This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Oops: Boehner Says Gang Of Six Proposal "Appears To Fall Short"

Tyler Durden's picture




 

No, the soap opera is not done just yet. According to The Hill the office of John Boehner has said that the Gang of Six proposed $3.7 trillion fluff "settlement" appears to fall short of goals set by House Republicans. "This plan shares many similarities with the framework the Speaker discussed with the president, but also appears to fall short in some important areas. The House is voting today on our 'cut, cap, and balance' plan, and we hope the Senate will take it up soon. That remains our focus,” a Boehner spokesman said. As expected the kicker is the impact on Social Security which will see drastic changes if Chained CPI is implemented in conjunction with cost of living adjustments: "They also are wary of the plan's complicated mechanism for dealing with Social Security. The plan states that Social Security reform only be taken up once the rest of deficit-reduction plan is completed. If Social Security reform is not passed by a 60-vote margin, the earlier vote on the rest of the deficit-reduction package is nullified." The actual impact on COLA was not mentioned by Boehner's office. We expect the AARP will require clarification on the speaker's stance on that issue shortly.

More from The Hill:

In talks with President Obama, Boehner has been pushing for larger cuts to Medicare and Medicaid than are laid out in the Gang's plan, which claims unspecified healthcare savings of $202 billion.

The GOP also wants more up-front savings, and deeper tax cuts than the Gang's plan contains, sources said. By eliminating the Alternative Minimum Tax and lowering tax rates, the Gang of Six claims its plan scores as a $1.5 trillion tax cut even though it eliminates tax loopholes.

According to sources, House Republicans are also worried the Gang's plan doesn't have sufficient triggers to force action on the deficit and could allow committees to stall.

Which probably means that the McConnell fall back plan is still the defacto Plan B. The issue is that as Moody's said earlier, this will likely not be sufficient to dent the US leverage position much, and downgrades to America's credit rating could still be forthcoming.

As usual, D.C. seems willing to wait until the 11th hour to find a resolution, which we continue to be confident will be one which has no change to the general bearing of the US spending pattern, which match every dollar in revenue with more than one dollar in new debt, and will result in a debt/GDP ratio of at least 120% one year from today.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:09 | 1472397 gwar5
gwar5's picture

89% of Americans already think the MSM deliberately protects Obama. I want to know who the other 11% are.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:24 | 1472578 WestVillageIdiot
WestVillageIdiot's picture

Racists

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 19:57 | 1472368 virgilcaine
virgilcaine's picture

This has to be interfering with his golf game by now.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 19:59 | 1472374 gwar5
gwar5's picture

Ronald Reagan: "They lied to me."

Reagan had struck a deal with Tip O'Neil whereby the GOP would get $3 in spending cuts for every $1 of in taxes raised. The taxes were put in place, but dems never made the spending cuts. Democrats controlled both houses of congress and lied their asses off. They'll do the same thing now in the senate. 2012 might come too late.

We know CPI manipulations will be pure gimmickry but it sure telegraphs their intention to produce hyperinflation, loud an clear.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:10 | 1472398 karzai_luver
karzai_luver's picture

so at NO TIME since reagan did the pugs have the juice to roll in those

forlorn spending cuts?

 

SHillY , go eat your fukin peas.

 

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:01 | 1472522 gwar5
gwar5's picture

Eat your own fucking pee ammonia breath....  the GOP never even controlled congress for decades before 1995.

Unless you were still sperm, or in a coma, you'll know that when they did, they made massive cuts and abolished Welfare ---  which Clinton vetoed 3 times before he finally signed it into law under threat of override, vowing to overturn it. 

To this day, Clinton brags it was somehow his greatest acheivement. GOP congress made other cuts to everything and a balanced budget was produced -- by the GOP congress, not Clinton.  Slick Willy acted just like Obama, and the GOP was voted in to stop him and they did. That's the only reason the budget ever got balanced.

