Savings Rate Climbs To 4%, Highest Since September 2009, Even As Spending And Income Both Miss Expectations

Tyler Durden's picture

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
papaswamp's picture

People got caught without any savings....too bad the bank rates blow.


firstdivision's picture

The beauty will be when all those that just got kicked off of FUNemployment have to sell all the worthless overprice Apple crap they bought.  Next months numbers will be dismal now with less discretionary spending taking place.  It is shaping up to be a great summer, almost reminiscent of 08's. 

OT: So I have been supporting the site by clicking on the ads that have been appearing...and I love the new Russian Bride ad TD.  I must admit that I looked at the girls on the site ;)

dehdhed's picture

i don't get it.  if once again as expected, americans outspent themselves .. how did savings go up?

was the comment because spending was greater than expected?

or is overall spending still greater than income?

but why did savings rate go up?

the comment about overspending wasn't self-explanatory to me and would appreciate any clarity ... thanks in advance

dehdhed's picture

for some reason, when i first read this article, the here's the goldman spin wasn't visible to me.

i guess yoy kinda explains overspending, but doesn't quite make obvious the once again analysis

thesapein's picture

I'm one of those over-spenders who blew my entire dollar savings on purchasing gold and silver. Now, I'm stuck with no savings account and just some worthless metal that I can't eat or have sex with.

Chemba's picture

I find it more than somewhat disingenous that Goldman Sachs is relentlessly shat upon for "bad FX trades" or whatever, while at the same time relied upon for insightful commentary on the economic data.

schoolsout's picture

I read the "here is Goldman's Spin" part and thought differently

mephisto's picture

That was not meant to be taken as insightful commentary. It's useful to see how the big houses spin bad errors.

GS predicted +0.6%, consensus +0.5%, result +0.4%. The whole GS piece is "We did not fuck up. If you lost money on this, you fucked up. Not us. Have a nice day."

jkruffin's picture

Gotta love this.  They tried desperately to pump this marekt up using Census jobs in the unemployment data to disguise how bad it is,  and now they do a 180 reverse and say don't count the 1/4 million jobs lost in June from Census exits, to keep trying to pump the markets up.  You can't have it both ways.  ROFL


In May, the Census hired 410,000 temporary workers, helping to boost payrolls by 431,000, the largest gain in 10 years. In June, the government laid off nearly a quarter million of those temps.

After subtracting all the layoffs in the government sphere and adding a modest gain in private-sector payrolls, total U.S. nonfarm payrolls are expected to fall by about 115,000 in June, according to the median forecast of our survey. It would be the first loss since December.

The focus should remain on private-sector payrolls, however.

DoctoRx's picture

Russian girl pics?  Can't wait for the ad to reappear . . .

Beats Goldman spin

Coast Watcher's picture

Doesn't "savings" also include paying down debt, including credit cards?

thesapein's picture

Another reason these numbers are lame. If you bought gold jewelry, that would be considered consumer spending. If you held dollars while they lost value, you saved!!!

JR's picture

reposted on BIS

thesapein's picture

What if people are trading dollars for things like gold, silver, or anything that works better than a cash "savings" account? Spending vs. saving numbers are warped in this casino circus.

Saving dollars is plain stupid, but that seems to be what the talking heads want. What we really want to see is "spending" going up and "savings" going down, which would mean people are exiting the dollar.