This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Obama escalates in Afghanistan
Obama escalates in Afghanistan
by Project Mayhem
Nobel 'Peace' Prize winner Obama escalates war in Afghanistan in act of Orwellian tragedy.
Within the first several minutes of the speech , Obama , brow furrowed, aggressive and serious, was working the crowd over with frightening words like 'slaughter' , 'terror' , 'Taleban' , 'ruthless' , 'ravaged' and so on. The West Point cadets sit uncomfortably as our heroic Nobel Peace Prize winner comes out sounding far more like a Roman military commander than like compassionate and liberal sitting President. To be honest the whole process was disgusting and I will not dwell on it further, other than the fact there was no mention of this. But as we all know, truth is the first casualty in war.
In terms of the political implications of this event, it is obvious we are witnessing an a serious and long-term escalation in Afghanistan by yet another President obsessed by war and acting on behalf of banks and defense contractors. But here, by 'Afghanistan', we implicitly mean Pakistan, which must necessarily enter chaos in order to meet the political objectives of Kissinger, Brzezinski, and others. So when you hear Afghanistan, think Pakistan.
Pakistan is now ravaged by CIA Predator drone attacks and in is on the brink of civil war in the Pashtun regions. But civil war appears this was precisely the political objectives of those operating behind the scenes in the Western political establishment -- to include the CFR and Trilateral Commission. We have known for some time that Brzezinski has favored fracturing Afghanistan-Pakistan into a series of micro-states. There are four major political objectives here, which you will not hear discussed outside of closed doors.
1) Protection of the Afghan drug trade
2) Control of Eurasian Oil supplies and pipeline routes
3) Fomentation of a longer-term conflict with Russia and China
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. He definitely knows Judo..
SCO summit in Russia - June 16, 2009
The former head of Pakistani ISI from 1987 to 1989 -- Lt. Gen. Hamid
Gul (on far left in above picture)-- has made the claim that the newly
created Afghan Intelligence Agency 'RAMA' has the officially-sanctioned
purpose of destabilizing neighboring Pakistan. A bold claim indeed.
4) Access to the strategic Pakistani deep-water ports
Pakistani deep-water port. US wants it. China wants it.
Deep-water ports -- strategically important.
The troop levels in Afghanistan now rival the levels when Russia was lost amongst its' quagmire 30 years ago. Pakistan is now in play. All that is required is a Gulf of Tonkin incident.
Project Mayhem Research (PMR) is a DC/Baltimore-based grassroots think tank dedicated to exposing corruption worldwide. PMR is affiliated with Zerohedge.com, a popular and growing anti-corruption site, through contribution of free articles for the public. Topics include the politics of war and weapons systems, unexpected applications of cybernetics, the growing international surveillance state, global warming 'deindustrialization' economics, broad systemic international corruption , in-depth policy analysis of studies from bank and military funded research groups, genetic analysis and surveillance of pandemic influenza, corruption in the international gold market, the power structure and history of the global elite, and analysis of their political objectives expressed through monopolistic international finance capital (read: powerful banks) between now and 2050.
Sign up for free news updates and future subscription information--
»
- advertisements -
This is not ad hominem my man, this is my opinion but, unlike yours, mine contains no conspiracy theories. No one is forcing you to read anything here, either, btw.
Are you mad that we are paying attention to PM? and not you?
ignorance is a bliss
yes, it truly is S.O., isn't it?
Of course the government's official story is really no more than a conspiracy theory. Come to think about it.
What incredible foolishness to think that in 18 months, we will have accomplished enough in Afghanistan to start bringing the troops home. Or does it have more to do with the fact that no matter what we have or have not accomplished, having the bulk of troops home befor the next Presidential Election is really what matters to this administration? Just how stupid do they think we are?
Hell we all know he has 0 intention of pulling the troops out in 18 months. It was said to hedge politically, to try to show that he is still the "peace" candidate. If we don't have a convenient "incident" to justify us staying over there I will be surprised. Though he might just man up and openly break this promise. It's not like he hasn't done that before. There is precisely 0 chance that we are out of the Middle East before we go into a full economic and social collapse, 0 chance. But remember folks the story would be the same with McCain. Last election we had the choice of being punched in the face by the right hand of tyranny or the left.
By my calendar he has ~8 mos left on his original post inauguration 18 month
Apparently we are very stupid.....we keep letting it happen.
Pakistani deep-water port. US wants it. China wants it.
IVAN WANT TOO!!!!
http://www.stratpost.com/indo-russian-naval-drills-this-month
Ivan's buddy Peter the Great (the guided missle cruiser incarnation) cruising the Arabian Sea, looking for a home (?) last January....
Makes perfect sense....use the AFGHAN war as a decoy to amass enough troops for another operation. That Bammy is sneaky, but Biden was definitely not the mastermind like Cheaney was to Bush.
Uh, no--he's not. In fact, he couldn't find his ass with both hands...
Puppetmaster and sockpuppet... no ties?