was used to inject water into the reactor to cool it. Subsequently, at 6:07AM, the temperature of the suppression chamber exceeded 100 degrees. As the reactor pressure suppression function was lost, at 6:07AM, it was determined that a specific incident stipulated in article 15, clause 1 has occurred. Safety and Impact to the Environment - Currently, water level to cool irradiated fuels in the reactor is maintained. - Indication of monitoring posts installed in the site boundary is not different from normal. Currently, no radiation impact to the external environment has been confirmed. We will continue monitoring in detail discharge of radioactive material from exhaust stack and discharge canal.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:56 | 1043163 tom a taxpayer
tom a taxpayer's picture

CitizenPete - Just wondering if the "kill switch" (or whatever is the last emergency measure) is a last resort that operators might be reluctant to take because it shuts down the plant in such a severe manner that the plant would take years to bring on line or perhaps even not ever operated again? Not that the operators would not take the last resort, but that they want to try everything short of a last resort. Do you have any insight on use of the last resort? 

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 00:31 | 1043355 CitizenPete
CitizenPete's picture

Please see my previous post.   Thanks

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:38 | 1043140 grunk
grunk's picture

This thing melts down, they'll rename it Fukusallshima. 

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:50 | 1043151 CitizenPete
CitizenPete's picture

 

Like I said earlier -- they will have to start releasing to the atmosphere; Water and air release...   (reason for regional evac)    Somebody tell the birds and fishes please.             Battle to stabilise earthquake reactors 12 March 2011

UPDATE 2: 1.52 am GMT
 
 

Attention is focused on the Fukushima Daiichi and Daini nuclear power plants as Japan struggles to cope in the aftermath of its worst earthquake in recorded history. 

 

Three of Fukushima Daiichi's six reactors were in operation when yesterday's quake hit, at which point they shut down automatically and commenced removal of residual heat with the help of emergency diesel generators. However, these suddenly stopped about an hour later for reasons as yet unknown.

This led the plant owners Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) to notify the government of a technical emergency situation, which allows officials to take additional precautionary measures.

 

Even now, the primary focus of work at the site remains to connect enough portable power modules to fully replace the diesels and enable the full operation of cooling systems.  

Pressure and releases  

Without enough power for cooling systems, decay heat from the reactor cores of units 1, 2 and 3 has gradually reduced coolant water levels through evaporation. The consequent increase in pressure in the coolant circuit can be managed via pressure release valves. However, this leads to an increase in pressure within the reactor building containment. Tepco has said that the pressure within the containment of Fukushima Daiichi 1 has reached around 840 kPa, compared to reference levels of 400 kPa. 

  

The company has decided to manage this "for those units that cannot confirm certain levels of water injection" by means of a controlled release of air and water vapour to the atmosphere. Because this water has been through the reactor core, this would inevitably mean a certain release of radiation. The International Atomic Energy Agency said this would be filtered to retain radiation within the containment.  

 

However, the company's monitoring of Fukushima Daiichi 1 has separately shown an increase in radiation levels detected emerging from the plant via routes such as the exhaust stack and the discharge canal.

 

Over the last several hours evacuation orders for local residents have been incrementally increased and now cover people living within ten kilometres of the power plant.

 

 

 

Raised temperatures 

 

Meanwhile at adjacent Fukushima Daini, where four reactors have been shut down safely since the earthquake hit, Tepco has notified government of another emergency status. 

 

Unit 1's reactor core isolation cooling system had been operating normally, and this was later supplemented by a separate make-up water condensate system. However, the latter was lost at 5.32am local time when its suppression chamber reached 100ºC. This led Tepco to notify government of another technical emergency situation. 

 

Tepco has announced it will soon begin controlled releases to ease pressure in the containments of units 1, 2 3 and 4 at Fukushima Daini.  

 

A three kilometre evacuation is in progress, with residents in a zone out to ten kilometres given notice of potential expansion.

  

Researched and written by World Nuclear News

 

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:20 | 1043214 tom a taxpayer
tom a taxpayer's picture

What will be interesting is the post-emergency investigation that would determine whether these "technical emergency situations" were due to 1) earthquake and tsunami damage of facilities, and/or 2) inadequate emergency equipment maintenance, operator error, design flaws, etc.

Technical emergency situation 1 - "Three of Fukushima Daiichi's six reactors were in operation when yesterday's quake hit, at which point they shut down automatically and commenced removal of residual heat with the help of emergency diesel generators. However, these suddenly stopped about an hour later for reasons as yet unknown."

