This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
SAC's Heavy Hand Prompts Thomson Reuters to Join the Journalistic Capture Hall of Shame
Regular readers of Zero Hedge will be keenly aware of our animosity for, if not the mainstream media, the malaise that has gripped the mainstream media's ethos (and a massive swelling of its increasingly corrupt pathos, as it happens). Our expressions of disgust go back months, even as far back as the birth of Zero Hedge itself. So, today, when we recognize new manifestations of these illnesses, we are far past the point of outrage. Our reaction might be better described as a slow, mournful shake of the head indicative of an almost bored (and certainly unsurprised) resignation. The decline of journalism (and the resultant and pending takeover of yet another broken business model by the Federal Government) is a common theme here at Zero Hedge because it is so common a theme. This morning it is Reuters that prompts our sad response.
Almost torn from the "through blue-tinted glasses" frames of "The Insider," Michael Mann's 1999 retelling of the 60 Minutes "Big Tobacco" story scandal (for the uninitiated, a pending sale of CBS to Westinghouse apparently prompted Don Hewitt and CBS lawyers to initially kill a 60 Minutes story highlighting a Brown & Williamson whistle-blower for fear of a deal-killing lawsuit by Brown & Williamson) the Carolina Business News Initiative's "Talking Biz News" blog (hereinafter "TBN") describes how Thomson "The World's Leading Source of Intelligent Information for Businesses and Professionals" Reuters killed Matthew Goldstein's piece on SAC's Steven Cohen. Says TBN:
Reuters editors last week killed a story by investigative reporter Matthew Goldstein about hedge fund trader Steven Cohen after Cohen complained to top Thomson Reuters executives that he was being persecuted by the news agency’s reporting, sources at Reuters said.
Goldstein’s story was an “incremental” advance in the reports swirling around Cohen that he engaged in insider trader [sic] during the 1980s, Reuters sources said. There have been reports that Cohen is next in the sights of the SEC following the Galleon case, which featured SEC wiretapping the conversations of hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam.
Zero Hedge has, of course, been sniffing around this story for months. But then, the CEO of our parent company's marketing division doesn't get calls from senior SAC executives. (Probably because we don't have a parent company). We are also quite sure that 60,000+ shares of Thomson Reuters held by SAC according to that firm's September 2009 SC13F-HR filing (up from ~42,000 shares in June of 2009 and up from 0 shares in March of 2009) is too small an amount to influence the likes of Devin Wenig. Just for the record, Zero Hedge has never owned even a single share of Thomson Reuters.
In 1995 When CBS killed the 60 Minutes story, and though 60 Minutes was later permitted to air modified and then finally a full version of the piece, the Editorial page of the New York Times issued the anonymous and scathing journalistic rebuke that: "The traditions of Edward R. Murrow and '60 Minutes' itself were diluted in the process." One wonders what the New York Times would make of Reuters' antics today Probably nothing. When Mann directed "The Insider" it was a shocking tale. Today journalistic perversion is a common bit of boring trivia. One ought instead to wonder what the New York Times of 1995 would make of Reuters' antics today, but that institution has been dead a long time. We defy you to try to imagine today's New York Times printing anything even remotely resembling this:
This act of self-censorship by the country's most powerful and aggressive television news program sends a chilling message to journalists investigating industry practices everywhere.
The 60 Minutes producer that championed the Brown & Williamson piece eventually left CBS over the incident. (Lowell Bergman joined what may be the last real haven for investigative journalism on television, PBS' Frontline). Perhaps more alarming for this particular story, Reuters does not even have lawyers fretting over a pending sale and a large lawsuit to fall back on:
Goldstein’s story was based on documents, and was approved by Reuters lawyers. After Goldstein contacted Cohen for the pro forma no comment before the story ran, Cohen repeatedly called Devin Wenig, CEO of the Thomson Reuters Markets Division and the No. 2 executive at Thomson Reuters, to complain about the story.
Wenig passed on the complaints to Reuters Editor in Chief David Schlesinger, who asked editors to look into them. Reuters editors debated the story for three days before finally killing it.
The decisions would appear to be totally editorial. This is, of course, beyond disgusting- but, in keeping with the theme we introduced at the beginning of this article, also totally unsurprising.
If the closing years of this decade are ever given a one-word theme it might well be "capture." The capture of regulators by financial institutions, the capture of financial institutions by the Treasury, the capture of the FDIC by the Fed, the capture of the Fed by the White House and the capture of the fourth estate (which this publication hereinafter refuses to capitalize) by the entity with the most "access" to sell this month. Apparently, for Reuters, that's SAC.
