The Problem With Competing Views….

Tyler Durden's picture




 
0
Your rating: None
 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:44 | 71549 NoBull1994
NoBull1994's picture

My view is that Bob Pisani is a complete homo and that Maria Bartiromo has had one too many liquor drinks and/or cigarettes in her career.  Any competing views?

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:26 | 71624 E Thomas St.
E Thomas St.'s picture

It's insulting to group Pisani with gay people. Gay people are way less harmful than Bob.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 16:52 | 71574 Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

My view is that if you pull back really hard on the yoke with a  low powered airplane you'll go up really really fast and then stall. If you just wait for everyone to die off that remembers this you can load the plane up with people who will go weee!! Everytime.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 20:53 | 71839 Stink_Pickle
Stink_Pickle's picture

Close--if you pull back really hard on the yoke then your wings will stall, but you will not go up at all.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:02 | 71592 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

but , what about the chinese put?????

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:14 | 71606 AR
AR's picture

The above chart (entitled: Global Liquidity) does pose an interesting correlation between global liquidity and the dollar's rate of change.  Does anyone else have an opinion or experience with this? The recent "carry trade" (selling of dollars and long almost every other asset class) has profound unwind implications if the dollar reverses -- a trade which absolutely no one expects to occur.  The trade that would hurt the most investors, would be the bearish dollar "unwinding."  And...the Fed or Treasury could orchestrate a swift dollar reversal like that with one simple overnight comment (like, "...we think the dollar is to low and with our counter parties will begin supporting it..."). 

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:17 | 71607 . . .
. . .'s picture

If the Fed is sitting on foreign currency, and pulled its swap lines with foreign central banks, that might support the dollar.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:22 | 71617 KeyserSöze
KeyserSöze's picture

swap lines put in place in Feb of this year expire Oct 31st...

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:23 | 71620 . . .
. . .'s picture

The swap lines can convert to loans after Oct 31st.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:18 | 71610 nightfly
Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:21 | 71616 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

The party's over at Dow 10000 pass it on.
The party's over at Dow 11000 pass it on.
The party's over at Dow 12000 pass it on.
The party's over at Dow
The party's over.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 20:33 | 71826 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

let's dance now

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:22 | 71618 Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Have you ever noticed how docilely we accept any and every "data"/chart that happens upon the web; especially those that have some kind of official/government stamp on them. Seriously guys - you may think I am paranoid, but Fed providing the monetary base/money supply data is like the fox guarding the henhouse. Unless there is a complete audit of the Fed I really cannot be sure that anything they say is true.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 18:06 | 71669 reading
reading's picture

No offense, but we don't "think" you're paranoid...we know you are!  However, it appears your paranoia might be well warranted at this point.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 18:54 | 71740 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

But, is "well-warranted paranoia" an oxymoron?

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 23:53 | 72013 defender
defender's picture

"Just because you are paranoid doesn't mean that they aren't out to get you"

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 20:55 | 71844 Stink_Pickle
Stink_Pickle's picture

GG--I agree.  How about some financial math?

Ben Bernanke = John Law

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:29 | 71629 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

pretcher says we are at multi-year lows for the dollar. 'nuff said.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 17:51 | 71656 TwoJacks
TwoJacks's picture

...and when Prechter points out a multi-year low, you can bet your ass it's going lower

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 18:36 | 71711 logistics (not verified)
logistics's picture

Second. Although I've emailed those brainless morans (CA) about this several times and have a growing number of form emails in my inbox. Your message is much less profane than mine

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 18:51 | 71736 putbuyer
putbuyer's picture

"fear and confusion driven melt up"

This says it all. What an extraordinary statement.

They will crack up, then they will crack down.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 20:39 | 71833 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

ya mon

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 18:59 | 71749 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

would be great if someone could establish a
fund where you click and donate, and have a web counter thing that rings up the amounts as it grows and have it go viral across the bloggisphere/internet, with it's mission openly designed to donate to anyone running against those senators that do not join the 1207 effort. Have it linked to all the important bloggers, talk radio, Beck etc.. let the senators sweat it out as they see the amount grow larger and larger. Like a giant Jerry Lewis telephone except this time we are collectively trying to save our country.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 20:38 | 71832 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

divide it up equally for every single opponent who gets on the ballot and we're in.

would be a nice experiment in the public financing of campaigns.

ring me up Jerry!

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 19:43 | 71788 Humble Gentleman
Humble Gentleman's picture

They can compete all they want -- it is almost certain this isn't going to end well, for anybody.

Wed, 09/16/2009 - 23:04 | 71963 crzyhun
crzyhun's picture

Late to the thread....so, the IMF how much are they to be trusted with data. Second, what is the definition of 'global liquidity?' Third, good thought provoking chart, but there are points where there just wasn't great correlation. Finally, even if 1omm people were bearish on the dollar, and CB were not, who wins? CB and their ilk have this in their hands. We watch and wait..... 

Fri, 09/18/2009 - 01:45 | 73155 Anonymous
Anonymous's picture

re:"S&P 20% above 200 sma; first time since 5-1983"

True, but 5-1983 was an excellent time to buy stocks.

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!