This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

QE 2 Was A Disaster: Here Is Why US Fiscal "Stimulus" Was A Complete Failure As Well

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Two and a half years ago, Christina Romer, then still employed by the Obama administration in the position of Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers penned "The Job Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan" - a report predicting the impact of a fiscal "stimulus" that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money...somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made legendary for its complete failure to predict the future, it sure did not go into creating jobs. Below we present the original chart that made the January 10, 2009 presentation, and superimpose upon it the reality of the past two and a half years. It is simply stunning. And while we are here, and discussing the abysmal failure of QE2 (the impending arrival of QE3 notwithstanding), it is amusing to hear the whimpering of the likes of one Richard Koo, who is now claiming that all along the money from the Fed's monetary stimulus should have been invested in the form of a fiscal one. Well, Dick, below is the impact of your fiscal stimulus....AND it also includes the impact of $2 trillion in incremental monetary stimulus. Combined, both fiscal and monetary stimulus has now missed the worst case projection for US unemployment for 30 months running. Here is the simple truth: both monetary and fiscal stimuli are abysmal failures, when the economy is mean reverting to a state where it was hijacked from courtesy of 30 years of "great moderation" - and there is nothing that can be done to stop it. Correction: there is one thing - the Fed can destroy the dollar in its attempt to disprove simple physics. And, ultimately, it will.

From the original ARRA proposal:

And the outcome:

Nuff said.

h/t Mike

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:12 | 1349236 Clowns on Acid
Clowns on Acid's picture

BobbyRib - The decision for a business invest is not ONLY based upon the level of nominal interest rates, which you use as the basis of your opinion.

Real interest rates (nominal rates - inflation rate) allows businesses the confidence to know that rates will be stable, the USD stable to stronger (lower costs for imported inputs, and lower commodity costs).

Positive real interest rates also do give people the option to save or spend...within their means.  

Yes, presently a real interest rate policy would force the hand of those who have spent beyond their means. Housing would find a bottom a lot quicker, than this long (3 year!!) drawn out process. The economy would find a bottom within a year, and grow responsibly from there.

There is "growth" but then there is real growth, which is much more healthy for the socio-economic condition of the US.

A positive real interest rate policy would also prevent politicians from their profligate spending, because if they spent too much (increased money supply) interest rates would HAVE to go up! They could not win re-election if their spending policies caused interest rates to go up.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 22:59 | 1349529 Bobbyrib
Bobbyrib's picture

If the dollar strengthened, our exports would be less competitive on the open market. I'm not endorsing the Fed's unofficial policy of weakening the dollar, but I do think it does help our exports somewhat. A strenthening dollar would hurt multi-national corporations in their new markets (developing nations) by making our goods "more expensive." While I don't measure our country's success by how good multi-national corporations' earnings are (the way some people do), they do seem to help add jobs for small businesses.

Bernank said the interest rates would remain low for a while (stable), but it doesn't seem to help the economy. The only reason I would not spend interest earned from my DDA's is that I believe the economy will be shitty for a long time no matter what our politicians think of.

I do agree that the quicker the economy bottomed, the better off the country would be.

Eventually as many people have noted on this site interest rates on our debt will rise and it will be the dollar end game (it's far too late to reverse this trend).

I think we are going to have to agree to disagree. As I said I think the economy will be shit no matter what the Fed or our politicians do. It's up to us to get corporations to bring the jobs back to the US. They enjoyed their record earnings, but now the party is over and their earnings (maybe dollars but not purchasing power) will never look anything close to that again. Eventually I do think raising interest rates is beneficial to the economy, it just wouldn't be good for our current ailments, IMHO.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 09:23 | 1350384 RKDS
RKDS's picture

I don't fucking care about what we do or don't export - products available on the local markets are all that matter.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 05:41 | 1349947 knowless
knowless's picture

sorry dude, but there's nothing american to buy on the comsumer end. the resource allocation centers (walmart, home depot, etc.), don't have american products.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 06:36 | 1349986 Bobbyrib
Bobbyrib's picture

There are American products to buy, you just have to look for them. I don't shop at Wal-Mart for that exact reason. Wal-Mart destroys American manufacturing jobs, but creates minimum wage greeter jobs.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 09:11 | 1350326 knowless
knowless's picture

find me an american made electric angle grinder.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 09:30 | 1350409 RKDS
RKDS's picture

You just have to go on the internet.