Technical emergency situation 2 -"Unit 1's reactor core isolation cooling system had been operating normally, and this was later supplemented by a separate make-up water condensate system. However, the latter was lost at 5.32am local time when its suppression chamber reached 100ºC. This led Tepco to notify government of another technical emergency situation."

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 22:53 | 1043158 Cursive
Cursive's picture

This news can't be good for Entergy's and Exelon's pending applications before the NERC.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 09:21 | 1043914 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

nor NRG South Texas Project 3 and 4

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:00 | 1043169 prophet
prophet's picture

Well at least we are not glued to remote cameras installed at exhaust pipes trying to armchair analyze what they are doing to the flow of gases.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:06 | 1043180 robertocarlos
robertocarlos's picture

God bless the hundreds of workers who will have to go in and cement this puppy over.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:06 | 1043182 Newsboy
Newsboy's picture

Thorium is looking better and better. It's much more stable in a worst case scenario like this. Maybe Japan will follow India to thorium.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:15 | 1043210 Misean
Misean's picture

I prefer lithium. Has fewer side effects for me.

Oh, THORIUM, not thorazine.

NVM

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:09 | 1043188 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

Nice Smithsonian Institute summary of the Three Mile Island incident, pointing out that it was in fact much worse than anyone knew at the time, with a partial meltdown, containment vessel failure, molten fuel puddled on the floor of the containment building, and only a few hours and some blind luck from a total disaster.

http://americanhistory.si.edu/tmi/tmi03.htm

Don't let anyone tell you otherwise: when the first robots went in and took pictures, much later, it was a complete shock how bad it was and how close it had been.  The official story was that they never approached the melting temperature of the fuel....and yes, Virginia, this is a PWR, not a 'dirty bomb' Chernobyl design.  So this is what Japan is facing now, only in multiple units.

The TMI scenario is not a feel-good story.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:46 | 1043291 Big Ben
Big Ben's picture

... and only a few hours and some blind luck from a total disaster.

I disagree with your characterization of the article. There is nothing which suggests that a breach of the containment structure was ever a possibility. Those structures were extremely strong and were designed to withstand the impact of a passenger jet.

People can read the article for themselves and come to their own conclusions. When I read it, I see a lot of scary language and hype which was probably written by an opponent of nuclear energy. But I don't see anything which suggests that a disaster was imminent.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:06 | 1043501 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

Your disagreement with my characterization is duly noted.  But there was a much later investigation conducted by the OECD and NRC specifically because the damage to the core was so much worse than anyone thought, and the damage to containment should have been much worse, according to the kinds of 'real honest to gosh engineers' that nuclear romantics take seriously.  They honestly did not think it could handle that thermal stress.

I just wish people could handle reality a bit more in between meaningless politicized extremes.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:02 | 1043579 Big Ben
Big Ben's picture

Since I didn't agree with your interpretation of the first article, there is no reason to think that I would agree with your characterization of the OECD/NRC report that you mention. Could you post a link to the report and specifically note the sections where the 'real honest to gosh engineers' claim that the containment could not handle the stress?

Otherwise, we just have your word for what the report said.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 11:13 | 1044224 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

Funny, none of the 'real engineers' here ever posts any actual information.  Although the like acronyms.  Cuz it looks so....credible.  I have put a lot of excellent information on this site for years now, so--the burden is on you.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:01 | 1043405 TBT or not TBT
TBT or not TBT's picture

And yet I feel fine about it, all in.

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:27 | 1043249 High Plains Drifter
High Plains Drifter's picture

Looks like Libya has been knocked off the front page for the forseeable future. So the president for life , needs to make his move and getter done.......

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:45 | 1043288 Atomizer
Atomizer's picture

Humor:

Never fear, Johnny Sokko is here.

 

Fact:

Data from station QSPA (South Pole, Antarctica)

Data from station WAKE (Wake Island, Pacific Ocean)

Humor:

650 Days 1 Hour 46 Minutes 25 Seconds Until the Pole Shift...Boo! This is what the doomers are predicting regarding timeframe.

 

In fact, the poles are shifting and Earthquakes do occur. Some of our finest multinational thieves are so pissed that the earthquakes don't generate CO2.  

Anyhow, keep a watchful eye on activity within the polar regions. Now might be a time for the greenies to set up a new foundation.

Adopt a fuzzy bear from polar shift extinction. Just phone your regional NGO branch for special details.

Regarding all the static on levels of radiation, let the dust settle. They have no fucking clue how many human beings are dead. What makes you think they can this bit of info correct?

