Presenting The Key H2 Milestones To Observe As The Economy Begins Its Next Pre-Stimulus Contraction Cycle

Tyler Durden's picture

Goldman's Andrew Tilton has laid out a useful framework of the most relevant factors to keep an eye on as the double dip unfolds in its entirety. While Goldman's bias is traditionally bullish, we are confident that as more and more economic indicators surprise to the downside (and June so far has been an unmitigated disaster - we will post Goldman's macroeconomic "surprise" tracker as soon as the latest version is released - it will be a bloodbath), which will eventually pull H2 GDP far below the administration's expectations for a number well north of 2%, and even Goldman's more tame forecast of 1.5%. Our thesis from the beginning of the bear market rally has consistently been that both the economic "rebound" and the market surge have all been a dollar for dollar translation of fiscal and monetary largesse, which in turn is just borrowing from future growth, via assorted credit mechanisms and an adherence to a Keynesian philosophy that eventually growth pick up will be large enough to overtake the incremental debt funding costs. We know from Reinhart and Rogoff's studies that this is no longer the case when you get into stratospheric sovereign debt levels. And as this is a closed loop, there is no way to get out of this Keynesian toxic spiral without inflicting terminal damage on the economy - perhaps in September 2008 there may have been a different outcome, but now it is too late. Which is why anyone looking for any modest economic bounce will be satisfied for only a quarter or two, as yet another greater stimulus flows through the economy. However, with the marginal utility of any new debt at or below zero, even the government's fiscal stimulus is now becoming useless (even when assuming a perfectly efficient distribution system, which in this corrupt political environment is a stretch). Which only leaves monetary stimulus as the last bastion of the reflation attempt, and we are certain it will be abused over and over by Bernanke, as America slowly careens to the unwinding of the current iteration. Which is why fiat paper will become increasingly worthless, and tangible, undilutable assets: vice versa.

Macro convictions aside, below we present Tilton's checklist for the key items that none other than Ben Bernanke is looking at most intently. We suggest readers use this list not so much as a guideline of when the economy will rebound (never in its current form), but when Bernanke will finally decide to pull the trigger on another $2+ trillion QE episode. Once the negative surprises become sufficiently dramatic, he will have no other choice. And since Obama will be forced to blame the inability of this most recent reflation attempt to heal the economy precisely on the Fed head, the one good outcome from this event, would be the Chairman's (and soon thereafter, the Fed's) exit, stage left, from the US policymaking arena. Alas, it will be too late.

  • As the recovery approaches its second year, the jury is still out on its sustainability and strength. Our long-held view is that US economic growth should decelerate to about 1.5% in the second half of the year as short-term supports fade out.
  • Consumer spending will be even more important to economic growth in the second half than its 70% share of GDP suggests. The twin boosts of government stimulus spending and early-cycle inventory accumulation are fading. Residential investment appears likely to retrench temporarily over the next few months as the hangover from the homebuyer tax credit sets in. Business investment and net exports are likely to be only small positives.
  • Spending growth should slow in coming months if our gauge of ?household discretionary cash flow? (see chart below) is on the mark. Our forecasted deceleration of cash flow and consumer spending could be avoided if bank credit? which is still contracting at a gradual pace? begins to ease in the second half, and/or if employment growth in the private sector accelerates beyond the 100,000-150,000 per month that we expect. Of course, deterioration in either of these areas would likely portend a sharper slowdown.
  • Revisions to first-quarter GDP growth revealed a slower pace of consumer spending and more inventory accumulation, with final demand rising at less than a 1% rate. Housing activity slumped following the end-April expiration of the homebuyer tax credit, with new home sales at an alltime low in May. Unsurprisingly, the latest FOMC statement took a more cautious line on growth and reiterated that rates would stay ?exceptionally low? for an ?extended period.?

As the recovery approaches its second year, the jury is still out on its sustainability and strength. Our long-held view is that US economic growth should decelerate to about 1.5% in the second half of the year as the tailwinds from government stimulus and the early-cycle swing to inventory accumulation peter out.  We recently laid out a “road map” for major economic indicators in the second half that will help our clients assess whether this forecast remains on track.  But which factors are most likely to determine the verdict?