Pro:  use less gas bought from durkadurkas

Pro:  less exposure to "people of Walmart"

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 20:52 | 1349174 mynhair
mynhair's picture

I refuse to chase USDHUF.  There is always tomorrow.  Maybe.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 20:53 | 1349183 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

What about USDCAD?

:-)

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:00 | 1349197 mynhair
mynhair's picture

Sorry, don't do the majors.  Too prone to mischief, which gives time to exit the minors.

 

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:06 | 1349206 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

Hungarian GDP on Thursday... expectation 2.4% up from 1.9% yoy

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:04 | 1349216 mynhair
mynhair's picture

Best canned bacon out there, though Poland is creeping up in quality.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:09 | 1349220 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

Shelf life?

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:13 | 1349230 mynhair
mynhair's picture

10 years.  Sure miss their brass based 130V light bulbs, tho.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:53 | 1349371 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

 Pulled the chart. Watch eur/chf and trade the opposite.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:15 | 1349235 gwar5
gwar5's picture

Check this out: 

Put the image of the last chart on your handheld device and stare at it while it spins backwards (counterclockwise) on the table top. You can see Benzebub.  

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 20:53 | 1349186 mynhair
mynhair's picture

Bull Conner riot is called the first political riot.  About race.  Conner was a 'D'.  All Jim Crow laws were passed by D's to keep guns outta the hands of Darkies.  Go Libs!

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 20:57 | 1349195 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

That's a riot!

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:03 | 1349205 Bobbyrib
Bobbyrib's picture

The people who passed those laws were Conservative Democrats not liberals. I have something "interesting" (offensive most likely) to say about the section of the country that enacted those laws, so don't get me started..

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:08 | 1349227 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

go for it ... we could use a little excitement right now ...

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:11 | 1349232 Bobbyrib
Bobbyrib's picture

I would rather not get chased off this site (basically abused to the point I can't post)...

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:19 | 1349257 mynhair
mynhair's picture

BS, this ain't MW.  Me as an example.  22 bounces off that scumbag site.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:27 | 1349271 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

22?

LOL

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:37 | 1349306 mynhair
mynhair's picture

You disbelieve?  Go there and say I wish them well.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:56 | 1349370 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

No... I believe you ... you're just a persistant MF!

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 23:11 | 1349558 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

 Robert, what is your trade?

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:13 | 1349240 mynhair
mynhair's picture

Bobby, go ahead and get started.  Tell us how those racist "Libs' weren't racist or Libs?  Please include Bobby Byrd in your 'excuse'.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:15 | 1349243 Clowns on Acid
Clowns on Acid's picture

BobbyRib...hehe go for it.

Again...a positive, real interest rate policy would prevent these political elite fecksticks from passing these spending / wealth transfer policies.

  

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:24 | 1349261 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

Bobby ... I got your back ...  Unleash!!!

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:24 | 1349264 Clowns on Acid
Clowns on Acid's picture

Perhaps...just perhaps.. Unca Ben's report today (no early QE3) has been scripted to force Congress to get serious about cutting the Fed budget deficit?

If so, ES will plummet tomorrow (maybe tonight) and get the attention of the cowards collecting large checks (y'know including their insider trading profits in their "blind" trusts) in Congress.

 

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:31 | 1349274 mynhair
mynhair's picture

Shhhh!  Sei ruhig!  Tough the Tea Party cares less.

Re-Elect Oblahma!  Vote Ron Paul!

Me, I'll take the orange juice can.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:32 | 1349294 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

Not to worry ... we got another genius coming:

"I saw my father march with Martin Luther King."

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:41 | 1349309 mynhair
mynhair's picture

Sharpton knows who his father is?

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:54 | 1349362 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

Nope ... he's a genealogical dilemma!

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 06:35 | 1349985 wackyquacker
wackyquacker's picture

Ha!

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:30 | 1349277 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

Well... he did say that he did not want to do any more QE .... but the he added that, in the event politicians would not act, he was gonna be there for us ....

You call it blackmail, I call it patriotism!!!

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:33 | 1349285 mynhair
mynhair's picture

2 TBT, or not 2 TBT?  That is the question.

Your Libs are melting down.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:54 | 1349373 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

I'll back that statement!

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:28 | 1349280 Reptil
Reptil's picture

what I don't get is

a. why there's such a smell of surprise in the air? (this is ZH isn't it? we've seen little snippets of info coming in, smart people everywhere knew there was a fan, and shit)

b. who knew this money wasn't put to good use? where's the money now? someone had been keeping track of it yeah?

 

A pivotal moment isn't it? In europe as well.