Fri, 03/11/2011 - 23:56 | 1043304 FreeAndSustainable
FreeAndSustainable's picture

The headline, and the preceding article on ZH may convey the notion that this is like the Deepwater Horizon accident. I.e. the longer it gets the worse it is.

Actually, it is exactly the contrary : As all the reactors have been properly shut down  - through the control bar and probably the release of all borated water (bore is a nuclear reaction poison) -, there is only decay heat left, which is a small and most importantly exponentially decreasing portion of the reactor nominal power. After one hour (when the coolant pump went AWOL), decay heat is 7% of the nominal power, after 3 hours, close to 1%, after 24 hours, close to 0.5%.

 

 

As some point, natural circulation of water (I.e. without a pump. but only through temperature-induced coolant density change) will be sufficient to dissipate the heat, although I assume they will bring new diesel generator before that. Again, the longer it goes, the less powerful the pump, and therefore the generator, will need to be.

 

That is not to say that this is not a serious accident, and it will certainly be reflected in the accident classification by the IEA, but, from what we know,  we are a far cry from Chernobyl or even TMI. 

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 00:32 | 1043328 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

It seems that generators have been trucked in to power the cooling pumps, and according to the latest IAEA bulletin, the water is still above the fuel rods, and they are venting from the inner to the outer containment to lower the pressure....although they also pointed out that gas releases would be filtered to limit radioactive material contamination of the environment, which should not happen in a cross-containment pressure release....unless the pressure in the outer containment starts to exceed design pressure and releases to the environment are required. Some reports are suggesting that containment design pressures have been exceeded by 2.1 times max, other reports say 2.1 times normal operating pressure, but none of these reports say whether this is in the inner or outer containment. The gas, if it has to be vented to atmosphere, is typically vented through HEPA filters and dense-packed charcoal to catch particulate matter. Radioactive gas or steam vented into the atmosphere will dissipate reasonably quickly, and it seems the prevailing winds are blowing off-shore, although are circling back over southern Japan and toward the Korean Peninsula. If they control the heat and stabilize the core, it is likely that the fuel rods (I believe being MOX) will probably have suffered cladding damage, so will have to be replaced. Many people in Japan are opposed to the use of MOX (partial plutonium) in Japanese reactors, so it would be likely that a long series of hearings, safety reviews and re-permitting will be required. In the event the heat cannot be controlled, then it will probably be necessary to poison the reactor with the stand-by boron water system, which in many reactors is powered by high-pressure Nitrogen accumulators, and does not require pumps....only the activation of an explosive valve that releases the kill liquid. This would not necessarily prevent a containment breach from latent heat pressure,  but should stop the resulting mass reaction if the fuel rods melt and pool in the inner containment. But, they will perform controlled vents to atmosphere before they will risk a containment failure.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 00:19 | 1043339 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

Dbl

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 00:39 | 1043364 CitizenPete
CitizenPete's picture

Impact to TEPCO's Facilities due to Miyagiken-Oki Earthquake (as of 10AM)

 

[Nuclear Power Station] Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station: Units 1 to 3: shutdown due to earthquake Units 4 to 6: outage due to regular inspection * The national government has instructed evacuation for those local residents within 10km radius of the periphery. * Measurement of radioactive material (Iodine, etc.) by monitoring car indicates increasing value compared to normal level. One of the monitoring posts is also indicating higher than normal level. We will continue monitoring discharge of radioactive material from exhaust stack and discharge canal, etc. * Considering the increasing pressure with in the reactor containment vessel of Unit 1, the national government has instructed us to implement measures to reduce the pressure of the reactor containment vessel (partial discharge of air containing radioactive materials) in order to fully secure safety. Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Station: Units 1 to 4: shutdown due to earthquake * The national government has instructed evacuation for those local residents within 3km radius of the periphery and indoor standby for those local residents between 3km and 10km radius of the periphery. * At present, we have decided to prepare implementing measures to reduce the pressure of the reactor containment vessel (partial discharge of air containing radioactive materials) in order to fully secure safety. These measures are considered to be implemented in Units 1 to 4 and accordingly, we have reported and/or noticed the government agencies concerned. Kashiwazaki Kariwa Nuclear Power Station: Units 1, 5, 6, 7: normal operation Units 2 to 4: outage due to regular inspection [Thermal Power Station] Hirono Thermal Power Station Units 2 and 4: shutdown due to earthquake Hitachinaka Thermal Power Station Unit 1: shutdown due to earthquake Kashima Thermal Power Station Units 2, 3, 5, 6: shutdown due to earthquake Ohi Thermal Power Station Units 2, 3: shutdown due to earthquake Higashi-Ohgishima Thermal Power Station Unit 1: shutdown due to earthquake [Hydro Power Station] 5 stations in Fukushima Prefecture were shutdown due to earthquake. Power stations in Yamanashi Prefecture have been restored. [Transmission System, etc.] 5 substations shown below have been shutdown: - Naka Substation - Shin Motegi Substation - Joban Substation - Ibaraki Substation - Nishi Mito Substation [Blackout in TEPCO's Service Area] Total of about 1 million households are out of power. Tokyo: 0 Kanagawa Pref.: 5,533 Tochigi Pref.: 214,817 Chiba Pref.: 134,611 Saitama Pref: 0 Gunma Pref.: 0 Ibaraki Pref: 642,657 Yamanashi Pref: 0 Shizuoka Pref: 0 (east of Fuji River) [Supply and Demand Status within TEPCO's Service Area to Secure Stable Power Supply] Backup supply from Shinshinano Conversion Station: 600MW Backup supply from Sakuma Conversion Station: 300MW Backup supply from Higashi Shimizu Conversion Station: 100MW

