You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Perspective Blast From The Most Recent Parabolic Market Past

Tyler Durden's picture




From a cheat sheet circulating way back when the first time we saw a solid downside reaction to a parabolic market in October 2007

Reacting to data and market releases:

  • weak data =  Fed ease, stocks rally
  • consensus data =  lower volatility, stocks rally
  • strong data =  economy strengthening, stocks rally
  • bank loses $4bln = bad news out of the way, stocks rally
  • oil spikes =  great for energy companies, stocks rally
  • oil drops =  great for the consumer, stocks rally
  • dollar plunges =  great for multinationals, stocks rally
  • dollar spikes =  lowers inflation, stocks rally
  • inflation spikes =  will inflate all assets, stocks rally
  • inflation drops =  improves earnings quality, stocks rally

 




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 11:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:01 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

The change folks can believe in.  It matters not the party, the action is nearly the same.

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:45 | Link to Comment economicmorphine
economicmorphine's picture

Exactly right.  Now connect the dots. 

 

1.  Somebody controls BOTH parties.

2.  That somebody is in charge.

3.  The lib vs. cons debate is made up to distract us.

4.  So that nothing gets done, except

5.  What those in charge want.

 

The question is, who's in charge?  The answer, if you look, is fairly obvious.

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 13:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 16:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 16:04 | Link to Comment Tao Jonesing
Tao Jonesing's picture

Accepting everything that is in those two blogposts as 100% true, uh, where is there even one crime, let alone a series of them?

I'm just sayin' . . .

 

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 11:59 | Link to Comment TumblingDice
TumblingDice's picture

More Bush crimes getting exposed = AMERICA F*** YEAH!!!, stocks rally

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 11:59 | Link to Comment Project Mayhem
Project Mayhem's picture

haha welcome to the twilight zone

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:19 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 14:11 | Link to Comment drwed (not verified)
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:04 | Link to Comment TraderMark
TraderMark's picture

Boo Yah!

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:06 | Link to Comment TraderMark
TraderMark's picture

And all it cost for this rally was an additional $2T deficit over the next decade -

 

http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/2009/08/cumulative-deficit-estimate-for-...

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:09 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Govt spending has almost nothing to do with it.

Fed money printing has almost everything to do with it.

And still another $500B - $1T of money to be printed in the next 4 months.  What do you think that is going to do to the market ratios?

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:32 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:23 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 13:39 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 12:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 13:40 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 13:57 | Link to Comment ghostfaceinvestah
ghostfaceinvestah's picture

Sounds about right.  And what better way to juice a market then to flood it with liquidity.

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 14:11 | Link to Comment walküre
walküre's picture

You're correct with point 1 in your analysis for sure.

If I remember correctly, it was Germany which declared early on they would not agree to either more bailouts or more stimulus. US had to follow suit or go it alone. Besides, the measure was increasingly unpopular at home also.

2 has been on my mind lately. They gave it a shot, oh well. Used all the tricks of the trade and then some to get the ship off the ground but alas, it failed. Most of us here would probably have projected the failure and are now wondering if the measures were solely aimed at recapitalizing the elite at tax payers expense. Guilotines might be next if that ever comes out.

Not so sure about 3 yet. The sell off will come when nobody expects it and the last bear has turned bullish. Last year's events were created at the push of a button as billions of dollars got drained from markets in hours. It was a cataclysmic event that helped get Obama elected. Make no mistake about that. Question is what came first, the Obama campaign or the market crash.

The game is increasingly crooked and the chicanry becomes more and more obvious to any retail investor. Having lost phenomenal wealth last year, I would think that many are going to sell into the last stages of the rally and going into cash.

Again, the Chinese gamblers will blink first.. The signs are lining up nicely.

 

 

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 13:22 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 13:37 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 14:11 | Link to Comment drwed (not verified)
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 15:18 | Link to Comment zanahorias
zanahorias's picture

In the end all that matters is love...

I love you all

Mon, 08/24/2009 - 16:00 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Mon, 08/24/2009 - 17:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!