I can't stop thinking, if the USA accepts the mistake of QE2 (the disappearance of all that wealth, meant to save a failing system), if europe accepts the banks as their masters (same deal), what is everyone supposed to do? They're not "benevolent masters" are they?

What did they think? That we wouldn't notice? That Joe Sixpack or Georgos Rastapapotolos (or who ever) didn't notice his house was taken from him, or his orchard? No one would notice that everything would turn to shit slowly? What a disastrous plan, this heist. What a complete waste of planetary resources. Idiots! Why couldn't they just steal a little? Why everything? A successful parasite doesn't kill the host. I don't get it.

:-S

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:33 | 1349295 mynhair
mynhair's picture

WTF?  (Weinering The Future)

Do YOU read ZH?  We knew it was pissed away.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 04:32 | 1349886 Reptil
Reptil's picture

all of it. even your posts ;-)

xoxox

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:37 | 1349287 Fiat Money
Fiat Money's picture

"Two and a half years ago, Christina Romer, then still employed by the Obama administration in the position of Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers penned "The Job Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan" - a report predicting the impact of a fiscal "stimulus" that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money...somewhere.

We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made legendary for its complete failure to predict the future, it sure did not go into creating jobs."  

Excellent comment, TD!  BUT... no need to be coy about "where the money went."  WE KNOW where it went: into the pockets, bank vaults, and offshore accounts of   RAHM EMANUEL, Larry Summers, Jared Bernstein, Gary Gensler, Mary Schapiro, Peter Orszag (bob rubin toadies all)  (et al) pals on Wall Street, City-of-London, & Tel Aviv.

  Which brings us to THE CURE for this economic nightmare: CUT OUT the EXTORTIONATE "financial geniuses" MIDDLE MEN!  The KEY to winning WWII, was to keep FINANCE COSTS DOWN to the absolute minimum (along with HIGH WAGE union scale jobs, which ALLOWED workers to buy war bonds; and HIGH MARGINAL TAX RATES at the top end - near 90%!!)     

EVEN THE FED  was productive & constructive during the WWII years - they (the Morganthau, Bernard Barch, Goldman,Sachs, Lehman, Solomon Bros, et al bunch)  realized the cost of failure! 

  It IS possible to restructure a PRODUCTIVE, more democratic economy;   we just have to reign in all the Fed/gs/jpm/r's lackeys first.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:39 | 1349302 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

 I'm working a (h5) dxy chart and it looks really heavy! The hourly looks very short term up and then a TANK.  The 10 can't even cross the 20 on short term charts! Yen

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:46 | 1349321 mynhair
mynhair's picture

Charting is, like, BS.  Contrary to popular belief. even Fx is rigged.

The trick is to find where the rig is.

Lookie that $ climb in the face of bankruptcy!

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 22:00 | 1349381 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

 Mynhair I read charts all day long. It's not rigged.  I'm up 400k in one of my fx accounts ytd. You have to manage margins and understand  macro/micro moves. It's not a part time job.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 22:05 | 1349404 mynhair
mynhair's picture

I don't do jobs.  Major kudos, tho, I've only done 22% on my half assed system.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 22:10 | 1349416 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

 Nice work as well!

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:42 | 1349328 tony bonn
tony bonn's picture

"both monetary and fiscal stimuli are abysmal failures"

and we can generalize those statements axiomatically. centrally planned monetary and fiscal programs create the very problems which they claim to solve. it is recursive fucktardedness...

the austrian perspective of economic depressions as a means of clearing bad investment is the correct one. until the crap is cleared from the system, the system will stagger and eventually collapse into perpetual stagnation and shrinkage as in japan....

however, the monetary and fiscal policy would be constrained if fractional banking were outlawed and if currency were redeemable for money.

we have the added burden of a debt based money system. it is a cancer on the people.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:54 | 1349357 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

And how would the Austrian theory work on bad investments re-packaged and diluted to unaware investors ... who would pay the price then?

Sorry ... I call the Austrian BS in this case!

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 22:17 | 1349429 Clowns on Acid
Clowns on Acid's picture

Idio - under the Austrian school that is called fraud...and the perps woukld go to jail. It's a great system.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 22:30 | 1349477 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

Granted that it is a system that sounds good ... however a system based on human behavior?!? ...

Isn't that the problem to begin with?

Homo homini lupus!!

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 04:38 | 1349892 css1971
css1971's picture

Personal responsibility.

 

Can't work in America though, which is ironic. People don't seem to understand that responsibility and freedom are the same thing. You cannot have one without the other.

