This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Presented Without Comment: Experience

Marla Singer's picture


- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 11/25/2009 - 17:59 | 142663 Rollerball
Rollerball's picture

Chains you can believe in.  Just axe Gary.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 21:28 | 142813 albion402
albion402's picture

Using Climategate as a point of reference, who is adding in "real" experience to the time series?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 23:48 | 142894 ED
ED's picture

How come Nixon do so swell?

Unless by 'private sector' they mean 'navel gazing'.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:04 | 142664 Fibozachi
Fibozachi's picture

.... almost as if Armstrong's Private-Public pendulum might have some cred to it, huh? 

Then again, what could the man behind The Foundation for the Study of Cycles and the premise for the cult film Pi, really know.  lol ... disbanded in '99, the MTA is reopening the Foundation ... just in time for the next leg lower. 

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:10 | 142677 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I'm listening.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 19:55 | 142767 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I was recently introduced to Armstrong's writings and have found his recent work to be a treasure trove. I haven't read anyone with a deeper understanding of markets and history which are the foundations of real economics. Not that bull Bernanke and his crony banker friends are spreading.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:06 | 142667 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

What is the take away here?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 22:58 | 142862 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Learn to think on your own...

Don't let this blog think for you.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:08 | 142672 JohnKing
JohnKing's picture


Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:09 | 142675 johngaltfla
johngaltfla's picture

Speaks volumes. The children are in charge.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 21:14 | 142804 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Well, it's not like the adults of the last 8 years had done any better.

(btw, this is not a political statement, but I'm just wondering whether this graph is of any value)

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 14:54 | 143266 Assetman
Assetman's picture

You don't need a whole lot of private sector experience to screw people over.

The biggest difference here is that this Admin staff will spread the screwing over as broad as possible, assuming the KY effect won't be as painful.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:11 | 142678 jdun
jdun's picture

Equality through poverty.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:16 | 142686 heatbarrier
heatbarrier's picture

Or GS's "Prosperity through inequality".

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 21:01 | 142796 jdun
jdun's picture

There will be always inequality. If everyone was smart then everybody would have their own business and be rich. The people that whine the most are the people that leech off those people that provided jobs.

This isn't a perfect world, deal with it.


Wed, 11/25/2009 - 21:25 | 142812 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

ok- you're a dumb ass-

how is GS representative of any small business- unless of course the USG is backstopping their fuck ups and covering their ass- making sure they regain profitability?

many people are whining- not because they ARE leeching- but because some folks have the USG's ear and have been made whole when they should be out of business-

a 4th grader- given the same information GS was privy to and with the inside contacts GS has- could of had a banner year-

so WTF are you talking about?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:14 | 142679 waterdog
waterdog's picture

Like being skinned with a fillet knife, Marla. One does not know they are on the menu until it is too late.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:13 | 142683 heatbarrier
heatbarrier's picture

Marla, How about "administration officials with WS experience/connection"? That would be more telling. Timmy G does qualify for "private sector experience".

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:49 | 142717 E pluribus unum
E pluribus unum's picture

Hardly - and I sure as hell wouldn't geel any better if Jamie Dimon was the Secretary of the Treasury, would you?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 19:02 | 142720 heatbarrier
heatbarrier's picture

Correction: I meant Timmy G doesn NOT qualify for private sector experience.

Jamie D wouldn't last six month in DC with this storm raging, he doesn't have the skills.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:14 | 142684 heatbarrier
heatbarrier's picture

Deleted - random, mysterious, double post.  NSA intercept?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:20 | 142693 niamor
niamor's picture

I am not sure was this says about the current administration's ability to deal with the mess they inherited from that so experienced GWB administration....  