We seriously doubt that you will ever read the killed Reuter's piece anywhere. But, then, that is what Zero Hedge is for.
»
- 14431 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
****! I forgot to sign out!
Don't stand under any black helicopters, you'll be fine.
All I know about Colby was what I read in his book (didn't even know he was dead while reading it)...then found out about his accident when I looked him up on the internet. It does seem a little strange that he would have drowned while canoeing. He was swiftly fired after heading the CIA during some pretty big investigations when Rockefeller kept calling him in and telling him not to be so honest. Did he seem like the type of a guy that was really incompetent with a canoe and was a poor swimmer?
Why does it anger you that people think he may have been murdered? what is better man with integrity gets offed by the elite for questioning and revealing too much info...or ex-CIA chief helped cover up MK Ultra torturing and drug running scams and then died by canoe accident?
For the record, I bet he was a very nice man in person. It was very enlightening and kind of him to describe how/why they would create relationships with different political groupd/leaders in Vietnam. It helps my understanding of how controlled opposition works in this country...can't thank him enough for sharing that with the masses.
This is a man who absolutely loved the profession of intelligence. He absolutely loved the agency and did what he did, as perhaps the first DCI to "open the kimono," as a response to the passion he had for the organization and his feeling that its survival depended on a new kind of disclosure.
I think he might have been one of the quiet professionals who always felt that it was possible to be in intelligence and still be "moral," finally given voice in the way that few "field men" ever had. Reflect, for just a moment, on what it meant to be Nixons DCI, and then recall that he was the most open DCI ever to hold the post. Today that might be a much rarer (extinct) breed. Can anyone imagine Obama's... anything... blowing against the wind? I think not.
We used to pester him ceaselessly to indulge us with tales of being a Jedburgh. I think he told us the story his mis-drop over France (and the shocked farmer he woke in the dark) a few dozen times. Each time patiently, passionately, and without even a trace of the boredom that must have accompanied the third repeat telling that day. One story he told always quite particularly changing the name of a certain officer who, he explained, had not yet died- but we all knew who he meant. He was just being polite.
He still blushed, decades after the fact, if you asked him if it was true that he cheated on the vision exam to get into jump school. He was clearly annoyed with Patton for moving fast enough to marginalize the role "Team Bruce" could play in France, but only because his drive to contribute to the anti-fascist effort was his strongest urge and he worried after the morale of his team having trained so long only to be overrun- by Patton.
Much as the family of Mark Pittman found conspiracy theories about his death voiced in comments here shocking and offensive (and said so), so too would Colby's heirs be alarmed and dismayed to hear totally baseless accusations of his death by foul play at the hands of the agency he loved. Certainly, could he see them, Colby himself would find such talk disgusting.
I am moved by your comment (short story). If these men of high integrity are now extinct, what hope is there for liberty?
We, the common folk, attempt to understand the machinations of 'big brother' - and what a damning task it is, to imagine that certain fellow countrymen have been found to be of the foulest material.
There are many (including myself, with limited, freshman knowledge) that consider death by foul play to be an honor. My ignorant peers consider the 'early' death of an honorable individual a reflection of one's integrity in these dark days. We have little validated insight into the twisted intelligence world. If Ron Paul were to be 'suicided', we can only imagine the acute public reaction.
Forgive the unenlightened ones for attempting to pierce the ever-shifting veil of obscurity.
LONG FUCKING LIVE THOMAS JEFFERSON
+1 Sympathies for the distress caused, Marla. At the same time, do understand that such musings from (most of) us stem from a respect for the integrity, intelligence and service of people such as Mr. Colby - and in this particular case we are far from the first ones to drift in this direction (search for his name and look at the first 5 results). In any case, while speculation here on his death here is not particularly fruitful, I don't believe malice was involved in mentioning it. Try to look at it like Maggie Pittman said 'I do appreciate and understand your thinking and would probably think the same in other circumstances.'
Ya sorry to anger Marla who I respect...as well as any of Colby's family. However, I don't get to choose what I believe, my brain just looks at the data and makes the probabilities accordingly. My brother is dead...feel free to make up probabilities about his cause of death.
It hurts my dad that I don't believe Jesus was the son of god...but I'm can't alter the output from the brain that I have been given.
Any organization that has been involved in some of the evil things the CIA has been involved in MK Ultra experiments on young girls...has some pretty deep dark stuff that a man like Colby would not be proud of. They don't tell new recruits, "hey come join us, we torture innocent people with sick perverse stuff"...the CIA recruits nice kids who want to do good. The CIA does murder nice people occasionally, like when they put cement powder in baby formula in Cuba in order to create backlash against the cuban government who would be seen as responsible. I can see how many don't want to believe the CIA would kill a good person, but it is incredibly naive.
