This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Obama's Advice To Those Complaining About Surging Gas Prices: Suck It In And Cope

Tyler Durden's picture


As gasoline prices continue to surge day after day (and with WTI touching $109 today this will continue for a long time), the peasantry is getting restless. Not only that but it is getting nosy. In fact today some plebs had the temerity to seek answers from the teleprompter over the festering question of just how long will Bernanke, pardon, UK stagflation, pardon, default Portugal, pardon, healthy worldwide demand keep pushing gas prices to $4, then $5, then $6, and eventually to the price paid in Europe: about $9. The response was straight out of Charlie Munger's (non-frontrunning) playbook: "I'm just going to be honest with you. There's not much we can do next week or two weeks from now," the president told workers at a wind turbine plant (one operated by Spanish company Gamesa). "Gas prices? They're going to still fluctuate until we can start making
these broader changes, and that's going to take a couple of years to
have serious effect." And we doubt Obama's hard core union electorate will be happy at the following stab at Channel Stuffing Motors: "If you're complaining about the price of gas and you're only getting 8
miles a gallon, you know," Obama said laughingly. "You might want to
think about a trade-in.
" Let's hope the people don't get the same idea about the presidential office two years from now, even after the $1 billion spent on TV ads. As to the core question, we were surprised Bill Dudley was not present at Obama's side explaining how deluded complainers should just have a chilled glass of unleaded 98 Octane with their main course of deflationary iPad 2.

More from AP:

The president spoke at a town hall meeting at Gamesa Technology Corp., a Spanish company that makes giant turbines that use wind to generate electricity. According to the White House, it is the first overseas company of its kind to set up shop in the U.S.

Back in Washington, negotiations continued on a budget deal to avert a government shutdown Friday and Obama urged lawmakers to get it done. The president said he wants to cut spending, but not at the expense of cutting priorities like energy and education.

As fuel prices rise because of growing demand worldwide and political
unrest in oil-producing nations in North Africa and the Middle East,
drivers are feeling pinched at the pump. Republicans blame Obama and his
policies and he, in turn, is striving to show the public that he gets

In the meantime, if the middle class repeats "Inflation is transitory" three times while starting in the mirror, a genocidal Chairsatan will appear behind it and slice its throat.

Gasoline prices rose another 2 cents Tuesday to a new national average
of just over $3.68 a gallon, according to AAA and other sources. Obama's
visit to Gamesa was his fourth energy event since March 11. He's
scheduled a fifth for Friday in Indianapolis.

It's not all bad news. By the looks of things, er, promises, the gas situation will normalize... some time in 2025.

Obama said he wants to move toward "a future where America is less
dependent on foreign oil, more reliant on clean energy produced by
workers like you." That will happen by reducing oil imports, tapping
domestic energy sources and shifting the nation to renewable and less
polluting sources of energy, such as wind, the president says. He has
set a goal of reducing oil imports by one-third by 2025.

And following tomorrow's ECB hike, and following Europe's subsequent economic deterioration, the only bank that continues to be uber-loose will be stuck in that mode as it seeks to remain the "dynamo" of ponzi growth, meaning Obama voters who complain about gas prices at $3.70 will soon have even more fun complaining when the gas price ends being an anagram of those three numbers in a a year or so.


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 04/06/2011 - 18:03 | 1142912 Haywood Jablowme
Haywood Jablowme's picture

Clash for Clunkers part Deux......The Return of The Tricycle

*this message has been brought to you by the makers of Hush Puppies, official Crocs footwear, and Takashi from Revenge of the Nerds

--> NERDS!

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 18:01 | 1142953 Millivanilli
Millivanilli's picture

Hope is for dopes now COPE!

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 18:16 | 1143020 AR15AU
AR15AU's picture

Let them eat cake...

-Marie Antoinette


Let them ride bike...

-Barry Soetoro

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 18:20 | 1143039 Haywood Jablowme
Haywood Jablowme's picture



Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:48 | 1143746 Ahmeexnal
Ahmeexnal's picture

Jeb Bush 2012.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:31 | 1144218 rocker
rocker's picture

Really. Let's Bomb,Bomb,Bomb Iran.  And more tax cuts.  The U.S. is now Japan. We are a Fucked nation. We are done. Period. Don't you get it.

Who the Fuck really cares about anybody running elections. More noise for the mindless.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:49 | 1144248 FEDbuster
FEDbuster's picture

"With president-elect Barack Obama soon to be sworn in as the nation’s leader, a new presidential limousine was in call for and once again General Motors was assigned the task of building it. Nicknamed ‘The Beast’, the limo is based on a number of GM platforms and shares components with several different....

All of this comes at a heavy weight penalty, with top speed rated at 60mph (96km/h) and fuel-economy expected to be about 8mpg."

I guess we know where the "8 miles per gallon" number came from! 

One fucking golf outing, sightseeing trip in Air Force One uses more fuel than I will use in my entire lifetime you arrogant cocksucker, fuck you.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 02:35 | 1144389 duckduckMOOSE
duckduckMOOSE's picture

“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it comes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism - ownership of government by an individual, by a group,”  ~FDR

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 03:52 | 1144436 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

nice research fedbuster (hope it's true).  however imo he and his ilk don't think the problem is theirs because they "can afford it" and are "doing god's work".  low gas mileage is a real sin only when coupled with inability to pay without complaint.  

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 05:42 | 1144499 FEDbuster
FEDbuster's picture

He hasn't paid for a dime worth of gas for that tank he rides in.  If we only knew what it cost to shuttle these assholes around for their fundraisers, sightseeing trips, nights on the town, etc.... I do everything I legally can to avoid paying a dime to these parasites, but watching them destroy the Country is becoming intolerable.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 01:23 | 1144327 Pondmaster
Pondmaster's picture

Mindless indeed !! Not unlike thier overlords in seats of power . But not mindless . There is a mindest of self destruction behavior from both . And both too blind too see , and too deaf to hear.  

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 08:53 | 1144736 Trundle
Trundle's picture

Then hope Ron Paul destroys the Republican party.

If the Republicans can't do any better than that tool, it's time to go out of business.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 18:30 | 1143087 Translational Lift
Translational Lift's picture

No...Let them eat iPad 2's.  I am shocked...I say SHOCKED that the the proletariat "is getting restless".

This is the change they signed on they don't even have HOPE!!

