• Leo Kolivakis
    03/19/2010 - 07:34
    A recent joint poll by Responsible-Investor.com, the Network for Sustainable Financial Markets and AQ Research, showed more than 90% of investment professionals believe moral hazard has increased. And yet, global pension funds and wealth funds manage trillions of dollars but they have not taken the lead to push for financial reforms. Why are they silent? Why do they acquiesce on post-crisis financial reforms?
  • Econophile
    03/19/2010 - 00:48
    The fact that Google will not kowtow to Bejing and will walk away from the market of greatest potential is to me a commendable act. This is a companion piece to my series, "China's Fragile Economy, Its Housing Bubble, and What It Means To Us." China is not a liberal country, by far.
  • madhedgefundtrader
    03/18/2010 - 23:00
    The outlook for natural gas is terrible. Will this be the ETF that kills the goose that laid the golden egg? Torpedoed by contango. Sarah Palin’s pet project bites the dust. Sweating bullets in Qatar. Moral of the story: read the damn prospectus first. A new 100 year supply of natural gas will be a dead weight on prices for decades. Gas companies are racing to out-produce each other in the hope of offsetting falling prices with increased volumes. It’s sad to see such a great molecule fall on such hard times. Pitiful, really. (UNG), (CHK), (DVN), (XTO).

SEC Probing 3Com Option Trades

Tyler Durden's picture




The SEC has no problem being all over what is handed to them on a silver platter. As to the pyramid scheme that the market now is, they'll just leave that one alone. " Bullish bets on 3Com Corp. options four hours before Hewlett-Packard Co.’s bid for the maker of computer-networking equipment are being investigated by regulators, according to a person familiar with the matter."

The chances this was an innocent calendar spread, or a trade masked as one, are promptly going to zero.

Bloomberg reports:

The Securities and Exchange Commission is examining whether someone used advance knowledge of Hewlett’s offer to illegally profit from the surge in 3Com’s stock when the deal was announced, according to the person, who declined to be identified because the inquiry isn’t public.


“It screams insider trading to the SEC,” said Peter Henning, a law professor at Wayne State University in Detroit and former SEC attorney.

Way to earn that $1 billion budget SEC. $50,000 booty split TBD.

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)



by E pluribus unum
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 10:14
#131728

Who's the lead investigator - Stevie Wonder?

by LoneStarHog
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 10:18
#131734

Another SEC "investigation"?  The SEC could not manage their bowel movements if their assholes did not do it for them.

Just like the so-called SILVER investigation at the CFTC.

When they have Dimon, Blankfein, Paulson, Geithner, et al in CUFFS, I just MIGHT start to believe something.

by Anonymous
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 18:38
#132487

SEC investigate silver? That is also handed to them yet.... Am visiting China right now and while they speak in hushed tones, the USA's truth is known and the dollar is not Happy Lucky Fun Time. When even the educated Chinese students (rightly) laugh right at Turbo Timmy during his visit here...

Got gold and silver?

PS: Amazing amount of new cars here in Beijing! traffic jam almost all day long even though each car can only drive every other day to reduce traffic(!). Chinese are buying more new cars than USA nowadays.

by buzzsaw99
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 10:28
#131738

The SEC got the go-ahead from teh big banx. Free Sergey!

by Anonymous
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 11:29
#131841

I just wonder why the SEC doesn't mandate the clawback of all options or stock trades made within a day of a major merger or acquisition. That would make it harder for these kinds of shenanigans to occur.

by Anonymous
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 11:32
#131843

The customer bought calls in both months (it was not a calender spread) and agreed to have the trade taken down after the news came out.

He likely was a cheater who decided to give the money back after realizing he was caught. The real winner is the firm who sold the options and bought stock against it only to have the losing side of the trade canceled.

by Anonymous
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 12:50
#131976

Do you have a link to where this was reported? I missed it.

Thank you

by janchup
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 11:37
#131850

The SEC does, at least, have to pretend, sort of, to have a job to do.

by buzzsaw99
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 12:30
#131947

They got a bigger budget because they helped the banks cook the books.

by Anonymous
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 12:12
#131918

watch them "catch" whoever did it only to see their case fall apart on technicalities or crappy evidence

by Fibozachi
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 12:31
#131948

Buzzy Krongard and OJ-esque probabilities surrounding 9/11 and front month airline equity options ... nah !

$780 bucks for Hawaiian ... now that is juicy !!

Thanks SEC !!! 

Give Patty Byrne 1% of their annual budget and see how many Steinhardts get nabbed.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 01/06/2010 - 15:45
#184805

Trade-offs must be made in enforcement activities. Martha Stewart was a high value target. The listers and buyers of the Bear Stearns puts, not so much.
My money is on Geithner as Bear buyer, he fits the profile.

Lee S.

by Anonymous
on Mon, 02/22/2010 - 20:47
#241000

Does anyone know whatever became of this?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.