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:27 | 142696 Sancho Ponzi
Sancho Ponzi's picture

I'll guess your age at < 30. Man, I hope I'm right.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 09:41 | 143038 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

No quite... 37 actually :o/
I guess my point was merely that private experience is not necessarily what is needed to run a successful government - good people will do.
I do recognise however that Obama's team is a bit on the light side. But does this really matter? There are numerous example of private corporations digging themselves into the ground (say US car industry), and plenty of example of successful public policies, e.g. education in Scandinavian countries is recognised as being pretty good. On a larger scale, the reconstruction of Europe after WWII (praise and respect to our US cousins who fought and fell on our land) was clearly a success, but as far as I know the allocation of capital under the Marshall Plan was not left to market forces.... simply because the job was way too important for that.
Also, I am yet to see a country with a decent infrastructure (roads, rails, water, electricity, etc) as a result of a free market policies...

Happy thanksgiving

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 19:37 | 142755 Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Experienced at evil is still experience.

And from where I stand 8 years of rule by greedy, professionally evil non-wall-streeters is looking better than not even a year of rule by greedy, amaterishly evil wall street cronies.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 20:04 | 142771 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

What does that even mean?

Bush's experienced team created the original bubble, Obama is just trying, at worst, to re-inflate it. As far as I can tell there is no difference.

As to that "you are under 30" comment dude -- so? If you are over 30 it was your lazy, selfish generation of baby boomers that brought us here. The people buying McMansions were over 30, ditto the geniuses who invaded Iraq, who supported free trade with the Red Chinese, who worshiped at the altar of Greenspan and the glorious Indo-Chino-Eastern European PhD guys' excel formulas 'proving' that assets and AAA CDS's can only go up.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 00:13 | 142910 Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Boy, someone has a chip on their shoulder!

Greenspan and the banksters created the bubbles with unparalleled support from both parties.  The repeal of Glass-Stegall by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was quite bipartisan and quite disastrous, and it all occurred under Clinton's reign and potential veto.

By the way, Gen X is now over 30 and largely had nothing to do with all the sins that you correctly identify with the Baby Boomers.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 15:41 | 143324 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Actually, when I look at the charts, the exponential growth of asset values started in about 1990 under GHW Bush. It continued under Clinton. The main peak of the asset bubble was in 2000-2002. Ever since then, W and Obama and their respective congresses, Fannies, Freddies, Ginnies, FHA's and Fed chairs have been frantically trying to reinflate the bubble that started popping in 2000. Each time the bubble gets blown up again makes the ultimate popping worse.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:30 | 142702 Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture


I think the most telling fact is that this number has almost never been more than 50%.


Think about that.


Half of the people in charge of helping the POUSA run the country have never actually worked for a living.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 19:30 | 142752 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Ummm.... 60%?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:39 | 142709 AnonymousMonetarist
AnonymousMonetarist's picture

'Where did it go Rahm?'

Right in the old lumberyard sir.'

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:53 | 142721 mikeyv1970
mikeyv1970's picture

Well using TA you can see a disctint trendline downward other than that little Jab from GWB...   Next president wont be ANY folks with Private Sector Experience.  Wonder if you should short the market long term then?  :P

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 23:03 | 142865 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Portends the idea that we will all be working for Uncle Sam soon.

Representative govt indeed.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 18:59 | 142726 ShankyS
ShankyS's picture

Was this a pick your poison question?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 19:07 | 142734 Zippyin Annapolis
Zippyin Annapolis's picture

Took 7 months to pick a dog--and then got it from Ted Kennedy--nuff said.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 19:08 | 142736 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Says it all really.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 19:25 | 142747 carbonmutant
carbonmutant's picture

 A crop of brand-new orators we grew,
and foolish, paltry lads who thought they knew."
Gnaeus Naevius    ca. 264-201 BC

There is historical precedent

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 20:04 | 142772 putbuyer
putbuyer's picture

I like that...

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 19:57 | 142768 The Rock
The Rock's picture

Private sector experience didn't mean shit for the last 100 years when the mothersquid (Rothschilds) began to take over the world.  They've appointed or successfully "convinced" 99% of the key cabinet positions.

James Forrestal R.I.P.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 20:36 | 142787 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Chicago Pol in charge

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 21:22 | 142809 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Now, just overlay monetary crises and recessions, and see what the private sector brings to governance.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 21:46 | 142827 torabora
torabora's picture

To each according to need (banksters are a needy bunch) and from each according to ability (they need you able to crawl behind a bush and die).