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 06:18 | 1144527 Richard Weed
Richard Weed's picture

Re: "the peasantry is getting restless"

Hej Tyler... the word is "restive"... as in "the peasantry is getting restive"... they might also be "restless", but that might be just a minor case of insomnia.


Wed, 04/06/2011 - 18:50 | 1143179 tmosley
tmosley's picture

More like "Let them eat shit."

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 19:27 | 1143278 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Hi, butthurt faggot name changing loser.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 19:35 | 1143303 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

Hey stool lips let me guess. Muammar Gaddafi would look like a male model if he stood next to you .

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:08 | 1143404 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

[hint: try a little less bigotry and a little more analysis and maybe individuals like me won't interrupt your comfy little echo chamber quite so often]

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:12 | 1143419 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

... er ... dude, no commentary on your content, but, well, you're talking to yourself.  don'tcha' know - Ned

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:53 | 1143509 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

tmoseley's a presumed god at ZH because he's a two hundred post a day gold doomer using same tired death by a thousand blows redundancy.

Challenge him once and the retorts are immediately puerile, sexual, anal. That's his programmed comeback. He totally bore the crap out of readers, ruins the threads, destroys the otherwise spirited dialogue. He even has a poodle here nights named Col Cooper to offer even more offensive homophobic childish slime as if one inverted mind weren't enough.

moseley was thrown off seeking alpha and for the same activity. Tens of thousands of posts, the vast majority of which are just chlidish sexual insults and retorts to common sense challenges.

In short he contributes as much to this blog as the third ball on a short possum in a circle jerk.

A real fight club would have long ago booted him for the thousands and thousands and thousands of insults and followed by a run for safety with chickenshit grinding slander rather than reasoned argument but hey, he predictably rah rahs gold a hundred times a day here so he stays here behind mommy's apron.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:37 | 1143859 Arkadaba
Arkadaba's picture

tmoseley's a presumed god at ZH....

Yeah whatever. Instead of responding to personalities - post something of interest. The fact that you haven't speaks volumes.

Edit: Same for that Maniac guy.


Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:42 | 1143884 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

Unlike you I'm not interested in sniggering with 10th graders over fart jokes. 

Likely that's why you're here. 

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:00 | 1143948 Arkadaba
Arkadaba's picture

thank you god!!!

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:23 | 1144011 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Yup.  Butthurt.  Did I strike a nerve when I insulted one of your other sock puppets?

Also, I was "thrown out" of neither site.  I just stopped posting there, because ZH is a much better outlet for anything and everything I like to talk about.  

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:30 | 1144039 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

You like to talk about things like this blindingly interesting wrap up of your action packed spring afternoon:


Seeking Alpha - ( Tmosley )

I have noticed that wheat is incredibly undervalued as well. I sometimes buy supplies for my mother's bakery, and I have been surprised at the persistently low price of flour, only ~6.50 for a 25 pound bag.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:53 | 1144105 tmosley
tmosley's picture

What are you even trying to say here?

God, so worthless.  So incoherent.  So INCOMPETENT.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:16 | 1144184 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

tmosley jew comments

About 1,240 results (0.24 seconds)
Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:20 | 1144193 Glass Steagall
Glass Steagall's picture

Jew say it like it's a bad thing..

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 05:48 | 1144502 Confused
Confused's picture

Please stop posting here. No one cares what you think. Take your personal vendetta somewhere else. 

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:17 | 1143444 SaulA
SaulA's picture

It's nice to have comrades, even if they are a bit eccentric.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:23 | 1143468 Holodomor2012
Holodomor2012's picture

Dr. Kevin MacDonald has done a wonderful job explaining exactly why your kind so quickly comes to the defense of the 'historically oppressed minority groups'.


It's just a short jump from identifying and polarizing one group, to identifying and polarizing your group.




Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:43 | 1143536 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Your comment makes little sense. That and I've already pointed out elsewhere that your cognitive reasoning skills are dubious at best, Holodomor.

Here's a thought: why should anyone care what bigoted assholes say to defend their narrow worldviews?

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:27 | 1143847 RoRoTrader
RoRoTrader's picture

Your writing style is way beyond the pale, very sharpe, quite slicing, and makes me think Max von Sydow's Joubert.

I guess the answer to the question is we need care only as long as b/a's occupy the primary stage, for how long, and the effect of the influence delivered across the common denominator.

I always ask what I don't know; what is a Holodomor?

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:43 | 1143886 Sheriff Douchen...
Sheriff Douchenik from AZ's picture

Maniac Researcher is making the case that being a 'bigoted asshole' is probably a pretty cool way to be. I would argue that the narrow worldview is mostly occupied by Maniac's ilk.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:50 | 1143915 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

He's actually making the opposite point but you'll defend the worst sociopaths and hypocrites as long as they are bullish on gold right?

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 04:00 | 1144439 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

no.  they have to be bullish on silver too.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:26 | 1144017 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Excellent.  You shouldn't care.  You should leave.  Yet you stay.  

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:26 | 1144205 Spalding_Smailes
Spalding_Smailes's picture

Libertarian telling someone what to do LOL'....... No freedom of speech ???? Two Faced Bitch showing his white stripe down his yella back. Punk ass bitch.




NWA - One Less Bitch


Thu, 04/07/2011 - 08:32 | 1144690 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Once again, our delivery driving friend here shows his total lack of understanding of libertarianism.  Or anything else for that matter.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:48 | 1143542 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture


I can't type the name Holodomor without imagining some mutated character in a bad sci-fi movie. Makes me chuckle every time.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:14 | 1143632 Holodomor2012
Holodomor2012's picture

I know.  You revel in the real genocides throughout history.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:22 | 1143651 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

Meanwhile you essentially called him a homosexual presuming he would take it as an insult. Hypocrite.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:10 | 1143812 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Learn to read. And learn the definition of hypocrite - start by looking the mirror.

Do you really think anyone buys your support of the ZH mission to "get the word to the masses about financial corruption" while you are sitting there defending jew hating morons like Holodomor? The only ones who are convinced are other racist idiots like you.

Again, Tyler -- you are making this waay too easy letting these foolish nazi fetishists piss all over your playground. I can only assume you condone their stupidity.


Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:29 | 1143851 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

Whoa dude, I'm defending and supporting YOU !! Read slower and relax OK. I'm with ya brother because you're in the right.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:52 | 1143924 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

...sorry about that, LJS. Your usage of the word "you" in that last post was unclear. Also the Hitler and icecream comment was meant for Holodomor.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:27 | 1144024 tmosley
tmosley's picture

You guys are hilariously dim-witted.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:31 | 1144047 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

stunning comeback from the sociopathic chemistry teacher.

Tell us more about mama's bakery supplies

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:55 | 1144115 tmosley
tmosley's picture

My mother is a baker is the best argument you can come up with?  Well, it's certainly better than the rather stupid mischaracterization of the manager of a multimillion dollar laboratory as a chemistry teacher, which is also a fine profession (as I owe my career to three "chemistry teachers" who encouraged me to pursue this path).


Thu, 04/07/2011 - 05:39 | 1144496 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Right. My misreading of an indefinite pronoun on a single post *totally* invalidates the discussion we are having about your defence of ZH and its problematic relationship to its racist cheerleaders and/or the ironic correlation between hard-core libertarianism and the banksters you lambaste. Sure.

Juan, I don't know where you're even going with this chemistry teacher business. If that's what tmosley does, good for him.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 08:35 | 1144694 tmosley
tmosley's picture

A. I wasn't invalidating anything with that post.  B. you aren't having any form of a discussion, you are just lashing out at everyone around you like a hysterical. C. very few here are racist. D. there is ZERO correlation between banksters and libertarians (you are just making shit up).

You get an F.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 15:41 | 1146583 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

If I'm making shit up about the correlation between libertarians and banksters, offer a counter argument.

Your "very few here are racist" comment made me laugh. There is plenty of bile to go around on this very thread. Perhaps you should put the grading pen down and open your eyes.

I find it interesting that my comments are junked and removed while the racist ones stay. Gee, that isn't further evidence to support my claims -- you know the ones that you aren't addressing.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:04 | 1143791 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Right. Do you also include Hitler buying you ice cream sundaes in your fantasies?

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:44 | 1143740 Andy Lewis
Andy Lewis's picture

Kevin MacDonald ain't nuthin' but shit and neither are you.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:17 | 1143832 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Ooo. What a comeback, Andy. What else do you have, tough guy? I have been greatly amused by your [enormously ironic] calls for common decency on past posts. I bet you could come up with zingers at a Klan rally.

I can just see it now..

"look..I know we're busy hanging people, but could you tone it down while I attempt to inform the people of the inherent inequality in our society?"


As Bill Hicks once incisively noted, "I suggest taking a look around you...and shutting the fuck up."

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 06:15 | 1144524 Andy Lewis
Andy Lewis's picture

My reply was to holo man, not you.



Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:34 | 1143507 KennyG09
KennyG09's picture

Where exactly are the partisan talking points? Although I agree that using words like those above have used doesn't add anything to the discussion, stop claiming everyone on here is worthless.I'm sure you have something to add to the discussion so stop trying to get a rise out of people and actually contribute.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:56 | 1143574 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Sure I'll get right on contributing in the hypocrite's clubhouse.

There's a world beyond ZeroHedge. I'll make my constructive contribution there, thanks.

Here, my addition is calling out bullshit where I see it.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:01 | 1143594 KennyG09
KennyG09's picture

Really? I didn't realize there was a world beyond zerohedge! Sorry that's not an arguement my friend. So if you're here to call out bullshit against Zero Hedges articles go for it. I get that bigoted statements add nothing. So add something Mr. Researcher. You still haven't answered my question. Where is the partisanship in this article?

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:31 | 1143665 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

Then why piss on his thread of grownup thinking meanwhile chuckling and cheering on all the other meatheads defecating all over the white places on your screen?

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 05:56 | 1144508 Confused
Confused's picture

What the fuck are you saying? 

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:28 | 1143668 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Oh! yes! let's play the "you didn't answer my question" game! I haven't seen that one before!

Yawn. This is just another common, dismissive response employed to derail a point or discussion. It cleverly puts the honus on the initiator of the critique - and if they bite, forces them into a loop where they have to keep coming up with "answers" to continually more unrelated questions. Unfortunately for you [chuckle] Kenny G, I won't run in circles for you. If I wanted to write a paper citing what is already plainly evident, it would never satisfy you. You see, with this technique you are employing, the "answers" supplied are never satisfactory. Your intent isn't to debate but to derail.

You aren't dictating this conversation - and your attempt to control and redirect it is transparent.


Kenny G? Really? that is what you've chosen as your handle? Let me supply you with a fun quote from music critic Pat Metheny - because I can't resist ;)

"But when Kenny G decided that it was appropriate for him to defile the music of the man who is probably the greatest jazz musician that has ever lived by spewing his lame-ass, jive, pseudo bluesy, out-of-tune, noodling, wimped out, fucked up playing all over one of the great Louis's tracks (even one of his lesser ones), he did something that I would not have imagined possible. He, in one move, through his unbelievably pretentious and calloused musical decision to embark on this most cynical of musical paths, shit all over the graves of all the musicians past and present who have risked their lives by going out there on the road for years and years developing their own music inspired by the standards of grace that Louis Armstrong brought to every single note he played over an amazing lifetime as a musician. By disrespecting Louis, his legacy and by default, everyone who has ever tried to do something positive with improvised music and what it can be, Kenny G has created a new low point in modern culture - something that we all should be totally embarrassed about - and afraid of. We ignore this, "let it slide", at our own peril."

For your reading pleasure, read the rest of the article here:

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:38 | 1143708 KennyG09
KennyG09's picture

Right. So by asking you to answer my original question I'm somehow trying to derail the conversation? You said something, I asked you to explain and you go into a discussion that has nothing to do with my original question. How does that make any sense? You are the one that derailed the conversation Sir. Answers that aren't satisfactory? Unrelated to the conversation? You haven't answered my god dam question! (from the point you made!!!) hahahaha!! You try to act like you are some sort of knowledgable guy that is above everyone on these boards yet you act like a child. Making fun of my screen name? Really? You're the one that is trying to derail and control this coversation by resorting to name calling and the very same narrow mindedness that you started off criticizing (which I agreed with). So maybe you should do some soul searching and figure out why you have to resort to making fun of people instead of actually explaining and defending your points. 