 

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 06:14 | 1349973 knowless
knowless's picture

++good.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 21:50 | 1349360 mynhair
mynhair's picture

Lib view:  tax every breath they take (cue the Police)

Conservative view:  Debirth the Libs so we can breath free

If you don't get it, vote Weiner

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 22:00 | 1349380 IdioTsincracY
IdioTsincracY's picture

Thanks for the laugh!!

We should go back to the good old times ...

The tax mechanisms used during first 150 years or so of U.S. tax history bears little resemblance to the current system of taxation. First, the U.S. Constitution restricted “direct” taxation by the federal government – meaning taxes directly on individuals. Instead, the federal government relied on indirect taxes including taxes on imports (tariffs) and excise taxes. Tariffs were the major source of U.S. government receipts from the beginning of the nation up to the early 1900s. For example, in 1800, custom duties comprised about 84% of government receipts. Internal federal revenue collections (which exclude tariffs on imports) as recently as the early 20th century were primarily derived from excise taxes on alcohol. In 1900 over 60% of internal revenue collections came from alcohol excise taxes with another 20% from tobacco excise taxes.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 22:44 | 1349502 bigdawg
bigdawg's picture

Romer's from UC Berkeley, if I remember correctly.  Well, what do you expect?  Shit, she's probably the one who sold the SAC trader the shrooms.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/what-gets-sac-portfolio-manager-13-mm-lots-insider-trading-and-running-around-naked-while-hi

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 22:55 | 1349528 gwar5
gwar5's picture

The next time somebody tells me to trust government central planning I'll show them that chart.  

Orzag, Romer, Summers, Goolsby.....  All wrong. All gone. All discredited. All things are now much worse than before.

Luckily, we still have the cheerful hobbit Krugman, at the NYT, to laugh at. He said we just didn't do enough stimulus. Guess that's why everybody else had to leave in disgrace --  if only they had spent twice as much like he wanted.    

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 22:59 | 1349530 mt paul
mt paul's picture

QE3

another economic

fiat enema ....

 

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 23:09 | 1349551 PulauHantu29
PulauHantu29's picture

Ouch!

That being said, I did read in Reuters that Wall Street handed out record high bonuses for both 2009 and 2010...if that's at all relevant.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 23:35 | 1349601 SirIssacNewton
SirIssacNewton's picture

The real unemployment numbers on that chart should really read closer to 15 - 20%, but to admit that would truly expose the failure of QE2.  Of course, the intention of the QE program was never about employment and only about saving Wall Street....and QE3 will be the same.  This type of action will continue....until it can't.

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 23:48 | 1349618 Monedas
Monedas's picture

QE3 a la Monedas ! Print up about 3/4 of a trillion FRNs......make it a trillion, WTF ! Identify the 10.000 most successful businesses in the country using IRS data ! Easy enough ! These are the leaders, the innovators, the job creators, the cutting edge of a forward looking economy ! Divide the trillion dollars between them in strict proportion to their profitability ! Tell them to go for it and do more of whatever they are doing right ! Promise them if they perform well they will receive simular stimulus each year in proportion to their success ! Tell them the program will last at least 20 years and maybe forever ! .............. Monedas 2011 It's called a permanent TAX CUT ! http://trololololololololololo.com/

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 23:51 | 1349631 cranky-old-geezer
cranky-old-geezer's picture

QE 2 Was A Disaster

No, actually it was a complete success ...once you understand the real purpose, transfering more wealth from the American people to the government ...and Wall Street of course.

 

Tue, 06/07/2011 - 23:57 | 1349637 Soul Train
Soul Train's picture

in general I would like to share some comments that are unrelated to moving averages etc., about the US stock market:::  it is headed down. Simple reasons: it's the end of the cycle - global and US-  and those who have been inclined to purchase and hold have for the most part already done it. The amount of new capital to keep it at these levels is soon to be rapidly declining. The greater fool theory is in intact.

And the game is now essentially over - musical chairs has just begun.

 

 

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 06:16 | 1349977 knowless
knowless's picture

the problem i have with spiritualists, is that they believe that there are natural laws which are immutable, and yet they refute reality.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 06:55 | 1349997 topcallingtroll
topcallingtroll's picture

Kondratiev winters cannot be stopped. They are also very cold.

Even if we know we need stimulatory countercyclical spending we cant stop the inevitable, because our priorities change at times like these and irrational debt acquisition turns into irrational debt revulsion.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 00:35 | 1349698 Fiat Money
Fiat Money's picture

this is not rocket science...