 

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 00:57 | 1043400 CitizenPete
CitizenPete's picture

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-03-12/tokyo-electric-starts-venting-r...

 

Radioactive Gas Released From Nuclear Plant Damaged by Japan’s EarthQuake

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:24 | 1043440 Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 I am watching NHK....first they said that 90 cm of the top of the core was above water...and that the cooling water is leaking.And they just detected cesium in the air...and suspect fuel rods may have melted.

 Cesium detection is a BAD sign, and core exposure=FAIL.

 They are adding cooling water like mad, but it looks grim.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:35 | 1043457 Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 They are now broadcasting tsunami warnings complete with a map of Japan with the warning areas flashing colors corresponding to the predicted wave height.

  What a horrible mess for the poor Japanese.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:56 | 1043492 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

If the fuel rods become uncovered, then it is close to game over. The boron poison system must be damaged, since if this is correct, it should have been deployed to prevent a core melt reaction. Earlier they could not circulate cooling water....maybe now they have the emergency generators up and are pumping, but the flow torus may be damaged. If....and I repeat IF this info is true....uncovered rods, cooling flow not coping with heat and rod submersion, and boron system not deployed, things could get bad.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:13 | 1043512 Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 Add iodine to the list, cesium and iodine both detected....it looks bad for that reactor.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:18 | 1043519 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

Cesium is the main thing....it is mainly a product of a fuel rod, and due to its high melting point, does not normally exist in signifigant amounts outside the cladding. If it is being emitted, then the rods are certainly damaged. If they are not dumping boron into that thing now...then it is because they cannot. No, if this is correct, and it seems to be, then things are not good.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:25 | 1043528 Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 It really sucks, at a minimum the reactor is junk now.I hope they don't get a major release...but since the reactor endured such a huge seismic hit, there is no way to tell how badly compromised containment is.They have sent their radiological response team to a headquarters 5km away from the reactor....not a good sign.

 The whole situation in Japan is horrible....what a mess.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:44 | 1043554 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

My hope is that they can still prevent a core melt. Yes, the reactor core is probably damaged, and if it survives, to get back on-line will probably require a lot of work....maybe impossible - this thing is, after all, 40 years old. The real problem long-term is the impact on Japanese society, although most of which were not alive for Hiroshima/Nagasaki, have it in them as a part of their historical culture.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:48 | 1043562 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

On a more general note, you are right. I lived in Japan for a few years, and have travelled there often. I like the Japanese and their culture. Now, they have had a massive earthquake, a massive tsunami, fires, avalanches and a possible nuclear plant meltdown. All in a few days. I have been going on about nuke technology, and am just now starting to realize the real impact of this horrible distaster.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:04 | 1043581 Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 The nuke failure is a minor sideshow...the fires are incredible.They are losing cities.NHK showed a place where a town was erased by tsunami.It is really horrible...and continuous tsunami warnings as I type this.

  I hope they can get the power plants back online....5 million are without power and it will take a long time to restore....giant sections of the grid were destroyed.

  In the aftermath I am sure studies will be done on reactor safety there.I hope it does not hurt the use of nuclear power there.They sure do need it.

  NHK says there were 13 diesel sets to power emergency cooling....and all failed from earthquake damage.That indicates very severe infrastructure damage.

