You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.
Obama escalates in Afghanistan
Obama escalates in Afghanistan
by Project Mayhem
Nobel 'Peace' Prize winner Obama escalates war in Afghanistan in act of Orwellian tragedy.
Within the first several minutes of the speech , Obama , brow furrowed, aggressive and serious, was working the crowd over with frightening words like 'slaughter' , 'terror' , 'Taleban' , 'ruthless' , 'ravaged' and so on. The West Point cadets sit uncomfortably as our heroic Nobel Peace Prize winner comes out sounding far more like a Roman military commander than like compassionate and liberal sitting President. To be honest the whole process was disgusting and I will not dwell on it further, other than the fact there was no mention of this. But as we all know, truth is the first casualty in war.
In terms of the political implications of this event, it is obvious we are witnessing an a serious and long-term escalation in Afghanistan by yet another President obsessed by war and acting on behalf of banks and defense contractors. But here, by 'Afghanistan', we implicitly mean Pakistan, which must necessarily enter chaos in order to meet the political objectives of Kissinger, Brzezinski, and others. So when you hear Afghanistan, think Pakistan.
Pakistan is now ravaged by CIA Predator drone attacks and in is on the brink of civil war in the Pashtun regions. But civil war appears this was precisely the political objectives of those operating behind the scenes in the Western political establishment -- to include the CFR and Trilateral Commission. We have known for some time that Brzezinski has favored fracturing Afghanistan-Pakistan into a series of micro-states. There are four major political objectives here, which you will not hear discussed outside of closed doors.
1) Protection of the Afghan drug trade
2) Control of Eurasian Oil supplies and pipeline routes
3) Fomentation of a longer-term conflict with Russia and China
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. He definitely knows Judo..
SCO summit in Russia - June 16, 2009
The former head of Pakistani ISI from 1987 to 1989 -- Lt. Gen. Hamid
Gul (on far left in above picture)-- has made the claim that the newly
created Afghan Intelligence Agency 'RAMA' has the officially-sanctioned
purpose of destabilizing neighboring Pakistan. A bold claim indeed.
4) Access to the strategic Pakistani deep-water ports
Pakistani deep-water port. US wants it. China wants it.
Deep-water ports -- strategically important.
The troop levels in Afghanistan now rival the levels when Russia was lost amongst its' quagmire 30 years ago. Pakistan is now in play. All that is required is a Gulf of Tonkin incident.
Project Mayhem Research (PMR) is a DC/Baltimore-based grassroots think tank dedicated to exposing corruption worldwide. PMR is affiliated with Zerohedge.com, a popular and growing anti-corruption site, through contribution of free articles for the public. Topics include the politics of war and weapons systems, unexpected applications of cybernetics, the growing international surveillance state, global warming 'deindustrialization' economics, broad systemic international corruption , in-depth policy analysis of studies from bank and military funded research groups, genetic analysis and surveillance of pandemic influenza, corruption in the international gold market, the power structure and history of the global elite, and analysis of their political objectives expressed through monopolistic international finance capital (read: powerful banks) between now and 2050.
Sign up for free news updates and future subscription information--
»
The purpose of more warfare across the world is one fold - to weaken the populous at home by removing anyone that can fight.
Open your eyes people, this has to do with money and control, not anything whatsoever with the common man except weakening him and his family.
First his money, then his life -- wake up fools.
Finally, someone gets it!
[Offensive] Wars are for one of two things, often encompasing both:
1) Acquire resources;
2) Control dissent within one's country.
Power is being challenged. It is fighting back, but eventually it will lose as it ends up using more and more energy being destructive than constructive.
As things go today there's a loss in the constructuve material (due to resource depletion, escalating costs). This has to be offset by the destructive, though this sets up a negative downward spiral, which not only places the common person in peril, but also the powers themselves.
A comment on the Bush/Obama doctrine. No one seems to see how these policies can be dangerous to us.
Mexico has problems with drug cartels with US weapons. They are within their right to now bomb US based ammunition and weapon manufacturing plants.
Any US citizen (military, CIA or otherwise) captured can be sent to any country and tortured for information (just like our black prisons).
By our rules and definitions - 9/11 can be classified as a defensive first strike.
