This page has been archived and commenting is disabled.

Second Circuit Tells Fed If It Wants To Maintain Its Secrecy It Better Get Congress To Change America's Laws

Tyler Durden's picture




 

Key selection from the Second Circuit's Fed FOIA appeal:

The “public interest” standard rejected in Merrill is the functional equivalent of the “program effectiveness” test, as the Board invokes it: the agency gets to withhold whatever it deems harmful to disclose--and an agency’s decision as to its own mission and effectiveness is the kind of thing that ordinarily commands deferential review. The Board and the Clearing House undertake to show that disclosure would harm the banks that borrowed (by disclosing their prior distress) and the banking system as a whole (because banks under stress may hesitate to seek relief or rescue), and that these harms will reduce the effectiveness of measures critical to the banking system. The arguments are plausible, and forcefully made. But a test that permits an agency to deny disclosure because the agency thinks it best to do so (or convinces a court to think so, by logic or deference) would undermine “the basic policy that disclosure, not secrecy, is the  dominant objective of [FOIA].” See Rose, 425 U.S. at 361.

The requirement of disclosure under FOIA and its proper limits are matters of congressional policy. The statute as written by Congress sets forth no basis for the exemption the Board asks us to read into it. If the Board believes such an exemption would better serve the national interest, it should ask Congress to amend the statute. 

In other words: if the Fed wants to maintain its strict secrecy, it better get Congress to change the laws immediately. Of course, if that happens it will become very clear who controls not just the fiscal and monetary destiny of America, its executive control (via the recently institued bilateral decision making of who apoints who - the President of the United States <-> The President of the FRBNY, and vice versa), but also the legislative. As for the judicial, we will know definitively when the Supreme Court overturns this decision. In other words, the Federal Reserve is about to become the President, the Congress and the Supreme Court (not to mention Wall Street) all rolled into one.

Full text:

Appeal Decision (3)

 

- advertisements -

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Fri, 03/19/2010 - 13:37 | 270325 nope-1004
nope-1004's picture

Further proof that Geithner needs to go to prison.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 15:49 | 270482 curbyourrisk
curbyourrisk's picture

+1 to the infintiy power.....

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 22:54 | 270724 35Pete
35Pete's picture

You do realize that +1^inf is still +1, right? :)

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 03:28 | 270801 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

yeah but it's an infinitely powerful 1.

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 13:33 | 270936 Millivanilli
Millivanilli's picture

Math illiterate people have no right commenting on finance.    Good job!!!

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 15:22 | 270972 35Pete
35Pete's picture

It's all in good fun. If curbyourisk is a successful investor, then I'm sure his math skills are just fine. 

I just couldn't resist the soft ball though. ;)

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 13:38 | 270326 Zeno of Citium
Zeno of Citium's picture

If things are quite so bad, why should we expect any response to be accurate, or more specifically complete. You either "trust" them or you don't.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 13:41 | 270330 fuu
Fri, 03/19/2010 - 13:47 | 270336 nope-1004
nope-1004's picture

Not a Rush Limbaugh fan, but this is interesting.

http://www.rbr.com/radio/22516.html

 

Rush Limbaugh says that he only asked listeners to call Capitol Hill once before, back in the 90s, just to show he could do it. That is until now – he has asked his listeners to call Congress in opposition to health care reform, and they are responding in a big way.

Reports say about 40K phone calls are being handled by switchboard operators on an hourly basis. Further, it is possible that as many as another 40K are being stopped by a busy signal. The Hill says there have been 500K calls so far.

 

The heat is on.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 14:11 | 270371 Bob
Bob's picture

That's some crazy shit.  But then, the Boy Scouts have been recruited by Homeland Security to "serve" :  http://www.infowars.com/boy-scouts-train-to-become-homeland-gestapo/

Likewise for Girl Scouts, local police, school children in general, clergymen nationwide, et al

Thank God for the web.  Hope Obama's CyberCzar doesn't pull the plug.

 

 

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 14:46 | 270415 merehuman
merehuman's picture

will there be a reward if we turn in the free thinkers? Who should i call, my neighbor didnt pay taxes? 

Hi, homeland security, my mom says the government is corrupt. Do i get a prize for turning her in?

I know it sounds ridiculous, but this is where we are heading. Nazy germany became like that and we are following that path, sad to say.

I really liked America the way it was in 63 when i first arrived here. Now i see the populace is in shock, confusion and ignorant of what really transpires in our country.

 

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 03:34 | 270802 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

The obama white house blog set up an email address you can forward 'fishy' emails to.

flag@whitehouse.gov

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/facts-are-stubborn-things/

Turn in your friends!

 

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 16:18 | 270508 Oso
Oso's picture

O.M.F.G...................  thank u for posting this.  totalitarianism is upon us.   Does Soviet States of America sound good?  the good ol' S.S. of A?

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 13:44 | 270335 sysin3
sysin3's picture

Laws ?  Ha !  Laws only apply to serfs and vassals.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 15:49 | 270483 Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Truer words were never spoken.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 13:46 | 270337 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

So what are the civil and criminal penalties for FOIA violation again?  I forget.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 14:23 | 270387 Thisson
Thisson's picture

Double secret probation!