 I hope Japan recovers quickly...it is heartbreaking.And now NHK is giving fallout survival info....wash clothes after being outside, keep a wet cloth over your face, etc.

  Poor Japan.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:24 | 1043600 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

Yeah, this sucks beyond belief. I focus on nuc stuff because I know something about it, but it is only one problem they have. It is the compounding of disasters that is heartbreaking. I was told by someone on the ground that gen sets had been trucked in and were being connected to provide power to coolant pumps. Not sure if that did not work, or if the coolant torus got damaged. But, you also have rice field flooded with saltwater, semiconductor plants off-line due to vibration and power outages, coastal seafood operations destroyed....Bonds will have to be issued for rebuilding, their oil imports will go up....Japan imports a lot of commodities. This has the makings of a real economic disaster as well as an infrastructure and social one.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:30 | 1043605 Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 Yes. The coolant level continues to fall,BTW.1.7 meters of core exposed.

  And NHK says 14 gensets failed, up one from the 13 reported earlier.The presenter looks  overwhelmed on NHK world.

  Japan is in my prayers tonite.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:46 | 1043620 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

1.7 meters of fuel rod exposure sounds bad, but it depends on the heat flux still in the core. Some cooling is transmitted up the rods from the coolant below, but if no coolant flow is going on, then a type of blackbody thermal equilibrium (temporary) eventually comes into play, where the coolant existing in the core reaches rod temperature, then the uncovered section of the rods try to transmit heat from the soak below into hot ambient air, and unable to do this, swell and rupture the cladding. Without a kill mechanism that absorbs neutron flux, things can get hairy here.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:56 | 1043633 Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

   It sure sounds hairy to me.And they can't get to the pressure release valves...one of them is too hot with radiation.It sounds like a total clusterfuck...

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:23 | 1043441 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

That fox nit wit was wrong. Control rods are dropped into a sodium bath. The heat (neutron) interaction in the bath is transferred through coils into a heat transfer circuit. There are not rods alligned to directly absorb heat in the reactor vessel. Unless it's a heavy water facility! Period!

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:41 | 1043467 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

The control rods are inserted into guide tubes inside a fuel rod element, and absorb neutrons to moderate the reaction.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:40 | 1043611 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

The rods are inserted to control/modulate heat in the bath. Yes pellets are inserted into titanium rods. The control rods modulate reactor heat. The coils around  the reactor transfer heat.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:53 | 1043629 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

Controlling neutron flux moderates the heat. Heat is a secondary reaction. The control rods are inserted into guide tubes in each fuel rod module, in an emergency they can be scrammed (dropped) into the modules. I used to design them.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:06 | 1043641 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

For the gallery. Neutron flux is the deflection of highly excited (high density atoms) The control rods are fixed on a seperate pallate to control scram(shutdown) down. These rods are filled with neutron absorbers for service and shutdowns.The reactor heat is as I said secondary. Via coils around the reactor core. Thanks for re-affirming my previous post Aristarchan.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:31 | 1043450 stoverny
stoverny's picture

market pulse

March 12, 2011, 12:20 a.m. EST

Japan warns of meltdown at quake-hit plant: Kyodo

Japanese authorities said there was a high chance of a nuclear meltdown at a plant in Fukushima operated by Tokyo Electric Power Corp. also known as Tepco, according to Kyodo News.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/japan-warns-of-meltdown-at-quake-hit-pl...

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:39 | 1043460 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture

Sounds pretty FUBAR to me:

  • BREAKING NEWS: Radioactive Cesium detected near Fukushima plant: nuke safety commission (14:20)
  • BREAKING NEWS: Fukushima nuke plant might be experiencing nuclear meltdown (14:13)

 

http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/76948.html

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:53 | 1043485 anvILL
anvILL's picture

I have never seen news show up in this size on the Nikkei.(the news, not the index)

http://www.nikkei.com/

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:56 | 1043489 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture

Thanks.

Here is the English translation Nikkei version, and yes, it is remarkably bold-faced font for the usually reserved Nikkei News Service:

Nuclear Authorities: Nuclear Reactor May Be Experiencing A Meltdown

TOKYO (Dow Jones)--Japanese nuclear authorities said Saturday afternoon the Fukushima Daiichi No. 1 nuclear reactor 240 kilometers north of Tokyo may be experiencing a meltdown after Friday's massive earthquake damaged the cooling system.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:52 | 1043482 baconator3000
baconator3000's picture

No worries.....The Bernanke is dropping fresh billions of pounds of printed cash on the reactors right now. The money should keep the fallout from reaching the atmosphere.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 01:58 | 1043495 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

Remember, engineers who work with nuclear power say it is safe.