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:01 | 1143777 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

Drop it man. You lost now get over it.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:09 | 1143810 KennyG09
KennyG09's picture

I'm not dropping shit. Tell me how I've lost anything when nothing has been debated? hahahahahaha

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:24 | 1143845 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

You are correct. Nothing is being debated. I simply made a fool out of you. You made it easy for me. Most ZHers do. That's all that is going on here, dude.

That, and it was fun pointing out your weak-ass taste in music.;D


Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:39 | 1143880 wisefool
wisefool's picture

You are both idiots. There are only two types of music = Country and Western. There are only 3 types of physcholgy/debate tactics. Passive/aggressive. passive/passive. agressive/agressive.

And there is only one proper school of economics. Keynesian-Krugman. If you see political talking points in tyler's posts, you have never worked hogs in your life.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:54 | 1143925 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

Do you play a banjo too?

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:56 | 1143932 wisefool
wisefool's picture

Yup. And I don't get lost.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:43 | 1143889 KennyG09
KennyG09's picture

I read your reply below and tend to agree with you up until the libertarian part. But other than that I think you've made a fool of yourself. I really tried discussing the issue with you but you went right on the defensive thinking I was attacking you. Nothing is being debated because of YOU not me. I wasn't attacking you but if it gets your e-peen larger that you made a fool out of me, by all means stroke your e-peen.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:45 | 1143897 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Luckily for me, I never cared what you think.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:56 | 1143937 KennyG09
KennyG09's picture

Good one! You obviously do or else you wouldn't be spending all this time trying to get me to shup up ;) Even better, you obviously care what everybody here thinks or else you wouldn't even care about calling "bullshit" whenever you see it, right?  

Take care.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:06 | 1143972 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

My commentary has and will be directed at the community. Just because you're a part of it doesn't mean I have to care about you individually.

What this exchange does suggest is that you may be feel a heightened sense of self important just like the real Kenny G.

I never asked you to shut up - the more you open your mouth, the more opportunities I have to demonstrate the bullshit I am calling out. Thanks for that, by the way.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:17 | 1144002 KennyG09
KennyG09's picture

I didn't say you asked me up to shut up, but declaring that you defeated me implies that. The more you open your mouth the easier it is for the community to see you're really not here to call "bullshit" but to stroke your internet ego because mommy didn't pay attention to you growing up. 

Lastly, did you ever stop and think for a second that maybe my name really is Kenny and that my last name begins with a G? Just goes to show that you're the prejudiced bigot that you work so hard to call "bullshit" on.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:30 | 1144045 wisefool
wisefool's picture

+1. This is how you do it kids.

Now that the LAS majors are running away as fast as they can, can we as a community think of something better than krugmanism -- but at the same time -- is not so heavy to carry around? It is also filthy, as anybody who has worked with large quantities of it knows.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:34 | 1144052 tmosley
tmosley's picture

My God, you are a whiny bitch, you know that?

Your posts in this thread have had exactly zero substance.  You are now the "Charlie Sheen" of Zero Hedge.  You are "winning", no matter what happens.  You aren't interested in anyone but yourself and some vaguely defined concept of "the community", any section of which you feel you can just ignore because they took the time to reply to your asinine assertions.  The truth is, you are in a downward spiral, and are fast losing all credibility and benefit of the doubt.  So SAD :(


Thu, 04/07/2011 - 05:26 | 1144493 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Aw gee. I really wanted some credibility in your eys. So much. Really. A lot. With extra reallys.

Don't give me that "you can't attack our community! it's vaguely defined!" crap. That may work on the people who have been around for two months, but not those who have been around for twenty. There's a community. It's defined. I'm critiquing it. You're defending it. That, and you want a cookie for keeping the nazis at bay. My advice? Don't quit your day job.

But bravo, tmosley. I think you have come the closest to actually presenting a reasonable counterargument so far.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 08:39 | 1144700 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Funny that you think an insult is an argument.  It isn't.  Mine wasn't, and neither are yours.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:31 | 1144043 tmosley
tmosley's picture

The first person to claim that the other party in a discussion lost is the real loser.  This is one of the rules of the internet, though I don't recall which one.

But of course, we already knew you were a loser, as you keep changing names in the vain hope of gaining some sort of credibility.  I don't know why you bother, since you NEVER, and i mean literally NEVER post ANYTHING other than a drive by insult, or at best, a diatribe against one person or another.  

Sorry you are such a loser that this is the best use of your time.  I would suggest you find yourself a girl.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:46 | 1144074 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture



Such ignorance. Here's a hint: tulips self-reproduce. Their supply can thus grow at an exponential rate


tell all 9 of us more o wise man.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:13 | 1144177 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Awwwwwww, is the wittle guy jealous?

But hey, I'll tell you what, you can have ALL of my "followers".  I'll just direct them to some of your posts and I'm sure they'll all like you right away.  I mean, your posts have so many positive traits like....uhhhhh, ummmmmm, hmmmmmm.  Well, you've got a lot of left field insults for no apparent reason against people you don't really know.  People like that, right?

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:41 | 1143877 Arkadaba
Arkadaba's picture

There's a world beyond ZeroHedge. I'll make my constructive contribution there, thanks.

Cool! That means you are going away???

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:49 | 1143908 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

I'll be back to call out more bullshit, I'm sure. There's no shortage of it here.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:04 | 1143960 tennisdude
tennisdude's picture

Statists like yourself are rare here.  It would be great if you offered thought provoking, challenging arguments rather than looking like a well trained statist by throwing the words "bigot" and "partisan" around, followed by a proclaimation that you have crushed your opponent.

I hope your posts get better.  If they don't get any better than this, I hope people learn to stop replying to you.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:26 | 1144027 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Unlikely. Fools like you always take the bait.

Statists, eh? I was waiting for that one. Do we have a delusional Rothbardian on our hands who thinks that every person is an island and we can all survive just fine with privatized fire and police services? Me'thinks we do!

There's just one little problem with your ethos. Some people were born without your special [affluent white male privilege] bootstraps, dumbass. Some people are lying drunk in their own vomit down on the corner. Some people are getting fired for being black or gay. Women who are actually brave enough to report being raped are being blamed for the crime.

This magic world where the state can be stripped away and everyone can fend for themselves does not exist. Whatever your heated fantasy's about "taking down the system" may be, people want infrastructure. They want basic services. They want social justice. No matter how much you yell and complain after this post, this is an unchangeable fact.