Consumers Remain the Key

Anyone who attended an economics class will remember the standard GDP accounting identity Y = C + I + G + NX.  Since consumer spending, C, is 70% of overall GDP, it’s obviously an important part of the outlook at all times.  But this is particularly true if we take a quick spin through the other components (splitting I—investment—into its residential, business fixed, and inventory components):

Residential investment has slumped after the expiry of the homebuyer tax credit
at the end of April.  New home sales fell by roughly one-third in May, more than reversing the entire acceleration in prior months; permits for new construction are down 15% over the past two months.  Some of this is a short-term hangover, but we think it illustrates that the housing sector has a long and probably slow path back to normalcy.  At only 2½% of GDP, it would need to show very strong growth indeed to move the needle on the overall economy.

Business fixed investment is on a modest growth track, averaging a bit over a 4% annualized pace in the past two quarters, with a modest contribution of 30 basis points to Q1 GDP growth.  This masks a sharp divergence between rapidly growing outlays for equipment and rapidly declining structures activity.

Inventory investment added an average of two points to GDP growth in recent quarters
, as companies ramped up production sharply after a period of inventory liquidation.  But with inventories clearly growing now, this phase is nearly over.

Government spending on stimulus outlays is likely to peak soon as elements of the stimulus package term out. Alongside a likely increase in taxes in 2011, fiscal stimulus is turning from a strong positive to a clear negative going forward (see Exhibit 1, which also shows the contribution of inventories).

Net exports are likely to be an eventual boost as the BRICs and other key fast-growing markets increase their share of the global economy.  But this is a gradual process and in the near term, a strengthening dollar and hints of decelerating global activity suggest only a limited contribution to US growth.

In short, although business investment and net exports may provide some help, the 2% growth in real consumer spending that we forecast for the second half will account for nearly all of the growth in the overall economy.  Thus, gauging any shift in its pace will be critical.

As Goes Cash Flow, So Goes Spending?

One altimeter for the direction of spending is our proprietary measure of the cash flow available to the household sector.  We calculate “discretionary cash flow” as follows: beginning with after-tax household income, we adjust for noncash items, add net growth in consumer credit (including home equity), and subtract spending on essentials like food and gasoline.  We then project this series forward based on known policy changes as well as forecasts for specific components.  A nontrivial portion of households appear to spend essentially all of their cash flow, so this simple approach has proved a useful guide to broad shifts in spending in the past.

Our estimate for cash flow, including projections through next year, is graphed on the top chart on the previous page (along with the actual and forecasted path of real spending growth).  Cash flow growth should decelerate modestly in the second half of the year because of a) the fading boost from tax refunds associated with the Making Work Pay credit, b) a softer tailwind from credit normalization, c) a bit more drag from nondiscretionary spending, including expected increases in oil prices, and d) temporarily slower income growth as short-term Census jobs end.

The most likely candidates for a “surprise” to this path—in either direction—are credit and the labor market.  Every 1% increase in consumer credit boosts discretionary cash flow by about 1/3 percentage point.  Every 1% increase in employment growth (a little more than 100,000 jobs per month) adds about ¾ percentage point to household cash flow. Of course, other factors such as oil prices could materially affect cash flow as well, but it would be difficult for real spending growth (and overall GDP growth) to deviate sharply from our forecast without a significant change to credit conditions and/or employment growth.

Still Waiting for a Revival of Bank Lending

The availability of credit to households and businesses is critical for the second-half economic outlook. Beyond its impact on consumer spending, a return to more normal bank lending conditions would also enable investment and hiring by businesses too small to access the credit markets; survey evidence continues to suggest that this is a meaningful constraint on growth for at least some firms.  Conversely, a renewed tightening would put the brakes on growth at a critical time.

Probably the best measure of bank lending standards over time is the Fed’s Senior Loan Officer Survey.  Unfortunately, it is updated only four times per year, so in the interim we must rely on indirect evidence such as lending volumes (which mix drawdowns on old commitments with new lending), bank funding costs, and anecdotal commentary from bank managements.  Exhibit 2 illustrates that the modest rise in bank funding costs over the past couple of months pales in comparison with the financial crisis, and still looks consistent with stable (if not improving) willingness to lend.

Private-Sector Payroll Expansion to Continue

Easier credit could boost both hiring and spending, thereby revving up the so-called economic “multiplier,” the virtuous recycling of business revenues into increased employment and wages, and ultimately more spending.  With temporary supports for income fading, private-sector employment growth is now as important as spending itself.