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 15:00 | 270434 Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Someone (mail clerk) must stand in the corner or write on the black board 500 times "I will be nice."

I like that the hot potato "buck" (pun intended) was passed by the court. Of course, if Congress does pass a law, what was obvious will become self evident. If Congress doesn't pass the law, the Fed can simply say "Make Me".

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 23:23 | 270733 35Pete
35Pete's picture

Me thinks congress will not pass a law. Then the FED will say "make me". 

And Congress will huff and puff and....

do nothing. 

But, like Lucy, Charlie Brown, and the football, the Amerikan Sheeple are fooled by it everytime. 

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 15:50 | 270484 Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

You get a blowjob?

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 17:52 | 270559 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

lol, and then a corner office at GS.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 13:48 | 270340 ArkansasAngie
ArkansasAngie's picture

That would be a very good reason to unelect all of the current Congress.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 13:53 | 270347 crosey
crosey's picture

...the Federal Reserve is about to become the President, the Congress and the Supreme Court (not to mention Wall Street) all rolled into one.

 

Better to have your adversaries gathered in one place.  Then, one shot gets them all.  Make no mistake, the market has always been far bigger and far less controllable than TPTB.  When it makes its "one shot", they all will feel it.

The resulting melee of blame and finger-pointing will be (sardonically) amusing and relieving.

Maybe then, we can rebuild?

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 13:59 | 270354 Village Idiot
Village Idiot's picture

'gelatin' tests have shown that that a properly placed .50 cal could make it all the way through.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 23:32 | 270738 35Pete
35Pete's picture

Firearms are for defense, not offense. Besides, worst possible "solution". The political dissenters in this nation, that'd be us, all get branded "terrorists", and the pretense for for an incredible crackdown of dissent is handed to the aristocratic establishment on a platter. 

Non cooperation works if we can only muster the ability to organize it. Crash TBTF's via Move Your Money. 

Pull out of the markets. Let them fall. 

Nationwide strikes. Continual, drumbeat, relentless use of the 1st amendment to expose the charade. If they crack down, it just forces their hand more and wakes more people up. 

But violence is the worst possible reaction. Awful, awful awful. 

Listen, I'd like to hang a few of the bastards myself for high treason against the United States. But wouldn't it be sweet if we could turn this thing around and witness the executions nationwide, being carried out by US Army MP's or the Justice Department? You know, a Dept. of Justice that was actually working for us? Sorry bro, had to mention it. Anytime someone brings up violence or bloody revolution it makes me cringe. I immediatey think of failure. 

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 03:40 | 270803 faustian bargain
faustian bargain's picture

The tricky thing is defining what defense is, in this case. Because once it gets to the point of defending against imminent force - like martial law or crackdowns or something - it's probably too late (unless you've got your own trained and well-armed militia). Talk about failure.

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 08:02 | 270837 35Pete
35Pete's picture

I'd be careful about what political thoughts that you think out loud. You might just get listed by the Southern Poverty-of-Law Center. 

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 11:40 | 270896 Bob
Bob's picture

Agreed.  Armed resistance would be a truly epic fail.  I don't think much of Ghandi, but he and his progeny had it right . . . it's hopeless until the soldiers must vote with their souls, a la Tiananmen Square, etc. 

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 14:02 | 270359 lsbumblebee
lsbumblebee's picture

The Fed's argument that "it could withhold the information under an exemption that allows federal agencies to refuse disclosure of 'trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential'” is ridiculous on its face. It is NOT a federal agency, and it's time for the courts to stop pretending otherwise.

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 11:47 | 270897 Bob
Bob's picture

+100

OTOH, though, that would make the Fed not subject to FOIA, right?  It's a Catch 22. 

It would be good to hear a Court rule sanely wrt legitimacy of the fundamental claim, though. 

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 14:04 | 270360 Waterfallsparkles
Waterfallsparkles's picture

The Fed must be hiding something VERY BIG.

Makes you wonder just what it is that they are hiding or protecting.

I do believe as another poster that they are protecting themselves from something indefensable.  Something that really would put an end to the FED.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 14:50 | 270421 merehuman
merehuman's picture

Something big!?  Like all the gold in Ft Knox gone? Or that the USA did in fact create tungsten gold. Or that Mrs Clinton gave China some of our country as collateral?  Whats your guess?

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 23:38 | 270740 35Pete
35Pete's picture

Well if the collateral is NY, NJ, California, and Massachusetts, then that's something that I could live with. 

It's a win-win for all. We settle our debts, rid ourselves of those mutant colonies, China gets paid, and the residents of those states get to enjoy greater freedom than they presently have. 

We'd have to insist that ZH'ers and other rational, freedom-loving, independent thinking folks in those states would have an opportunity to emigrate over to Flyover Land though. There's still a lot of good folks trapped in those regimes. Ohh, Illinois too. China can keep Barry once his one term is up. 

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 14:09 | 270367 lizzy36
lizzy36's picture

There are 2 levels of appellate courts before the Supreme Court would even consider whether to grant leave.

