You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Oil Plunges As Inventory Build Does Not Confirm Rosy Economic Forecasts

Tyler Durden's picture




A presumably growing economy, one that has now emerged from a recession (if one listens to the Chairman) needs fuel. Or, as the case may be, oil. So today's oil inventory report did two things: it flatly refuted the Chairman's ongoing propaganda that all is finally well with the US economy, but also played a nasty trick on oil speculators who got majorly burned after oil tumbled as a result of ongoing lack of demand for the black gold. At least all those parked tankers overflowing with oil and betting that sooner or later the stored oil will be put to some use will get a few more chances to finally be proven right.

From the CNN Money:

Inventory rising. The Energy Information Administration
reported a surprise increase in crude stocks by 2.8 million barrels in
the week ended Sept. 18. Analysts were expecting a drop of 2.25 million
barrels, according to a consensus estimate collected by energy
information provider Platts.

Gasoline stockpiles jumped by 5.4
million barrels, according to the EIA report. Analysts had forecasted a
more modest increase of 800,000 barrels.

The government report
also showed that distillates, used to make heating oil and diesel, rose
by 3 million barrels, topping analysts' expectations for a
1.5-million-barrel increase.

And this is what pure, unadulterated speculation looks like: the Nov 09 contract.Yet this is no surprise in the US capital markets casino when companies on the verge of a liquidity crisis can outperform the S&P by over 1,000%.

And here is what mouth gaping surprise at the NYMEX looks like:




Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 09/23/2009 - 11:49 | Link to Comment Handle with care
Handle with care's picture

Obviously cash for clunkers has worked!  

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 11:56 | Link to Comment AnonymousMonetarist
AnonymousMonetarist's picture

It won't matter until it does and until then its' the reflexivity cha-cha. 

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 12:20 | Link to Comment ptoemmes
ptoemmes's picture

Speaking of the cha-cha and waiting for the Fed did ya see The Hammer (Tom Delay).  Not that I watch that stuff, but it was on many of the news - news really ?!&*(^ - shows.

Pete

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 12:56 | Link to Comment D.O.D.
D.O.D.'s picture

I know you're not asking about dancing with the stars, please tell me you are not talking about dancing with the stars...

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 11:59 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

I assume you didn't intend a pun when you used "crack" and "oil" in the same sentence?

BTW, I agree, for what it's worth. But you had me rolling on the floor with your comment. In true sophomoric tradition, I also love the term "crack spread" for an easy laugh.

Hey, it's Wednesday 2 hours before the Fed. What else is there to do?

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 12:21 | Link to Comment Whizbang
Whizbang's picture

Man, I would've paid to be a fly on the wall for that debate

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 11:51 | Link to Comment lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

Platts reported that Chinese oil demand in August slid 5.4% from July. Platts said that China's implied oil demand totaled 33.02 million metric tons in August versus 34.92 million metric tons in July. Oil refiners in China are reporting that demand is still weak. Reuter’s news reported that Chinese oil company Sinopec had sales of refined oil products still lower than one year ago. Reuters says that despite a moderate inventory draw in August, China's diesel inventories had been building up faster than gasoline had in past months, reflecting the slower consumption for the main transportation fuel used by Chinese industry and trucks.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 12:18 | Link to Comment lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

great minds.....

the trend is your friend!

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 12:42 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

I've been dumbfounded how many people believe China is fine and dandy and not suffering any ill effects.

I guess the people who believe China's economic numbers are the same people who believe Washington's economic numbers.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 13:20 | Link to Comment percolator
percolator's picture

until the bend in the end.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 12:19 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

thank you for the china oil info lizzy.  is it true they no longer report electricity usage?

 

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 12:57 | Link to Comment lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

as far as i know they still report that number.

my memory can be fuzzy, but august was up 8% m/m and .3% y/y.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 13:27 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

thanks!

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 11:52 | Link to Comment AnonymousMonetarist
AnonymousMonetarist's picture

Oil stockpiling, cars selling at quarter century low, foreclosures' closet door about ready to burst, commodity stockpiling tapering off, steel forecasts being tampered down, and a market where traders are laughing that fundamentals are crap but technicals rock .....

Move along nothing to see.

Its' a zip-a-dee-doo-dah market Mr. Grant.

 

 

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 12:04 | Link to Comment kevinearick
kevinearick's picture

The demand is artificially created, and the supply can no longer serve as the basis for a global economy.

For 51:

 

This is a little experiment. We will do this once, and see how much misery it causes. I don’t want to upset your applecart.

