This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.
Search The Online Sarah Palin Email Archive
Frankly, we couldn't care less about the content of Sarah Palin's emails. But some do. And since Alaska office has made it prohibitively difficult for most to access this collection in non-electronic format, requiring up to $750 in physical content fees, below we provide a link to the only resource that currently provides the most comprehensive selection of the just disclosed Palin email archive. The redacted emails can be found here.
Click on the image for the interactive link; the NYT is also creating an interactive option, but due to their paid firewall we recommend readers avoid it.
»
- 6356 reads
- Printer-friendly version
- Send to friend
- advertisements -
A honeypot for retards! Call it NePalinthes or DionaEmaila.
Exactly. Who get's a rat's behind? Would the neo-con puppet please just go away? Please??
Comb through 'em - she will only look like a hero.
Anyone want to see Obama's emails :)
I am sorry but the 'Left Right Paradigm' is an illusion. One must understand this in order to move forward ideologically. I do not say this as a republican or democrat, but as a 'political atheist'. It seems that both parties are two heads of the same snake and all we see is the dog and pony show.
I suggest reading the whole of 'George Washington's Farewell Address' if one has not done so, it is fairly short but speaks volumes about what is happening today.
Remember George Washington's Farewell Address (Section on the Danger of Political Parties):
"
The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.
Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.
It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.
There is an opinion that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the government and serve to keep alive the spirit of liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in governments of a monarchical cast, patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume.
It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution in those entrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositaries, and constituting each the guardian of the public weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them. If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit, which the use can at any time yield.
"
Farewell Address: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp
The summary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington%27s_Farewell_Address
It is the Progressive Party that has taken both Elephant and Donkey. Obama, Clinton, Pelosi and McCain are Progressives. How do I know, they admitted it. Look it up.
It is corporate welfare 'that has taken both Elephant and Donkey.' There is no democracy nor capitalism but the will of the special interests groups (corporations ala lobbyists). I would not be so naive as to trust Miss Palin as the solution to the troubles. All one has in this world is their word and I know of only one person to stand the test of time (and who has warned us about the many issues). Ron Paul has not wavered on any issue and is the foremost candidate with knowledge and the will to follow through.
Integrity and intelligence is something I look for. You may disagree with some of his points and views, but all I want to point out is his steadfast beliefs of which he has not sold out. (...for about 40+ years)
I am sorry but if Palin is somehow elected, it will be business as usual, they may bicker about abortion, trivial spending cuts...etc... but the same policies will stay in place. Big contracts to defense companies, bail-outs for the banks, conquest wars without end, etc.... (I could go on.)
Obama is the same. (No prosecution of bankers, not ending the wars, not closing Guantanamo, not ending rendition, expanding the military industrial complex.... etc.... )
If you have the time, do take a look at George Washington's Farewell Address, it is highly insightful. Here again: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/washing.asp
David Stockman talks about this phenomena in this speech: http://youtu.be/CAkdB-2qFHY
(I just forget at what point he touches upon the subject, but it is a great one if you have the time.)
Watched a piece on MSNBC this morning on the Palin emails. It was favorable, implied that a thorough review of the emails shows that she was very involved in the day-to-day affairs of the State of Alaska while she was gov. Why would MSNBC do a puff piece on Palin? Why are these emails being released now, after yet another Palin incident involving her apparent lack of intellect?
There's only one reason.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyharnden/100091820/american-way-sar...
"American Way: Sarah Palin email frenzy backfires on her media antagonists"
Another puff in UK Telegraph.
Crony Capitalism is a term describing an allegedly capitalist economy in which success in business depends on close relationships between business people and government officials. It may be exhibited by favoritism in the distribution of legal permits, government grants, special tax breaks, and so forth.
Or
"Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power." - Benito Mussolini
You decide. (At this point, it is just preference on which ever term you prefer.)
Zionist puppet, just like all the rest of them, demican or republicrat. The big dual citizenship lie. No politician gets anywhere without pledging their loyalty to Israhell.
Thanks TD. Progressive a-hole idealists are so scared of this woman they have thrown everything including the kitchen sink at herself and family...and she just keeps steady marching. Anyone doing the slinging here or elsewhere has not bothered to know who this lady is. She's definitely not a regular politico and she's not owned (yet)...but at this juncture, the woman certainly exposes the ignorance and truer identities of the herd trolls. They hide here well enough though, but like like flies to honey, the trolls CANNOT resist this woman no matter what! But even these pissants can realize the world is desperatley short of leaders with guts and conviction. The collectivists are very afraid of this woman and intent on destroying anyone like her.