I invite you to study any chaotic period in history - whether you look at the post-Qing dynasty collapse, the French Revolution, the Great Depression and the New Deal, the Bolshevik Revolution, Mexico in the 1920s, 17th century German states, etc etc. People found ways to constitute these basic services any way they could. States exist. No matter how much you whine about it, you aren't going to change that.

Now is that to say that there have been an unceasing procession of brutal dictatorial assholes who have taken advantage of this paradigm and in the process murdered, raped, pillaged and made life generally unpleasant? of course.

As far as these days go in the US - are arrests, trials, and even perhaps executions in order? Probably. Do I think Hank Paulson, Lloyd Blankfein, Jamie Dimon, and Tim Geithner should be behind bars spending the rest of their life in extreme discomfort? Yes - for starters.

But spare me the "smash the state" bullshit. Because that's what it is.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:43 | 1144073 Flakmeister
Flakmeister's picture

My, you are a confrontational one... but, it is clear you can handle yourself. Well, done, welcome aboard. Call out bullshit and debate 'em straight up...

Holiday in Somalia?

Ask 'em about Rule of Law and Tinkerbell the faerie that makes it happen with a wave of the her magic wand.... 

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 04:06 | 1144442 jeff montanye
jeff montanye's picture

let's hear it for tinkerbell (disney version) and her fabulous waist/hip ratio!  that ratio's not the gold/silver but its been fascinating for even more thousands of years.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:55 | 1144116 Arkadaba
Arkadaba's picture

Give me a  few days to think about it. In the meantime, what do you with this:

The person writing the article worked for Reagon and the CIA.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 06:31 | 1144537 tennisdude
tennisdude's picture

You certainly drew quite a lot from my short comment that was not even largely about statism.  The social justice crowd keeps the ponzi going, Wall Street appreciates your support.  Your knowledge of history is dissapointing.  If a libertarian society was what the elite wanted, it would be what we have now.  They would not have created a central bank, and they would not have funded universities that say the same hilarious things that you say.

Your worldview is shattered by the fact that socialism is a joke on low level socialists like yourself.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 15:51 | 1146623 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Right. And public space is growing not shrinking. And the wave of privatization in so many aspects of American life that has occurred since the end of WW2 is all a myth made up by socialists. And the US isn't a corporate oligarchy. Sure.

What planet do you live on?


Thu, 04/07/2011 - 19:01 | 1147450 tennisdude
tennisdude's picture

Our system of corporate fascism is socialism for the rich.  It's reverse Robin Hood.  In your world, there have been no bailouts over the decades? No price fixing of interest rates to benefit the few at the expense of the many? At least the useful idiot neo cons know that they are pro Wall Street. The clueless diet socialists actually think that their worldview sticks it to the oligarchy. Socialism is a lie.  Big government always gets bought out. That is why your earlier statement about the elite being libertarian is completely false.

As long as you pursue a woldview that requires a big government to loot from your neighbor to centrally plan as you see fit, you will always be a tool for the elite.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 06:09 | 1144516 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

By the way, junking people you don't agree with doesn't add anything to the credibility of the community.

Que stock ZH member.

"Alright guys! I'm going to get right out and let everyone know about they hypocrisy of the financial system right away! We have to let everyone know about this wonderful place called Zerohedge! We really stick to the man! We're so radical, we even have nazis here! We are sooo *edgy*... OMG someone just came in and called us racist and misguided! Junk him! Shut him up!"

In fact, I am simply encouraged to reiterate the points I have been making all along. Here, let me pop your flimsy charade-bubble of legitimacy mmmright fucking now.

Here it goes: Isn't it ironic that those who have taken on the mantle to "get the word out about financial corruption" to "stop the exploitation of the little guy" also have nazis and bigots in their midst? And furthermore, isn't it also more than a little hypocritical to promote an extreme libertarianism that espouses privatizing everything - while simultaneously lambasting big predatory finance corporations that buy political power to promote the same thing? Hypocrisy and Irony. Did you get that? Good.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:14 | 1143426 Robot Traders Mom
Robot Traders Mom's picture

Dude, you are weird. What is partisan on here? This might be the most non-partisan financial or political website there is. The reason why people are here is because they are fed up with the ponzi scheme financial and two-party system.

You probably have some spelling tests to grade. Why don't you bounce...

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:39 | 1143524 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture


two observations: First, look at who is calling who weird. That is one fucked up avatar, dude.

Second, most non-partisan? What a joke. I think you need to look that one up.

While we're talking about homework, next look up the word Irony. Here, let me use it in a sentence to help you out.

It is quite ironic that you want to claim the support of "the people" who are "fed up" to defend bigoted commentary.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:44 | 1143535 Bugman82
Bugman82's picture

It seems you need a definition for non-partisan.  I'll give you one.

Non-partisan:  Both parties = shit

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:13 | 1143629 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

I think the word you are looking for is miscreant. Or perhaps alienated.

Non-partisan delineates a desire [however small] to work with the established system in order to seek a solution. The gold, guns, and wingnut crowd here at ZH couldn't be further from that definition.

Do I think non-partisanship works? Not particularly. Perhaps it would if there were anything near a level playing field. Unfortunately, capital has consolidated to the point where it controls most political power. Here I agree with the sentiments expressed on ZH.

However, and here is an umpteenth reiteration of my point for the cheap seats, whatever value ZeroHedge has in its criticism, it is completely undermined by the bigotry of its members - and undermined by their highly vocal support for libertarianism - which is an ethos much more closely related to that of the bankers they abhor then they would like to admit.

The banksters want to privatize everything, too. The banksters also believe social welfare is theft. The banksters also want to ignore history in order to justify the dubious claim that everyone can "make it" if they just work hard enough. Sound familiar? Good.


Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:22 | 1143650 Holodomor2012
Holodomor2012's picture

Bigotry! someone call the waaambulance. 


This is very typical of your people.  Perhaps since your overtures to TD pining for censorship have fallen on deaf ears a call to Abe Foxman or Mark Potok is the next course of action?

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:31 | 1143679 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Let's add "jew-baiting" to the google analytics as well, while we're at it.

Tyler - your little Stormfront wannabes are making my job far too easy.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:41 | 1143718 baby_BLYTHE
baby_BLYTHE's picture

you really are pathetic.

once they backed you into the corner, you scream of anti-semitism and bigotry!

ad hominem attacks are the lowest form of disagreement.

