Ron Paul Calls For An End To America's Welfare State, Choice To Opt Out Of Social Security

Tyler Durden's picture

In addition to calling for the abolishing of America's insolvent "welfare state" regime (and not to mention the Fed), Ron Paul floats the idea of allowing Americans to opt out of payroll tax in exchange for never receiving Social Security benefits. As the SSA will be pretty much insolvent in a few years, and not provide any benefit to anyone soon thereafter, this seems like a reasonable trade off.

By Ron Paul

Reject the Welfare/Warfare State

week’s midterm elections have been characterized as a victory for
grassroots Americans who are fed up with Washington and the political
status quo.  In particular, the elections are
being touted as a clear indicator that voters demand reductions in
federal spending, deficits, and debt.

If the new Congress hopes to live up to the expectations of Tea Party voters, however, it faces some daunting choices.  For
all the talk about pork and waste, the truth is that Congress cannot
fix the budget and get our national debt under control by trimming fat
and eliminating earmarks for “Bridges to Nowhere.” 

reductions in federal spending can be achieved only by getting to the
meat of the federal budget, meaning expenditures in all areas.

annual budget soon will be $5 trillion unless Congress takes serious
steps to reduce spending for entitlements, military, and debt service.
Yet how many Tea Party candidates who campaigned on a platform of
spending cuts talked about Social Security, Medicare, foreign wars, or
bond debt?

With regard to entitlements, the 2010 Social Security and Medicare Trustees report tells it all.  It
paints a stark picture of two entitlement programs that cannot be
sustained under even the rosiest scenarios of economic growth.  No one, regardless of political stripe, can deny the fundamental problem of unfunded future liabilities in both programs.

We should understand that Social Security was intended primarily to prevent old widows from becoming destitute.  Life expectancy in 1935 was only about 65, when there were several workers for each Social Security recipient.  The
program was never intended to be a general transfer payment from young
workers to older retirees, regardless of those retirees’ financial need.  Yet today Social Security faces an unfunded liability of approximately $18 trillion. 

Congress needs to stop using payroll taxes for purposes not related to
Social Security, which was a trick the Clinton administration used to
claim balanced budgets. Second, Congress should eliminate
unconstitutional spending -  including unnecessary
overseas commitments - and use the saved funds to help transition to a
Social Security system that is completely voluntary.  At
some point in the near future Congress must allow taxpayers to opt out
of federal payroll taxes in exchange for never receiving Social Security

Medicare similarly faces a shortfall of $30.8 trillion in unfunded future benefits.  The Part D prescription drug benefit accounts for approximately $15.5 trillion, or half of the unfunded Medicare liability.  Congress should immediately repeal the disastrous drug benefit passed in 2003 by President Bush and a Republican Congress. 

Fiscal conservatives should not be afraid to attack entitlements philosophically.  We
should reject the phony narrative that entitlement programs are
inherently noble or required by “progressive” western values.  Why
exactly should Americans be required, by force of taxation, to fund
retirement or medical care for senior citizens, especially senior
citizens who are comfortable financially?  And if
taxpayers provide retirement and health care benefits to some older
Americans who are less well off, can’t we just call it welfare instead
of maintaining the charade about “insurance” and “trust funds”?

spending and interest on the national debt similarly represent large
federal expenditures that Congress must address by rethinking our
foreign policy and exercising far greater oversight over the Federal
Reserve and the Treasury department. 

I have for a long time criticized our interventionist foreign policy and the Fed, and I will continue to do so.  It’s
time for Congress to face the fundamental problems that affect Social
Security and Medicare, and show the courage necessary to make real
changes to both programs by rejecting the welfare/warfare state.