This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Obama Says NATO Considering Military Options Against Libya

Tyler Durden's picture





 

Oops.

From Reuters:

U.S. President Barack Obama said on Monday that NATO was considering military options in response to the situation in Libya.

Obama, speaking after talks with visiting Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard, said the two countries agreed that violence by the Libyan government against its people was unacceptable.

And some more "insights" from Robert Gates:

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates cautioned on Monday that any foreign military intervention in the crisis in Libya would require international backing.

"I think we will have to monitor the situation very closely," Gates, on a visit to Afghanistan, said when asked about the possibility of an international military response in Libya.

"But I think at this point there is a sense that any action should be the result of international sanction," he told a news conference.

The comments came as government forces loyal to Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi struck at rebels in the east and concern mounted over civilian suffering and a growing exodus of refugees.

Gates said developments in the Middle East had further damaged the image of Iran, where the opposition says at least 79 people were arrested at protest rallies last week that the government denied had even taken place.

"I think where Iran is the loser ... is the contrast between militaries and security authorities in places like Tunisia and Egypt standing aside while people protest against their government, while security services of the Iranian government ruthlessly suppress and kill those who would criticise or protest."

"They (Iran) are losers already in this image across the world," he said.

Gates did not mention Bahrain, where seven people died last month when security forces moved to break up protests in Manama.

Nor did he criticise Saudi Arabia, where activists say security forces on Sunday moved to keep the wave of Arab unrest outside Saudi borders by detaining at least 22 minority Shi'ites who protested last week against discrimination.

 


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:23 | Link to Comment MayIMommaDogFac...
MayIMommaDogFace2theBananaPatch's picture

But, but, but...

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:27 | Link to Comment Pladizow
Pladizow's picture

America will never allow the citizens of an oil rich country to be violated.

 

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:33 | Link to Comment pragmatic hobo
pragmatic hobo's picture

... unless the government of that oil-rich country is winning.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:43 | Link to Comment SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

...or their name sounds like "Saud"

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:01 | Link to Comment rocker
rocker's picture

Looks like it could be time to go 100% short everything.   They want a correction. The CBs always get what they want.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:08 | Link to Comment financeguru500
financeguru500's picture

No, everything is fine. The next move will be to bring democracy to Libya and then to Iran & Saud.

Then all our democratic friends will share their oil with us at discount prices.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 15:44 | Link to Comment rocker
rocker's picture

LOL     I am a seller today.  HFTs look like they are going after accounts.  Sell in May just might be now.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:44 | Link to Comment morph
morph's picture

Yeah funny how no one cares about Zimbabwe.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:15 | Link to Comment Robert Neville
Robert Neville's picture

Or Somalia. Funny how oil brings out the "humanitarian" in everyone.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:34 | Link to Comment MayIMommaDogFac...
MayIMommaDogFace2theBananaPatch's picture

Very well-put.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 14:31 | Link to Comment Tail Dogging The Wag
Tail Dogging The Wag's picture

NATO will not stand idly by, so they're going into Libya. Considering that there's no oil or riches in Somalia, I guess the Somalians don't deserve "democracy".

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:15 | Link to Comment EscapeKey
EscapeKey's picture

America will never allow the oil of a citizen rich country to be violated.

Fixed.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:29 | Link to Comment SofaPapa
SofaPapa's picture

LOL.  Good fix.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:29 | Link to Comment nope-1004
nope-1004's picture

But Obummer means:

"gotta invade to slow the rise in oil prices cuz we gotta keep printing toilet paper for my shitty banker buds...."

 

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:34 | Link to Comment SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Could easily go horribly wrong overnite IMO. Hillary and Gates running the 'war with no plan', the 'We Gotta Do Somethin' war. Imagine oil prices when 400 marines are killed or captured for another Iran hostage situation. Not to mention pouring gas on the muslim bonfire...seriously what are these people thinking?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:41 | Link to Comment Henry Chinaski
Henry Chinaski's picture

No boots on ground.  The rebels don't want us there, but they do want to cop some air power.  Special forces and drones.  Gates stuck around for a reason; he knew the bozos running the show needed adult supervision.  

UN or NATO will come in later and pick up the pieces.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:40 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

All very true.