China already has a port on the Indian Ocean, in Burma. In addition, they are constructing two pipelines from the Arakan (Rakhine) coast in Burma to Kunming. One pipeline will carry natural gas, recovered from Burma's massive offshore deposits, and exploited by a host of firms from China, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, South Korea and Australia, many using platforms on lease from the US firm Transocean (so much for the effectiveness of sanctions when one is politically connected in Washington). The second pipeline will carry crude oil shipped from the Middle East, saving China the dangerous trip through the pirate infested waters of the Straits of Malacca. (A gas pipeline operated by the French firm Total and the US firm Chevron currently carries gas from Burma to Thailand, and is responsible for 25% of the junta's revenues. When the Burma Sanctions Bill hit Congress' floor, effective lobbying removed Chevron from any possible repercussions and economic loss. Such is the moral high ground the US claims to occupy.)
Just to show that not all shenanigans are the monopoly of Western Powers, one of the prime contractors in the port/pipeline is a company called Asia World, whose owner is Lo Hsing Han, a Kokang Chinese and the so-called King of Opium, Southeast Asia's top druglord. Day to day operations are run by his Harvard Business School educated son, Steven Law, who is married to a woman from one of Singapore's top families. Singapore may execute the occasional Filipina maid or Vietnamese bargirl for possessing a gram or two of heroin, but when the rich druglords hit town, the Singapore Government rolls out the red carpet. As a humorous aside, much of the Burmese junta's ill-gotten gains, as well the monies of the druglords, flows from Singapore banks to Temasek, who was a major investor in the ill-timed Merrill Lynch bailout.
To say the least, Bentham is unprofessional, and highly questionable as a source.
Bentham is not a member of OASPA. (Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association).
They are better known for spamming researchers than publishing scholarly scientific research.
The editor-in-chief resigned because this particular paper was published without her knowledge or approval.
They seem to publish virtually anything submitted, including “C.R.A.P.” (Center for Research in Applied Phrenology), as long as the fee is paid. This (2009) case alone proves that the claim by The Open Information Science Journal (TOISCIJ) to “enforce peer-review” is a lie.
http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2009/06/10/nonsense-for-dollars/
The author was told that this obvious bunk had been peer-reviewed, and was instructed to “pay US$800, to be sent to a post office box in the SAIF Zone, a tax-free complex in the United Arab Emirates.”
This is not an isolate incident:
http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2009/06/bentham-editors-resign.html
Those rascals at MIT. Sitting around with nothing to do.
http://apps.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/scicache/724/scimakelatex.43538.Tyler+Durde...
Any thoughts about the big party for India's prime minister and the IMF allowing them to purchase 200 MT of gold?
Did we buy the blessing from India? Will they can finally get Kashmir?
PM, if you will, explain a good question raised by OxfordJoe re why it is profitable for Western Governments to protect the Drug trade?
PM another great read, but please - less of the pompous scientific bamboozlement that you are beginning to throw around to explain the virus thoeries. I know about your background- it's science etc, but its like a finance graduate who now works as a brick-layer, explaining to all the other brick-layers about the EMH.
BO is not a leader. If you decide to fight a war, if you decide it is in our vital interest, if you say we will have resolve, but don't use overwhelming force, don't have any real plan for victory, and tell everyone we will retreat in 18 months, well then you are a political pandering moron - our President.
And the MSM just soaks it up without any serious questions - as does the majority of the general public who remains focused on whether they can get that big screen TV or not, while others are forced to provide them health care.
Last night Soetoro said, "Our prosperity provides a foundation for our power."
Given that we have to borrow every flippin' dollar for these wars, we're screwed.
"Our prosperity provides a foundation for our power."
I burst out laughing when Obama said that, startling my wife sitting beside me on the couch.
Our prosperity.....that's some funny shit Barry!
you misspelled "escalate": e-j-a-c-u-l-a-t-e. honestly though, i'd get one helluva woody if i could invade the senate with my fully loaded m-16.
you don't need religion to see the karma that's coming our way.
i am sorry that our men and women are over there fighting. but let us not forget. they volunteered for this. no one made them go. also one must remember that if anyone invaded this country and did the things to us that we are doing to them, would you too, not fight and die for your country and make their stay most "hospitable".....? some of you may hate me for saying this. but it is a contrarian point of view. i support the freedom fighters of iraq and afghanistan against the invading enemies of their countries even though those illegal invaders are my own people. how can we as thinking americans do anything less? liberty and freedom is what they want. is that such a bad thing? they want the american boot off of their necks. so may God help them to remove it in whatever means they find necessary.
At best, this post is poorly presented. There is no evidence offered to prove or even suggest that the Obama administration is truly motivated by the four political objectives. The reader is left to draw their own conclusion on the basis of the own presuppositions and the rhetoric of the author.