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 22:17 | 142843 Unscarred
Unscarred's picture

When Obama got elected, I gave him a 1 in 10 chance at fixing the economy...  Looks I slightly overestimated him.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 23:05 | 142867 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

You were far more optimistic than I.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 08:41 | 143022 Anton LaVey
Anton LaVey's picture

I gave him 50% - but only if he brought Glass-Steagall back and put half of Wall Street behind bars. For life. With no possibility of parole. Now, the inmates are running the asylum.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 09:21 | 143035 wackyquacker
wackyquacker's picture

who appointed the crooks?

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 18:54 | 143480 Unscarred
Unscarred's picture

Well, the U.S. citizens elect the President, as well as Congress...

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 22:24 | 142846 Gubbmint Cheese
Gubbmint Cheese's picture

Hmm.. they might not have a lot of experience - but the f*ing we are getting sure feels like its coming from someone with a LOT of experience.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 22:25 | 142847 Psquared
Psquared's picture

I take two things from this chart. First, Obama has the fewest and Eisenhower had the most. Second, the 50s were less corrupt than the first decade of this millenium. GWB had a higher percentage but included such wonders as Hank Paulson.

It does not appear to me at all obvious that previous private sector experience indicates a more highly developed sense of ethics or morality or, for that matter, competence.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 08:21 | 143016 Zippyin Annapolis
Zippyin Annapolis's picture

The 50s "less corrupt"?  What about the McCarthy hearings and that young Senate page, Bobby Baker. A cesspool of conflicts and a sleepy corrupt press--sort of like now!

"""""Baker took a job as a page in the United States Senate when he was fourteen years old for Senator Burnet Maybank. Baker quickly became friends with then Senate Majority Leader, Lyndon Johnson, and several other high-ranking Democrats. In the Senate, Baker eventually rose to serve as Secretary to the Majority (which at the time was the Democrats); this was his highest official position, as well as the position he would resign from. At the height of his political career, Baker's power as a Washington insider and Senate deal-broker was so great that he was often referred to as the "101st Senator". When Johnson was elected as Vice President under John F. Kennedy in 1960, Baker remained a close political adviser to Johnson, while continuing his larger role in the Democratic Party.

Baker frequently mixed politics with personal business, as was common practice among most politicians at the time. In 1962, Baker established the Serve-U-Corporation with his friend, Fred Black. The company was designed to provide vending machines for companies working on federally granted programs. Though a part of numerous other deals involving both politics and private financial affairs, this particular business venture would cause the uproar and scandal that would cause Baker to resign a year later.

The Serve-U-Corporation deal became the centerpiece of allegations of conflict of interest and corruption after a disgruntled former government contractor sued Baker and Black in civil court. This lawsuit eventually generated a great deal of press and a Republican investigation into Baker's business and political activities. Under increasing pressure, Baker resigned his job as Secretary to the Majority on October 7, 1963."""



Thu, 11/26/2009 - 15:49 | 143338 Psquared
Psquared's picture

I didn't say without corruption. There always has been and always will be corruption in a free society. What I don't see in the 1950s (unlike today) is Wall Street buying Washington DC and securing for themselves public payment for their bad bets. Baker may have been a scandal, but he never threatened to take down the world economic system and enslave the American people.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 17:10 | 143407 Zippyin Annapolis
Zippyin Annapolis's picture

Exhibit A--Eisenhower's last inaugural address on the military- industrial complex


The actual takeover was completed shortly therafter.


Reading history is a necessity not a hobby.


Wed, 11/25/2009 - 22:30 | 142849 Edna R. Rider
Edna R. Rider's picture

Dinner tonight with relatives who are big fish hedge fund managers:  me:  "the dollar has to stop going down at some point, right?"  them, simultaneously:  "No, not at all."

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 22:38 | 142854 phaesed
phaesed's picture

Given the current level of corporate fraud out there, does it really make a fucking difference?