Go back to the research bud. As was stated by RTM, this is one of the most diverse opinionated sites on the web.

Zerohedge redefines the meaning of Free Speech!!! Hence its surging reputation.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:00 | 1143781 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

As long as you're bulling gold and silver that is.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:31 | 1143857 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Look up Ad Authoritarium.

You looked stupid when I tore your flimsy arguments apart to your face yesterday..and well, nothing has changed. Next..

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:08 | 1143805 nmewn
nmewn's picture

"Let's add "jew-baiting" to the google analytics as well, while we're at it.

Tyler - your little Stormfront wannabes are making my job far too easy."

Ahhh...there it is.

So I take it censorship is part of your "job" description?

Nothing is censored here Goebbels.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:30 | 1143854 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Way to extrapolate. I just want ZH to be associated with the words that truly define it: racism, bigotry, misogyny, jew-bating, nazi fetishes, homophobia, and a partridge in a pear tree. Again, thanks for your help in that regard. The more it is repeated, the more times it will come up in search.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:45 | 1143891 nmewn
nmewn's picture

You forgot your presence, now that will come up in a search ;-)

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 18:29 | 1147305 Arkadaba
Arkadaba's picture

+ very good

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:50 | 1143916 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Well at least you're smart enough to know that the people here can readily see that all you are interested in is smearing and distorting. So you don't have to continue laboring under a false hope.

oh and fuck your jew google search. I'm up to having google front run everything I do on the interenet and they need 20 ip addresses for EVERYTHING I do. So they are sharing it with all their little fucktard friends. And when people are wiping their ass on with stupid jew book of life and laughing at the akashic records like it's a frikkin comedy satire written by retards who constantly laughed at every time they talk about how precise and careful they are. Or called fucking stupid for claiming to be more experienced. Or giggle at for thier rediculous fucking nobel peace prizes and scientific achievement awards. It will all be worth it.

I sure hope I get a stupid dream full of lies and meaningless crap from my wonderful fucked in the head guides. It's the source of my humor.

But can we add to the list of characturization. Let's throw in stupidity and evil desire to ignore and ruin sacred holidays like christmas with our silver coin bear worshiping gifts.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:55 | 1143941 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

Don't drink and drive man.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:02 | 1143957 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

What a tough guy. I am just shaking in my boots.

What am I smearing and distorting? The presence of Nazi assholes like you? You just proved my point. In spades. Thanks!

Tyler -- your people are just handing me this one on a silver platter. Better put your little reifenstahl on a leash.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:56 | 1143943 Arkadaba
Arkadaba's picture

Sorry dude. I would describe myself as liberal and leftist (if those labels mean anything these days - not sure they do) and have had some great interactions with the posters at ZH. And I've never hid my political leanings. Yes a few nut cases occasionally come out - like you - but overall the majority of posters are willing to listen to alternative views and I try to reciprocate. Obviously Israel is an issue for you but with the whole Middle East undergoing historical change - that is something that needs to be discussed. And if ZH needs any help in SEO (which I doubt), I will offer a few hours a week for free because it is one of the few non-bullshit zones for news.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:09 | 1143986 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Good luck with that.

Israel is an issue? Where did you come up with that?

Non-bullshit zones? Have you noticed how easy it was to draw out the bullshit here?

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:37 | 1144061 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Indeed, you just pop up and go crazy all on your own.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 01:43 | 1144350 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

I wish I was really anti-semetic. Instead of just playing with this stupid jewish come from the google pit of hell over search terms machine of stupid assholes.

You're fun to play with. You're a game and a joke. The banks you ran sent you all to the slaughter house to build a sympathy whore shield to hide behind. You're nothing but a distraction that your own kind use. You're not worth hating because well the truth about how much crap you guys put up with for the benefit of a few jews is just sad all by itself. A million lousy little turds continually fucking over people to keep and maintain your us-versus them philosophy. Completely disconnected from what is really occuring around you. Like your silly little statements. You see how easy it is to draw out the bullshit here.

You'll never find who fucked you over and stuffed you guys in ovens. Because it was your own people. Do you really think jews are so "naturally" hated that they can get this done to them in EUROPE. NOT butt fucking nowhere. The middle of GODDAMN europe. With nobody saying anything or setting off any alarms. Of course no alarms were set off. It was a total inside job. A fuck over of you own kind.

Now you own all this computer technology and you invest all this energy into creating and propagating this myth of your severe danger through all the communications companies you control. And it's all about to get melted into ash by not being very suitable for operating at 400kvolts.

The goyim will finally get the only thing they've ever wanted from the jew since the foundation of the world. The silence of the Jews. Oh you'll still scream about what everybody owes you and how much they hate you and how you can make them stop hating you. You just won't have a megaphone to do with. Poor constantly projecting constantly asserting jews with nobody around to make an impression on.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 04:38 | 1144455 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

It's spelled anti-semitic. If you're going to get emotional about the concept, then you're going to have to learn how to make sure the key words in your chaotic, disjointed, non-sequitur rants are spelled correctly. I mean, you've totally got the full on wingnut thing already happening, H, bravo there...but you'll be disappointing your fans.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:45 | 1144079 Glass Steagall
Glass Steagall's picture

your little Stormfront wannabes are making my job far too easy

Your "job"??? Very telling, fucking troll.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 04:31 | 1144454 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

oh stop. you're gonna hurt my feelings.

Learn to understand rhetorical devices.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 12:16 | 1145604 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

Confessing to being a professional troll. Confessing to using rhetorik. You just can't keep your mouth shut can you.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 16:03 | 1146677 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

I'm sorry that being exposed to an opinion that differs from your own makes you uncomfortable. No..wait, I'm not sorry. Deal. You'd like to believe I'm a professional troll -- because the reality should be far more disturbing - not to you, Hephaseus - you have precious few brain cells to waste.

No - I'm talking about the more intelligent members, some of whom I've also engaged in this thread. Deep down, it might just bother them a little bit that individuals who have been lurking for long periods of time can spontaneously come out of nowhere to upset their little self-important, racist, libertarian circle jerk. And behold, looks like it might have even emboldened a few others to speak up. I'm just one guy. Imagine if there were more of me...not paid trolls, not astroturfers, just individuals with enough sense to point out hypocrisy where they see it. Haphasteus here wouldn't be able to get a hateful word out without getting ripped a dozen ways from Sunday..