- tom
Seriously? Palin's a leader? A woman who couldn't even finish one term as Governor of Alaska?
I am about as anti-establishment, pro-liberty as one can get. I suppose Palin has had a couple decent ideas WRT small gov. But that doesn't change the fact that she is one, a war monger who wholeheartedly believes in the BS War on Terror and two, is not all that intelligent.
I disagree with you, but I appreciate your level-headed (if wrong, heh) tone.
In this comment I am shilling for Palin, not as President, but as the target of unjustified attacks, so for those who can't bear to read that sort of thing, move on.
Briefly, this e-mail fiasco is (I think) just another example of the sort of bizarre phenomenon surrounding Palin. I do think the media is terrified of her, because squeaky annoying voice, dreadful accent, questionable policies etc aside, Americans hate Obama and like Palin.
It's difficult to develop a sound case against a pistol-packing soccer mom type, and it is just as difficult to support an America-hating communist tool of the Frankfurt school of thought with anything other than emtpy-vessel sloganeering.
The media accomplished this, and will defend their unsteady construction to the death.
Palin was beset with a raft of bogus ethics charges that had already guaranteed to swamp the rest of her term in office. Notice that as soon as she left, the charges dried up. An unprecedented combination of lawfare and media selection cost Alaska one of the most popular governors in the nation's history. By the way, Alaska state law prohibited her from speaking about this while the subject of ethics charges. See? Perfect weapon. Her record of integrity remains admirable.
There are several politicians who should be required to divulge communications before Palin, if any. Where, for example, are the current President's transcripts and theses? I am sure that there are various legalist reasons, and that is not what I mean. I mean how is it that former governor, not running for office, strange lady with a bus tour is once again being roasted by the media, while countless elected officials are able to hide behind exemptions for the governing? Why no media interest beyond a few conservative columns?
In general, I believe that Americans hate Obama while they like Palin. His continuing popularity, I believe, is more a product of image massage by all involved than actual widespread approval or even ambivalence. Americans may not want her to be President, but the disparity between these two figures is a threat to the media's death-grip on perception. Stand by.
I guess you're right, she's such a peach! She couldn't be any worse than Ronald Reagan, right? More dangerous, mb. Stupider, perhaps; but oh, the integrity. So I have to admit, she might be the first to actually believe that she's doing the right thing while she destroys America and makes damn sure she takes the rest of the world down with it; a kind of useful idiot, a powerful dupe. Yay.
BTW, who is this "... America-hating communist tool of the Frankfurt school of thought..." to which you refer? It certainly does sound like it would be difficult to like him/her.
Obama and Palin are both inspiriational and appear streets ahead of what the rest of the world allows itself to be governed by.
If POTUS were the all powerful A1 king of the heap, would it be better if it was a cool Hawian black dude or a huntin' fishin' hockey MILF? Either way the future looks good, just a shame rules of old order mean we cant get both.
+1 on the MILF, -1E9 on the rest.
Keep the faith Thom! 50 million uninsured americans can't be wrong when it comes to your final, Paineful solution!
Heh, it's not the 'collectivismistites' or whatever that fear this woman, it's that ever increasing number of impoverished and unfortunate, IE the powerless that are scared to death of her, as all defenceless soft targets should be. Everyone else with a conscience is merely disgusted by her.
Regards
Absolutely - Socialist math does work, as long as you solve that pesky 'useless eater' problem in a socially acceptable way.
Scandanavia has all the variables in that equation nicely balancing out.
Three words: Sovereign Wealth Fund.
`course they also value education the same way others are enraptured with the 'bravery and honour' of killing civilians with missles fired from RC drones.
Now there's a ROI chart comparison you won't ever see stateside.
What's the tax rate on wage earners in "Scandinavia" by the way?
Who cares? Why not ask a question that in the long run matters much more to Scandinavian wage earners: what's their standard of living compared to the rest of the world?