You think Bush wouldn't kill innocent people? these are the people who sya it was "worth it" to kill several hundred thousand iraqi children through a trade blockade....you really think there is some moral code that would prevent the CIA puppetmasters from killing an american?
I didn't source it, but it's interesting.
http://www.pythiapress.com/wartales/colby.htm
good example:
http://america-hijacked.com/2009/12/14/what-christians-dont-know-about-israel/
Since you tagged that on to my post I want to make myself clear, as it is a delicate subject.
What I posted has nothing to do with Jewish people. The Jewish were used as scapegoats. Their wealth confiscated to fuel the fascist war.
The USA took a large dose of the disease in after WW2 when she sought after and adopted thousands of the fascist professors, scientists and engineers.
Instead of looking towards the Jewish people, look towards the empire that has used the divide and conquer strategy for hundreds of years.
The Dutch/British Establishment/ Not the British people, they are pretty much the same position as the American people.
[I think perhaps 2 bible verse citations in a single comment might be the limit, 1 if it is a Revelations cite. You exceeded both these metrics by 300%. This is a finance blog, you could at least confine yourself to John 2:15 -Marla]
LOL, cheers to the prophet for revealing his smackdown. (p.s. John 2:17 is good too)
Marla,
Thank you for your commentary and reporting! Reminds me of WGBH Boston and other PBS stations before corporate sponsors took over. As an information professional I really apprecaite your work and that of ZH. Best regards to you and ZH staff for the new year.
IP
JFK address to the press:
Warns about the dangers of secrecy
Urges the press to do their job of informing the public and to do it's duty of criticizing the government when it errors.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zlghYpDx0f4&feature=related
------------------------------
Another interesting link I just found regarding JFK and the CIA
JFK warned of a coup from the CIA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5563viRC2w
The CIA is a great organization, they would never think of killing americans even if it meant they would get more power.
Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Ephesians 2:2
And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. Revelation 12:9
"There is no such thing, at this date in the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it.
There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the street looking for another job.
If I allowed my honest opinion to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. You know it and I know it. And what folly is this - toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance.
Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes."
John Swinton - New York Times - New York Press Club
"The news and truth are not the same thing."Walter Lippmann, American journalist, 1889-1974 Rubin Frank, former president NBC News
"News is what someone wants to suppress. Everything else is advertising."
"We tell the people what they need to know, not what they want to know." Frank Sesno, CNN NewsRichard Salent, former pres. CBS News
"Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have."
I sent the above post to an investigative reporter at the NY Times who was one of my college roommates and remains a close friend. I thought his response was worth posting:
"Yeah, that's pretty crazy. i read about it on gawker yesterday. sadly, it's not that surprising. the stifling of information like this is not terribly uncommon at some newspapers today. there are several reasons for this, a very large one being that many newspapers are struggling so severely when it comes to their finances that they end up making a lot of boneheaded decisions that sacrifice the quality of their journalism. they also end up cutting very intelligent but highly paid reporters and editors and replacing them with a bunch of lackeys who cost less. that's why it bothers me when people cancel their newspaper subscriptions and then complain about a lack of quality journalism. this is the reason we're seeing more and more examples of stuff like this.
what i can't really understand is why the editors at reuters made this decision. but make no mistake: it will have consequences and the story will eventually see the light of day. matt goldstein was reporting on something that's actually public, and several other publications have written about these accusations and will of course keep digging. here for example are the new york times and the wall street journal. i believe we actually had the insider trading story on our front page.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/17/business/17hedge.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=co...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870358120457460064376983288...
it's also coming out now that the top editors at reuters are investigating what happened and why the story was squelched. cohen hasn't gotten away with this. he hasn't escaped the scrutiny he deserves. he bought himself some time by somehow persuading some editors at reuters to bury one story. but now those editors have egg all over their faces, and the entire story will keep growing. back in the day we probably would have had the reuters/goldstein story on our front page. but guess what? we just laid off 200 journalists this past year here at the Times. we don't have the resources we once had. and we're not alone. newspapers all over the country are saying goodbye to investigative reporters. and some papers have simply closed up shop and said goodbye to everyone. things are that dire."
It's an end-game strategy. If the MSM and news originators had any concerns about their or our or any body's future, they would manage themselves differently.
But there is no future, certainly not anything anyone can point to with the firm conviction that they will be there and personally relevant.
What do you do at the end?