While Obama has undoubtedly had to sell out to the banks, would Kea.... I mean... would McCain have done any different?

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 08:23 | 143018 Zippyin Annapolis
Zippyin Annapolis's picture

Hell no--bipartisan control of the Treasury and Fed is an objective that is seldom if ever not met.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 15:00 | 143274 Assetman
Assetman's picture

Probably not, pheased.

McCain, though, likely would have been unpredicatable... capable of making even more political enemies.  The Chinese would have sabotaged AF One going out of Bejing.

Otherwise, Obama/McCain are one of the same.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 16:13 | 143353 phaesed
phaesed's picture

Thanks for seeing that...

Seriously, I don't care who's in office, but I can say that I prefer we spend 1trillion on healthcare than another war in afghanistan.

All the banks want is for us to be in DEBT.

90% of the bozos who are bitching about higher taxes are also enjoying the cause of the higher taxes... BAILING OUT THE BANKS.

$1 trillion pales in comparison.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 22:43 | 142856 Ignore Amos
Ignore Amos's picture

Aw c'mon, who needs experience when you have hope and change?

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 22:53 | 142860 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

To put this in perspective, it's either T^3 or former GS CEO and famed Bazooka Boy Paulson.

Just sayin'

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 23:03 | 142864 pooplagrande
pooplagrande's picture

Don't be afraid to comment...why is everyone so afraid to say something about Obama? Is it the race card? Is it bashing the icon for hope/change?

He is just another politician, who happens to be a great campaigner/speaker/networker/organizer, but he is JUST ANOTHER LYING, SELF-SERVING, POLITICIAN...and no, I am not a republican or a democrat...just a frustrated citizen sick of the lies.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 23:04 | 142866 phaesed
phaesed's picture

And speaking of which.........

Let's look at the twats who have the most corporate experience.

Taft/Wilson - WWI

Truman - WWII

Eisenhower - North Korea

Nixon - Vietnam

Reagan - Iran/Contra

Bush I - Desert Storm

Bushie II - Iraq

Notice any fucking patterns? :)

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 23:20 | 142874 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Vietnam was a kennedy/johnson combo platter. Nixon got in in 69-- Johnson had it escalated by then. Not a Nixon fan, but facts are facts. Was in Vietnam 67-68 USMC

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 02:47 | 142963 phaesed
phaesed's picture

I was wondering whether to add LBJ to that... thanks, so it was LBJ/Nixon...

still goes to prove the point, but thank you for pointing that out and thank you for that service.

Bosnia, 1st Cav here.

<oh and I should add that aint shit compared to what you and what many of ours are going through right now>

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 09:44 | 143040 wackyquacker
wackyquacker's picture

wondering? please, read a history book. Your attempt of correlation is, well, selective? Ever heard of outliers? Assignable cause variation? (ie, by design, on purpose, assignable). Marla's chart is saying we're in uncharted (!) waters here. And this doesn't even include the real kingpins- unvetted czars. Carter, Clinton, Kennedy- left of center realists -relatively. This guy- Koolaid drinker- off the charts.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 16:07 | 143348 phaesed
phaesed's picture

I wasn't attempting any correlation wackyquacker, I was pointing out that corporate experience doesn't necessarily correlate to better outcomes. Corporate experience shows flat out a higher war preference. If you're using corporate experience as a measure of competence, how the fuck do you explain Bush II?


Errr Duh.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 17:55 | 143451 wackyquacker
wackyquacker's picture

Whether corp experience is a + or - cannot be gleaned from the chart and I don't think that's Marla's point. We only have what is, not what was or what we hope; history will explain Bush ii. You're assuming alot with your assertion.

Fri, 11/27/2009 - 01:21 | 143651 phaesed
phaesed's picture

You're right, I am.

I don't think it was Marla's point, I think her point was the discussion itself has merit, regardless of her own viewpoint. But, as you say, I am assuming a lot with my opinion.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 16:45 | 143388 phaesed
phaesed's picture

Oh, I should mention.... read a history book? So I guessed the other presidents because I obviously didn't read a history book about which puppet caused which war.

