This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Paul Wilmott Says Wall Street Has Become Mathematical Playground Lacking Common Sense

Tyler Durden's picture




 

“I just want people to
stop and think for once. There is too much mathematics in this business."

So says Paul Wilmott in a Bloomberg Radio interview when discussing the exclusive reliance on financial models that Wall Street seems to do nowadays, with little to no regard for common sense.

Financial markets have grown too
dependent on mathematicians who use models to anticipate price
moves and need to start injecting common sense into the
equation, said Paul Wilmott, a London-based author and
quantitative finance instructor.

mathematics to forecast how markets will behave can
overlook errors in the models, leading to flawed predictions.

“People don’t really question those assumptions enough,”
said Wilmott, who founded the Diploma in Mathematical Finance at
Oxford University, according to his Web site. “If the
assumptions are wrong, then obviously the models and what
follows can be wrong as well.”

A direct corollary: the caliber and qualifications of the people retained by Wall Street.

“You go back 20 years,
and people running finance, they were maybe history graduates,”
Wilmott said. Now, much of the industry is run by
mathematicians, he said. “A lot of mathematicians do not have
that common sense that the old guard had,” he said.

In essence we have a market of Art Cashins versus 19 year old reflex champions pumped to the brim with caffeine (and other stimulants). We would be happy to prove Paul's point by presenting the roster of professionals at a place like Rentec, however for privacy reasons we will withhold. However, we would like to point out that in its marketing book, the firm proudly indicates that of its research staff of 50, 49 have PhDs. Tangentially, so do Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:05 | 75624 chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

High credit score homeowners are now "strategically" defaulting:

http://www.latimes.com/classified/realestate/news/la-fi-harney20-2009sep...

Debtor's Revolt!

I am Chumbawamba.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:08 | 75629 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Debtors Revolt - Will turn into debtors prison in the coming years.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:37 | 75653 Veteran
Veteran's picture

Fer real.  Get out now while the getting is good.  This administration, (I lump mostly worthless congress in as well), has already proven whose best interest they have in mind, and it sure as hell ain't the American people.  Debtor's prison is already in the works.  The threat of revolution is the only thing keeping them from going full out feudal-style on our sorry asses

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:51 | 75670 mule65
mule65's picture

If you don't know how to play then you should get out.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:45 | 75664 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

From the latimes article:

"A study shows that people who abruptly and intentionally abandon their mortgages often have high credit scores, in stark contrast with most financially distressed borrowers"

Does intelligence play a factor here, or a lack thereof when it comes to credit scores?

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 17:18 | 75696 chumbawamba
chumbawamba's picture

I had a pretty damn high credit score (almost 800) before I took my Obama Bailout.  But then, I'm dumb, so I don't know if this datapoint is useful to your thesis.

I am Chumbawamba.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:50 | 75669 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

As an addendum, (from the latimes)

"Strategic defaulters often go straight from perfect payment histories to no mortgage payments at all. This is in stark contrast with most financially distressed borrowers, who try to keep paying on their mortgage even after they've fallen behind on other accounts"

How dumb to you have to be before it comes time to realize that one needs to stop diggin a bigger hole?

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 17:19 | 75697 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

So you are cheering these morally corrupt liars who broke their promise (Promissory Note being the name and all) to repay their debt? Cheer those people who bought a house they couldn't afford and either too greedy or too irresponsible to understand the consequences of their decision?

Nice. Great ethics to learn.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 18:11 | 75765 hp12c
hp12c's picture

How is that any different than AIG's CDS? They sure as hell knew there would be no chance of them covering their "promise to pay"..and stick it to the tax payer in the end to boot

Great ethics to learn? you learn from the best...

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 19:11 | 75821 msorense
msorense's picture

There is equal culpability on the part of the banksters who set many up with financial products that would explode down the road.  As someone who operates without a penny of debt (except for credit cards that are paid off each month) I am OK with it.  Anything to fuck over the banksters who have so corrupted our country.  Need to buy guns and ammo next before they set up the gulags.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:06 | 75626 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

It's a truism that smart people are always correct, right up to the point where they are proved tragically wrong.

How many times must we hear "It's different this time" before we understand up front that it isn't?

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:31 | 75644 SV
SV's picture

LTCM! ohhh, wait - they blew up too.  Shoot.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:17 | 75636 PAPA ROACH
PAPA ROACH's picture

Just another aspect of our country that has become a joke.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:18 | 75637 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

PhD: someone who learns more and more about less and less until he eventually learns everything there is to know about nothing ;-)

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:39 | 75656 ptoemmes
ptoemmes's picture

And the flip side to that is somone who learns less and less about more and more until they know nothing about everything.