You may very well be right - but until you offer actual evidence I can only admire how pretty your words and pictures are. You might as well have said, "President Obama really likes the shape that Afghanistan and Pakistan would make if they were one country instead of two. Therefore he is increasing US military strength in the region to conquer those countries so that maps in the future will show Afghapakimerica, his new favorite shape!"
a whole generation of dumbed down children that played video war games and etc. now they have smoke blown up their asses about those mean old muslims and they go and join the army and go and see the world and be a army of one, and all of that bullshit, get sucked into this false paradigm of false patriotism, saying to anyone that listens. we are doing this for you to protect your rights.....oh really says i? and so they ride around day in and day out and get blown up and then go and re up for another 6 years time and time again and you ask yourself why? this has been going on now for almost 8 years.... why do they do this? why? surely they see what is going on? but no they don't. why is that? it has to be that most of these men and women cannot see what is really going on for they have been brain washed since the day they were born so that when they became of useful military age, they would be told to join this mercenary army for the terrorist state of israhell. just who is it that owns those damn pipelines that run across afghanistan? hmmm?
Pipeline Plans And Diaper Dreaming
http://www.rense.com/general83/pipe.htm
unless you wake up and realize who controls what and what is really going on, all is lost and i don't mean maybe. right now they destroy our young men and our armies. right now they are destroying our finanicial system. for many years they have worked overtime to destroy white western european culture by various means......
as old man sykes said in the movie "the wild bunch"
THEY!!! WHO THE HELL ARE THEY!!!
yeh , who the hell are they?
coolaid drinkers on the left blaming bush. coolaid drinkers on the right, blaming obama. does anyone start to scratch their heads and realize what a grand show all of this really is? or shall we continue to swallow the garbage spewing out of the boob toob, day in and day out. eddie bernays knew what it was all about....
He basically endorsed, adopted and is in the process of expanding the Bush doctrine.
We will invade anybody,anytime,anywhere if we perceive a potential threat may occur at sometime in the future in any dimension.
Hope! Change! A turkey in every oval office!
PM,
So, all the logic is in place for a first strike. Bases on every continent, good coverage overall. Eventually the world will turn on the US, so we need to defend ourselves to preserve freedom for all. All we need is someone with some small German subs and we should be good to go in a couple of years. Then we can continue our mandate of promoting freedom and democracy for all.
Project Mayhem...always find your pieces enlightening and thank you for the efforts.
as i have stated, i have always thought that one of the biggest fears for the current admin is that the tali/al q crew would get themselves one or two of them thar Paki nukes. naturally, Obama confirmed that last nite and we will soon be on Paki soil.
I would be curious to see what people think or if there is any research out there that assesses the odds of one or two Paki nukes being obtained? any thoughts?
Antrhax came from Fort Dix. WMD in Iraq were basically from the US, though were long-since (before the invasion) disposed of. US is the ONLY nati nto use nuclear weapons, AND ON A CIVILIAN POPULATION!
Sorry folks, but the real "enemy" isn't "out there" someplace...
I think a loose nuke is pretty high up the list of potential Gulf of Tonkin incidents. I was discussing exactly this yesterday, as we'd need a good pretext to go into Pakistan...
Pretexts to go into Pakistan--
1) Civil war / government collapse
2) Loose nuke
3) Kashmir
4) Hostages
There are probably plenty of others
Thanks PM.
I think Obama put to rest last night the need for a pretext. in other words, I think his words in regards to Paki was that the deal has been cut and he has the okay of the Pakis to go in.
Agreed. Good stuff PM. Lots of work to put this piece together. Appreciate it.
Some participants may have loose nukes but I'll bet we do the precision nuking to stay on top.
I vote "Loose nuke", it has that WMD quality.
His speech was retarded. But since when did Zero Hedge start flirting with moronic 9/11 conspiracy theories? The little article was hillarious. It drew quite a conclusion from the presence of mysterious "red chips" in the 9/11 debris. It admits that were that exotic chemical "iron oxide" and some were "aluminium." Holy shit, that's called rust and other stuff we'd expect when a huge building is toppled by Islamic crazy guys with beards and shorted AA stock.
Instead of standard thermite, or even 'rust and aluminum' as you put it, what the Harrit team found was highly ordered dual layers of iron oxide /aluminum at the micrometer level (nanotechnology). The remarkable chips were highly reaction with an ignition temp that was half that of the theoretical Fe2O3/Al reaction activation energy . This was apparently due to the construction of the thermitic chips which had highly-ordered sub-micrometer structure. The issue was the fact that this was a military-grade incendiary, which remains unexplained.
It was a national railroad track union day at the world trade center and after the meeting they were going to go out and weld some track? I'm sure that's what it is.
Nice! That's a winner for record blank stares. How can even come back to that!