 

Output Gap Information Systems & Trading Platforms

 

Talent is the only part of a system that cannot be replaced. The spectrum is appreciating what you have, wanting what you do not have, wanting what others have, and wanting what you cannot have. In isolation, which does not exist anywhere, you would have a normal distribution of behavior.

 

The force of inertia, which naturally seeks to maintain control over the distribution, rolls out an economy of wanting what you cannot have, creating a distribution shift. Talent naturally swims against the current, creating natural selection.

 

Chapter 1             Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics

 

Throw them in the deep end and see what kind of instincts they have.

 

Actually, this is not going to be nearly as bad as you may think. This is an extremely powerful set of tools. You just have to get by all the misinformation, outdated models in your head. Forget everything you were taught. Now, isn’t that easy.

 

We begin by confirming your suspicions. The bell curve is not statistics. Further, the bell curve is the anti-thesis of statistics. You can hardly blame your professors for not standing up to this establishment; it pervades every facet of life in the old economy. This manual can only be physically distributed because we are in a global crisis.

 

Endurance.            You have to understand that legacy special interests were once just like you. They had to beat their way through a jungle, designed over thousands of years to slow them down, gather at personal peril, work in poverty, and watch the people they loved get attacked, all to see their masterpieces continually berated and destroyed. They don’t call it survival of the fittest for nothing.

 

What do you expect when your work threatens to replace the work of masters across History, and displace the incomes of the majority of people on the planet. It’s like hitting your mother for God‘s sake. There are 9 billion people on this planet, most connected by instant communications. Make it worth their while to participate.

 

The Bell Curve. Yes, populations naturally seek a normal distribution, the infamous bell curve. If you think in terms balance, you can see why every force has a counter-force.

 

(diagram - bell curve centered over a fulcrum)

 

This is what they call the snapshot. History does not exist anywhere as a snapshot. (Distributions are living, moving beings that exist on a fulcrum of fulcrums, which we will discuss in the next chapter.)

 

The argument against grading students on a bell curve is a good one, and introduces us to real statistics, the theory of time, and several variables in the Unified Field Equation. Let’s see what’s wrong with the practice:

 

(diagram - bell curve ending at 100%, dotted bell curve ending at 85%, arrow showing left shift)

 

If the top score on a test of current students is 85%, we make it equivalent to 100% by dividing Joe’s score of 75% by the top score of 85%, getting his relative position in the current class curve. And presto, his new grade is 88%, like magic. Now, Joe needs an A- so his GPA will get him that job or entrance into an ivy league graduate school, so he successfully pleads with his professor to bump him up. His grade goes from a C to an A-.

 

Mission creep. Watering down. Call it whatever you want, but, over time, system quality suffers and everyone pays a penalty before it’s all over. There is nothing wrong with giving an A for effort, because effective effort results in better performance down the road, but the A has to be for effort, not current performance. As you will see later, effort significantly enhances the performance model; just don’t confuse the two.

 

Take a look at education outcomes vs. economic outcomes. There’s a time lag, a shift, that a snap-shot cannot capture, but we all pay if we assume tomorrow is going to look a lot like today in this scenario. Sooner or later, the market is going to recognize the swap, reassess the asset value, and trigger release of the non-performing “toxic” assets.

 

Gravitational Fields.             We call this backward shift, or left-skewed distribution, a gravitational field effect on the distribution. The inherent gravity, or social inertia, of rewarding existing performance without respect to History pulls the distribution back, creating a spring effect. It creates a spring effect because the environment always demands improvement. A force and a counter-force results.

 

This is the inherent problem with rewarding compliance. It removes the possibility of quantum advancement (large jumps) through expectation of increased generational performance:

 

(diagram - left-skewed distribution with a spring inside it)

 

We also call this socialization to mediocrity. From an architects perspective, it is neither good nor bad. From the positive perspective, it’s a tool that can deliver mass production, grow scale economies, and capture external economies with its gravitational force, as we have seen with recent developments in the global economy.

 

A good architect thinks in terms of raw materials currently available in the environment, environmental demand, and how to most effectively put the materials together to satisfy that demand. What you are going to find with all these tools is that stopping at different points in development will result in different outcomes, all of which may be useful.

 

Spring Activation.            The spring in the left-skewed distribution is like holding a rock in the air. Sooner or later, you have to release the rock, and let the system spring forward. With experience, we find that there are relationships between these springs, relative population sizes and forces developed. A good architect can observe these springs develop, and walk in with just the right force at just the right time to control spring activation, speed, and direction.