 

A Liberal Arts major perhaps...as I slink off to secure cover.

Pete

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:44 | 75662 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Nope, I'm an Engineer and programmer. Doesn't mean that I don't have a sense of humor, or that I won't twist somebody's tail ;-)

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 17:22 | 75698 ptoemmes
ptoemmes's picture

Me too - just now adding the :-) for the possibly humor impaired.

My wife is an MeD? (Masters of Education) and actually I can only raise up an old somewhat lame BAS - Bachelor of Applied Science where said parchment long since turned to dust.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:55 | 75675 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

oh wait .... I (perhaps) wrongly assumed that your comment was a flame (which is cool too). If it was a literal definition of a B.A. or M.A., then I agree without reservation.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 17:16 | 75694 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

hahaha nice.
PoliSci and arts are joke degrees. Seriously, whats the point.

Finnawnsss is where its at.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:22 | 75638 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

If you want to have a look at this crazy world - just take a look at stocktwits.com, see how many are gunning up AIG to $50 today.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:29 | 75643 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Mathematics? What you talking about? This market is simply 1 direction without math needed and that's UP! UP! UP! gee... And if you want to inject fundamental into this market? Dream on... until GS and Bermonkey and Obama and Geithner's pockets are full, this mrket ain't going down... And IF we do inject fundamental, this market will be down in the 200s on SPX...

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:34 | 75649 JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

True dat.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:47 | 75667 What_Me_Worry
What_Me_Worry's picture

Maybe they only use absolute values?

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:36 | 75651 buzzsaw99
buzzsaw99's picture

I need a PhD too, that way I can get big bucks for doing shit that is f$cked to high heaven.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:55 | 75652 Sancho Ponzi
Sancho Ponzi's picture

OT:

Is Edolphus Towns corrupt, or certifiably insane?

http://www.reuters.com/article/businessNews/idUSTRE58K3OL20090921 

 

'Rep. Edolphus Towns, a Democrat who chairs the Government Reform Committee, told staff to take a look at a proposal from former AIG Chief Executive Officer Hank Greenberg that could make it easier for the insurer to repay federal obligations, a committee spokeswoman told Reuters on Monday.'

 

'The proposal would cut the government stake in AIG from the current 80 percent and trim interest rates on AIG's government loan. It also would extend the term of the loan, giving the company more time to repay, the spokeswoman said.'

And this is one of the guys 'going after' Ken Lewis? Puhllllease.

Added: AIG holds roughly a trillion dollars of CRE, and their stock shoots to the moon. This is utter and complete insanity.

Added: Guess who will soon own a trillion dollars of CRE crap? Bernanke, you and I will.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 18:00 | 75755 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

We already own all of Fanny and Freddie's book of loans, securities & swaps plus the approximate 1.5 the has been or will soon be purchased...

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:46 | 75665 tradertim
tradertim's picture

according to the math on my 28 year old HP41cx calculator...it's time to sell my 'longs' today and go 'short'. wow..i almost forgot what it was like to hit the 'short' button in e-trade. hopefully the nasdaq will go down at least 5 points before it reverses and goes up for another month.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 17:33 | 75720 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

I am very angry with you. I too had an HP41cx. Mine got eaten by leaked batteries about 10 years ago. It was a very very sad day in my life.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 18:26 | 75776 tradertim
tradertim's picture

sorry to hear that. it is a wonderful calculator. i still can't believe i've owned it since 1981. i'll never get rid of it.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:46 | 75666 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Capitalism without failure is like Christianity without HELL. Thanks to our Government for enabling an entire nation of crooks and theives on the back of the taxpayer..

INSANE.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:54 | 75674 andrew123
andrew123's picture

"However, we would like to point out that in its marketing book, the firm proudly indicates that of its research staff of 50, 49 have PhDs. Tangentially, so do Alan Greenspan and Ben Bernanke."

Yeah, but Greenspan and Bernanke don't know hwo to do basic math.

 

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 16:58 | 75679 fotokemist
fotokemist's picture

To be fair to Greenspan, stapling together a series of publications (hopefully in reviewed journals) is now widespread, even in science departments.  Yet another way to process more students with less faculty (and student) effort with the side benefit that the research advisor no longer has to write his own papers.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 17:07 | 75687 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

thanks for every body whom were sharing the commons on the page....and made me laughhing as well as that I never have before. My questions for your guys is how is your guys pockets are full now? if you are and thanks GOD more!!!

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 17:21 | 75701 OrganicGeorge
OrganicGeorge's picture

Several months ago I had an email exchange with a physics professor from Harvard.  He was fuming at the poor quality work that was being done on the financial models by many of his ex-students.  It seems that the top of the class physicist would set of the parmaters of the models then turn it over the less qualified to finish. 