Care to hazard a guess at who made the following statement,
"I don't believe in this working class movement. I am sure that, generally speaking, working people are very satisfied with their lot, that they don't complain at all and that they are not in the least interested in what is called socialism. There are obviously ringleaders who try to make a lot of noise and attract a following but such people have neither hold nor influence over honest reasonable, hard-working labourers. One has to distinguish between good and bad workers. Those who demand the eight hour day are the lazy, incapable ones. The others, the steady serious fathers of families, want to be able to work long enough to provide for themselves and their family. But if they were all compelled to work only eight hours a day do you know what the majority of them would do? Well, they would drink!... What else would you expect them to do?"
?
If the high cost of living restricts communication how will they know for sure?
I have no idea what you're on about... they don't have telephones in Norway? No interweb connections to Sweden?
Please elaborate.
"Who cares?"
I do and you avoided the question.
Sweden has a 58% income tax and a 25% VAT. Finland 51% and 23% VAT...should I go on?
You may desire to work for the state all of your life instead of yourself, I do not.
Ignorant on your part... since the correct question went to the standard of living ...
those Countries are always at the top for everything that matters ...
of course not to you!
I'm sure the Swedes are flattered that 'you care' so much about their tax burdens (sarc) MB you should run for office there, they seem to enjoy a good laugh.
Heh, truth is you're a'flounderin'. The question I asked answered yours perfectly, and it is as plain as the irony of that mask on your face. That is, I wasn't being evasive at all, you're just being thick. You're pissed off because I so effortlessly negated your loaded question.
"It's easy when you believe in what you're doing."-JL
I notice you haven't responded to mine yet...hunh.
Really, 'go on' away; in light of my response the numbers you managed to squeeze out are of no consequence, even outright irrelevant, and anyone who can see past their own screen door knows it. So by all means continue if you wish underline further your pig-headed ignorance.
"You may desire schmee da schmee blah blah blah gargle blather rote fume hiss",
what a load of conditioned malarkey. They're not working for 'the state', but their (less fortunate) fellow citizens, and valuable, tangible services for themselves and their families. Unlike your taxes, which may be less in percentage (assuming the US NEVER pays its debts), but with the lion's share of revenue going directly to your plutocrats and their private army (publicly funded) instead you still don't get to enjoy a standard of living in even the same league as our Swedish friends. Stop trying to blindly project your failings onto success stories.
Pretty fucking simple point you're so derperate to derp around, all in all. I wonder why? Hanging on by your fingernails to outdated idealistic dogma despite a litany of hard evidence refuting it, would be my guess.
Speaking of 'being evasive': So, do you ID with the quote? Own up. C'mon, aren't you the slightest bit interested in discovering who would say something that, I would think, you find so agreeable?
Sorry, Tyler. I have to call "bullshit" on this statement. If it were true you wouldn't have jumped into this cess pool. You are better than that.
;-)
I assume these are in-office emails and as such subject to public disclosure.
I'm still not going to read them. Just seems wrong. Seems ... well like the kind of thing the government and corporations would do, if they could get away with it.
As such, I'm not going to read them. Empty gesture I know. But still.
OH I see....one of their own boyz got humiliated, so now the media hacks want to go on an expedition for some Palin dirt....what a stupid juvenile country full of sheep, its going to get everything it deserves in spades real soon.
Am I a dumb cunt?..you betcha
lulz
count those junks as laughs.
Not to worry Michelle - you look mahvelous wearing the White House drapes...
She is a Hot Granny
No, she's a douchenozzle.
I wouldn't mind drilling her for oil, if you know what I mean.
Stop, please. The vomit is burning the back of my throat.
Pretend it's bong water then, dipshit
Whoever runs this show in Alaska should have charged more for the e-mails since these jackasses would pay whatever it takes to get them.
I guess the libbies need something to fire up their weekend.. or divert attention away from their Weiner..
I guess the retard needs to poke fun at the majority of the country that thinks the Quitta from Wasilla is also a retard.
Imagine if you were a Sarah Palin supporter hahahahah that's the punch line. oi how to I get on to wikipedia again?
File this story along with Weiner in the wasted battery power from my wireless mouse pile
I could care less about Palin, I neither like or dislike her. However, there seems to be a widespread somewhat irrational hatred for her, what kind of threat does she present that elicits these strong feelings/opinions. Lets take for example Pelosi, why not the same or greater hatred for her? I can think of quite a few more reasons why people should hate Pelosi, she has actually fucked up the country in more ways than I can count. Seems misdirected is all.