However I think they are probably planning a no-fly zone, and then let the (Libyan) grunts on the ground do the wet work. Maybe at the end drop a few daisy cutters to smoke Moammar out of whatever hole he digs for himself.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:46 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Could I really witness two "spider hole incidents" in the same lifetime?

Pinch me so I know I'm awake. 

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:51 | Link to Comment SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Spider hole dictators, lol.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:55 | Link to Comment Atomizer
Atomizer's picture

Your not the only one. My arm is bruised.

Tue, 03/08/2011 - 11:40 | Link to Comment Hexus
Hexus's picture

.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:45 | Link to Comment Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

SD-i, these people are thinking... so far so good, allaccording to plan.

These seeds (dictators) were planted a long time ago.

Look at Babt Doc, hsi dad and haiti. it was stunningly kitchy, how they brought baby doc to face justice, 30 years on, statute of limitations gone, haiti in post quake frenzy...

sudden cognitive dissonance....baby doc back and on trial?

Haiti trouble have been off the news since.

So far so according to script.

We all have to remember, ordo Ab Chao (order out of chaos) will only follow ordo Ad Chao (chaos out of order).

What we are currently witnessing is nowhere near planetary chaos, which, I believe, is the goal.

ORI

http://aadivaahan.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/astrological-and-other-deep-insights-from-ca/

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:54 | Link to Comment SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

All to prevent attention being concentrated on any 1 thing for longer than a few minutes.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:34 | Link to Comment Michael
Michael's picture

I'm really getting tired of all this US policing of the world shit. Let China and Russia deal with it or leave it alone.

I pray the Muslim world get together and form a Muslim NATO like coalition.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 14:49 | Link to Comment Vergeltung
Vergeltung's picture

oh, yeah, brilliant idea. I'm sure nothing but good & peaceful things would come from that. cause, after all, it's such a peaceful religion and all.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 15:34 | Link to Comment Michael
Michael's picture

No one and nothing can ever be more evil than what the US made the 60's Russian communists out to be.

As long as everbody has nukes eveything will be fine.

Nikita Khrushchev shoe banging incident

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-er3fkMnFYY&feature=related

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 19:51 | Link to Comment asteroids
asteroids's picture

Bush went to the UN to invade. We know how that worked out. Now Obozo wants to pull the same trick with NATO. How stupid do you think the world is.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:37 | Link to Comment Azannoth
Azannoth's picture

This is Not Violence this is Civil War! Stay the hell out of Libya

Violence is what Saudi Arabia and Bahrain are doing go invade there

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:39 | Link to Comment Larry Darrell
Larry Darrell's picture

Let's not go invade there.  Let's not go invade anywhere else.  Let's get out of the current invasions.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:44 | Link to Comment Spastica Rex
Spastica Rex's picture

Doubleplusgood.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:46 | Link to Comment SWRichmond
SWRichmond's picture

Hey, it's another balance-sheet entry on the income side for the MIC...

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:51 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Say that's right, this must be bullish for equities then.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:24 | Link to Comment Id fight Gandhi
Id fight Gandhi's picture

Must be why price line is soaring to new highs. Gas up? Travel restricted? No matter. Momos away.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:23 | Link to Comment spinone
spinone's picture

Oh snap

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:24 | Link to Comment the not so migh...
the not so mighty maximiza's picture

The peace movement will bend over and take it like always since its "their" guy in the white house.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:41 | Link to Comment kaiserhoff
kaiserhoff's picture

Vat Else? 

Obama to Godaffy "Yo Momma!"

I've seen more hostility between two fat chicks fighting over a stale twinkie.

 

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:04 | Link to Comment carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

Bush of a diferent color...

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:25 | Link to Comment alien-IQ
alien-IQ's picture

market should like totally rally on this. definitely bullish...definitely definitely bullish....

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:23 | Link to Comment Hugh Jorgan
Hugh Jorgan's picture

They aren't actually going to tell Obama what the plan is are they?  Does Bradley Manning get a phone call? 

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:39 | Link to Comment serotonindumptruck
serotonindumptruck's picture

"Does Bradley Manning get a phone call?"

No, but he should be getting his clothes back any time now.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:27 | Link to Comment Big Corked Boots
Big Corked Boots's picture

Do we get to keep the oil this time?

Waiting for the protester's chants of "no blood for oil, no blood for oil..."

