You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Obvious Insider Trading In Ann Taylor Options Ahead Of Earnings

Tyler Durden's picture




At this point blatant episodes of insider trading are a weekly if not daily occurrence. While we still expect to hear back from our friends over at Mary Schapiro's woefully underfunded Syndicate Encouraging Corruption (SEC), regarding the previously disclosed insider trading in New York Bancorp, here is another one for Mary and her gray matter-challenged subordinated to mull, this time involving clothing retailed AnnTaylor.

From Bloomberg:

Trading of bullish AnnTaylor Stores
Corp. options surged to a 10-week high yesterday before the
women’s clothing retailer boosted its fourth-quarter sales
forecast today in an unscheduled release.

Either this was a very savvy investor or the information
was leaked
,” said Frederic Ruffy, the senior options strategist
at WhatsTrading.com, a New York-based provider of options market
analysis. “The call buying was just a couple of hours before
the close yesterday.”

Almost all of yesterday’s trading of 5,766 options giving
the right to buy the stock was concentrated in the March $15
calls, which closed at 45 cents yesterday. They more than
tripled to $1.65 today as the shares jumped the most in nine
months, adding 19 percent to $15.88 at 3:42 p.m. in New York.

With the options purchased at $0.45 and now trading at $1.65, every call attained a profit of $1.20, or roughly $690,000 on the total 5,766 call options purhcased yesterdaty.

Here is a chart demonstrating the highly abnormal trading patterin in ANN, which was very likely precipitated by a leak of insider information from the firm.

In reality, with a hearing currently proceeding in which Senators are trying to perpetuate the "legality" of gambling, front running and market manipulation (Senator Corker, we will have some talking points later, which while not as eloquent as those prepared for you by Goldman Sachs will hopefully provide some much needed deobfuscation), why would anyone be even remotely surprised that this kind of blatant insider trading is a daily occurrence. We hope the perpetrator of the alleged illegal trades is not punished, and instead is made into a symbol of just how broken this market is.

 




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 02/02/2010 - 17:24 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

never did hear anything about New York Community Bancorp....

the SEC is a fucking joke and makes FEMA look good.

Helluva job Mary Schapiro, you wall street shill.

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 17:26 | Link to Comment bugs_
bugs_'s picture

Interesting they focused on March instead of
February which would have been more profit
if they were buying for this event.  What if
the improved sales forecast is lipstick on
the pig and the call buying is for another
event which will occur later, requiring the
purchase of the further month?

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 17:27 | Link to Comment lsbumblebee
lsbumblebee's picture

Why should Mary give a damn? She wouldn't be caught dead at Ann Taylor.

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 17:33 | Link to Comment dumpster
dumpster's picture

just had a hunch trade.. nothing to see here .  move along.

win a few lose a few.

 

 

 

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 19:48 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

Agree.....just move along....when insider trading moves into the daily routine mode, this is called " NORMAL ". Like the sun rising each morning.

Amusing to keep score, though.

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 17:48 | Link to Comment gunsmoke011
gunsmoke011's picture

The question is – what can we do about this sort of thing? Seriously – I have called the SEC on numerous occasions – and always get the same old shit answer. While we cannot comment on individual cases, rest assured that we are constantly monitoring these sorts of situations and will take action if any wrongdoing is discovered. Thank you for your call – is there anything else we can help you with? It would seem that it would be a VERY simple matter to deal with – surely they have account numbers and can trace these trades to someone – and from there find out if this person did in fact have any way of getting inside information. Seriously – it is not rocket science. My question remains – what can we do about it short of taking up arms and storming the SEC? I for one am tired of this manipulated piece of shit we call a “Free Market”. Been trading for over 20 years now – and every time you think it really can’t get any worse or more ridiculously manipulated – all you have to do is wait a day or two and there will be something even more blatant.

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 17:50 | Link to Comment JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

SEC is too busy downloading all that porn (someones got to do it).

 

But he wasn't alone. More than two dozen SEC employees and contractors over roughly the past two years have faced internal investigations after they were caught viewing pornography on their government computers, according to records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and other public documents.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/feb/02/sec-workers-investigated...

 

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 18:01 | Link to Comment No More Bubbles
No More Bubbles's picture

Hmmm, SEC downloading PORN -

I guess these guys can actually say they are

"HARD" at work.........

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 18:29 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

Innocent until proven guilty, I say.

They were just trying to sniff out abuses in the snuff film industry.

Impossible to believe they would be so stupid with computer filters tracking their every click. Impossible.

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 21:04 | Link to Comment Master Bates
Master Bates's picture

LOL.  I posted that in another thread this morning.  I was looking for it to post here again, but you beat me to it. ..

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 17:54 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Tyler, Tyler, Tyler.

You just don't get it, do you? There's no such thing as "insider trading" anymore. It's all part of the super secret Economic Recovery and Market Stabilization Act of 2008-2050 that was passed by Congress without Congress actually being present. Don't you remember the memo?

Get with the program Dude.

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 18:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/02/2010 - 18:16 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/02/2010 - 19:01 | Link to Comment Argonaught
Argonaught's picture

Price is quoted at 1/100th (each call = 100 shares).  To buy 6k calls at $.45, you lay out $270k.  When you sell at $1.65, you get back $990,000...

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 19:02 | Link to Comment malusDiaz
malusDiaz's picture

1$ per share = 100$ option * 6 K options = 600,000

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 19:02 | Link to Comment Quantum Nucleonics
Quantum Nucleonics's picture

Prices are quoted per share, volume is in contracts.  Contracts are for 100 shares.  6000 contracts times 100 shares times $1/share is $600,000.

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 18:43 | Link to Comment chet
chet's picture

SEC guy #1:  "Hmm.  Zero Hedge is finding some interesting stuff.  I don't quite understand it, but maybe we should look into it."

SEC guy #2:  "Say, that is kind of fishy.  Maybe it's time to get Mary on the phone and.... Oops, lunchtime!"

SEC guy #1:  "Mmmm, I vote for teriyaki!"

 

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 19:20 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

Control of SEC ops must have been one of the concessions to Wall St to convince them to not completely nuke Main St.

Now all your regulator are belong to us. Beotches.

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 19:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/02/2010 - 19:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/02/2010 - 21:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/02/2010 - 20:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/02/2010 - 20:17 | Link to Comment Jus7tme
Jus7tme's picture

SEC only cares about catching OUTSIDERS doing insider trading.

That is, if someone report that you traded 500 shares of WXYZ on insider information, they want to procecute you.

But if you trade billions and/or front-run all the retail customers, that is quite alright. In fact, we encourage it.

Syndicate Encouraging Corruption (SEC), indeed.

Tue, 02/02/2010 - 21:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/02/2010 - 21:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 02/02/2010 - 21:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 02/03/2010 - 02:26 | Link to Comment Rick64
Rick64's picture

 The SEC is not interested in busting just anybody it has to be the right person i.e. Martha Stewart . Jesus what a catch. Huge Bust. Meanwhile they were handed Bernie Madoff with pages and pages of proof and they ignored it twice. They are bought and paid for like the others.

Wed, 02/03/2010 - 21:11 | Link to Comment JohnGoodbutter
JohnGoodbutter's picture

who sold the calls ?

 

note : Bloomberg +1 ^^

 

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!