Maybe they will even say it again. 

This is all impossible.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:05 | 1043499 fuu
fuu's picture

Al Jazeera just quoted Japanese nuclear authorities stating a meltdown is now probable.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:14 | 1043513 DaveyJones
DaveyJones's picture

They're headlines are learning from the west. This is deeper in the article:

'No Chernobyl possible'

However, Naoto Sekimura, a professor at the University of Tokyo, said a major radioactive disaster was unlikely.

"No Chernobyl is possible at a light water reactor. Loss of coolant means a temperature rise, but it also will stop the
reaction," he said.

"Even in the worst-case scenario, that would mean some radioactive leakage and equipment damage, but not an explosion. If venting is done carefully, there will be little leakage. Certainly not beyond the 3 km radius."

Japan's Prime Minister Naoto Kan said securing the nuclear plants were Japan's top priority. Early on Saturday morning, he left on a helicopter ride to Fukushima to assess the situation at the plants operated by Tokyo Electric Power, and in other areas in the disaster zone.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:24 | 1043525 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

See extensive earlier discussions of Chernobyl vs. Three Mile Island scenarios.  TMI is not a feel-good scenario, especially with buildings full of water and structural damage.  Basically they don't know what's coming.

The quote you mention was in earlier articles, before this new statement from the government--that statement is the only new information causing the giant headlines.

The expert ruling out explosions may not have thought about ruptured gas lines, fuel tanks, downed wires, etc. etc. etc.

Why not some more appeal to good luck and/or prayer, and less misplaced confidence in the robustness of massively complex systems under unprecedented stress?  Remind anyone of the financial engineering profession? 

Humility, sheesh.  It's in the hands of the Seven Lucky Gods of Japan.  The goddamn systems have failed already.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:08 | 1043504 anvILL
anvILL's picture

Update on the Japanese Nikkei at 15:02 Japan.
Self Defence Force has been requested to supply water for cooling the reactor.
This looks terribly desparate....
http://www.nikkei.com/

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:36 | 1043537 Big Ben
Big Ben's picture

There was a partial meltdown in the US Three Mile Island accident, but it only lead to a minor release of radiation and no one was killed or injured.

However a meltdown would probably mean an expensive cleanup and the reactor would probably be damaged beyond repair. At the very least, it would be a long time before it would be back online.

If there is no meltdown, the reactors could be restarted after repairs and a thorough damage inspection.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:40 | 1043547 reader2010
reader2010's picture

is this just a prelude to what could happen in 2012?

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:11 | 1043506 Mentalic
Mentalic's picture

OT: Yahoo headline:

 

Stocks inch higher day after Japan earthquake

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Stocks-inch-higher-day-after-apf-257219421...

 

Very surreal....Bad news is good news for the stock market....

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:19 | 1043518 LRC Fan
LRC Fan's picture

Not surreal at all.  Dollar down, Dow up.  BTFD (dip, not dollar).  As someone said earlier, HFT bots don't give a flying fuck about radiation, earthquakes, rape, tax cuts, unions, or Charlie Sheen.  B.T.F.D. is all they know. 

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:23 | 1043510 CitizenPete
CitizenPete's picture

 

SENDAI, Japan -- A nuclear power plant affected by a massive earthquake is facing a possible meltdown, an official with Japan's nuclear safety commission said Saturday.

Ryohei Shiomi said that officials were checking whether a meltdown [core melt] had taken place at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant's Unit 1, which had lost cooling ability ...

 

Japan's nuclear safety agency said the situation was most dire at Fukushima Daiichi's Unit 1, where pressure had risen to twice what is consider the normal level. The International Atomic Energy Agency said in a statement that diesel generators that normally would have kept cooling systems running at Fukushima Daiichi had been disabled by tsunami flooding.

 

Hmmm... water line got below the top of the fuel bundles?  Emergency DG set got flooded so no power -- no aux power? -- because they shut down and other plants probably shutdown or tripped? -- so recirc pumps (and any LPCI/HPCI) had no power?  Are these units passive ABWR or BWR - in other woeds is the suppression pool above (gravity fed) or below the reactor (blow down)?  Either way the steam release in the containment has caused the pressure to be high enough that they are releasing.  Hopefully HEPAs and Radwaste systems are now functioning. 

 

Not good. Fukushima lessons learned: 1) locate generator set and deisel above flood level. (if thats what happened) 2)...