You grab and run. You lie. You push and shove and get as many others BEHIND you as you can, so they drop off the crumbling cliff instead of yourself. And when the end is over and the beginning is begun and everyone is looking around at the other survivors and blinking in the light, they are all thinking exactly the same thought:
"We are the bastards. Every last man Jack did something horrid and evil to be here on this last day of the end and the next generation will be born of our mighty sin. But we're not going to talk about any of that. We're just going to let all that go unsaid. We're going to speak of ourselves as among the chosen, favored by God. We get to write the history of the end and that will be our narrative about ourselves."
Big lies cannot help but become the truth.
cougar
Our family is fortunate enough to still be able to travel by air somewhat frequently. However, whenever the kids are seated somewhere else other than right next to us (which sometimes happens), I always make a mental map of not only the emergency exits, but how to get to them and then push everyone out of the way as we head for the exits. Fight or flight 101.
There is a huge future - there is always a future. It's just that it might appear be a little different than from what many people are expecting. What is occurring right now? Federalization. Is it sustainable? No - we simply do not produce enough true wealth to afford the federal overhead. Then what is the opposite? De-federalization.
What does this mean? What are the existing natural constituencies? What were the original arguments against the concept of independence in the first place? That 13 separate & distinct colonies lacked any mutual alliances.
How strong is the dollar? What happens to central banking? Will we see a return to regional, hard-money backed free-banking?
Think locally - this is where all economic activity originates and where the centers of influence & power will return (and thrive) once the cancer that is consuming the productive wealth finally kills its own self.
I am crossing my fingers!
Okay. Fine. In the literal sense that the space-time continuum is continuous in all points of curved local space, there is a future.
I don't imagine it will be even "a little different" from what we understand now. Rather, a lot. Like you won't recognize it. Like you might blow your brains out in shocked dismay on day 1.
If the future is sufficiently different, then history at least gets a do-over. And we (post-industrial technotopian western mankind, and allied clans, and anyone dependent on our largess) are toast. No future them as cannot do for themselves. Sure there will be humans of some kind, just as there will be slime molds of some kind, but the gross continuity of germ plasm is not what we are talking about here.
It can just burn for all I care. The suckness coefficient is high enough that it would be easier to build it over full scratch that to try and salvage anything. Trying to save a bent gear means everything goes in bent.
cougar
Gotta love a world where a rich guy can still kill a story. What a miserable place this would be if money and power were nullified.
THE VAMPIRE SQUID SHALL SET YOU FREE ONCE ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US
How is it that everyone is missing the fact that Rubin and his 15 disciples were the ones who committed the most deep and damaging crimes. First of all it was convincing the SEC to increase the leverage ratio from 12:1 to 30:1 - just when the quality of mortgage pools were deteriorating. GS bought a huge amount of CDS protection from AIG - isnt it amazing that the Feds somehow became convinced that Lehman and Bear Sterns could fail - but AIG could not??? Did they disclose that if AIG went under then GS would really be in trouble.
Doesnt anyone realize that all of the big banks have contacts in the DOJ, SEC, CFTC and all other regulatory organizations. Do you think they are pushing the focus to the buyside organizations to take the focus on themselves.
If the buysiders crossed the grey insider trading line then they need to be held accountable - but i will point out that these firms made money without leverage and it was the sell-siders who literally walked into the Fed Reserve Bank and robbed billions of dollars from taxpayers.
If you cant see this - then youre missing whats really happening.
If you deal with the Slippery Snakes in Reality, Marla, others will deal with the Venal Viruses in ITs SurReally Controlled Mirrors in the CyberSpace Field of Live Operational Virtual Environments ........ which you might like to Realise has Created AIMarket of Exceptionally Stealthy Wealth :-)
And the following shared post is intended to Betatest the intelligence of those who participate at and donate their views and information to Zero Hedge. It's a mad, mad, mad world out there, and getting crazier too, for some are getting So Smart as to be Unreal/Out of this World? :-) Merry Xmas and Thanks for All the Phishing.
AIRapid Fox in the Headless Chicken White House?
Posted Tuesday 22nd December 2009 17:27 GMT
Santa delivers a Space Hopping Bubble Pricker/Bouncing Turing Bombe Advisory Notice? Hiding your lights under a bushel leaves everything in cold darkness. Let there be light and warmth generated? A Spirited Holiday Message from the Operations Offices of CyberIntelAIgent Security Theatre.
Posted by: amanfromMars | 12/22/09 | 12:06 pm
And as unpleasant as it may be, is the fate and dispossession of the native American to pioneering white settlers and immigrants as shown in Western Cowboys and Injun Movies reflected in the War of Terror crusades by similar post modern pioneering forces in other occupied "alien" lands with the same modus operandi employed?
Is that Surge the Al Qaeda that all fight to defeat and thus is the battle one to vanquish one's own ignorance and arrogance?
