This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Rosie Is Back From Vacation And Is As "Rosy" As Ever

Tyler Durden's picture




 

If listening to Mark Zandi makes you punch your monitor every time, this is, as always, required reading.

IF IT'S NOT A DOUBLE DIP THEN IT'S MR. SOFTEE

Again, U.S. nonfarm payrolls came in weaker than expected, and while some of the components offered up some good news, like a 36,000 rise in manufacturing employment and an uptick in the workweek, the report overall was quite soft. If this were summer school, I’d be tempted to give it a C-minus, and only because after a terrific week vacationing in Chicago, I’m in a generous mood.

The headline came in at -131,000 versus the consensus estimate of -65,000 (private payrolls did rise 71,000 but this was below the 90,000 increase that was widely expected). And, the net revisions to the prior two months was -97,000, so in effect the “level” of employment was 153,000 lower than what the economics community was penning in the for the month. So, the shortfall was even greater than the headline “miss” would suggest, counting in the revisions.

The Establishment survey tends to understate what is happening at the small business level, which is why it is imperative to keep a close eye on the household survey — and employment here contracted 159,000 in July after sliding 301,000 in June and 35,000 in May. Historically, the odds of seeing three whiffs in a row in this survey without the economy either being in a recession or quickly heading into one is 50 to one.

There was palpable relief in some circles that the unemployment rate managed to stabilize at 9.5% in July. The problem here is that the labour force continues to shrink as discouraged workers drop out an alarming rate for an alleged economic recovery — down 181,000 in July and down 1.2 million in the past three months. If the labour force merely stayed the same in the past three months — keeping in mind that in “normal” recoveries the labour force swells as job opportunities expand — the unemployment rate would be sitting at 10½% today. What investors should really be keying on — no doubt the Fed is — is the “employment rate” or the employment-to-population ratio, which fell to 58.4% from 58.5% and is back to where it was at the turn of the year.

While it was encouraging to see the work week rebound, two other leading indicators of job trends — the direction of revisions and temp agency hiring — point to lingering malaise. In fact, the 5,600 drop in temps was the first decline since last August. And, we already know that 479,000 on jobless claims (a three-month high) is the starting point; therefore, we are likely on our way for another poor August reading on the employment backdrop.

To put it all in context, by this stage of the cycle, fully 31 months after the onset of recession, the U.S. economy has not only recouped all of the losses induced by the prior downturns but employment is already at a new high by now (having smashed the previous pre-recession peak by 1.1 million jobs or 2.3%). And, here we are today, sadly, still 7.7mln (or 5.6%) below the December 2007 peak. It will probably take at least five years to climb out of this hole.

As I said, there were some bright spots in the report. Incomes edged up. The workweek did likewise, though is still at depressed levels. The manufacturing sector is in revival mode, though part of this has reflected the powerful inventory cycle that seems to have run its course. The overspending culprits in the prior bubble phase, notably construction, financials and state/local government continue to shed jobs and these sectors comprise 25% of the overall employment pie. To put the math into perspective, for every 1% decline in jobs in these three shrinking areas of the economy, the manufacturing sector has to post a 3% increase. Daunting to say the least.

PERSPECTIVE NEEDED

We need a little perspective on the economic backdrop because I am becoming increasingly concerned. The fact that some at the Fed are beginning to warm towards the idea of more quantitative easing, vocal support from a growing number of Democrats to extend the once-reviled Bush tax cuts, and now chatter of another government-led bailout of “upside-down” homeowners, suggests that I am not alone in this concern.

Even before the release of the nonfarm payroll data, we received the ADP number for July, and while fractionally surpassing market expectations, the results were simply awful. To put it into some perspective, when the economy was coming out of its lull in 2003 and 2004 we were already north of 100k on ADP, on a monthly basis, and by 2005-06 we were printing 200k-250k numbers consistently. A 42k print is actually horrible and is telling you that the economy is either fundamentally weak or that companies are still rationalizing on labour.

Again, to put a 42k print into context, it printed 78k in December 2007 when everyone thought a recession was being averted (it started that month). That same month, the ISM non-manufacturing index came in at 52.3 and if I recall, the widespread sentiment at that time was that we were seeing a pause that refreshes. To sum it all up, the data points don’t tell you a whole lot right now that is very good. They certainly don’t give anyone a green light for cyclical exposure any more than the December 2007 data-flow managed to do. And, as for the non-manufacturing ISM, like its manufacturing counterpart, showed that the number of industries reporting “growth” is on the decline — down to 13 in July from 15 in June and 16 in May, and at a five-month low.

What we know is that we are heading into the third quarter knowing that there was minimal growth coming from that key 70% of the economy otherwise known as the U.S. consumer. July’s data on chain store and auto sales were both below expectations. Personal bankruptcies jumped 9% in June (138,000 personal filings during the month) and 2010 is now on track to be the highest in five years, with respect to consumer insolvencies (908,000 thus far or just under 1% of the total number of households). If capital spending is going to do the heavy lifting, keep in mind that just to keep the economy steady, it has to accelerate by nearly 10 percentage points for every percentage point slowing in household spending. Now that is a daunting task.