I'll leave you with that thought.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 18:02 | 1147204 Arkadaba
Arkadaba's picture

I'm pretty sure Maniac is that Oglyfart person who was all over me a month ago when I (gosh) was so presumptuous to question some middle east country's policies. Its the tone .... same cadence, some similar vocab .... As someone with a background in English lit, linguistics and computer science, this might be fun! 

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:39 | 1143707 Sancho Ponzi
Sancho Ponzi's picture

"whatever value ZeroHedge has in its criticism, it is completely undermined by the bigotry of its members - and undermined by their highly vocal support for libertarianism - which is an ethos much more closely related to that of the bankers they abhor then they would like to admit"

Your statement is patently false, and you are being disingenuous. The enlightening research found at ZH and a handful of other websites more than offsets a few politically incorrect posts.  Let me provide you with a tip: Don't be so obvious when you attempt to disrupt and discredit an invaluable source of news, information and insight.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:39 | 1143873 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Now we are getting somewhere. I will freely concede that some decent research has been presented here.

Of course that isn't my point..nor has it ever been. What I keep reiterating for the obtuse fans of this website is that anything good that has been portrayed here is overshadowed by racism and dubious ideology.

And dude, come on. The information and news can be found elsewhere. Maybe not insight, as you have mentioned, Sancho. But then again, that has been lacking lately, too. Hence my original comment.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:12 | 1144167 Arkadaba
Arkadaba's picture

In fight club virtual reality - fuck off!!!

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:22 | 1144192 Arkadaba
Arkadaba's picture

he's scared - I'm ok with that.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 04:46 | 1144460 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

What are you babbling? Are you attempting an elaboration of some sort? Spit it out. To restate the point I *think* you may be responding to, I noted that the content started falling off on ZH when it still had the other commenting system going on aka a good amount of time ago.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:58 | 1143768 nmewn
nmewn's picture

Nice framing ;-)

"The banksters also believe social welfare is theft."

What does "social welfare" mean? How much is required, of those who produce, to meet your theoretical balance of social welfare vs. fairness to keep what one earns? I need to know where that line is so I don't go above it...that should help...socially ;-)

"The banksters also want to ignore history in order to justify the dubious claim that everyone can "make it" if they just work hard enough."

Crony capitalism can only "make it" by being regulated and thereby you object to those collecting unemployment or welfare working on government projects...infrastructure, maintenance of roads, libraries etc.?

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 20:23 | 1143469 Bugman82
Bugman82's picture

I would venture to say you should rephrase and instead call his commentary "full of the logic inehrent to natural selection". 

Disclaimer:  I don't like natural selection but as children learn values, work ethic, etc. from their family of origin I think we can understand why "the poor are staying poor" and the wealthy are wallowing in the fruits of their greedy ambition.

I think zeroghedge is a perfect avenue towards waking up some of the sheep.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:35 | 1143692 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Right...and heroin helps children sleep.

I find ZH better used as a lesson in hypocrisy, Bugman.

Glad you found it in your heart to overlook the racist bile, though. Here's my favorite question for the apologists like you -- what imagery do you use when all the little nazis come out to play and spew all their hateful nastiness on the chat? Do you think of puppies? a pretty sunset? Howabout a smiling aryan child? Please, enlighten us.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:01 | 1143779 Sancho Ponzi
Sancho Ponzi's picture

"spew all their hateful nastiness on the chat?"

Where did you learn to construct a sentence?

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:45 | 1143892 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

That was deep. Gee, Sancho - you just totally took every argument I have ever constructed down with that post. Damn. With those kind of insights, how are you able to live with such grandeur? You must be one of the most enlightened individuals I've ever had the pleasure of interacting with! Do you have to wear shades to keep from going blind from your own brilliance? Do you have to wear a diaper to keep from pissing yourself?


Okay, enough joking around. Again, let's unpack: Attacking a minor rhetorical device? Yeah - you have nothing more to say, either.


Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:31 | 1144217 Teamtc321
Teamtc321's picture

Maniac Researcher do you know professor hindsight ass?

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 22:53 | 1143929 nmewn
nmewn's picture

I'm thinkin Oxfaaahd...with tea cup pinky extended while sayin it of course...LOL.

Socialist/elitist snobbery (Keynes theory) is dying across the globe...we had to expect a death rattle or two.

Let em gag.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 04:54 | 1144463 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture any true believer, the apocalypse is [always] coming to justify your ethos.

You need to work on that ideology - it's paper thin and quite easy to tear up.


Heh - now you're going Joe the Plumber/Palin, on me huh? Right, I get it -- Anyone who disagrees with you is an elitist. Duh - my bad. You do have a dash of that oh so endearing Zerohedge tinfoil hat paranoia thing going on though - mentioning Keynes without any provocation -- I'll give you that.

You're still way out in wingnutville though, just so you know. If you make it down from the clouds, let's talk.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 07:08 | 1144556 nmewn
nmewn's picture

You're running out of straw to build your men out of...answer my post to you that you casually skipped over...lay it on the line or just stay in the bushes and snipe;

You have plenty of time to think it over...I have to go to work, something I doubt you do, as you'll be here all day if I got my tin foil hat on straight ;-)

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 16:12 | 1146719 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

I didn't find you comment worth addressing because it wasn't all that coherent. If you want to open a can of worms and talk about the merits of social welfare, then you need to be more specific - not offer disjointed non-sequiturs. Secondly, I agree with you that crony capitalism is  a problem, but you essentially superimposed that over my point about the relationship between extreme self-interested libertarianism as an ethos -- and the very real actions of corporations both in the economic and political spheres. I considered that offering a non-starter as well. Feel free to give it another try!


Thu, 04/07/2011 - 18:12 | 1147245 nmewn
nmewn's picture

I'd rather try nailing jello to a tree.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 18:32 | 1147321 Arkadaba
Arkadaba's picture

+ really funny!

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 22:00 | 1148026 nmewn
nmewn's picture


Well, I tried levity...I also tried being no avail.

He brings up social justice, then does not wish to discuss or define it...for producers or takers. 

He brings up banksta's...trying some ham handed inference to Libertarianism/fiscal conservatism and then backs away from his own strawman position.