That "STIMULUS has been A FAILURE"   is simplicity itself.

 the BAIT & SWITCH swindlers from GoddamnSachs (and closely related NY, DC, appartchick swindlers)  who INFEST the obama administration,  http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/US-Israel/obamajews.html   have  SWINDLED  money publicly committed to "STIMULUS"  (actual ground-breaking, shovel moving, sweat producing, jobs & paychecks creating business contracts) and  JUST ADDED those "stimulus" dollars to the GREAT HEAPING PILE of money they have already stolen http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aY0tX8UysIaM   as "Bailouts," "liquidity injections,"  http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a9MTZEgukPLY   "Quantitative easings," "Loan quarantees,"  "backstops,"  Fannie & Freddie paying TOP DOLLAR for pure s*** Wall St "securities"  etc. etc. etc. etc. etc.

 HAD that money been spent on REAL JOBS CREATING contracts, and HAD  obama's INSANELY CORRUPT & DERELICT REGULATORS been doing their jobs these past 2 1/2 years (holder, gensler, shapiro...)   we WOULD HAVE HAD SOME GENUINE  economic activity/recovery by now.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 01:01 | 1349713 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

No, we would have had another economic bubble in whatever 'shovel-moving' industry the central planners decided in their infinite wisdom to stimulate.
The government creates malinvestment when it intervenes fiscally, same way the Fed does when it intervenes monetarily. Both are just moral hazards, imposed on the economy with no responsibility to be efficient or effective, because they operate without fear of failure. Most here agree that "TBTF"s are bad news...well the government and the Federal Reserve are the biggest of the Big.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 01:23 | 1349736 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

 Awesome avatar!

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 01:16 | 1349728 Dr. Sum Ting Wong
Dr. Sum Ting Wong's picture

"Two and a half years ago, Christina Romer, then still employed by the Obama administration in the position of Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers penned "The Job Impact of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan" - a report predicting the impact of a fiscal "stimulus" that took out $787 billion from the pocket of American Taxpayers (subsequently discovered to cost even more) and put that money...somewhere. We are not sure where, because according to a chart now made legendary for its complete failure to predict the future, it sure did not go into creating jobs."  Really Tyler?  One third of it was in the form of tax cuts! That )and the fact that given the size of the problem the stimulus should have been more in the range of two trillion on an historically adjusted basis - remember debt to GDP levels incurred to fight WW2) probably account for the fact that not enough jobs were created.or saved.  Here's the thing. You can argue the utility of the stimulus either way -- but when you say misrepresent the facts you lose credibility, douchebag. 

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 01:17 | 1349732 glenlloyd
glenlloyd's picture

All I can say is yep, pretty much tells the story of the 'success' that is DC.

Just think what the chart would look like if real unemployment numbers were used!

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 01:17 | 1349733 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

 

Christina Fucking Romer,

Perveted Government Barney the dinosaur Lackey in female spots spouting dinosaur eggs, flatulence, and digested middle income families for mainstream media consumption.

What a crock of shit.

Anyone who watched her in interveiws and her wandering eyes, high pitched pandering falsetto, and gazed into the the glazed orbs of decades long self-decpetion at schools of arcane economic sophistry delving the depths of masturbatory theory relating to people being eager to serve judicial overlords and perverted elitist baboons must know she is a bag of wind, of piss, a bladder of effluence and the dead airs of a gasping oppressive republic.

 

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 03:10 | 1349812 steveo
steveo's picture

Wow, and I thought I could rant.   Indeed, look into their eyes, read their body language.    Some of the best of the thieves can partly control both, but most cannot.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 03:31 | 1349828 wandstrasse
wandstrasse's picture

...a bladder of effluence and the dead airs of a gasping oppressive republic.

My dead lords...my dead lords
Your strange ringed fingers turn,
Turned to knots of scented wood.

From your arms
that held our secrets fell the fruit
My dead lords...
You hold the past.
And I confess the uneasiness
of my love for you my lords.

My anger gives me strength my lords.
You loved and listened to the lovers
But we have stopped listening to you...
We have stopped listening to you my lords
We've paralysed...the pain.

And the wind in your bare ribs
Uttered still the tunes of lovers
In the geese veed sky
My dead lords
I confess an uneasiness in my love for you,
Confusion in my passion.