The Smarter Players in such Global Games need only do as was beautifully conveyed in the article we have just read, and share the question for the answer to be clearly registered and recognised.
Further discussion between differing and disparate disciplines will also enhance and speed up resolution and offer deeper and clearer insight on that pressing present problem which a dedicated "expert" team may be blinded to, in much the same way as the E coli experts were hindered by the extent of what they knew as experts in their very limited field in the tale shared here?
Or would you prefer to avoid the issue and sweep it under the White House and Pentagon carpets? You will not be thanked or be thought well of for that deliberate abject failure and abdication of intelligent reasoning and thus would it be best to be bold and explore the bigger picture with an alternative view and alternative views .......for NEUKlearer Vistas and SurReal New Beginnings.
Welcome to the Cinderella RockerFeller Program in HyperRadioProActive IT. One in a Suite for NIRobotIQs in CyberIntelAIgents.
In Global Operating Devices We Trust ..... and have Entrusted and Enabled Information Flow for SMARTer than Human Intelligence, which will no doubt be a #1 Priority for Mr Howard Schmidt to deal with in his newly created leading role as President Obama's cybersecurity czar, for Information and Intelligence Sharing between Smarter than Human Intelligences are Cyber Domain Fields with Future Controls under Masterly SuperVision with HyperVisionary Mentoring and Virtual Monitoring.
http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/12/fail_accept_defeat/
http://forums.theregister.co.uk/forum/1/2009/12/22/schmidt_cybersecurity...
this wired article is excellent. C.D. especially should read this one in context of the questions above:
“The scientists had these elaborate theories about what was supposed to happen,” Dunbar says. “But the results kept contradicting their theories. It wasn’t uncommon for someone to spend a month on a project and then just discard all their data because the data didn’t make sense. But experiments rarely tell us what we think they’re going to tell us. That’s the dirty secret of science. The scientists were trying to explain away what they didn’t understand,” Dunbar says. “It’s as if they didn’t want to believe it.” The problem with science, then, isn’t that most experiments fail — it’s that most failures are ignored." [maybe not just science...]
Did someone just let a Turing-test module loose here on ZH? Wow. It seems CAPTCHA is nowhere near good enough (I wonder if wolframalpha has an API, and if so, could it be used to circumvent CAPTCHA questions?)
The Wired article is indeed an excellent one, nevertheless.
A very well written, well organized, and provocative post. As much as I enjoy the tone of your writing, I really enjoy your perspective. Thanks.
And with your penchant for movie stills, I take you for a film buff.
Even more reason to believe the BLS as well:
http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/news/local-beat/Unemployment-Calls-Overwhe...
Perhaps it is not a question of what SAC has invested in Thomson-Reuters but what (if anything) #24 on Forbes Global Billionaires List has invested with SAC.
Thomson Reuters is an information provider which makes most of its money from its markets division. This group sells information to sales and trading and also investment and advisory customers.
Their news organization (a much smaller revenue producer) is unlikely to go against the firm's customers.
As always, nicely done, ZH. Keep on keepin' on.
We've captured each other, eh?
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.packersjerseysonlineshop.com">Packers Jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.packersjerseysonlineshop.com">Green Bay Packers Jersey</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.packersjerseysonlineshop.com">Packers Jersey</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.packersjerseysonlineshop.com/aaron-rodgers-jersey-c-3.html">Aaron Rodgers Jersey</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.packersjerseysonlineshop.com/charles-woodson-jersey-c-13.html">Charles Woodson Jersey</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.packersjerseysonlineshop.com/clay-matthews-jersey-c-7.html">Clay Matthews Jersey</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.packersjerseysonlineshop.com/greg-jennings-jersey-c-4.html">Greg Jennings Jersey</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/">Wholesale nfl jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/">wholesale jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/">wholesale football jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/">authentic jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/nfl-jerseys-c-206">Wholesale nfl jersey</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/nhl-jerseys-c-249">wholesale nhl jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/nhl-jerseys-c-249">wholesale hockey jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/nhl-jerseys-c-249">discount nhl jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/nba-jerseys-c-168">Wholesale nba jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/nba-jerseys-c-168">wholesale basketball jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/nba-jerseys-c-168">discount nba jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/mlb-jerseys-c-134">Wholesale mlb jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/mlb-jerseys-c-134">wholesale baseball jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/mlb-jerseys-c-134">discount mlb jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/ncaa-jerseys">Wholesale NCAA Jerseys</a></strong><h1>
<h1><strong><a href="http://www.wholesalesportjersey.com/custom-jersey">Wholesale Custom Jersey</a></strong><h1>