And if you've ever read any of my fucking posts, you'll realize I've read way more history books than most, except I concentrate on what matters.... the banks.

Koolaid drinker? lol, you're drinking vodka if you're so numb to the blunt reality of who's being called Mr. President is really just a puppet.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 22:06 | 143552 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

s/f and happy thanksgiving


Thu, 11/26/2009 - 22:29 | 143560 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

Nooo.... Truman June 1950 with an April Gillespie (sp?) moment where Sec State (Acheson?) didn't "include" South Korea under the umbrella of US protection.  Let's see...

Wilson "too proud to fight" because it would be hurting his progressive agenda, but then, well, was forced to declare war. Geee, Taft not in policy arena.

Truman was a Pendergast (sp?) machine pol in KC when WW2 started.  Senator.  War profiteering hawk as a populist.  (Harry S. Truman--S is his middle name).

Ike got elected because he was willing to end the conflict in a blinding instant.1

Bobby Kennedy and JFK -- Vietnam

Nixon with Realpolitik unf***ed the bad JFK/LBJ situation, my brothers weap, but best of a bad situation at the time.

Reagan--Berlin wall, and I/C--let's see, no war there.

GHWB didn't go all wobbly and achieved his (Powell and Cheney advised) ends.

W-well, you'll miss him on your dieing grave.

O--"dithering" sticks so well.

so the pattern I see is obfuscation and other revisionism.   Problem is, there are those of us who'se toughest times were not in the financial or other industries.

My best wishes to you,



Wed, 11/25/2009 - 23:08 | 142869 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Many coming to Obumblers aid, have you all lost your mind.

Sure he caught a bad economy from Bush and the Democratic houses of congress. I don't remember Bush blaming Clinton as the NASDAQ dropped 80%.

And what exactly has Obumbler done for the economy besides threaten Nationalized Health Care, Cap & Tax and Union Card Check. Thankfully I sold all my businesses years ago. I wouldn't be hiring ether with these massive Government policies coming down the pike.

Oh yeah. lets not forget the Trillion dollar stimulus, why aren't you hacks defending that?

Face it unless he changes, which I highly doubt, his only term will be a zerO. He can read a TelePrompter and apologize to a bunch of cleptocrats and two bit thugs for his perceived American short comings. Other then that he is a loser who except for being elected to public office never accomplished one damn thing.

The TOTUS is a nothing, his latest polls are proving many now get it and we all will have to pay for it, including those yet born.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 04:48 | 142983 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

+1 Bernankillion (infinity)

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 08:46 | 143024 Anton LaVey
Anton LaVey's picture

Bush not blaming Clinton? Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Re-read the Wall Street Journal op-ed pages of that time, please. Obama nationalized everything? Well, it's a toss between Obama "cash for clunkers" and "nationalized health care" and GWB/Cheney support for Halliburton, Blackwater and others. Pick your poison. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss and all that.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 16:09 | 143350 phaesed
phaesed's picture


I still don't understand how people are falling into populist comparisons of the "elected" (please read bought and paid for) leaders.

Attack the problem, not the figureheads which are placed to pin the proverbial tail on the donkey.

Wed, 11/25/2009 - 23:28 | 142878 Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 Obama presidency=Epic FAIL.

 Totally worthless.When Larry and Timmy boy were named I suspected the doom was total.Sometimes, it really sucks to be right.It must really, really suck to be one of those poor dolts who thought he was going to be something special.Which is ultimately very sad for something as salutatory as being the first President of color in our nations history.And he is just nothing...a puppet who dances on the orders of wall st and their pals.Of course, things will get worse.And what will history say of President Obama?That he was welcomed , and showed so much promise....and then systematically betrayed the people who elected him and sealed the doom of the USA.What a nightmare.