 

The snapshot theory fails the minute you take a series of snap-shots and develop expectations for the next snap shot, because it assumes a continuous containment system, with no jumping. In old economy statistics, it’s called regression. Short-sellers live on this scenario.

 

Once you have gravitational bodies, the shortest distance between two points is not a straight line. Because you can control a stored gravitational force, you can change the speed of development. This is called slingshot development, and is the source of viral product launches in the electronic industry. Practically overnight, a new product takes over a market due to pent up demand.

 

Relative to those who do not truly understand these gravitational fields, you can move in an unexpected direction, and get to the other end faster. Now, you are controlling speed and direction. Both are relevant to your perception, which makes time relevant to your perception.

 

Magnetic Fields. Here is where effective effort, not customarily measured with the proper perspective, comes into the picture. Let’s say you go out and get a textbook that allows you to learn the material in 1/3 the time. Then you form a group of like-minded individuals and work together to advance the material. On the tests, your answers natural express your advanced learning. The professor gives you credit, and scores the rest of the class accordingly.

 

In a truly free economy, this would shift the distribution to the right. Quite obviously, the need for social inertia, the need to forecast future requirements, and the need to have confidence in the source of future cash flows naturally prevents this action, temporarily (we will discuss how the new economy overcomes these problems later in the manual).

 

(diagram right shift)

 

Every force quickly triggers development of a counter-force, supported by the larger planetary economy. First one individual jumps forward, creating a small magnetic force, then another and another. Soon the group multiplier effect creates a force larger than the sum of the individuals because they learn from one another.

 

(diagrams - individual jump, small group formation, stable large group)

 

In a static world of equal respect among groups, this would give you the snapshot normal distribution, or bell curve. Continuous incremental improvement would occur over time as inertia outliers retired, and the main body advanced toward magnetic outliers. Retirements in both the gravitational and magnetic fields would be replaced by jumpers from a growing main body.

 

(diagram - gravity distribution, main distribution, magnetic distribution, retirements, and replacement jumpers, large arrow above showing movement of distribution forward)

 

As we know the world is not static, and the universe evolves by building capacitors and jumping. The distribution, accordingly, moves like an inchworm. First it pulls back, then it leaps forward, like a spring, pulling its hindquarters behind. Then it repeats the process.

 

This occurs because the magnetic outliers must avoid detection long enough to attract sufficient numbers to reach a sustainable magnetic field, otherwise the omnipresent gravitational field will simply pull the individuals back into the main distribution.

 

(diagram - inch-worm movement of the distribution over time)

 

Speciation.             A bimodal distribution develops when external forces/distributions add weight, or subsidize, the inertia of a distribution. This temporarily slows the distribution further, while more and more individuals jump to the increasingly magnetic side of the distribution. If enough external force is applied, the distribution cleaves, leaving the inertia side behind for economic recycling, while the magnetic side jumps very far ahead due to the release of the spring. There are many business and biological applications that follow this pattern.

 

Architects call this process spring & release:

 

(diagrams - full spring containment, followed by cleavage and catapult)

 

With modification, it can be used both to replicate, and to incinerate.    

 

Applications.               At this point, you can see how statistics needs to be updated to the needs of your organization. However, Labor, Government, and Corporation will each have different needs. Fortunately, if you give different groups the same specifications for a tool, the results will be different. Diversity, and respect for diversity, is a healthy outcome. “Chinese walls” between parts of the organization is the source of learning.

 

There is always a portfolio of actors in the marketplace, their place dependent on their scope of vision and the environmental demand they are satisfying. In order to adjust as an architect, you must be able to change speed, change direction, daisy chain, step up power, and step down power. You must understand the constants of History, and share a vision into the future.

 

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 13:00 | Link to Comment OrganicGeorge
OrganicGeorge's picture

I remember a similar line of thought from the 60's, probably based on some idea from antiquity.

Natural forces are replicated in all actions and aspects of our lives.

Never saw any follow up or documentation to support the concept.

Is that what your working on now?

 

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 13:33 | Link to Comment AlexanderKZ
AlexanderKZ's picture

would you be so kind to share a link to the whole article? 

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 15:11 | Link to Comment OrganicGeorge
OrganicGeorge's picture

UMMM, ER,  AHHH..... back in the 60's there was no internet. We used memograph machines for duplication.  I read a paper back then along the same lines.  It's just a vauge memory.

