RINO Signs Own Death Sentence, Company Likely To Be Halted Forever As Chinese IPO Craze Fizzles

Tyler Durden's picture

The plight of Chinese company RINO International is about to be over. The company has just filed an 8-K which essentially signs its own death sentence (see below). This is a stark reminder of what happens when one deals with companies going public in the US, yet subject to regulations and accounting rules of a different time and place, and we are confident that the recent onslaught of Chinese IPOs on the revenue strapped NYSE (hint: listing fees) will prove to be a complete disaster for everyone who bought into this most recent market top tick. The RINO case study will soon create a cottage industry of micro funds seeking to make massive profits by shorting then destroying the credibility of every Chinese company to have gone public on the NYSE recently. Our advice: get the hell out of dodge. We will shortly present a list of all the sell side analysts who should be summarily fired for recommending a Buy rating on this stock as recently as a month ago (yes, that include Canaccord).

From the just filed 8-K:

“In a telephone conversation on November 16, 2010, Mr. Zou Dejun, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, informed Ms. Susan Woo of our firm, in substance, that as to the six RINO customer contracts discussed in the recent report of Muddy Waters LLC, the Company did not in fact enter into two of the six purported contracts, and a third contract among the six was explainable. When Ms. Woo inquired about the Company’s other contracts, Mr. Zou said he was not sure, but there might be problems with 20 - 40% of them. Assuming that these statements were reasonably accurate, it appears that our reports would have been affected if this information had been known to us at the date of our reports, although the effect on the financial statements is currently unknown and cannot be quantified without a thorough investigation. We further note that in a conversation the following day, November 17, 2010, involving Ms. Woo, several directors of the Company, Company counsel, and Mr. Zou, Mr. Zou stated that he was not sure the day before and went back to look into some things, and found that apart from the two problematic contracts, all other contracts are legitimate and can be verified.

The auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board provide procedures to be followed by an auditor to prevent continued reliance on audit reports in such circumstances. In view of the information provided by Mr. Zou Dejun, we hereby advise the Company to promptly notify any person or entity that is known to be relying upon or is likely to rely upon our audit report(s) for the periods ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2009 and reviewed quarterly financial statements for periods between March 31, 2008 to September 30, 2010 that they should no longer be relied upon, and that revised financial statements and revised auditor's report(s) will be issued upon completion of an investigation.”

On November 17, 2010 certain members of the Board of Directors, including Kennith Johnson, the Chairman of the Audit Committee, Jianping Qiu, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, and Mr. Zou Dejun participated in a conference call with Ms. Susan Woo, a partner of Frazer Frost, LLP in which the foregoing statements were discussed. The two other members of the Board were not available because they were traveling and therefore the Board of Directors could not take any formal action regarding the matters discussed in the Auditor’s Letter. The Registrant intends to have a telephonic meeting of the Board of Directors to further discuss such matters and related matters as soon as all of the members of the Board of Directors are available.

Update: this release has just been followed up by the following disaster:

ITEM 4.02 NON-RELIANCE ON PREVIOUSLY ISSUED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OR A RELATED AUDIT REPORT OR COMPLETED INTERIM REVIEW.

On November 18, 2010, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of RINO International Corporation (the "Registrant") a Nevada corporation, concluded that previously issued audited financial statements of the Registrant for its fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, which were included in the Registrant's Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2009, and previously issued interim unaudited financial statements which were included in the Registrant's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods ended March 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 should no longer be relied on.1 The Board also concluded that previously issued interim unaudited financial statements which were included in the Registrant's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the periods March 31, 2010, June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010 should no longer be relied on inasmuch as such financial statements incorporate results from 2008 and 2009.

The conclusion of the Board that the financial statements for the above-described periods should not be relied upon was based on statements made by the Registrant's Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Zou Dejun, after consultation with the Registrant's Chief Accountant, who reported to the Board that the Registrant did not enter into two contracts for which it reported revenue during the Registrant's 2008 and 2009 fiscal years.

Three of the Registrant's Board members, including the Chairman of its Audit Committee and Chief Executive Officer, discussed the foregoing matters with the Registrant's independent accountant on November 16 and 17, 2010.

The Registrant's Board has authorized its Audit Committee to take all steps necessary to investigate the matters set forth above and other allegations of misstatements, and address any deficiencies found, including authorization to engage an outside law firm to conduct an independent investigation with the assistance of such other professionals as it may require.

Read: game over