Wed, 11/25/2009 - 23:53 | 142896 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

General comment. Too many graphics and charts disappear under the Zero Hedge right side bar. This is a constant situation.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 05:02 | 142987 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

I second that. Can some house keeping be done to fix
this. It is pretty annoying in an otherwise excellent

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 00:34 | 142922 agrotera
agrotera's picture


Thu, 11/26/2009 - 01:14 | 142936 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

If only we could go back to the Bush years, we wouldn't have to worry about the economy....sigh

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 02:24 | 142956 Bear
Bear's picture

I think the plot of the Presidents 'actual experience' would look even more dramatic. With Obama at 180 days of national service (does not include campaigning). This is pathetic.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 08:05 | 143013 ArkansasAngie
ArkansasAngie's picture

Personally ... if you haven't had the pleasure of meeting payroll out of your own pocket you can't possibly be ready to be president or one of his advisors.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 08:50 | 143025 Anton LaVey
Anton LaVey's picture

What's next? Giving the right to vote only to people who have created their own company? That's not a "democracy" anymore, it's an oligarchy. Or, even worse, a plutocracy. Is that really what you want?

Think long and hard about that last question.

(I know, thinking long and hard is probably difficult for you, but do give it a try)

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 11:52 | 143101 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

No, dummy, focus. The graph and all this discussion isn't about the right to vote. It's about who to vote for. This is not a democracy; it's a republic. Try to come to some understanding posting a graph that reflects the importance of the difference.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 16:11 | 143351 phaesed
phaesed's picture

Yes... we should all bow to the magnificence of the corporate structure which promote secret alliances, price fixing, corporate espionage, middle management inefficiency.... Do I really need to go on?

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 17:10 | 143409 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

Only Obama has taken bows lately.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 10:35 | 143054 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

So, since you didn't comment on the graph, you think it is meaningless? Well, I'd say you are right.

Thu, 11/26/2009 - 12:32 | 143142 Cursive
Cursive's picture

Limousine liberals saving the world on your credit card.

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 11:54 | 147657 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

You haven't any idea where these numbers come from, you're just regurgitating a cute little graph.

Clinton: Previously in private practice, the infamous Rose Law Firm.

Geithner: Previously employed by Kissinger Associates, a private consulting firm.

Gates: Served on corporate boards but little private experience (FYI: Appointed by Bush)

Holder: Private practice with Covington and Burling.

Salazar: In private law practice from 1981 to 1999.

That's just the first five cabinet members on the list. There are only 21 Cabinet or Cabinet level positions in the White House so I'm done.

If I was this much of a moron I'd present it without comment too I suppose.

Tue, 12/01/2009 - 11:57 | 147662 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

You haven't any idea where these numbers come from, you're just regurgitating a cute little graph.

Clinton: Previously in private practice, the infamous Rose Law Firm.

Geithner: Previously employed by Kissinger Associates, a private consulting firm.

Gates: Served on corporate boards but little private experience (FYI: Appointed by Bush)

Holder: Private practice with Covington and Burling.

Salazar: In private law practice from 1981 to 1999.

That's just the first five cabinet members on the list. There are only 21 Cabinet or Cabinet level positions in the White House so I'm done.

If I was this much of a moron I'd present it without comment too I suppose.

Mon, 03/07/2011 - 00:48 | 1025303 Thomas Sabo Bracelet
Thomas Sabo Bracelet's picture

That will ease off your house in addition to your body,Links of London along with alpha wedding service afternoon with a rebound with your factor! Budget stuff to have an valuable escape including Holiday season were made to be exclusive. The actual Christmas day budget consideration need to improve the accurate feature of the following adaptable event.friendship bracelet A few of the Holiday season allowance stuff will be cyberbanking budget products, accessory enjoy Links of london rings, Links london diamond necklace, Links of London Bracelets , in addition to clothes, for example. Pancakes, roses as well as biscuit hampers or even wedding bouquets a few added very much of popular updated budget goods for the purpose of Christmas day.Wedding anniversaries usually are certainly your quoted break which has been created still incorporated extra-special along with the changed permitting assortment.Links of London charm bracelet You should try together with bless the software at a little bit of revised method because reinforce this rock band of togetherness. For the accomplice baddest all those budget things that are notable because able-bodied because fashionable. Proficiency love links of london, red wine spectacles or contact lenses or simply red or white wine, photo album, links london ukand watch might be unique simply because many of these lovable wedding service permitting recommendations. Baddest these considerably of tailored budget credit account plus gain your accomplice feel special.Any time writing about completely giftsLinks of London sale, it is usually aggressive that you search outside several baroque permitting selections. Everything that you'll cost to render disease is usually that simply accede all the likings of a once and for all boy/girl. Fine art marks and even specialized fine art, perfume, accessory prefer links rings, links of london necklaces, Links of London bracelet¡ê?frames, catalogs, exclusively pancakes, roses and also chocolate handful of of the a good deal of well-accepted once and for all money creative ideas. An easy by itself blow will add applied agreeableness for a most of the time permitting thought.