The resulting models he said were bad math.

So we have a system where everyone depends on the models and the models are flawed.

His parting remarks were: "Don't get me started on quants"

 

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 17:36 | 75724 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Odd math related thing. Anyone know what made wilshire 5000 WFIVX and S&P 500 synch in july of 2008? It looks like previous to that time wilshire 5000 was a sort of delayed echo. I'm looking at google chart with a span of about six months.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 17:54 | 75745 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

Since when has common sense had anything to do with the decision making processes of those that are currently holding power?  All this current wave has provided is the capacity to manipulate at a time when it was necessary for those that hold power to continue to do so while providing an index of excuse for when it all blows up.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 18:31 | 75782 mule65
mule65's picture

"The world is positioned for disappointment. But, in economic and financial matters, the world rarely gets what it expects."

read in the WSJ

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 21:46 | 75943 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Actually the problem in the financial industry seems to be immature mathematicians. Real mathematicians engage their minds on their abstract models and are aware that their models rarely describe any real phenomena. But quants people who populate the finance industry have no real understanding of the structure of mathematics and the and its relation to the 'real world', they are merely good at manipulating a few symbols and crunching a few numbers.
Finally considering the state of math education in America, every half brained idiot who can count is labeled a mathematician/genius. In the valley of the blind...

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 21:52 | 75950 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

balding quants, white haired historians, 19-year olds and bloggers who claim the above are mathematicians - all have one thing in common - they are all failures in math, have no clue what math is and think they know. All may be perfectly honest people, but don't confuse mathematicians and scientists with folks making up models on wall-street and for trading - it only goes to show how poorly folks on financial blogs are shallow bunch of math failures.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 22:03 | 75960 Tyler Durden
Tyler Durden's picture

some other folks on financial blogs enjoy the irony of groundless stereotyping more than anything

Tue, 09/22/2009 - 01:56 | 76105 defender
defender's picture

Sorry to burst your bubble, but giving someone a piece of paper does not increase their intelligence unless you are playing D&D.  The similarity between the mathematicians and the scientists with the wall-street gang is that they all have degrees.  If an institution will spit out qualified and unqualified degree holders, what does that say about your piece of paper?  Or mine?

The truth is that statistics is really only good at modeling what has been, not what will be.  The future is just to complex to reduce down to an algo.  Even if you included enough variables to get a 90% success rate, you can still go bankrupt when that 10% hits all at once.

Mon, 09/21/2009 - 23:42 | 76045 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Wilmott is a dufuss. He is so smart with hindsight. Don't think he was printing enormous returns over past 36 months when all these dumb quants were blowing up -- the shorting opportunity of a lifetime capable of producing very high double digit returns missed by Wilmott. He is primarily interested in selling his quant accreditation program.........

Tue, 09/22/2009 - 14:37 | 76546 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

++1

I had a quick flick through 'The Mathematics of Financial Derivatives' just to check. Nothing in there about value investing, not a sausage.

Tue, 09/22/2009 - 01:46 | 76102 dhengineer
dhengineer's picture

As an average, run-of-the-mill taxpayer, what would my personal credit rating be if I were to issue bonds like the big corporations?  About 37 levels below junk, right?  But the egg-headed quants rounded up a million losers like me, took our mortgages, stapled them together, tranched them off, and ran the data through their genius-level math models.  The result:  a bright, shiny triple-A rating.  Unless my TI calculator is horribly off (it's not an HP, sorry) a million times zero is still a zero rating, right?  So, how come nobody sat back, looked at the results, and realized that there were obvious flaws in the calculations?

When I was a young civil engineer, we worked with a gray-beard who sat in the corner office with his slide rule, who checked our work that we had done on an original IBM-PC (two floppys, no hard drive, slower than a congressman).  We of course thought that we were the hottest thing in the construction world, but he would invariably sit back and point out our misconceptions and now-obvious errors with a wry little smile.  He had a pet saying:  "The computer always gives the correct answer.  BUT, have we asked it the correct question?"

Tue, 09/22/2009 - 06:44 | 76168 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I think the blame is two-part:

1) The managers who make the hiring decisions. They cared more about the qualifications on paper than the person's judgement and maturity.

2) The practitioners of this superstitious scientism, whether they believed in it or not. They were using the trappings of science and mathematics to provide rationalizations for flawed business models.

The short term gains spurred greedy behavior at all levels and no one wanted to verify the assumptions or quality of data in the models too closely. Ignorance + Arrogance = train wreck.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!