 

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:27 | 1043530 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

Plant is early 1970s vintage, I think 1971.  Draw your own conclusions.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:34 | 1043541 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

It is my understanding that the emergency passive cooling pool is below the core, but was designed to operate on convection flow. It was also deemed highly unlikely that both on-site and off-site power sources would go down simultaneously. It seems like there is a lot more infrastructural damage at this plant than earlier reported or realized.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:43 | 1043553 cosmictrainwreck
cosmictrainwreck's picture

"...more than earlier realized" yup; that's true more often than not with any kind of "disaster" unfortunately 

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:47 | 1043694 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

You are correct. core cooling is from the bottom. Core size and shape can effect cooling (points) Generally a core service point is from the top. Liquid coolant under presure makes  servicing easier, when the cavity is evacuated. Think of being in space. The contaminates surface after the pressure is relieved.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:49 | 1043700 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

I would discuss how to build a nuke with you, but I love my country and family.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:13 | 1043511 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture

URGENT: Concerns of core partially melting at Fukushima nuke plant

TOKYO, March 12, Kyodo

The core at Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant's No. 1 reactor may be partially melting, the nuclear safety agency said Saturday.

Radioactive substance cesium was detected around the reactor, it said.

==Kyodo

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:15 | 1043515 Drag Racer
Drag Racer's picture

Al Jazeera just reported that Japan's energy dept said meltdown is 'probable'

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:21 | 1043520 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture

Casualties being reported @ Fukushima No. 1

TimeOutTokyo: Reports confirm that 2 people have died at Fukushima nuclear reactor 1, and 1 person at nuclear reactor 2

 

 

 

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:34 | 1043538 RmcAZ
RmcAZ's picture

More legitimate source? I have not seen this anywhere and don't trust random Twitter feeds.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:55 | 1043571 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture

I can't vouch for the twitter feed, but that Nikkei News headline about a meltdown in the making should scare anyone.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:48 | 1043565 Big Ben
Big Ben's picture

What killed them? Radiation levels only 1000 times higher than background are not going to kill anyone.

However, from the photo, it appears that the reactor is right next to the ocean. If so, perhaps the tsunami killed them.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:27 | 1043531 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture

Fukushima is on the order of 8x (I think) larger than Chernobyl.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:28 | 1043532 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

If all this is true, then it will have a terrible impact on the Japanese psyche.....Hiroshima. Nagasaki.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:37 | 1043546 RmcAZ
RmcAZ's picture

Reuters - Japan nuclear authorities: successfully released pressure at Fukushima plant by opening valves

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:47 | 1043559 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

nope. not by my sources.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:56 | 1043574 reader2010
Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:41 | 1043550 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

oh fuck! I knew it. Got to move the family south. Meltdown!

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:45 | 1043556 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

the first reactor blew!

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:46 | 1043557 baconator3000
baconator3000's picture

source?

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:49 | 1043561 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

patience my ass. the diving team cleared #2 inlet?

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:01 | 1043578 RmcAZ
RmcAZ's picture

Quit junking up the site posting stupid shit that isn't legitimate and has no source.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:11 | 1043645 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

How are your sources now ? Junk meister!

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:47 | 1043560 baby_BLYTHE
baby_BLYTHE's picture

Damn you people are depressing.

This shit isn't worth it.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:39 | 1043684 ft65
ft65's picture

baby_BLYTHE Please go back to the other place from whence you came!

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:51 | 1043566 baconator3000
baconator3000's picture

oh junk me. real mature fag

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:56 | 1043573 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

I like bacon, and therefore I like you.I'm wanting some breakfast at the wrong time!

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:51 | 1043568 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

Still total silence on the 'other other plant' Onagawa, which put out a fire but quietly reported another unit was experiencing a water leak.  That was like twelve hours ago.  Onagawa is in the real disaster zone. 

It's confusing because Fukushima Daiichi is in the town of Onahama.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:53 | 1043569 reader2010
reader2010's picture

Warren Buffett's Swiss Re is gonna get some big insurance claims there.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 02:57 | 1043577 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

This thing is no where close to being fixed. Too much Tv.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:10 | 1043587 robertocarlos
robertocarlos's picture

I call BS. The MSM wants me glued to CNN 24 hrs a day waiting for a meltdown that won't happen.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:10 | 1043589 RmcAZ
RmcAZ's picture

NHK:

Agency: Uranium fuel may be melting at reactor

The government's Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency says 2 radioactive substances, cesium and radioactive iodine, have been detected near the Number One reactor at the Fukushima Number One nuclear power station.