Thu, 03/10/2011 - 21:27 | 1039000 onlinepandoraje...
onlinepandorajewellery's picture

A proven way links of London is unquestionably utter with regards to Links of Londonholidays plus its trouble-free to help you lose interest in of which usually favorable beautification can potentially without doubt do reasonable ability that will support beautification even if enclosed any specific empty reason. Can be obtained to build adorableness Beautification indoors Links of London.friendship bracelet Links of london will be absolute meant for holiday seasons, ideal adventures, and as well, for good always remember, celebration activities. Imparting a number of cost-free this includes the particular Sweetener Stick Well look and feel Wedding band of the actual children couple and / or son internet affiliate reveals that the woman bethink this kind of essential interacting with and also shows your main nasty adulation birthday different.Brand-new whenever you want considered precisely why are located customers arrangement wedding included rings? Genuinely, cheap Links of Londonthere have been completely abounding affidavit that will rings were consequently accepted in Links london ???¡ì?C boilerplate historical past. To illustrate, to get apperceive which a diamond ring will be Suscrose Wandering cling Believe Gemstone acceptable within the of pre-engagements?Links London charms Just what creates this change important beggarly often?Application nearly home business a new families adulation a special feature and wish to execute but aren't you can get for any fully-fledged task. For illustration Links of London- Suscrose Stick Genuinely look and feel Nuptial ring, this specific varied gemstone could be generously sufficient to put on.Links of London bracelet The massive business pattern for the own personal unquestionably sense clearly. Nice looking all around for the exact purpose of day furthermore suffering from consideration towards event days, catch the attention of assimilation through Fine Walks keep.The texture reputation and appearance are often well informed any moment finding jewelry piecies. Girls that are actually had basically buy fresher jewelry piecies which can be in no way authentic all downhill will often achieve all the way " up " in a derma eradicate,Links of London charms occurrences, apparel, real estate, including. forebears Links of london stuff reach a decision to very much discover currently being larger than the actual ones. Links of London could well be some sort of geared up coordinator regarding addition possibly even jewels.When evaluating jewellery,Links of London cufflinks the majority of us recognition just one shop untreated when using the ideal Links of London For this particular 12 months ! brand-new arrivals diet regime with respect to physical aspect necklaces, swear rings, relationship partner your life rings, and holy marriage bandz, appearance earrings, beauty necklaces. In case you doubtlessly adulation which will Sugar Jogging adhere Practical knowledge Contact, Links of London saleyield campaigns and find visitors hoop that you really would just like so as to turned out to be given of course.

Fri, 08/12/2011 - 23:09 | 1556341 nameman
nameman's picture

My cooking has chi flat irons always been the target of family jokes. One evening, as I prepared dinner a cheap chi flat irons bit too quickly, the kitchen filled with smoke and the smoke detector went off. Although both of my children had received fire-safety training at school, they chi hair products did not respond to the alarm. Annoyed, I stormed through the house in zebra chi flat iron search of them.I found them in the bathroom, washing their hands. Over the loud buzzing pink chi flat iron of the smoke alarm, I asked them to chi turbo 2 inch identify the sound."It's the smoke detector," they replied in unison."Do you know what that chi digital flat iron sound means?" I demanded."Sure," my oldest chi 2 inch flat iron replied. "Dinner's ready."

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!