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:24 | Link to Comment Cdad
Cdad's picture

Well then, I guess the criminal syndicate known as Wall Street is done intra-day rumor mongering for this session.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:25 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

I would love to be a fly on the wall in the State Department or the Oval office.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:28 | Link to Comment williambanzai7
williambanzai7's picture

I have a robot cockroach in there right now. Be back shortly.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:37 | Link to Comment bania
bania's picture

cheney?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:44 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Rahm is back in town and he's working for you?

Pull the other one.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:45 | Link to Comment Miss Expectations
Miss Expectations's picture

Is it a sneaky little type like in New York City or the giant Palmetto bugs (that fly) like the ones in the south?  Washington might be on the border of both territories.  In my NYC apartment they used to sneak into the microwave.  30 seconds on high sounded like a bag of jiffy pop.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:55 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Yuck.

Now I don't know if I'll ever be able to eat microwave popcorn again without thinking about your damn NYC apartment.

I thought we were friends Miss Expectations? :>)

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:27 | Link to Comment Temporalist
Temporalist's picture

You shouldn't be eating that garbage from the microwave.  Burning microwave popcorn'll kill ya.  It is simple to make on the stovetop or with an air popper.  Plus you get way more popped kernels and it doesn't go stale in 4 minutes.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:31 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Sorry, forgot the (/sarc) tag.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 15:12 | Link to Comment Temporalist
Temporalist's picture

Yea I know I was just typing to give myself something to do...

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:35 | Link to Comment cossack55
cossack55's picture

Could be dangerous. They might appoint you TreasSec.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:49 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Which means I would have been selected to fall on my pocket knife.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:26 | Link to Comment SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Blood for oil much Obama??

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:14 | Link to Comment carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

WH is just floating a rumor to get public opinion.

This administration isn't going to invade anything without public support.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:24 | Link to Comment Saxxon
Saxxon's picture

Correct carbon.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 14:09 | Link to Comment Yardfarmer
Yardfarmer's picture

public support?! bwahahahahahaha! since when did the "public" have any say about invasions or monetary policy or anything else for that matter other than a survey of fat asses planted on couches for television ratings. brain dead lemmings.

Wed, 03/09/2011 - 18:27 | Link to Comment carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

Public Support is the cornerstone of "Moral Justification"

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:26 | Link to Comment ReallySparky
ReallySparky's picture

Uh Oh.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:25 | Link to Comment Me XMan
Me XMan's picture

This is old news IMO.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:28 | Link to Comment Mercury
Mercury's picture

Still, still, still don't think U.S. will be part of any military action in Libya.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:30 | Link to Comment CPL
CPL's picture

I agree, why use US troops when Ottawa has so many officers in reserve sitting on their fat asses.  For a 100k a year, I think Canada could use some cost cutting by slapping a gun in their hands and throwing them on the shore.

 

Besides i don't think the Chinese would like the optics of the American troops running around messing up their ten year investment.  Then we would have something else to worry about.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:27 | Link to Comment rubearish10
rubearish10's picture

Yeah, the natives would really appreciate more occupation.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:55 | Link to Comment Zero Govt
Zero Govt's picture

no the CIA are the worlds official 'self-appointed' police force didn't you know?!!
...they know what's best for everyone, selfless in their persuit of global happiness

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:28 | Link to Comment TradingJoe
TradingJoe's picture

Aha! So who will sell USO then, because it's "rolling-over" futures contracts starting tomorrow, eh?

Guess NOBODY :))!

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:34 | Link to Comment earlthepearl
earlthepearl's picture

Shit I just closed all my call  options on USO thinking i could 

buy them back at a discount before friday...

 

Was i dumb?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:42 | Link to Comment TradingJoe
TradingJoe's picture

depends which ones you had, April or July, if you had April never mind, buy back July, make sure you're not too far off, buy near the money say strike 50 they go for 1.80 right now!

this is just the usual scare to shake out weak hands, the bancheros are on to something and I am sure they want you out now...the less "retailers" the bigger the pie!

with JP Morgue paying hotel bills for some 4* Generals...I think they "know" what we anticipate, I don't get scared that easily SA is the elephant not Lybia!

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:49 | Link to Comment earlthepearl
earlthepearl's picture

I closed out April - 51 calls, i bought them for 0.15, sold for 0.58.

