Obama vs Ryan: A Comparison Of Two Utterly Unbelievable Deficit Cutting Plans
Lately everyone and their kitchen sink is coming up with one after another grandiloquent deficit cutting plan, one more unbelievable than the next. At this point nobody believes that either administration can cut $4 million let alone $4 trillion, which seems to be the bogey targeted by both the Obama and the Ryan budget proposals. Too bad no one can explain just how we get from point A to point B. But the show must go on until America finally depletes the good will of the once-reserve currency which now has become a bigger funding currency than the Yen, and pulls the plug. Until then, here is a comparison of the two most recent plan proposed to get America from its current deplorable state, which for those paying attention is located some $27 billion dollars away from the official debt ceiling following today's $13 billion auction. Courtesy of Reuters, we present a compare and contrast of the Obama and the Ryan plans. Feel free to heckle at will.
Comparing Obama, Ryan budget plans, from Reuters
- Obama calls for $4
trillion in deficit reduction to be phased in over 12 years or less.
Three-fourths would come from spending cuts and interest savings and the
rest by streamlining the tax code. A "fail-safe" would trigger
across-the-board spending cuts if debt reduction goals are not met.
It calls for reducing deficits as a percentage of gross domestic
product from around 10 percent currently to 2.5 percent in 2015 and 2
percent by the end of the decade.
- Ryan's 2012 budget reduces
deficits over the next decade by $4.4 trillion, calls for $5.8 trillion
in spending cuts and lowers tax rates for businesses and individuals. It
would set a binding cap on government spending to keep it below 20
percent of the $14 trillion U.S. economy.
- Ryan's plan brings the deficit as a share of the economy to 2.4 percent in 2015 and 1.6 percent in 10 years.
MEDICARE, MEDICAID, SOCIAL SECURITY
Obama says Social Security is not contributing to the current debt
and its financial future should be dealt with separately with bipartisan
- On healthcare, his plan calls for $480 billion in
Medicare and Medicaid savings by 2023. He would strengthen Medicare's
Independent Payment Advisory Board and save Medicaid money by
streamlining the formula for giving federal funds to states.
Obama's plan emphasizes improving care quality to achieve savings for
the Medicare healthcare program for the elderly. He would allow Medicare
to use its purchasing power to negotiate lower costs on prescription
drugs and he would speed up the availability of cheaper generic drugs.
He wants upper limits to be set on Medicaid payments for durable medical
- Ryan would repeal the healthcare overhaul enacted
into law last year. He wants to eventually eliminate the current
fee-for-service program for Medicare. Instead, future retirees would get
a federal subsidy based on income and health status to shop for medical
coverage from private insurers. Medicaid would become a block grant
program where the federal government gives states a chunk of money to
run the health program for the poor without federal interference.
- Ryan calls for bipartisan negotiations on Social Security.
- Obama calls for ending Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthiest. He wants
Congress to overhaul the tax code to make it simpler and fairer and
reduce the number of tax breaks that favor one taxpayer over another. He
calls for a corporate tax overhaul to help lower the corporate tax
- Ryan also calls for a tax law overhaul. His plan would
cut the top corporate and personal tax rates to 25 percent, down from 35
DEFENSE AND OTHER DISCRETIONARY SPENDING
wants a fundamental review of U.S. military missions and capabilities
around the world. His plan proposes some $400 billion defense spending
cuts that would not compromise U.S. defense capabilities.
non-security discretionary spending, Obama's plan seeks another $200
billion in savings beyond the $400 billion proposed in his February
budget blueprint for fiscal 2012, which begins Oct. 1.
budget leaves military spending mostly untouched. But it does reflect
$178 billion in savings identified by Defense Secretary Robert Gates.
Some $100 billion is reinvested in combat capabilities and the rest is
used for deficit reduction. Ryan calls for bringing other spending down
to 2008 levels and freezing it there for five years.
- advertisements -