It appears he was just into flamin the thread.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:42 | 1144069 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Funny, you talk about racist bile, but I myself jump over any racist comments.  I continually berate Trav7777 for his fucked up brand of racism against blacks.  I guess you missed that.  Or you are conveniently forgetting it, so you can try to mischaracterize a whole group of people.

Also, I find it hilarious that you can't tell the difference between the Nazis, who were the ultimate statists, and libertarians who are in every way their opposite.  Take you bile elsewhere, loser.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:59 | 1144128 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

tmosley 09-20-2008 12:51 AM

My great uncle liberated one of the camps. He was part of no conspiracy or coverup. Holocaust deniers are assholes.

Of course, Zionists using the Holocaust to justify their Nazi-style actions are even bigger assholes.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:05 | 1144140 tmosley
tmosley's picture

lol, you got something against war heroes now?

Give it up, loser.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:09 | 1144150 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture

You're not related to a war hero. You're spewing jism.


tmosley butt comments

About 4,020 results (0.29 seconds)
Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:18 | 1144181 tmosley
tmosley's picture

Cry more, weakling.  It's highly attractive.

"Hurr durr, u r not related to ur grampa, hrrrr!"

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 21:26 | 1143669 Sancho Ponzi
Sancho Ponzi's picture

Ok, let's hear your cleverly reasoned musings about today's fluctuations in gas prices. Please enlighten us.

Wed, 04/06/2011 - 23:20 | 1144006 tmosley
tmosley's picture

What the fuck are you even talking about?  You sound pretty butthurt yourself.

Go cry to the PC police.  There isn't a stronger defender of gay rights than me.  Of course, you are a loser who must resort to such things as "you're a BIGOT" to make up for the fact that you can't form a cogent argument.

Also, point out the fag:

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:14 | 1144173 long juan silver
long juan silver's picture
by tmosley
on Sun, 08/29/2010 - 13:44


I lived in Boston in 1880 and between 20 and 33% of the people I saw on the street were 'foreign', most of them Irish or Italian, they usually stayed in groups of their nationality and speak their own languages (between them selves) I feel like living in Southern Europe at times, it's scary I can't imagine how this will look like in 10 years, probably catholic churches everywhere with bishops calling for prayer and Catholic law being officially or in officially enforced, it;s not a question of Xenophobia but naked survival.


The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:19 | 1144191 tmosley
tmosley's picture

You are really a moron you know that?  The above post was a word for word transcription of a person who hated/was afraid of a change in the "racial character" of her town, with the influx of some minority.  I pointed out that the same thing happened then, and they assimilated just fine.

But you are too stupid to understand that, and would rather take a comment out of context in order to prove "something", that you clearly haven't thought out very well.

Keep going.  I enjoy reliving old posts.  These are pure gold.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 04:59 | 1144469 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

tmosley just wants his cookie, dude. Come on.

"I have lots of black friends!" "Some of them are jewish and gay!"


Damned PC police!

The PC police are hiding under your bed -- sharpening their shivs. Stay vigilant.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 08:41 | 1144708 tmosley
tmosley's picture

You accuse people of being things that they are not.  You PURPOSEFULLY mischaracterize the whole, and then use that mischaracterization as a basis for making individual judgements.

But hey, who cares?  We're all just a bunch of redneck cavemen here.  What are you, some kind of Mooninite wannabe?

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 16:34 | 1146807 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

Right. I'm sure it was a total mischaracterization. Love the way you jumped all over the vile homophobic jokes being made in today's post [entitled "Consumer credit rises at fastest pace since 2008..or does it?"]. Oh wait, you didn't. Saw your name there, saw that you commented - but wow, just as I predicted you didn't say shit. What is it, you have more jewish friends than gay ones?

So sorry, tmosley, my points stand. What were those points again? I'd be happy to elaborate:

A) It is beyond easy to look at any thread on ZH and find bile filled nastiness.

B) Your claim that you "jump all over" people who spew bigotry is a crock.


I've since made a third observation: None of the bigoted comments had any junks whatsoever. My comments calling out bigotry..well, you get the picture.

Please feel free to continue your feeble argument that I am somehow being unfair in my characterization. Your dumbass peers provide endless fodder for me.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 18:49 | 1147391 Arkadaba
Arkadaba's picture

A.) .... and find bile filled nastiness

What the .... I don't always agree with all comments but "bile filled nastiness" - not.

B.) None of the bigoted comments had any junks whatsoever ....

Have you looked at other comment threads on the internet - try Drudge or HuffPo or Market Watch - at least here people do try to express there thoughts in more than one line! Maybe that is what is scaring you. And people get junked here all the time regardless of poitical affiliation.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 00:15 | 1144174 Glass Steagall
Glass Steagall's picture

@ Miasmic Researcher:

Wasn’t so long ago that debt collectors were regarded as the ‘bottom feeders’ of society. Seems they have actually been supplanted by ‘web trolls’.

Congratulations, troll. That was so no small task. Too bad for you and your ilk though, as I don’t think it pays as well. No bother, right troll? All you need is a bridge to hide under – that can’t cost much. Rumpelstiltskin ass clown.

Thu, 04/07/2011 - 05:09 | 1144480 Maniac Researcher
Maniac Researcher's picture

[Insert witty response to stock non-sequitur wingnut speak]


..Rumpelstiltskin ass clown? Did you come up with that one yourself, or did you get some help from a five year old? Wow, though -- you're really doing Tyler proud by providing such an insightful rebuttal to my sustained criticism of the Zerohedge "community."

Let's recap. What was that criticism I was referring to again?

You *are* the tormentors you lambaste: the bigoted, the selfish, the embittered armchair losers. The banksters you claim to hate are just more powerful versions of yourself.
You couldn't care less about the impoverished, those stricken by disaster, or the historically screwed-over populations. So why pretend to play activist? I'll answer that -- because you need to validate your petty, vicious little life. You only see disaster and apocalypse because it provides you an escape from your impotence. I pity you and all the other ZHers - the foolish regulars and the new Stormfront add-ons. You've got nothing but your misdirected anger. It clouds what little analytical ability you have developed in each of your narrow experiences. Thus, you're simply talking to yourselves because you can imagine few options to improve your lives and/or the world. Feel free to pass on the message and have a nice day.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!