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 08/06/2010 - 11:39 | 507374 bonddude
bonddude's picture

Did someone slip me some magic mushrooms in my

omelette ? Or just some more GREEN CHUTES ?

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 11:43 | 507385 SheepDog-One
SheepDog-One's picture

Good ol Rosy!

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 13:33 | 507661 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture

Jane, stop this crazy thing! Help! Jane!

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 13:57 | 507715 MeTarzanUjane
MeTarzanUjane's picture

I love you, Rosie,
And if it's quite alright,
I need you, Rosie,
To warm a lonely night.
I love you, Rosie.
Trust in me when I say:
Oh, pretty Rosie,
Don't bring me down, I pray.
Oh, pretty Rosie, now that I found you, stay
And let me love you, Rosie.
Let me love you.

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 11:46 | 507392 overmedicatedun...
overmedicatedundersexed's picture

cnbc "GE is bring 400 jobs back to USA from China" sure they are.  what BS ..this tells me China is about to roll over and GE is cutting costs there as well.

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 11:52 | 507414 LeBalance
LeBalance's picture

Is GE bringing 20 Execs home and that's the number of service girls required?

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 13:15 | 507624 Dburn
Dburn's picture

+100

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 13:34 | 507662 Clayton Bigsby
Clayton Bigsby's picture

that's just for Immelt

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 15:02 | 507855 Ted K
Ted K's picture

You're making the assumption Immelt can still get it up.  America doesn't have the manufacturing base to produce that much Viagra.

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 11:48 | 507399 septicshock
septicshock's picture

My personal spending is higher today than it ever was...  I purchase more ammo, guns, food, and gold than I ever did.  The ultimate end point will be hyperinflation... Best to get things that are essential now before.... well... you can't!  

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 12:01 | 507445 John McCloy
John McCloy's picture

Surprised myself markets are not up on the prospect of Tier 17 unemployment. Have no fear 99'ers the printing presses have a fresh 5 months of unemployment checks coming right at you.

http://www.examiner.com/x-27052-Rochester-Unemployment-Examiner~y2010m8d...

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 12:14 | 507479 Ned Zeppelin
Ned Zeppelin's picture

Yes, loved the ridiculous MSM story today  - this stuff HAS to come from some central propaganda source - about the good news being that outsourcing is over and everyone is repatriating jobs to America. I thought about all of those minimum wage call banks, telemarketers, and credit card processors and felt a whole lot better about the employment numbers today.

Other spin: unemployment remained at 9.5% It didn't go up - hurray!

There are alot of fools in this world, and alot of people spouting things that are untrue (Timmah's recovery theme making the rounds)  that should be ashamed of themselves.  Rosie is not one of them. 

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 12:53 | 507577 New_Meat
New_Meat's picture

But the Teleprompter is. - Ned

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 17:26 | 508114 Jasper M
Jasper M's picture

"Other spin: unemployment remained at 9.5% It didn't go up - hurray!"

I am reminded of one historian's take on British celebration of a certain repetitive aspect of their military history: "Another successful retreat from The Continent! Huzzah!"

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 12:20 | 507498 DJFUNK
DJFUNK's picture

We must assume the Gov purveyors of economic genius wisdom even WANT this to be solved.....I used to "believe" all hands wanted prosperity, of whatever, because the only thing a 1st term politician wants is a 2nd term. Now I'm not so sure. This looks a bit purposeful. 

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 13:31 | 507654 Davilis
Davilis's picture

It has always been purposeful.  What's happening now is that its becoming obvious.  The rats are looting the pantry one last time before jumping from the sinking ship, and the passengers are saying "Wow, I didn't know we had rats onboard!"

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 14:39 | 507810 DavidC
DavidC's picture

It's because they don't understand the difference between prosperity and monetary wealth or material possessions.

DavidC

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 13:26 | 507639 CrockettAlmanac.com
CrockettAlmanac.com's picture
Rosie Is Back From Vacation And Is As "Rosy" As Ever

 

I'm riveted!

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 13:56 | 507705 hbjork1
hbjork1's picture

Word from GM is that they have money for a variety of projects that managements wants to get going but the guys that can "make it happen" are gone.  

 

Fri, 08/06/2010 - 16:09 | 508001 Snidley Whipsnae
Snidley Whipsnae's picture

Public sector jobs are going away in the area where I live. One police force of 67 men/women is being dissolved and their duties will be handed over to the county sheriffs department. The sheriffs dept will expand some but not by 67.

Another local police dept is currently carrying out a time study in preparation for force reduction or a hand over to the county sheriffs dept.

The two examples above are stories in my local newspaper. I have no idea how many public sector jobs are going to be lost state wide but it will be a very large number.

The police dept jobs on average pay double the private sector average wage so the loss of public sector jobs will have a bigger impact on local economies. Not to mention what will happen if crime increases as people become more desperate when/if jobless benefits run out and police forces are MIA. 

More pain for Main St ahead...imo.

Sat, 10/09/2010 - 09:46 | 637586 senthil456
senthil456's picture


There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration.I read and understand the entire article and I really enjoyed it to be honest.
cheap vps | windows vps | forex vps

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!