 

Iwas thinking going for July near money like you said, but do think there is some sorta pull back coming?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:11 | Link to Comment TradingJoe
TradingJoe's picture

not really "pearl"! I rather think the "pull backs" will be "daily shows" at most! all we need is Saudi getting into something, even small, and this sucker goes to the moon. it's all speculation now..don't get me wrong, there is plenty of oil to go around, for a while, this is just using "momentum" in the ME!

 

Get the July 50 Calls before they hit $2! Got mine @ $1.23 last week, also got me some July 50 Puts on QQQQ, you know just in case!

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:48 | Link to Comment earlthepearl
earlthepearl's picture

I closed out April - 51 calls, i bought them for 0.15, sold for 0.58.

 

Iwas thinking going for July near money like you said, but do think there is some sorta pull back coming?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:38 | Link to Comment earlthepearl
earlthepearl's picture

Shit I just closed all my call  options on USO thinking i could 

buy them back at a discount before friday...

 

Was i dumb?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:27 | Link to Comment Harmonious_Diss...
Harmonious_Dissonance's picture

This sounds quite Bullish for the DOW.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:29 | Link to Comment hognutz
hognutz's picture

Ohbummer might better hold all his cards until he sees what is going to happen in saudia Arabia.........

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:29 | Link to Comment Tulli
Tulli's picture

Really? You mean that all those little boats out there in the med are actually there to take action, and not just make a navy party?

 

Oh my... what a surprise.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:29 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

All those ships are in position to kick ass and chew gum.  And they just ran out of gum.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:38 | Link to Comment Franken_Stein
Franken_Stein's picture

Roddy Piper, They live !

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:29 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Hopefully within six months we'll be in a position to save the Arabians from the Saudis.  Freedom, hope n'change, etc. etc.

Let this be your warning Canada!

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:33 | Link to Comment CPL
CPL's picture

What warning.  Canada has been part of the US empire for the better half of 20 years now under NAFTA.  Can't name a large Canuck company that's left after NAFTA that isn't in some way shape or form owned wholly or at least by proxy by a multinational US company.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 14:23 | Link to Comment Oh regional Indian
Oh regional Indian's picture

CPL, it's been happening here in India too. Loosening ownership regulationships to outsiders in every field. Dollars/Euros pumpng in (don't just believe FDI, Defence is a HUGE industry in India now, courtesy israel and the US and they do tons of off-sets).

Something I posted in another thread seems apropos...

.......................


It's all a script, the dealer collecting all the cards off the table, odds were always in his favour, a couple of lucky marks got rich and everyone else is already thinking, will I catch the next big wave? No waves now suckers, only tsooooo nammys!

No cause wars are now the norm.

hey, you got the Himalayas. God made unfair mountain distribution.

In the name of the unjust god, I'm going to blow you apart so i can put a flag on the Himalayas. Of infinite appetite and gigantic ass, I want it all. Scarf scarf....all mine....snort snort...

 

........................................................................................

ORI

http://aadivaahan.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/astrological-and-other-deep-insights-from-ca/

 

 

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:29 | Link to Comment Crassus
Crassus's picture

Julia must be spellbinding.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:30 | Link to Comment InconvenientCou...
InconvenientCounterParty's picture

I must have been reading ZH for too long but, I could swear this business in Libya is following a script.

You've got to know the U.S. and other western interests have only one interest in this. It's certainly not blood or lack thereof. Those effers are running a play right now. The end zone is a temporary military structure just like Egypt. Y'know... players.

 

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:29 | Link to Comment buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

He also said: It's not about the oil. NOT!!

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:34 | Link to Comment johnQpublic
johnQpublic's picture

we'd do the same thing if all they exported was carrots

 

not..

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:33 | Link to Comment Cpl Hicks
Cpl Hicks's picture

Oil? An American interest? No way, it's about human rights and American non-exceptionalism.

BTW- who is calling the shots in the NATO military community these days?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:39 | Link to Comment CPL
CPL's picture

China

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:46 | Link to Comment Cpl Hicks
Cpl Hicks's picture

Then the invasion, sorry-'option' is off.

Barry will have to learn how to do his masters' bidding.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:29 | Link to Comment hognutz
hognutz's picture

On another note, when the people rise up against the House of Saud, will Obama support the people or the Monarchs???????