The RINO GOP under Bush started acting just like socialist democrats and got voted out in 2006. Unfortunately, the dems came back as full blown marxists.  Joe Lieberman wasn't even liberal enough for them anymore and he was their national VP candidate in 2000. Dems ran a third generation marxist against him in CT for senate, that's why he ran as an Independent.

 

 

 

 

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 22:45 | 1472750 nmewn
nmewn's picture

Which presents the question...when is a socialist/progressive not being deceitful?

Never.

Wed, 07/20/2011 - 11:34 | 1473868 JW n FL
JW n FL's picture

It amazes me.. when people that I know have a Brain.. still want to believe that the Regresssive's (which I very much am with regard to the immigration policies of this Nation) batter the Progressives (which I very much am with regard to more than one policy, not that I can think of one more important than returning America to its Former Glory) which is out right stupidity.

 

The next thing that I must admit.. to myself.. is that I do exactly the same thing all the time. Some times for fun, sometimes becuase I would like to stir the pot and even more likely becuase I am pushing to see where a person really stands.

 

But.. us.. and I mean us. Like above us.. us. like you, us. going back and forth like it really is the Wigger fault?

 

Obama got to office and was the most powerful wigger of all time.. and do you think he back tracked and went against everything he has said for years becuase they offered him cake?

 

How about the reality, that the President has NO Control! No Safety!! and No! Ability to Change Anything!

 

Now! how do you fix that? while "WE" lob balls to each other about how evil the Wigger is? How do we fix the system without leaving ourselves open for attack from Russia / China?

 

Enough of the easy stuff.. lets use some of the horse power here to get to the bottom of a problem. a real problem.. not tee ball practice problems. let the new people have those conversations.. you guys have been here long enough to know better and to want better for all. so put the tee ball holder away that is the Presidency and how do we Protect a Real President from the Forces that be that would cause a Real President Harm. please dont say secret service, they are the problem, they keep the President in line! becuase the President ALWAYS has to wonder if they are going to stand down like with Kennedy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY02Qkuc_f8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCHGNvTvqU0

 

Wed, 07/20/2011 - 11:41 | 1473919 JW n FL
JW n FL's picture

http://www.ctka.net/reviews/kennedydetailreview.html

 

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: A Review of The Kennedy Detail, a Compelling but Dangerous Mix of Fact, Faction, and Fiction by Vince Palamara


EDITOR’S NOTE: In advance of the Discovery Channel’s latest annual attempt to bolster the flagging Lone Gunman Myth—via their production of The Kennedy Detail—CTKA welcomes Vincent Palamara’s review of former Secret Service Agent Gerald Blaine’s recently published book of the same title, on which the Discovery Channel production has been based. Without question, the JFK research community is heavily indebted to Vince for his decades-long diligence in his pursuit and collection of first-hand accounts from Secret Service Agents in regard to procedures, directives, and actual eye-witness testimony surrounding the fateful events of November 22, 1963.

While reading through Palamara’s own account of the testimonies that he has collected over the years in refutation of Gerald Blaine’s own personal remembrances, CKTA readers should keep in mind the controversial nature of sources such as Sy Hersh (The Dark Side of Camelot) and Peter Jennings (Dangerous World: The Kennedy Years) which Palamara references in this review. For the purpose of a balanced perspective, readers would do well to read an excerpt of an article by Jim DiEugenio: The Posthumous Assassination of JFK, Part II Sy Hersh and the Monroe/JFK Papers: The History of a Thirty-Year Hoax. (The complete essay may be found in The Assassinations: Probe Magazine on JFK, MLK, RFK, and Malcolm X, edited by Jim DiEugenio and Lisa Pease.)

Finally, and most importantly, CTKA readers should bear in mind that both Blaine’s book The Kennedy Detail and the Discovery Channel production on which it is based find “big picture” questions “radioactive.” In other words, Blaine and the Discovery Channel keep a very safe distance from the most important questions involving the Secret Service’s performance surrounding the events of November 22, 1963:

 

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:49 | 1472504 Rodent Freikorps
Rodent Freikorps's picture

Bush the Elder made the same deal, with the same results.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:25 | 1472582 WestVillageIdiot
WestVillageIdiot's picture

Votes don't buy themselves.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:40 | 1472610 John_Coltrane
John_Coltrane's picture

Just wanted you know you've got the three funniest comments in this post.  And humor is the only defense we have.  Keep it up!!!