Were you the song of September
That charmed the fieldfares?
When your rotten skin grew hard
It fed your minion crows,
My black shining brothers
My dead lords
Oh my dead lords
I confess...
My anger gives me strength my lords.
I kissed your hard crusted rotten skin.
My uneasiness it grows
But you my Morton lords
Live on in my anger
Like the sun.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 03:52 | 1349841 ebworthen
ebworthen's picture

"And Also The Trees - Blind Opera"?

Sounds like Shakespeare.

I like it.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 01:19 | 1349735 Uncle Keith
Uncle Keith's picture

Supply Side has proven to be a failure. Propping up the Plutocratic state has ruined the working/middle classes (read: majority of citizens/voters).

 

Gifting more money to the Too Wealthy Few will result in more of the same: Hording.

 

To invigorate the economy - and, to create "New Wealth" - any additional monies (stimulus?... yeah...) should be targetted at projects that will put said money into circulation - NOT a Bankster's pocket.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 02:48 | 1349801 Bear
Bear's picture

Uncle,

The truth is that any money that flows from the Gobberment goes into the coffers of oligarchical Big Business who create no new jobs with the money they receive. Over the past 11 years there has been zero job growth attributed to large concerns. Yes 100%, of growth has come from medium to small companies.

The federal cannot create jobs … all it needs to do is get out of the way (smaller government, less regulation, and rational taxes) … and the jobs will be created. In addition, ‘stimulus created’ will be of a short duration created to accomplish a marginally valuable purpose and at the same time rob the private sector (through taxes required for the stimulus) of jobs that could become truly productive for our society. Government stimulus are counter productive. 

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 06:59 | 1349998 anony
anony's picture

This opinion that government getting out of the way, etc. will create jobs is wrong.

There are many reasons for the Federal Government to get out of our way, and be pulled back from its tyrannical rule, but creating jobs isn't one of them.

Jobs that mean something, wherein something of value is created, like a steam engine, an Ipod, a S/W program that allows us to bid with the click of mouse, a Cotton gin, plow, or sewing machine, etc. are not being conceived because industries and services are not aborning. 

Bottom line is our creative, inventive, and development minds, hard at work in research and development departments all over the world are not coming on line with innovative products and services fast enough to absorb the people that are being reproduced at rates which exceed our  ability to use them. 

Paradigm changes, game-changing policies are at odds with the establishment businesses, like oil, autos, roads and superfluous infrastructue.

The ability for existing industry to put 400,000 people a month to work just in the U.S. is completely absent. Either population has to go down, or industries need to be created or a combination of both if we are to avoid a Vonnegut-like world where the few work to support the many.  

 

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 04:28 | 1349880 Yen Cross
Yen Cross's picture

   Lets sell the dollar into New York.  That 5 hour chart says it all! YEN

    P.S. I'm a day ahead.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 05:22 | 1349929 The Navigator
The Navigator's picture

and THAT is why, your bumper sticker should read "ANYBODY but Obama" - is if it matters who is the puppet of the banksters - but just in case.

Who needs you when I can argue with myself.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 06:36 | 1349987 Bobbyrib
Bobbyrib's picture

The NY Post has an article that Wall Street banks will be laying off "thousands."

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/slasher_street_3N2eDrojp9DGzQcAlzGPhN

 

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 06:50 | 1349992 topcallingtroll
topcallingtroll's picture

Government cannot allocate capital efficiently and the more money spent by government the less growth in productivity and living standards in aggregate.

Why do some people refuse to see the obvious? All serious economists concede the inefficiency of government capital allocation decisions. Some will argue that efficient improvement in average standard of living is not an important.goal. That is the only serious argument for increased government spending.

Governments thinking short term and passing out goodies as bribes to voters harms our long term vigor. Asians will work with a back ache. Americans and Europeans want a disability check.

The asians will ultimately surpass whiny, lazy westerners who want something.for nothing with western governments only too willing to attempt to provide it.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 07:18 | 1350022 dolly madison
dolly madison's picture

Did anybody notice that Bernanke looked like he had a gun to his back when he spoke recently?

It definitely makes me think things are gonna tank really soon.  He was peaked (pee-kid), and mis-spoke many times.  He was not at his best for sure.  So, either he was sick, or he's a terrible liar.

Wed, 06/08/2011 - 07:47 | 1350067 blindman
blindman's picture


qe is free finance for the disabled financial sector
broken by its own fraud, in need of credibility and cash.
without it the crooks can't finance the austerity vigilantism
with which
they wish to execute the peasants and natives around the globe.
one world, one scam. qe^, fiat, fractional reserve requirement
to bludgeon the masses.
fight back !

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!