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:32 | Link to Comment buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

What do you think Bush III will do?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:29 | Link to Comment serotonindumptruck
serotonindumptruck's picture

I'm wondering what Russia's response would be to this type of campaign?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:43 | Link to Comment Shameful
Shameful's picture

Privately, open laughter and hi-fives.

American Empire spreads itself thinner while driving up oil prices. Yeah I think Russia is pretty ok with that.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:51 | Link to Comment serotonindumptruck
serotonindumptruck's picture

Yes, that seems plausible. By applying a bit of reverse psychology and warning the West to stay out of Libya, the Russians were privately hoping for an American military response that would serve to hasten the demise.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:30 | Link to Comment Caviar Emptor
Caviar Emptor's picture

This is the first step toward building the permanent MENA-to-USA underwater pipeline ! Booya !

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:32 | Link to Comment SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Cut'n paste 'military action', this has all the warning signs of going very wrong. They have no clear plan, just 'got to do something', well thats no way to carry out a war. Russia and Iran have warned US to dont even consider going into Libya. And where are all the Obama minions clogging DC streets over 'No War For Oil' huh wheres all the bigmouths? Wow Obama sure has turned out to be the all time war monger after all.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:35 | Link to Comment Turd Ferguson
Turd Ferguson's picture

+++

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:12 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Turd,

Did I just hear correctly that you had a million hits on your blog inside of a month?

I'm jealous. :>)

http://tfmetalsreport.blogspot.com/

 

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:39 | Link to Comment johnQpublic
johnQpublic's picture

nobel shoulds waited to see what he did befor  they gave him an award for not being bush...because he is bush

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:14 | Link to Comment zaknick
zaknick's picture

Thomas "apparatchik" Friedman, Krugman, Henry "I'll have genocide for breakfast" Kissinger, some jooooo prime minister, Obamao

You really think those Swedes aren't politicized? Their latest was the Chinese guy in jail....not because of human rights because there are tons of other dissidents being oppressed in the "free world" but because they're an instrument for regime change for the banksters.

All of the "institutions" we have grown up with are nothing but a cheap farce enabled by the Great Wurlitzer (the MSM).

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 14:41 | Link to Comment Tail Dogging The Wag
Tail Dogging The Wag's picture

But wait, this is in the name of peace. Remember Obama got the Nobel Peace Prize!

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:31 | Link to Comment Racer
Racer's picture

But what about that rumour about Gadaffi leaving that was timed for the US open? You mean that wasn't true?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:35 | Link to Comment QuantumCat
QuantumCat's picture

Really?  Why?  Because the Libyan people need to be liberated from their own indigenously lead liberation movement under the banner of NATO?  WTF?!!!  Enough meddling!  Let the people rise up and claim their own country, for better or for worse. The arrogance is appalling.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 14:52 | Link to Comment Tail Dogging The Wag
Tail Dogging The Wag's picture

If we let the Libyans free themselves from the Colonel, how are we going to secure free oil for our multinational corporations? we must "liberate" the people, bring "democracy", and replace our puppet and then offer military aid to this country. Put our weapons makers and  corporations to rebuild the new Libya, and repeat the cycle. We can't let the Chinese our Russians take our role. This is a gold mine. Imagine a McDonald's and a KFC on every block. It's time to bring Colonel Sanders of KFC fame to the rescue!

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:33 | Link to Comment adonisdemilo
adonisdemilo's picture

williambanzai7; how will you know which is your cockroach? the place is full of them

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:36 | Link to Comment QuantumCat
QuantumCat's picture

duplicate

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:33 | Link to Comment rayban
rayban's picture

I wonder whether China will ever do something "unacceptable". Unless, of course, exporting democracy does not apply to creditor nations with a strong atomic arsenal and a few million enlisted men...

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:01 | Link to Comment ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

LOL - yup, true that.

What's thousands of Tibetans and Christians executed and organs harvested compared to the supplier of cheap crap to U.S. retailers who also has nuclear subs off our West coast?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:32 | Link to Comment adonisdemilo
adonisdemilo's picture

williambanzai7; how will you know which is your cockroach? the place is full of them

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:35 | Link to Comment Piranhanoia
Piranhanoia's picture

flash; 2059, no fly zone encroaches entire world. UN intends to make a resolution

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:35 | Link to Comment Caveman93
Caveman93's picture

As I sit here looking at how WAR, Money printing and ever increasing oil prices have such a bullish effect on silver, I say invade! The higher the oil price the better!