1) China is supporting Taliban, you would do the same if someone invaded your back yard.
2) America will bleed the fuck out over there, just like Soviets and Brits did.
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Well, this much is certain:
Escalation Is Withdrawal
The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the "agentur" of the "Illuminati" between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion…We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time." 4
4. Cmdr. William Guy Carr: Quoted in Satan: Prince of This World.
Check out this video of an incredibly creepy masonic ritual at ground zero on the one year anniversary creating the eye of horus (also called the eye of lucifer). The twin towers represented the two pillars of freemasonry, Boaz and Jachin, which represent good and evil.
They were destroyed on the 11th anniversary to the day that GB Senior announced the masonic New World Order (Sept 11, 1990). The masons are big into the ancient mystery religions including numerology (hence the significance with dates and reoccuring numbers). They idolize Jacques DeMolay, a templar executed for heresy and rumored to have worshipped lucifer. The templars were the first to come up with the original concept of banking and became extremely wealthy. There is a reason they are a secret society.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ToJlsqyVdQ&feature=related
+100
None of the above. I think the surge has to do with (nuclear) Pakistan and it's success may depend on Pakistan.
Fate of Afghanistan surge 'lies in Pakistan'
Diplomats believe the fate of President Barack Obama's new "surge" in Afghanistan may be sealed in Pakistan.
The Obama administration was reported to be planning in influx of CIA operatives and an intensified campaign of missile attacks from Predator drones after Pakistan's failure to so far rein in militant attacks launched across the Afghan border and increasing concern about the security of its nuclear arsenal.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/barackobama/6...
PS. Great fan PM, enjoy everything you write. Don't get too close to Fort Meade.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/84/National_Security_Age...
Yup it is Pakistan - only place around that can swing the deal - what are the odds - oddly I think 50/50 if they go weird India is hard to figure, if they fail they are out of biz as we will nuke.
Hi PM-
In addition to Pakistan you didn't mention Iran, as we are amassing troops in the two countries on both sides of Iran. Obama was probably sold this on the value of "an option" - for Iran or Pakistan, definitely war footing.
If it is Pakistan, an interesting news blurb wanted to link the Ft. Hood shooter to Pakistan and that he may have communicated with someone in Pakistan (possibly a trigger once the investigation is completed and the report is released).
Good point on Iran, Kurtz. Securing the Realm, again?
Thanks... when war eventually goes down in Pakistan , I think Iran get pulled in by proximity. I agree 100% there is no way to have wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan without getting Iran involved.
This may well be the plan... BUT - how on earth would we even fight, much less win, a war involving those four countries without using nukes? Even with nukes it would be a challenge. Think Cannae on a regional if not hemispheric scale. This could be a rapid and dramatic end of empire for us, if it happens.
I don't think nukes would be devastating for us, reinforce our failing empire and get rid of a few aging weapons. Mt St. Helena wasn't that bad, little dust here and there. Slow down a lot of locals in western sub continent India if that is what this is, build oil pipelines - in and out like the guys in Canada who mine asbestos - live to fifty nine but love it.
Gotta get our boots off the ground before we drop one though....
How about if the idea is not to "win" in the traditional sense of "owning the ground", but merely to destroy so much infrastructure and cause such widespread suffering that the invaded country's government is forced to go to the IMF to borrow money to rebuild bombed hospitals, drinking water facilities, and roads. Through the IMF, the bankers enslave the country (the way bankers always enslave countries) by forcing it to "democratize" its government by allowing "campaign funding" of candidates by bankers. The resulting "duly" elected government then institutes "austerity programs" which enslave all the working people in the country. Again, to accomplish this, you don't have to "win"; all you have to do is "destroy enough stuff".
Very conspiratorial and yet extremely plausible. Yippee. I'm gonna be ill now.
I think that was part of the idea behind 'full-spectrum'. I also suspect as regional conflicts escalate we'll see the use of more and more unmanned aircraft.
USA’s Unmanned Aircraft Systems Roadmap, 2005-2030http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/usas-unmanned-aircraft-systems-roadmap-20052030-01094/
You are right about the idiotic migration of these wars. But that was always the design, was it not:
http://www.israeleconomy.org/strat1.htm
Iran has always been the eventual target and while there certainly are parallel objectives involving natural gas, let us not forget our overriding fundamental mission: Making the world safe for Israel. And to that end there will be absolutely no expense or American life spared, trust me.
In the delivery of his speech, President Obama used the word "I" 43 times. He used the words "victory" and "win" ZERO times. I guess the political ego trumps victory and winning.
Victory? WTF, smoking the lawn?