You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

In One Short Month, MBA Now Sees 2010 Morgtage Originations Plummeting By Even More

Tyler Durden's picture




It appears the shit in housing is about to re-hit the fan. While in December, the Mortgage Brokers Association anticipated an already staggering 24% drop in mortgage originations, a mere month later they now see the drop to be 40%. And all this occurring with Q.E.'s MBS purchases set to expire in less than 3 months. With mid-term elections coming, someone better line up more bailouts, stimuli and subsidies pronto. The American dream of middle-class homeowner debt slavery must continue.

Lenders will underwrite $1.28 trillion in home loans this
year, down from $2.11 trillion in 2009, the Mortgage Bankers
Association said in its latest forecast. That would be the
lowest since $1.14 trillion in 2000.
The forecast was downgraded from December, when the MBA
predicted originations would fall about 24 percent.

And if anyone still thinks Q.E. is ending...

Interest rates are expected to rise when the Federal
Reserve completes its pledge to support the mortgage securities
market with $1.25 trillion in purchases.

Not to worry - taxpayers, as usual, will come to the involuntary rescue:

The MBA on Tuesday also said it will also encourage
creation of a new type of government-guaranteed mortgage
security that would be backed by privately owned,
government-chartered "mortgage-credit guarantor entities" based
off existing U.S. mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac.

Gotta love the dollar strength we have been seeing recently. Enjoy it while you can - Tim Geithner is about to make yet another public lie about how he "supports a strong dollar policy."




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 13:52 | Link to Comment AnonymousMonetarist
AnonymousMonetarist's picture

Folks go broke slowly and then all at once ...

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 13:55 | Link to Comment cdskiller
cdskiller's picture

Another reason why the credit default swaps market still stands at about $40 trillion. The collapse of the house of cards still has a long way to go. 

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:05 | Link to Comment Ripped Chunk
Ripped Chunk's picture

But it is going to start getting breezy.........

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 17:17 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

Breezy is right.

It would cost $ 745 Billion just to bring every current underwater homeowner to an equity position of ZERO !!

    www.doctorhousingbubble.com

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 17:52 | Link to Comment Anonymouse
Anonymouse's picture

Which would have been a lot less expensive than Stimulus 1, Stimulus 2, soon-to-be Stimulus 3, AIG, TARP, PPIP, QE 1, soon-to-be QE2, etc.

Not that I support any of those, but if it were to be done, at least that would have been cheaper.

But I'm sure they'll get it right this time....

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:07 | Link to Comment docj
docj's picture

The American dream of middle-class homeowner debt slavery must continue.

Just what is this "middle-class" of which you speak?

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:27 | Link to Comment Anonymouse
Anonymouse's picture

I met him once.  He lives in Iowa.  Nice guy.  Wife, 2.2 kids, bowling league.

There used to be another one, but I think he filed for Chapter 7 last year

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:39 | Link to Comment buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

Stop whining, the billionaires are doing fine.

 

Wed, 01/13/2010 - 00:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:11 | Link to Comment SDRII
SDRII's picture

nothing another trillion or two in QE cant fix

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:13 | Link to Comment Segestan
Segestan's picture

"The American dream of middle-class homeowner debt slavery must continue".

 

 Ya right..... just rent for 30 years before you finally get to own the house and land you live in... I'd rather own at any price than have some landlord telling me I can't plant a tree or own a pet. Get real stop the anti-American BS..

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:18 | Link to Comment SDRII
SDRII's picture

very finacially savvy...ivy i assume

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:57 | Link to Comment SteveNYC
SteveNYC's picture

That's just plain bad economics. Dude, there are so many rentals around at the moment, it is the TENANT who is calling the shots.....not the landlord.

The landlords are so "up the duff" with mortgage, maintenance, and taxes, they NEED rental income, and it is a competitive rental market.

I rent in Manhattan, for a pittance of what the place would have cost 2-3yrs ago. Landlord leaves me alone just nicely......don't want the cash flow to dry up.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 15:24 | Link to Comment fxguy
fxguy's picture

You can buy my house.... I sold a home in Californian in 2000
before the dot.com crash. Made lateral move to upstate NY where
prior to 2000, the real-estate prices had not appreciated by more
than 2-3% in 10 years. Since 2000, my house, which is on the
outskirts of nowhere, has been assessed every year. Bush's
tax cuts left the state short, and hence the county had to raise
prop and school tax. Bush's tax cut left me paying $3k/yr more
in taxes ( joy ! )

I now pay $7500/yr in property tax and a whopping $12,800/yr
in school taxes ( good thing I don't have kids ;-) ) So, it's
hardly the american dream.... I would have been better off
putting 5% down, at least I could walk now like so many
others...

I'm currenly paying $1,650/month "tax rent" to the city
and state. (Gee, that's only 100K every 5 years! ) But
I'm sure the state and city will give me back that tax money
I paid when I eventually sell the house for far less than
assessment....

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 15:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 17:51 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 18:26 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

I have no idea why someone would junk fxguy's note....i'm in upstate NY and his statistics are accurate for what might be a very nice home; i'll guess it's worth 800k, which is a very, very nice home in upstate NY.

key is the ratio between property taxes of 7500 (these are county, town, local, sewer, water etc) and 12,800 (school).

 

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 16:58 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

So, you would rather pay a paper holder a mortgage every month just so you can pet a kitty and plant a fig then to be free of usury?

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 19:00 | Link to Comment A tumor named Marla
A tumor named Marla's picture

Yup -- because my HOA is so reasonable about planting things and owning pets.....then there's the Property Tax man....