Dad always said laughter was the best medicine, until he got tuberulosis and died.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:06 | 1472388 KrugmansChauffeur
KrugmansChauffeur's picture

Vitiate bitchez

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:15 | 1472413 electronpaul
electronpaul's picture

The only grown-up in the room:

 

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/07/19/ron_paul_we_will_defau...

Ron Paul today on the "debt ceiling".

 

Got to love the line: "one side

loves entitlements the other side loves war".

 

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:18 | 1472421 gwar5
gwar5's picture

Call Obama's bluff.

Let Obama raise the ceiling if he gets rid of Air Force One and puts it on E-Bay first. 

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:29 | 1472451 Hubbs
Hubbs's picture

Gang of Six? Sounds like the pallbearers for the US economy funeral.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:30 | 1472455 ParaZite
ParaZite's picture

So, the dow is up 200+ today... when the proposal epic fails... who's betting on a blood bath on the stock market?

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:27 | 1472585 WestVillageIdiot
WestVillageIdiot's picture

Nobody will remember that tomorrow.  They will be too busy trumpeting Apple's earnings as a sign that our economy is perfect. 

Don't forget that today's rally was first credited to the "housing numbers".  And look at those and how much bullshit they entailed.  It didn't turn into the Debt Ceiling rally until about 1:30.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:44 | 1472623 Fred Hayek
Fred Hayek's picture

Funny, our economy is perfect but Apple makes everything overseas and that's where the great majority of their profits came from, too.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:36 | 1472462 spanish inquisition
spanish inquisition's picture

Really, no one has said this yet

Washington headline - Boehner calls for more fluffing!

Edit - change the title of this post! I win!

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:28 | 1472587 WestVillageIdiot
WestVillageIdiot's picture

Bring on the Barney Frank jokes.

Did I ever tell you the one about Barney and his pacifier? 

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:44 | 1472487 LooseLee
LooseLee's picture

Ron Paul rebukes the 'cut, cap, and balance' proposal as more 'status quo'. What a bunch of morons we have running our country. See link for full rebuttal:

 

http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1894:statement-on-the-cut-cap-and-balance-act&catid=15:floor-statements

 

 

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:46 | 1472491 Trying to Understand
Trying to Understand's picture
House of Representatives votes 234-190 to approve GOP’s ‘Cut, Cap and Balance’ plan
Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:52 | 1472508 Justaman
Justaman's picture

Debt Ceiling = snorefest.  Blah, blah, blah.  Does this posturing really matter? 

If they raise it, we are screwed after a possible short-term euphoria.

If they don't (no chance), they will implode the crooked system sooner than they want. 

Do TPTB and most of the US population really fail to understand that we have a debt ceiling problem because the dollar has collapsed in relative value.  All this for a bloated country that imports all of its materials.  Inflation has been here for years as prices don't lie. I guess the question is whether it has been hyper- or stag-.  That is the real debate in my book. 

 

 

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 20:54 | 1472513 Ms. Erable
Ms. Erable's picture

So, Sentaor Derpderp Effinclown, what do you think will happen first - seeing those taxes in the government's (empty) virtual coffers, or you catching a nasty case of rope burn?

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:01 | 1472523 ptolemy_newit
ptolemy_newit's picture

american pussies loloool!

300 million hand gunds and not a single banker even scared!   hahaha.  

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 22:24 | 1472708 nmewn
nmewn's picture

I'm gonna to ship a few of mine to Syria.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:25 | 1472557 GOSPLAN HERO
GOSPLAN HERO's picture

One can always find long pig on the White House menu.

Wed, 07/20/2011 - 00:58 | 1472928 66Sexy
66Sexy's picture

right along with black lie peas and bull-chitlins

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:17 | 1472561 CrashisOptimistic
CrashisOptimistic's picture

The bottom line on all of this crap is FY2012 spending.  If you don't cut that, you haven't cut.