The news here has been mixed.  Employment is clearly growing again, with private-sector employment up about 100,000 per month on average so far in 2010 (and the admittedly volatile household survey showing a far stronger 374,000).  However, new jobless claims remain relatively high, and the total number of people reliant on benefits seems to be trending down only gradually (see chart).   Growth in job advertising has slowed after a sharp acceleration in late 2009.


We are cautiously optimistic that June’s payroll report will show a pickup in private-sector payroll growth to around 150,000.  In part, this is because there seems to be some “crowding out” of private sector payroll growth by short-term Census hiring—indeed, this may explain a good part of the payroll disappointment last month.  Total payrolls should be down about 100,000 in June as a large portion of Census employment rolls off.  Softer employment should be reflected in the household survey as well, pushing the unemployment rate back up to 9.8%.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
huckman's picture

Finally able to browse the zh website again.  Hopefully the kinks are worked out. 

boooyaaaah's picture

ZH says in the above introduction

"Our thesis from the beginning"

And then proceeds to wise crack meaningless wise cracks

ZH thesis from the begining was pump gold pump inflation ---- and now that this may not be in the cards the ZH thesis is changinging

Which is not a bad thing

All we need is a little truthfullness we can get SPIN anyplace

Watch Beck for some insight before you revise your thesis from the beginning all over again

 

InconvenientCounterParty's picture

Calling BS

You should read the article again and pull yourself away from little Goebels. If you think that propaganda is truth, maybe you're drunk on your own biases?

cheers

MichiganMilitiaMan's picture

Are you a Beck Fan?  The last I checked he was humping gold as well.  I guess what is one person's spin is another person's insight and visa versa.

hp12c's picture
  • Consumer spending will be even more important to economic growth

Ha... ha..Good luck with that.  With the largest increase in tax rates in a generation about to hit, combined with likely property tax increases due to the State budgetary woes. add to that 0% wage growth to those who still have jobs (and the 22% that don't, well...)

.. where in the fuck is the consumer going to get $$ to spend...

ISEEIT's picture

Maybe he/she is going to borrow the money from a previous life? He/She has already hit up the next life and the answer was (as rumored)," We're broke to , thanks to you!!"

boooyaaaah's picture

Good point ---- and as Mr Obama has noted Electricty prices will skyrocket with cap and trade

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTxGHn4sH4

 

 

SayTabserb's picture

The problem in this country remains unemployment. The rest is just persiflage, and uninteresting persiflage at that. "Inventories," "consumer spending," all these leading indicators to job growth - until we see actual job growth, it's all meaningless. A month of Bideneque true growth, on the order of 350,000 jobs added, net of "birth/death," net of Census or govt hiring, net of everything but reality. Then I would believe, a little. Until then, it's sound and fury signifying nothing, and the Obama Admin is getting precisely nowhere.

boooyaaaah's picture

I know --- we will hire, with taxpayers oney, 10,000 people to dig postholes, and then 10,000 people to fill them in

and we will have created 20,000 new jobs that can be repeated over and over again

PS I want to be a post hole filler --- muche easier more time fo comentary

DavidC's picture

Persiflage - what a lovely word!

And so descriptive of Mr Tilton's piece.

DavidC

lawton's picture

Q2's GDP will barely be 1% (final number) and Q3 will be about (-1.5% at least final number but look for the initial release before elections to be just barely over 0) - the double dip is here and the supply side will confirm it officially in Q3....

Mitchman's picture

The canard of "tighter bank lending standards" once again is a blind here.  There is no borrowing because there is no credit demand.  Not only are corporates not issuing despite low "absolute" interest rates (after all, they are priced at a spread to Treasuries) bit small businesses are not borrowing because they have no reason to borrow.

Small businesses do not need to build inventories for sales that they do not have.  They do not need to expand their stores for goods that they cannot sell.  They do not need to hire sales staff for customers that do not exist.  There is no demand for business credit.  All this talk about lending standards is a bunch of hooey.

duo's picture

Instead, we have to threaten 5-10% pay cuts to our employees to allow them to keep their group health insurance.

Deflation to everyone except the medical-industrial-complex.

Invisible Hand's picture

I think one huge source of consumer cash (that may be about to dry up ) is being ignored in this article.