Well people should hate the Zionist puppet masters who actually run Wash DC, but these kind of 'American Witch hunt' expeditions are way more entertaining for the simpletons who inhabit the country.
Burn the witch! She turned me into a newt!! Well I got better...
I would be much more interested in reading the Pelosi's, Reid's, Bernank's, Timmy's, Ohbummer's, etc., emails, and not for entertainment, but to glean information on what is really going on in the world.
I do not support the disclosure of anyone's emails that are personal, I feel differently about email used in an official capacity.
If these emails are personal in nature then this post by ZH is in very poor taste. However, if they are emails in Palin's official capacity then that is a different matter entirely. Would seem to me that it would be reasonable to have the same access to the aforementioned individual's if Palin's can be disclosed.
How about seeing Weiner's emails, that were sent from his Congressional email account, that is much more pertinent and relevant, might even reveal some ethical issues given his recent blunders.
+1
Hmmm country falling apart what to do....OH Ive got it lets go on a witch hunt to divert peoples attention! Humans never made it out of the dark ages.
Indeed.
An economy in shambles.
Gas/food/clothing prices skyrocketing.
Five - count them - FIVE wars. One with a record death toll.
$14 trillion in deficits.
Foreign policy disasters.
Raiding the public pension fund to avoid the debt ceiling.
Southern border completely unguarded and falling into chaos.
Worsening nuclear disaster completely ignored.
But there's always time to attack Sarah Palin, a private citizen who currently holds no elected office.
thanks Eddie. You said it best. Brings tears to my eyes. Bread and Circuses 4 ever
Lol that is great.
Many parallels to Rome or any other historical empire.
Isn't she running for POTUS? That would make her fair game.
She's not running yet. If she does, then investigate away. I'm all for it. If there is something there, we need to know. God knows we don't know a thing about the horror in the White House now. And look where it got us.
If it's not running, it needs to STFU. It will get the hose.
Oh POTUS would make her fair game? Then why arent Obombers records fair game? Why are they totaly sealed?
Good point.
Agreed!
Because he is POTUS, of course. If you wanted to see his records you should have gotten hold of them when he started making noise.
We did.
Not to quibble, but the national debt is actually on the order of somewhere of at least 53 trillion and as much as 202 trillion in debt (annual deficit is big, too, at nearly 2 trillion).
I won't take your reply as a quibble at all. Suffice to say, we're in serious trouble as a nation and 'betters' are asking us to focus on the emails of someone they don't like but completely aignore the actual laws being passed by their own friends.
The masses need a break from the laser focus of 'journalists' on the wholly pertinent to their lives revelations contained in the Casey Anthony Weiner drama that's being beaten like a dead horse into their lives and thus around the idiots' watercooler. This is a step up in focus for them, although still wholly impertinent. Everyone knows she's a dipshit already and unqualified to do anything except be paid to spout nonsense, for which she is very good at. Rome is Burning is not just an ESPN show.
Sure they may find something about troopergate or something else, but while the heavens fall, I think focus should be placed elsewhere.
if there was 1/10 of 1% of the evidence that Sarah Palin was born in Scotland as there is that barry was born in kenya it would be on msm 24/7
Please, not Scotland!
John McCain was born in Panama, deluded dipshit.
The Dem's must be scared sh..less of her
Yes liberals seem to have a livid hatred for Palin. Is she really that threatening to them? or perhaps they feel she is an easy target? Maybe they just hate what she stands for? Who the fuck really cares anyways.
Either way, its lame and its weak. Get over Palin already, at least from an executive experience standpoint, she was much more qualified than Obama to be President/Vice-President, something the libbies forget when they are trashing Palin.
Obama and Palin both suck, neither are qualified for office in my opinion, both represent the establishment.
She is a relious nut, which scares me to death. The minister whose prayer she credits with her election as Governor of the State of Alaska apparently participated in actual witch hunts in Kenya, where people are still murdered for that particular crime. I prefer my politicians to hold God in so much respect that they don't practice such casual familiarity.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iwkb9_zB2Pg
And Ohbummer's pastor was more upright or had a better message? Rhetorical question. I can understand someone needing spiritual guidance, however their message should be moral, uplifting, and enlightening. More importantly you do not need a pastor/minister to teach you how to think or tell you what you should think. Think for yourself.
