PIMCO Tells Investors To Take Advantage Of Tight Credit Spreads And Sell
Following up on Paul McCulley somewhat disingenous piece we discussed earlier, the Fashion Island bond guys are out with another report, this time by Managing Director Mark Kiesel, who basically is saying it is time to "Sell, Mortimer."
Strong growth in emerging
markets (EM), the inventory cycle and accommodative fiscal and monetary
policy continue to support the global economy. However, the handoff
from the public sector to the private sector in most developed
countries is likely to be weak due to a lack of animal spirits
exhibited by businesses as well as consumers, high and growing
sovereign debt burdens and ongoing deleveraging in the private sector
(Chart 1). The U.S. economy’s recent growth has been underpinned
significantly by government policy, yet this short-term cyclical
support will likely fade in the second half of 2010. As a result,
investors should take advantage of the tighter credit spreads and focus
on de-risking their portfolios in order to prepare for the increasing
long-term secular headwinds stemming from the growing deterioration in
public sector balance sheets in many developed economies.
Pimco's distrust of the new normal is nothing new.
Corporate capital spending and
hiring remain weak as firms continue to focus on cost cutting,
repairing balance sheets and deleveraging. Consumer spending in most
developed countries continues to be depressed by weak labor markets,
poor income growth, low savings, high debt, the potential for an
increasing tax burden and tight credit availability. While prices for
low-end U.S. housing have recovered somewhat, most of the improvement
has been driven by the government’s homebuyer tax credit. The
government’s “cash for clunkers” stimulus program is over, and there
appears to be only limited pent-up demand for autos in its absence. Simply put, private sector demand remains weak and public
sector support is set to fade.
The biggest threat to capital markets everywhere is the gradual (or sudden) withdrawal of liquidity. On this point Kiesel seems to contradict his superior McCulley in a variety of ways, mainly in that he expects Central Banks to act prudently and rationally.
Further, public sector debt has
now increased to a level that will require fiscal tightening in most
developed countries. State and local government spending is also likely
to be reduced. In addition, monetary policy is likely to become less
accommodative globally as central banks unwind unconventional liquidity
programs put in place during the crisis and gradually raise interest
rates. Nevertheless, central banks in countries with high consumer and
growing government debt burdens will likely continue to inflate,
leading to steep yield curves, in particular in the U.S. and the U.K.
The effectiveness of fiscal and monetary policy should remain limited
in these economies due to the continuing deleveraging in the private
sector, a weak multiplier effect and constrained bank lending (Chart
As we touched upon a week ago, a rather relevant topic that has been untouched for now, is the increase in equityholder-friendly actions in corporate capital structures, which will ultimately be credit negative.
However, there are a number of
risks facing the corporate bond market, including defaults,
increasingly shareholder-friendly corporate actions and the potential
for rising government and municipal issuance to “crowd out” capital and
raise corporate borrowing costs. With U.S. economic growth likely to
fade in the second half of 2010 and below-trend economic growth likely
in 2011, corporate default rates should be elevated over our secular
horizon (Chart 4). This argues for investments that are senior in the
capital structure and a focus on bonds in companies with strong asset
coverage and low leverage.
Investors also need to be wary
of the pendulum swinging from bondholders toward equity holders if
rising corporate cash balances are diverted to equity holders through
increased dividends or share buybacks (Chart 5). In addition, capital
spending could pick up given the divergence between capital
expenditures and corporate cash flow (Chart 6). This argues for careful
credit selection within industries that have the incentive to maintain
The cautious conclusion which leads to the earlier observation that it may be time to get out of credits:
While rising public sector debt
levels have not yet led to materially higher interest rates, rising
demand for credit in the private sector could lead to higher risk
premiums as the global marketplace struggles to support large and
growing government financing needs. Finally, governments in some
countries may choose to raise corporate tax rates in order to reduce
growing sovereign budget deficits. All these risks argue for
extraordinary discipline in evaluating credit investments.
- advertisements -