The number of households that have not paid a penny for housing for months is huge.  That money is being spent on other things, not saved.

I believe I read just this week that 5.3 million households are more than 2 months behind on the mortgage.  With the end of the foreclosure "moratorium" these people with have to pay something for a place to live and therefore will be able to consume less.

This is real money that is going into consumer purchases but is destroying bank reserves further limiting future lending.

The second half will probably not be pretty.

A Man without Qualities's picture

So basically, unless the government gives everyone a bank card with $10,000 on it, which can only be spent shopping for consumer durables and has a time limit of six months, we're going down and we're going down hard... 

Breaker's picture

Paying $10,000 on every mortgage and requiring a proportional reduction in payments would accomplish more. At least if we are going to increase gvt debt, we can reduce debt somewhere else.

bugs_'s picture

Its not a contraction its a bowel movement.

Coast Watcher's picture

The comment about the "slowly dwindling pool of jobless benefit recipients" shows a level of inanity that is simply breathtaking. The pool is dwindling not because people are finding jobs but because their benefits have run out and they've rolled off the end of the gravy train. Whatever this guy is smoking, they should be handing it out for free with every unemployment check.

pip's picture

When templatemonster.com gets down to 9 new templates a day, that's where they were during the height of the pre-stimulus financial crisis.

BurningFuld's picture

When Q3 GDP comes in at -2% "Shock and Awe" will take on a whole new meaning. QE redux approaches.

Got Gold?

ViewfromUndertheBridge's picture

umm....if you (the writer) really want to help, how about marking your assets to market so we can discover prices generally and then, maybe, we might borrrow to re-start the whole machine...you first.

ATG's picture

Re "Our thesis from the beginning of the bear market rally has consistently been that both the economic "rebound" and the market surge have all been a dollar for dollar translation of fiscal and monetary largesse," snip

Not quite so sure they have been dollar for dollar.

On the monetary side, the money-multiplier was most recently 83.8%, meaning 16.2 cents of slippage for every dollar of monetary base to M1, with the no-longer officially tracked M3 somewhere south of -7% the last three months and the adjusted monetary base slowing at a -91% rate (second derivative).

Rumour of BSB doubling the monetary base again to $5 Trillion to avert a double dip may be just that - rumour. Little way bond vigilantes like PIMCO may not sell bonds down and drive interest rates up to reflect increased risks of sovereign insolvency. Already ourt Big4 indicators find the Five-Year T Note yield itching to rise.

On the fiscal side, DC is renowned for administrative haircuts of 50% or more on revenues received. As of the last two years, tax revenues fell more than -30% a year.

What with HUD losing $59 Billion for off budget black ops and Social (in)Security Trust raided and all, that would seem to be a declining market too, particularly when taxes are raised.

After all, 0 admitted they were out of money, hence the urgent passage of more taxes disguised as healthcare and cap and trade.

Not having studied business or economics like Reagan, WH or W, nor having an opposition party, 0 and his porcine financial advisers seem to have little appreciation for either the Laffer Curve, or what JFK, admitted to the London School of Economics, knew from the classic economics of Adam Smith, a customs officer, and Ricardo, a trader, that cutting taxes increases revenues, and raising them reduces revenues.

We could all welcome the new austerity, AKA Irving Fisher's Permanent Plateau of Prosperity repentant debt deflation, were it not for a total necessary reconstruction of the failing Fed and Treasury dollar debt deficit pyramid usury system that will return us to a scarce barter, cash or gold economy, two of three things most people lack.

We see more asset debt deflation in the future, including gold as well as houses and stocks, which makes dollars and solvent bonds more, not less valuable, no matter how many portfolio managers are trading the inflation war of the last four generations of Jubilee Prosperity.

Congrats on improving the functionality of ZH. Still think it might be beneficial for the community to see who is handing out all those Junks (and why)...

overmedicatedundersexed's picture

"Still think it might be beneficial for the "community to see who is handing out all those Junks (and why)..."

it seems to my lowly self that most of the junks given out have reasons that are self evident..

The number of junks here on ZH is quite low vs the very numbskull posts that are sometimes  junked here.

junker or junkee of course they see it differently - if the why is not obvious to you perhaps ZH is a bit above your level.

do not take offense and don't junk me bro!!