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:38 | Link to Comment locinvestor
locinvestor's picture

2 part question for the President and Prime Minister:

Aside from wanting the oil, how is the Libyan crisis a threat in any way to either one of your countries?

Two, you keep talking about "respecting people's rights to air their grievances". Does this also mean the right to choose the type of government that they want?

If they do use the military to invade and take over Libya, how will they pay for it? The States can't afford it. Gillard's getting roasted alive back home for trying to pass a carbon tax and packaging it as "not being a real tax". How will they justify Libya as being a real threat to their national security? Not to be rude about it. But the truth is Gillard will copy everything Obama does. She doesn't have the political nerve to stand up to him.

People (and yes, this includes Iraqis and Afghans) have and continue to die for no reason since we've invaded. Now, Obama's seriously proposing we do it for a third time?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:42 | Link to Comment the not so migh...
the not so mighty maximiza's picture

3rd times the charm.  Obama will prove he is better then Bush by killing more in a shorter period of time.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:46 | Link to Comment Shameful
Shameful's picture

OK I got it.  Spin a story about how there will not be an NFL season unless we invade Libya.  that the players are simply to distraught by their civil war and won't be able to take the field unless they know that oil...err people are safe.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:55 | Link to Comment Pants McPants
Pants McPants's picture

Uhh, yeah it'll be done a third time.  And a fourth, and a fifth, etc.

Besides, armed with a Nobel prize, Obama's invasions promise the "kinder, gentler machine gun hand"  ( - Neil Young)

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:37 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Oil market stability FTW

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:39 | Link to Comment sulfur
sulfur's picture

who would have expected that...i thought all that us marines just wanted to do some sightseeing

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 15:17 | Link to Comment aerojet
aerojet's picture

They even already mention Tripoli in the Marine Corps Hymn because the US invaded once already!  It's just retro--like cars and movies!

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:41 | Link to Comment SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Obama says 'Violence against the Libyan people by Gadaffi is simply unacceptable'...wow the hypocrisy, where do you even START? How about the massive violence against citizens by illegal aliens in the US south west border war zone, is that at all unacceptable? Nah.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:52 | Link to Comment irishgurl4
irishgurl4's picture

Of course not, those "illegal aliens" are "future citizens."  Gotta keep 'em happy.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:58 | Link to Comment Pants McPants
Pants McPants's picture

I totally agree with your line of thinking.

But you have to admire - albeit in a dark way - the brashness of it all.

My question is, after Obama has spent all of his political capital, who does the US turn to for "credibility"?  I fear the US may install one of those strict disciplinarians after the lovy-dovey Obama period has worn off.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:08 | Link to Comment SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Could very well be the strict disciplinarian dictator is already there! I always thought Obamas kinder gentler speech and mannerisms was a mask to the real tyrant underneath.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:31 | Link to Comment Pants McPants
Pants McPants's picture

I think Michelle is ten times as ruthless as Barack.  Her and Hillary would make a hell of a tandem.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:41 | Link to Comment Franken_Stein
Franken_Stein's picture

Thank God us Germans never joined your GIs in this morass called Iraq.

 

Good to see Blackwater mercenaries quartered in the streets.

 

Eric Prince can go to hell !!!

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:59 | Link to Comment serotonindumptruck
serotonindumptruck's picture

"Eric Prince can go to hell !!!"

Or Mexico City. Whichever is the hottest.

The Germans should be glad that they won't have to deal with the heavily armed Mexican drug cartels in the near future. I believe Prince's hands may be dirty in this regard.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:40 | Link to Comment irishgurl4
irishgurl4's picture

Funny how when the genocide in Darfur was going on we did nothing, but Libya strafes a few of their people and oh no we can't have that.  Guess they just don't have enough oil in Darfur for us to give a damn.

I say let the Libyans fight.  This is none of our damn business.  They want to be free, let them earn it.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:53 | Link to Comment Racer
Racer's picture

Exactly... the US only cares about oil and that's it.

They don't care about the unemployment in the US, they don't care about killing of people, the rich banksters need oil to fuel their gas guzzling fleets of cars

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:10 | Link to Comment UninterestedObserver
UninterestedObserver's picture

Uh you mean fleets of jets...