The game playing is to take a high FY2012 baseline, apply huge growth rates to it manufactured from inflation projections, GDP projections and population growth projections, and then cut from that growth curve.  You can claim big cut numbers that way from out years, because the cut is from an absurd growth curve.  You'll wind up with year 2020 spending far above 2011 spending, even farther above it than reasonable inflation and pop growth.

ONLY FY2012 CUTS MATTER AND THEY SHOULD BE NORTH OF 200 BILLION DOLLARS.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:50 | 1472640 John_Coltrane
John_Coltrane's picture

Completely true.  And the way to ensure that is to pass an increase of only about $500B (5 months spending) and then make Obama come back for more.  Its Chinese water torture to spenders.  You could make it even better by passing only a 100B$ increase.  No default, but spending has to be reduced immediately.  Let Obama veto it on Aug 1 at midnight if he dares.  This is the real house "fall back" plan that no ones discussing-and it would pass both chambers.  Plenty of money to meet core obligations like interest, so no default.  And bond markets would rally (lower interest expense) knowing that spending is now being reduced systematically.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 23:45 | 1472849 FinalCollapse
FinalCollapse's picture

They have $467B Tbills maturing next month. It's not about interest. They need serious dough, right away.

 

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:22 | 1472577 GOSPLAN HERO
GOSPLAN HERO's picture

Gang of Six = RINOs and Commiecrats.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:42 | 1472619 Fred Hayek
Fred Hayek's picture

Nah. Coburn's a fairly serious conservative. He's trying to leaven the loaf of shit the others would serve to America. Largely a waste of time on his part but you can at least understand his strategy.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:40 | 1472611 Fred Hayek
Fred Hayek's picture

They wait until the last minute to do something because then people HAVE to pay attention to them. Who the hell would live for power and *not* force people to pay attention to themselves?

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:52 | 1472645 Bobbyrib
Bobbyrib's picture

I hope it backfires and we default.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:41 | 1472613 G. Marx
G. Marx's picture

This episode of "Debt Theater" brought to you by......your friendly Federal Reserve bank, the central bank that just can't say no.*

*(so long as you're a TBTF bank.)

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 21:47 | 1472630 Everybodys All ...
Everybodys All American's picture

These republican senators need to take up the cut cap and balance and vote on it. What I've complained about all along is that our republic is not supposed to use back door negotions in which 99% of the legislators are not even included in the discussions. This is more of the same left wing garbage you get in places like Venezuela and Cuba. Where the dictator dictates and the legislators just sit and collect a check. This is so disgusting and typical of Obama.

Wed, 07/20/2011 - 01:52 | 1472697 Dr. Engali
Dr. Engali's picture

"The gang of six" what a stupid fucking name. What ad agency branded them? Are they gang bangers? Biker gangs? Lobby whore gangs? Stupid fucks.

Tue, 07/19/2011 - 22:28 | 1472720 kaptainkrunch
kaptainkrunch's picture

The gang of six had a beer summit 

at the local bar called "The debt 

ceiling" Joe brought a six pack and some green shoots. They feasted on PIIGS in a blanket. Blah blah blah....

Wed, 07/20/2011 - 02:39 | 1472996 Peter K
Peter K's picture

A word to the Republicans in Congress from yours truely: You go Girl ;)

Wed, 07/20/2011 - 05:10 | 1473065 AldousHuxley
AldousHuxley's picture

Wed, 07/20/2011 - 05:13 | 1473067 AldousHuxley
AldousHuxley's picture

It is all fluff

Wed, 07/20/2011 - 07:46 | 1473181 j0nx
j0nx's picture

Anything that originates in the senate is almost certainly written by lawyers and/or banksters for their gain at our expense. I trust NOTHING that comes from there. As far as I am concerned, the senate is a rogue body that does not serve the people and is probably 80% or more of the corruption cancer that has affected CONgress.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!