"Owning" a home now just means you're renting a nicer place and don't have to pay damages or clean up when you leave.

Wed, 01/13/2010 - 10:31 | Link to Comment MeTarzanUjane
MeTarzanUjane's picture

A tumor named Marla! LoL. Funny. Is that you Mr. Chairman?

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:20 | Link to Comment Psquared
Psquared's picture

Question: if you were 89 and had a million dollar portfolio made up of 50% stocks and 50% fixed income what would you do?

I have been trying to convince my mother to become even more conservative but she believes the "green shoots" people. I could twist her arm, but I have chosen not to so far.

She owns some land but no gold or other commodities.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:58 | Link to Comment SteveNYC
SteveNYC's picture

Sell stocks immediately.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 17:00 | Link to Comment dnarby
dnarby's picture

First, explain the goverment is lying to her.  Take her for a drive around town and highlight all the empty commercial real estate.  Take her to a food pantry and have a conversation with the people who run it.  Go to a woman's shelter and ask if they're busy.

Then suggest she put 1/2 her assets in physical gold and silver, and the other half in USD, Norwegian Krone, Canadian dollars, and agricultural ETFs.

IMO.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:21 | Link to Comment texpat
texpat's picture

Somehow I really doubt this.

Once mid-range and higher prices start to drop, the 80% of the country that is still working will enter a buying frenzy.

This just happened with the low-end. People still want shiny houses in good school areas. Once prices start to fall, the game will be on again.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:33 | Link to Comment cougar_w
cougar_w's picture

People always want shiny houses near good schools. But that is maybe 1% of the housing market.

The rest of the market is vapid McMansions in far away suburbs with sucky schools overrun with gangs, drugs and obesity. Where the upward pressure on gas and downward pressure of job prospects is looking like a perfect storm. Nobody with any brains wants those houses, and the stupid people who scarf them up anyway on the bounce will shortly (a few years) toss them right back on the market broken, unpainted and weeded over.

Yes, we remain locked in insanity. No, that will not continue.

Madness on a grand scale is brutally self-limiting.

cougar

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 22:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 15:04 | Link to Comment IE
IE's picture

They're either flipping to take advantage of short term dislocations, or they're anticipating a recovery that is not going to come.  I wouldn't anticipate that other people are going to flock to follow in this area once the recovery proves false.  But what you've said does explain why markets don't rise & fall in a straight line (normally).

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 17:02 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

ROFLAMO

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:23 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

I think the bigger impact will be to the jobs market - there are a lot of people employed in the FIRE economy originating, underwriting, selling, mortgages.  Those folks got a reprieve this year due to record low interest rates that spurred a mini-refi boom.  At a 40% drop, a lot of those people are out on the streets.

Our FIRE economy depends on useless activities like this, without this activity we have nothing to fall back on.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 15:01 | Link to Comment IE
IE's picture

Yep.  If there IS any rationale for propping up the banks and RE, that's it - jobs.  If FIRE collapses like it would have without gov't intervention to sustain the useless activities ... we'd have chaos. 

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 01/13/2010 - 01:45 | Link to Comment Tethys
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 14:57 | Link to Comment Paul E. Math
Paul E. Math's picture

The MBA is campaigning to maintain QE, low rates and housing-focused stimuli.

Expect them to be strategically releasing dire stats and analysis as we approach the supposed end of these gifts to the real estate industrial complex.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 18:28 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

very good point Paul.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 15:06 | Link to Comment Ragnarok
Ragnarok's picture

The MBA on Tuesday also said it will also encourage creation of a new type of government-guaranteed mortgage security that would be backed by privately owned, government-chartered "mortgage-credit guarantor entities" based off existing U.S. mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

 

 

More exotic mortgage securities based off the much celebrated Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac model...  I think the government's goal is to make the populous enter  a state of depression and despair, then they  can drug us into a zombies state so we won't care that all is being stolen from us.

 

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 17:14 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

That was the MBA's plan for the post-Fannie/Freddie world, for the government to create and back 12 Fannie/Freddie's.  These criminals just want to originate loans and have the government take the risk, they have zero interest in keeping any skin in the game.

Wed, 01/13/2010 - 00:03 | Link to Comment Molon Labe
Molon Labe's picture

True.  These helpers just skim a cut off every deal they package up and float down the river.  They were the front-line in the subprime housing bubble and their hands are filthy.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 15:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 15:24 | Link to Comment bugs_
bugs_'s picture

Man this sh-t is so high its in orbit.  Its going to keep

coming around and hitting the fan again and again.

 

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 15:31 | Link to Comment Commander Cody
Commander Cody's picture

Zombie Fed: Must continue to support all bubbles at all costs or Armaggedon is at hand.

Banksters:  Who luvs ya babe!  Where's my bonus?

Big Three: Need money now!  Need money again!  Need money...

RE cartel: Gotta a hot house to sell at low rates in great area!  Get'em while they're hot.

Healthcare cartel: Here, let us write the legislation - you can trust us.  Yeah, baby!

Financial reform:  No doubt that the financial industry lobbyists can write the best laws.

Middle Class taxpayer:  WTF!

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 15:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 19:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 01/12/2010 - 19:13 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

The Bad Bank(S) have been the scheme all along.....now with an unlimited Christmas eve funding line. Might get a tad bloated with just these three players. Ginnie will get in the game soon.

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 16:45 | Link to Comment carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

I keep hearing more and more people talking about rising interest rates.

It'll be interesting see how such a move impacts that -40% number.

 

Tue, 01/12/2010 - 17:53 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 01/13/2010 - 00:00 | Link to Comment his name is...
his name is...'s picture

giggitty

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!