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 14:19 | Link to Comment velobabe
velobabe's picture

av or aviation gas, is really expensive.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:41 | Link to Comment Kurtieboy
Kurtieboy's picture

Yup......very old news. I predict a know fly zone shortly. Oh and by the way NATO is already involved with special forces commando troops on the ground.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:42 | Link to Comment GolfHatesMe
GolfHatesMe's picture

Chavez must have forgot to send the Spanish to Muslim Rosetta Stone with his peace deal.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:48 | Link to Comment SilverRhino
SilverRhino's picture

NATO?   WTF?   That's a defensive organization.  Guess they need to rename it.

Northern AXIS Treaty Organization.  

This sucks; we're (the US) are becoming the bad guys.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:42 | Link to Comment Temporalist
Temporalist's picture

NATO

North America Takes Oil

 

The U.S. is like the fat guy at the dinner table when you're half done with your meal and he reaches for you fries and says "I'll eat it if you're done with it."

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:49 | Link to Comment johngerard
johngerard's picture

I don't see what the problem is.  Let them chop each other up in the desert.  Let Libya burn to the ground.  The purpose of war is to bring about peace after passing a culminating phase of violence.  Let the strong vanquish the weak, whatever the result.

And then see who will rise from the ashes and form a government.

Let them get on with it.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:01 | Link to Comment Inthemix96
Inthemix96's picture

Spot on john mate, spot on

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:50 | Link to Comment alexwest
alexwest's picture

ITS HOW WW3 STARTED.. MARK THIS DAY IN CALENDAR COMPRADS..

its getting hot in herrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeeeeee
alex

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:57 | Link to Comment SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Yep exactly.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:50 | Link to Comment John McCloy
John McCloy's picture

First the dollar ends (Slowly albeit) in favor of metals as a haven  for safety.Next up we should start seeing our selloffs have minimal impact on the 10 year. If begin does beging to tighten and protect the dollar it will be too late because confidence is something that is earned.

  Much like the confidence that has been lost in rumors and rhetoric from our global central planners.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:51 | Link to Comment Racer
Racer's picture

Now it wouldn't be that there is a lot of OIL involved, people don't matter but oil does

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:52 | Link to Comment ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

 

NATO?

Wait, let's send the U.N. guys in their blue helmets and color scheme which says to everyone on the world "We have rubber bullets and wouldn't shoot a rapist in broad daylight."

What next, leaflet drops that say "We care about your fluid situation" with rolls of toilet paper?

 

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:53 | Link to Comment robobbob
robobbob's picture

legal justification? anyone?

how about at least a closed ended plan with definable goals? how about at least Italy and Germany picking up the tab?

this empire garbage is turning into such a farce. hopey changey hahaha

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 14:36 | Link to Comment depression
depression's picture

The Legal Justification is that we cannot afford $4 a gallon gasoline, and it will be a lot easier to get re-elected in 2012 if gasoline is $2.25 a gallon than $5.50.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:54 | Link to Comment gwar5
gwar5's picture

..

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:55 | Link to Comment gwar5
gwar5's picture

They're just talking right now to scare Muammar out of his spider hole and to go away.

If they do anything it's to protect the oil facilities. Europe is precarious and too dependent on Libyan oil.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:58 | Link to Comment SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Then let Europe worry about it.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:34 | Link to Comment AnAnonymous
AnAnonymous's picture

Qaddafi is fighting Al Qaeda or/and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 16:58 | Link to Comment SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Al Qaeda, youre refering to the training group the CIA set up in the 80's?

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:56 | Link to Comment rubearish10
rubearish10's picture

How audacious a remark Mr Gates!

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 12:59 | Link to Comment Robslob
Robslob's picture

Nobel Peace Prize Bitches!

Sorry, couldn't help myself...

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:02 | Link to Comment Atomizer
Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:03 | Link to Comment Aductor
Aductor's picture

Not that I believe this Administration is any different than its predecessor, so it would almost certainly disregard formalities such as interational law. In case anyone cares anymore, NATO intervention would require a decision by the UN Security Council in order to be legal. Good luck persuading Russia.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:03 | Link to Comment SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Russia has already said 'Hell to the NO'.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 13:02 | Link to Comment Abitdodgie
Abitdodgie's picture

Well the more UN troops that libya kills saves the USA having to kill them when they come here

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!