Think for yourself.
Says the dittohead.
Sorry, I've always suspected that those who are happy enough to have found the one and only truth expect that everyone should embrace it. Historically, if those true believers have sufficient numbers, they will require that everyone embrace such truth. They will require it strenuously. Don't get me wrong, I believe that people should be free to practice whatever belief they happen to hold as long they don't bother anyone else with it. Truly, I can't see that prayers of protection against witchcraft will do any more harm than my old Granny's 19th Century Catholic superstitions (that included a guaranteed entrance into heaven if you made a Novena and nobody who was not Baptised a Catholic would be admitted to heaven so nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah, nyah); however, in the case of the religious right, I suspect that if I want to dance naked under the moon during the summer solstice in honor of the Great Mother or make an offering of milk to a statue of Ganesh, they would deny me that if they could, just as my old Granny's church would have when they had such power.
No, no, no...not God Bless America...God Damn America..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnlRrxXv-v8&feature=related
With all due respect... I think God has more pressing issues than this bullshit!
One person in this story has been attacked relentlessly, investigated, and slandered by the media for three long years.
One has been protected at all costs by the same media.
One person in this story runs the country.
One does not.
How is your country doing?
I thought so. Then, knowing that, whose emails should the media be investigating?
Very well stated.
Right.
Quite the "Twit for Twat" you have going on there.
Jump you fuckers!
Here here, Van Halen,
This whole "I hate Palin" thing is a product of the MSM. Now, setting aside your belief about whether or not she could be an effective President, or whether anyone can be an effective President under the currently screwed up system, to get on board the hate train is to be a Johny come lately, bandwagon hopper. It would be your admission that you need others to think for you. And the others to which I refer are the worst lightweights of all.
The way I see it, she could do no worse than the current inhabitant of the White House.
Pics or GTFO
I'm not a supporter of Palin, but after this kind invasion. I'm of mind to change that view. Thank you main stream media for bringing me around.
+1. This is the liberals revenge for that twit Weiner. The Democrat parties descent into hell has pulled the entire country along with it. Democrats are scumbags, pure and simple.
Bloomberg Knew The Dirt On Weiner In 2009, And Used It To Force Him Out Of The Mayoral Race Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/bloomberg-weiner-dirt-2011-6#ixzz1Ou59hDxZShe gave up her position of power because unwarranted attacks on herself was costing constituents.... has that even ever happened before?
I could take her or leave her but the more the media hates on her the more I think she's probably my kind of people!
Good point, Lucky...
Well I can see why the MSM hates her, considering how biased the MSM is to the liberal side. Its lame the irrational hatred toward Palin when there are so many others that are more deserving of those feelings. lol.
Why aren't we marching yet? Why do we continue to let them crap all over us and divert our attention with this crap? Investigating emails? In THIS economy? After we're done marching on the government, bankers and CEOs who have been screwing us for years, we need to turn our attention to the media.
OFF WITH THEIR HEADS! ALL OF THEM!
You are sheep. Get used to it.
No. I am not sheep. Neither are you. We are people. And we do not deserve to be treated like animals. You are only sheep if you sit quiet and let them walk all over you. You make the choice.
The people are acting like sheep. Baa baa baa. That could always change of course, maybe people will start to think.
After all its easy to be a sheep, its a mindless existence, all you have to do is eat, sleep, and waddle around, people are good at that to. And a sheep is sheared for its one asset, wool, which it does not seem to mind parting with as long as it has food, shelter, and can waddle around now and then. Perhaps the shearing will eventually stop.
Emotional experience in sheep: Predictability of a sudden event lowers subsequent emotional responses
Abstracthttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031938407001916
The study of emotions in animals can be approached thanks to a framework derived from appraisal theories developed in cognitive psychology, according to which emotions are triggered when the individual evaluates challenging events. This evaluation is based on a limited number of criteria such as the familiarity and the predictability of an event. If animals are able to experience emotions rather than simply displaying reflex responses to their environment, then their appraisal of events should, as in humans, modulate their emotional responses. We tested this hypothesis by comparing vocalisations, feeding behaviour, and the startle and cardiac responses of lambs submitted to a sudden event that could or could not be predicted. Lambs able to predict the sudden event thanks to a light cue (associative predictability) showed weaker suddenness-induced startle and cardiac responses and spent more time feeding than their counterparts, thus supporting the existence of an emotional experience in these animals. Furthermore, lambs submitted to the regular appearance of the sudden event (temporal regularity) vocalised less and left less unconsumed food deliveries than lambs submitted to random appearances of the sudden event (controls). These results underline that the cognitive abilities of animals should be taken into account when assessing their emotional experiences and more generally their mood states, which are underlying factors of animal welfare.
