• rc whalen
    02/09/2010 - 08:06
    At our firm we frequently receive calls from clients and readers asking about the likelihood of the passage by the Congress in Washington of reform legislation regarding over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, financial regulation and/or mortgage securitization. Our answer is small to none given the political trends and the state of the lobbies in Washington, most specifically the large bank lobby that protects the Sell Side monopoly in OTC derivatives and securities. The fact that Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) is still apparently not comfortable with the entirely watered down House proposal to reform OTC derivatives, for example, tells you all you need to know. Stick a fork in it.
  • Reggie Middleton
    02/09/2010 - 05:12
    The levered assets of the banks in many Euro-sovereign nations easily outstrip those nations' GDP's. So when the nations' banks get in trouble from bad banking practices (and a very large swath have), the nations themselves are helpless in attempting to truly save the banks (and instead only institute a bait and switch wherein private default risk/insolvency potential is swapped for public manifestations of the same).
  • Chopshop
    02/09/2010 - 02:41
    Derivatives trading volumes in January 2010 were stronger, with European derivatives volumes increasing 32.4% and U.S. options trading volumes increasing a whopping 102.4% y/o/y. Cash equities trading volumes were mixed, with European cash transactions increasing 4.1% and U.S. cash equities trading volumes declining 23.7% from Jan '09. Total interest rate products ADV of 2.7 million contracts in January 2010 increased 37.8% from January 2009, and increased 50.5% from December 2009. Total interest rate product ADV is at the highest level since March 2008 !

SEC Probing 3Com Option Trades

Tyler Durden's picture




The SEC has no problem being all over what is handed to them on a silver platter. As to the pyramid scheme that the market now is, they'll just leave that one alone. " Bullish bets on 3Com Corp. options four hours before Hewlett-Packard Co.’s bid for the maker of computer-networking equipment are being investigated by regulators, according to a person familiar with the matter."

The chances this was an innocent calendar spread, or a trade masked as one, are promptly going to zero.

Bloomberg reports:

The Securities and Exchange Commission is examining whether someone used advance knowledge of Hewlett’s offer to illegally profit from the surge in 3Com’s stock when the deal was announced, according to the person, who declined to be identified because the inquiry isn’t public.


“It screams insider trading to the SEC,” said Peter Henning, a law professor at Wayne State University in Detroit and former SEC attorney.

Way to earn that $1 billion budget SEC. $50,000 booty split TBD.

5
Your rating: None Average: 5 (1 vote)



by E pluribus unum
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 10:14
#131728

Who's the lead investigator - Stevie Wonder?

by LoneStarHog
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 10:18
#131734

Another SEC "investigation"?  The SEC could not manage their bowel movements if their assholes did not do it for them.

Just like the so-called SILVER investigation at the CFTC.

When they have Dimon, Blankfein, Paulson, Geithner, et al in CUFFS, I just MIGHT start to believe something.

by Anonymous
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 18:38
#132487

SEC investigate silver? That is also handed to them yet.... Am visiting China right now and while they speak in hushed tones, the USA's truth is known and the dollar is not Happy Lucky Fun Time. When even the educated Chinese students (rightly) laugh right at Turbo Timmy during his visit here...

Got gold and silver?

PS: Amazing amount of new cars here in Beijing! traffic jam almost all day long even though each car can only drive every other day to reduce traffic(!). Chinese are buying more new cars than USA nowadays.

by buzzsaw99
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 10:28
#131738

The SEC got the go-ahead from teh big banx. Free Sergey!

by Anonymous
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 11:29
#131841

I just wonder why the SEC doesn't mandate the clawback of all options or stock trades made within a day of a major merger or acquisition. That would make it harder for these kinds of shenanigans to occur.

by Anonymous
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 11:32
#131843

The customer bought calls in both months (it was not a calender spread) and agreed to have the trade taken down after the news came out.

He likely was a cheater who decided to give the money back after realizing he was caught. The real winner is the firm who sold the options and bought stock against it only to have the losing side of the trade canceled.

by Anonymous
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 12:50
#131976

Do you have a link to where this was reported? I missed it.

Thank you

by janchup
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 11:37
#131850

The SEC does, at least, have to pretend, sort of, to have a job to do.

by buzzsaw99
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 12:30
#131947

They got a bigger budget because they helped the banks cook the books.

by Anonymous
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 12:12
#131918

watch them "catch" whoever did it only to see their case fall apart on technicalities or crappy evidence

by Fibozachi
on Mon, 11/16/2009 - 12:31
#131948

Buzzy Krongard and OJ-esque probabilities surrounding 9/11 and front month airline equity options ... nah !

$780 bucks for Hawaiian ... now that is juicy !!

Thanks SEC !!! 

Give Patty Byrne 1% of their annual budget and see how many Steinhardts get nabbed.

by Anonymous
on Wed, 01/06/2010 - 15:45
#184805

Trade-offs must be made in enforcement activities. Martha Stewart was a high value target. The listers and buyers of the Bear Stearns puts, not so much.
My money is on Geithner as Bear buyer, he fits the profile.

Lee S.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This problem is intended to determine if you are a machine- or not sufficiently intelligent (or determined) to participate at Zero Hedge.
33 minus (minus four) equals
Solve this math question and enter the solution with digits. E.g. for "two plus four = ?" enter "6".