The agency says this indicates that some of the metal containers of uranium fuel may have started melting.
The substances are produced by fuel fission.

University of Tokyo Professor Naoto Sekimura says only a small part of the fuel may have melted and leaked outside.

He called on residents near the power station to stay calm, saying that most of the fuel remains inside the reactor, which has stopped operation and is being cooled.

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/12_45.html

Almost all of these articles I have been reading say "Oh it's just a little radiation..." and now it's "Oh, it's just a little cesium/iodine/uranium." What's next?

Lots of conflicting information on this, but it sure doesn't sound like it's getting any better.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:43 | 1043614 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Gotta love the subversive (low enriched uranium) approach.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:45 | 1043619 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Send me a steam cloud from that site! All the good water vapor?

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:13 | 1043591 robertocarlos
robertocarlos's picture

Would somebody nuke Libya so we don't have to split our time between these two news stories.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:13 | 1043592 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture

These containment vessels were not built to withstand a 9.0 or 9.1 magnitude earthquake.

 

One has to wonder at how much damage to the containment structures occurred.

The Japanese Gov is moving hot and heavy now, as both cesium and iodine have been detected at Fukushima indicating the containers of uranium fuel have begun to melt.

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/12_45.html

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:25 | 1043603 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

Keep in mind that the containment structures were built to withstand a 6.7 DIRECTLY UNDER THE PLANT. An 8.9 230 miles away does not translate directly as far as ground acceleration is concerned under the plant itself.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:35 | 1043608 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture

Fair point.

 

But as I understand it, the EQ has been upgraded to an official 9.1, and the magnitude of energy and damage between a 6.7 and a 9.1 is literally light years apart.

How that reconciles, proportionately, given the distance factor, I do not know.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:57 | 1043636 Aristarchan
Aristarchan's picture

Nobody knows at this point. Will have to wait for the accelerometer readings from the plant itself. It is possible that the G-force readings will be higher than design criteria, if so, then I suspect nuclear plants will become much harder to build in the future - anywhere.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:21 | 1043657 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

You are post facto! how do we fix it?

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:19 | 1043596 baconator3000
baconator3000's picture

I love of how some of you assholes just make stuff up. Like you come into a thread and 

 

"YELLOWSTONE JUST BLEW UP" 

 

and get people freaking out. fu fu fu. im going to bed.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:24 | 1043601 Glass Steagall
Glass Steagall's picture

ass-clown

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:22 | 1043599 robertocarlos
robertocarlos's picture

CNN is useless.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:33 | 1043607 Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 Watch NHK.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:45 | 1043621 Glass Steagall
Glass Steagall's picture

So, yesterday PIMCO dumps all its Treasuries. Today the dollar rallies. Anything to this?

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:48 | 1043625 RmcAZ
RmcAZ's picture

Reuters: Explosion heard at Tepco's Fukushima Daiichi plant - Jiji

Not good...

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:13 | 1043647 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Reaaly! Your sources?

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:55 | 1043631 sax
sax's picture

24 hours to repair the problem...

Where is Jack Bauer when you need him

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:55 | 1043632 Mentalic
Mentalic's picture

Reuters: Japan Nuclear Safety Commission: still trying to confirm if there was an explosion at Fukushima plant; Several people appear to have been injured after reported Fukushima plant explosion

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 03:56 | 1043634 Panafrican Funk...
Panafrican Funktron Robot's picture

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/12_38.html

They had to stop the pressure release due to high radiation.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:14 | 1043648 RmcAZ
RmcAZ's picture

Outer structure of building that houses reactor at Fukushima plant appears to have blown off - NHK

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:20 | 1043655 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

Beat it!

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:19 | 1043653 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

It's irrelevant. They lost control of the reactors. The cores of the other reactors are going to get HOT!

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:18 | 1043654 TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture


  Here is video of explosion that has apparently ripped the hull off the nuclear facility! http://www.twitvid.com/LICNU

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:22 | 1043662 RmcAZ
RmcAZ's picture

Wow... that doesn't look good at all.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:24 | 1043663 robertocarlos
robertocarlos's picture

That was huge. The people that convinced me that the reactor is safe might have some splaining to do.

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:26 | 1043664 reader2010
reader2010's picture

They're fucked. Much worse than Hiroshima?

Sat, 03/12/2011 - 04:31 | 1043671 Mentalic
Mentalic's picture

Man !! That's some explosion...

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!