Keywords: Predictability; Suddenness; Startle; Cardiac activity; Appraisal theories; Emotions; Animal welfare; Sheep
Why doesn't the New York Times request all of Weiner's emails?
And why doesn't the New York Time and Washington Post request every goddamned email between the bankers and politicians who have been screwing you, me and everyone else for years? Why didn't they investigate Obama's emails? Why did they circle the wagons when we tried to find out what the CRU was doing with all their climategate emails? If they want to investigate something, find out what the hell Geithner and the Bernanke are doing with our money. NOW there's some EFFING EMAILS WE COULD READ!
Lets see all the emails between the FED, Treasury, GS, AIG, and Citi.
Oh, those are 'none of our business' Im sure.....BURN the WITCH!! LOL what a stupid bankrupt dumb country.
It's very sad . . . but in the land of free choice, I guess we need a political alternative to Lady Gaga, in this case a seemingly sincere five year old who hasn't gotten over that pulling her dress up thing as she squirms to make up history under the terrible pressure of those bright lights. Ohhh, hot girl!
Guess there's somebody for everybody in this crazy world.
And if you're not getting it, the media will feed your fantasies endlessly . . .
Bread and circuses. With people camping in line.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9duSZL_-mM
The day Sarah Palin got pranked.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbEwKcs-7Hc&feature=player_embedded
November 4, 2008. The day the United States and the Western world got pranked.
Ten bucks says this stays more in the spotlight than OBL did.
nice distraction, a whole thread dedicated to gossip.
remember when US corporations used to set up maquiladoras, and other "special economic zones" in other countries to exploit labour?
http://www.idahostatesman.com/2010/12/31/1472023/chinese-company-eyes-bo...
how's yer Mandarin folks?
Use it as target practice - allow US citizens, including felons, to freely target and shoot any occupants of that area with any weapon.
If China wants to provide live test-fire subjects(in the form of businessfolk), the US will happily provide the amount of citizens willing to tell China to go home.
Looks like Palen is a lightning rod for the left/democrat, hug a tree and nail a Republican to it sociopaths. Not sure why the Demogogs are scared of her. Now, if Clinton is the replacement for Obama at half time, then the gun debate could be worrisome for the Demoncrats. I don’t think Obama will go away so not sure why they are scared of her. It would be fun to see Obama and Palin debate. Might show Obama aint so bad, or maybe
The media and the socialist democrats of America want to destroy her because she is a strong female role model that is self-made, happily married, up from the middle class, and she has done it all without subscribing to the Feminazi script.
The socialists can't allow such a creature to exist. It must be torched by the village mob. They are desperate for dykes like Big Sis and Hillary to female role model, not a conservative like Sarah Palin. The horror.
C'mon, emotionally she's a little girl! Likewise for her intellect. What she's a role model for is women dancing their way up a pole of repressed sexuality in the fundamentalist world.
Surely there's a sizable and fully respectable middle ground somewhere between her and the feminazis.
There's a little Wiener in every socialist democrat -- the NYT and WaPo are only doing this to hurry the news cycle and distract from Weinergate and his sexting to underage girls so they can save his little ass.
If these socialist news rags are really so interested in Palin why did they entirely blackout the story when her church was firebombed on Dec. 14, 2008, targeting the exits, while people were still inside?
The usual suspects hate Palin because she's not owned by anybody, so she's fair game for all. I hope she sticks her cariboots up their asses wearing her leather mini.
She's not owned by anybody? She just goes around wearing a Star of David for shits and giggles?
Clueless no doubt, NY is 1/4 Jewish after all and last weekend was the Isreal day parade.
The spanking Obama hit Netanyahu with when he visited was on purpose, what do you suppose that purpose was?
You realize that while the MSM goes over the Palin emails with a fine tooth comb, the Bilderberg meeting is happening at the same time.