 

However if you read both E.O. Wilson and Schumpeter you can get near the same concept from a very different path.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 14:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 09/23/2009 - 15:40 | Link to Comment Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Pretty damn EXCELLENT! Can you please post a link to the whole book/article or the name of the book this is from? Much appreciated.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 21:01 | Link to Comment kevinearick
kevinearick's picture

The problem with these old trading platforms is that they are snapshots.

A cheap solution that will get people going:

Start with a GIS foundation with a river flow analysis overlay. Color the rivers for goods & services; cash flow; etc. You can tweak the GIS to give you asset ponds, lakes, and oceans. You will quickly find that the nation/state boundaries are no longer relevant. Have the window pop-ups feed you whatever characteristic data you care to trade on, and the momentum of the river, along with its source and destination will give you what you want. The new statistical method allows you to calculate spring tension.

If a picture is worth a thousand words, the video stream is worth a million.

(open source: Building the New Economy)

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 12:10 | Link to Comment lieutenantjohnchard
lieutenantjohnchard's picture

i never front run the oil data. it's way too risky. uso goes down quickly, then up slowly.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 12:28 | Link to Comment Comrade de Chaos
Comrade de Chaos's picture

riding a bike (cicle) is actually OK in LA. It's not HOT yet but still it's already OK. It was a NO - NO couple years ago. That alone should tell us something about oil demand.

Now imagine if that trillion plus of bailout $ was invested into energy efficiency, grid update etc. Bringing our oil dependency from 1/2 trillion to a 100 bl annually is possible and would be huge for our economy in the long run. Not that Washington DC cares... They would rather waste money on super-trains (thanks to GE lobbing efforts..), those are so shiny and slick (plus rarely pay off for themselves unless a population saturation per mile is very high.)

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 13:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 09/23/2009 - 13:01 | Link to Comment perfectlyGoodWh...
perfectlyGoodWhiteBoy's picture

It was my point re abandoment of the 'burbs.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 12:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 09/23/2009 - 13:16 | Link to Comment Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden's picture

we pride ourselves in our...how was it put... hyperventilation. alas our style is too flawed to be corrected at this point.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 13:34 | Link to Comment percolator
percolator's picture

Glad you're going to keep on hyperventilating, its what keeps me here well that and ZH Radio.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 14:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 09/23/2009 - 15:17 | Link to Comment Ben_the_Bald
Ben_the_Bald's picture

Those who hyperventilate don't usually make money in the markets. So, I let TD hyperventilate, I remain calm and collected, and laughing all the way to the bank.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 15:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 09/23/2009 - 13:00 | Link to Comment D.O.D.
D.O.D.'s picture

I guess they aren't going to raise rates this time...

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 14:24 | Link to Comment cocoablini
cocoablini's picture

Crude is amazingly weak-even with the dollar smashdown and FOMC minutes it's not pulling past it's 74 highs. In fact it's still off 3 bucks a barrel. The glut out there is apparent and the little games of push the oil through refineries and glut distillates market reads like a cheap novel.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 14:29 | Link to Comment naiverealist
naiverealist's picture

Oil stocks are extremely volatile and can be gamed by withholding/unloading tankers on a prearranged schedule (several million barrels at a time, depending upon the size of the tanker), what percentage of throughput the refineries had, (it was 85% this week, down from last week).  Less oil flows through the refineries shows up in greater stocks.  This is the time of year that diesel production is ramping up (diesel can be sold to Europe and China).  Also, the SPR has been tapped this year to give the impression of oil gluts.  Our civilization runs on CL, and the cheap stuff is beginning to run out.

Wed, 09/23/2009 - 14:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 09/23/2009 - 15:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 09/23/2009 - 21:10 | Link to Comment waterdog
waterdog's picture

The problem is that the pipeline valves have been wide open for so long, they are stuck open. If you try to force the valve, it will snap in half, just like the one you busted off under the kitchen sink last week.

Thu, 09/24/2009 - 00:06 | Link to Comment AlexanderKZ
AlexanderKZ's picture

I always wonder why long commodity (especially oil) exposure for the institutional investors is sold in the form of futures-linked vehicles (like USO) despite those institutional investors are willing to make long-term bet? Nearest futures represent on-the-ground oil and oil which will soon to be lifted from the ground, so this is IMHO stupid to participate in this short term process of redistribution of already or soon to be excavated and subsequently consumed oil with long term money coz they do nothing but just produce constant excessive artifical demand. Isn't it much more reasonable to purchase oil in deposits, via oil stocks, if institutional investor is willing to invest in oil?

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!