Strange that you don't hear a word about that. Strange, indeed.
Also strange that while Palin chooses to move freely amongst the people, the attendees at the Bilderberger Conference have hired armed guards, demanded total secrecy, and put up a wall to avoid being seen.
Once again, I ask: Who is a bigger threat to your liberties, Sarah Palin or the Bilderberger attendees? And once again, I ask: who is the MSM keeping you focused on?
Nope, haven't heard a word lately about the Bilderberg meeting.
On the other hand, I've never heard a word in the MSM about the Bilderberg organization, much less meetings, in my entire life.
Does Sarah really deserve all that credit?
You've made some great points in this thread, Eddie. Yet you keep getting 'junked' and receiving partisan replies ... from useful idiots and trolls who probably have no idea what Bilderberg even represents!
What nobody here seems to understand is that the less-than-a-handful of owners of the MSM -- under tactical planning agreed at Bilderberg -- know who to cover in a favourable or neutral light (McCain last time; Perry this time) and who to disparage or dig up dirt on (Palin, Paul, Romney, Edwards, etc). The simple objective is to set up a final runoff on Nov 4 where only two choices of overseer are presented to the slaves ... and both are fully under the control of the plantation owner and committed to carrying out his wishes after the votes have been counted / rigged / adjusted and the slaves have applauded 'their' wise choice. It's called "controlled opposition".
Anybody who participates in these rigged election farces should be euthanised as a collaborator!
Then by all means arrange for an "accident" to remove this group. Turn the isolation and privacy that they seek into a liability - if they aren't open, how do we know(with evidence) they aren't harboring enemies of the US?
As a fuzzy foreigner I cannot understand that a person with such a reduced intellectual can candiate for presidency. Why are clever and integer persons like Ron Paul never making the run in the US?
Ron Paul did run last time, mostly no one knew who he was back then.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ron_Paul_presidential_campaign,_2008
From CNN...
CNN Busts Palin
Palin is a dingbat distraction that nobody with half a brain should pay attention to for more than five minutes just to get a laugh. NEXT!
Monty Python is not that bad.
And then there's this... The state received no requests from Palin’s lawyer to redact or withhold any documents
Gosh, this was a great idea, forcing her to release all of these emails. Well done you super intellectual progressives. You all are sooooooooo smart. heh.
When the state will gladly do her bidding without those requests, who needs them?
Hopefully there's a governor elected there that will release all of what's withheld, even if it is offensive.
I truly believe the left and progressive/statist/whatever right don't like her because she can't be bought and there is not a damn thing with which to blackmail her. She is exactly what she appears: an honorable, determined woman who loves the country and the principles upon which it was founded. Go see that movie when it comes out, The Undefeated. Even leftie publications are giving it good reviews. What has taken all of them back is what Palin preaches 'the planks' of her beliefs on how government should function has not changed in 20 years. She's the real deal, people. If she runs and wins, our nation will be very lucky to have her. She will work to clean things up.
Ralph Nader has already been doing that successfully for the last four decades. Where you been the last four elections? You think he would have bailed out the banks?
The probable answer to that question alone should have had you marking an 'x' by his name since 1996.
It appears to me that the vast majority of people vote based upon their "personal" like or dislike of the candidate. You like how they walk or talk. That little smile they have . . . the way their lip tilts before they swivel and give that stage point to their friend in the audience. The way they handle being asked . . . here it comes . . . a question in public.
It's a cheap beauty contest, everybody over time falling into a harmony of perceptions about the special human qualities they've projected upon a media-defined screen.
It's nothing but dumb love.
When you see the absurd shit they come to defend a given politician for and the intense investment they have in doing so, it's hard to have any real hope in democracy under any conditions.
Ron Paul is also one of Them. If he had run as an independent we would now have a 3rd party with matching funds. But he chose instead to run as a Republican knowing he could not win. The Libertarians were infiltrated by a mole with a neonazi sidekick: it's a dead party now, same as the 2 legacy parties. The Constitution party was likewise infiltrated by a mole. The leftwing parties were too weak to bother infiltrating. Ron Paul helped to make it happen. He is no more anti-establishment is Dennis Kucinich. Their parties keep them to give the illusion that the legacy parties retain some vestige of actual conservatism or liberalism, when neither does.
wtf