If the Fed decides to go the Court route, we will be on marstian bailout #3 by the time the Supreme Court ever ruled on this matter.

One wonders what wold be the fall out if Congress did decide to change this law to allow the Fed to maintain the secrecy it so desires (so it can bailout wall street in perpetuity) at this critical T-6 months to mid-term elections. 

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 14:18 | 270380 Bob
Bob's picture

The time issue was what stood out to me as well.  Given that the appeals leading to SCOTUS would take years (assuming optimistically that the Fed continued losing), Congress wouldn't need to even talk about it until long after the next presidential election.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 14:40 | 270410 lookma
lookma's picture

Hi Lizzy,

What levels of appellate courts are between the 2nd circuit and SCOTUS?

District court for southern NY grants judgment on FOIA lawsuit in Bloomberg's favor.  So the FED appeals to 2nd circuit and the 2nd circuit upholds.  Isn't the next stop SCOTUS?

 

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 15:28 | 270450 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

The fed can petition for the full circuit to hear the case first.  Regardless, the 2d should be done with it fairly quickly.  I suspect that the fed will seek relief so they may well file for consideration during the 10-11 term.  We'll see... I must admit to a desire to see the SCOTUS refuse the case, without comment...  Ya, I know..

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 21:04 | 270666 Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

Every banker in this country is shaking in their boots--I wish.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 21:10 | 270674 Howard_Beale
Howard_Beale's picture

We all want that Miles. Ya, I know too.

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 08:05 | 270838 35Pete
35Pete's picture

The Credit River decision is a classic precedent for what happens to judges that defy the will of the elite people. 

The record of people that just "die" after taking on the FED is rather incredible, isn't it. 

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 15:34 | 270466 trav7777
trav7777's picture

First the Fed will ask for an en banc hearing...they'll need enough judges to agree to rehear it and disagree with the panel's decision.

If that is denied or the entire bench affirms, then a Justice would have to grant cert and the matter would be placed on the SCOTUS docket

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 15:16 | 270452 painequalschange
painequalschange's picture

Of course, if that happens it will become very clear who controls not just the fiscal and monetary destiny of America, its executive control (via the recently institued bilateral decision making of who apoints who - the President of the United States <-> The President of the FRBNY, and vice versa), but also the legislative.

 

THIS...You would never see this in the MSM

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 15:36 | 270467 Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

The 2d reminds the fed of the responsibilities inherent in our do, check & review form of government and how it is supposed to function.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 15:47 | 270478 Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

In other words, the Federal Reserve is about to become the President, the Congress and the Supreme Court (not to mention Wall Street) all rolled into one.

B.I.N.G.O.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 16:24 | 270514 DavosSherman
DavosSherman's picture

Au revoir FOIA.

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 23:07 | 270726 the grateful un...
the grateful unemployed's picture

well the Fed is about to become a PERSON, under the current ruling of SCOTUS, which granted this Constitutional Right to corporaations and labor unions. Ergo their right to privacy is secured. later on i hope to expound on the current Supreme Court dilemma, and how a weak kneed presidental wannabe could use it to act preemptively in matter s of foreign policy, if he thought a lot of Congressional debate would jeopardize the security of the nation. this is of course how we got to such enhanced executive branch powers, as it was popularly thought that if the Russians were to say launch some missiles there would be no time to convene Congress.

in the near futures every organization will have the same Constituional right individuals used to have. stay tuned

Fri, 03/19/2010 - 23:43 | 270744 35Pete
35Pete's picture

I was contemplating incorporating my person so that I could have the best of both worlds: 

Full rights of citizenship and immunity from criminal prosecution. 

Just like "corporate peoples"!

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 00:49 | 270763 Jim in MN
Jim in MN's picture

That's Awzome.  So the Fed can contribute unlimited amounts to Congressional campaigns too!!!

 

A_W_Z_O_M_E

 

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 11:15 | 270886 the grateful un...
the grateful unemployed's picture

the fed already did! this is why Ron Paul wants to audit the Fed, he wants to reveal their involvement in Watergate, and covert activities such as iran/contra. it's entirely likely that even if he acquires documents they will be seriously redacted, for security reasons. national security has already been suggested as a defense against the FOIA, although there is a statute of limitations. Once the fed's authority is reduced, or the fed is officially insolvent, the president will recreate the agency within the Treasury, subject to some congressional oversight probably. concurrent with that we will see some serious constraints on private credit expansion, as this is what really drives the money supply guys crazy, or at least some control over how credit is monetized, which is to say government will have more control over how much capital is created and who gets it. consumer credit is okay, which doesn't leverage out. consumerism is good for wall street and the current corporate business model, and bad for small business, (but hey who likes competition?) anyway i wanted to talk about Libertarianism, its growing appeal, and the threat to the system.

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 00:47 | 270761 LeBalance
LeBalance's picture

The FED is one of your Tyler Durdens.

They dress like you want to dress.

They f%%k like you want to f&&k.

They steal, rape, kill, maim, and give the finger like you want to.

They run the world.

So...you are waiting for what?

They will be that area of your life, unless you want to take responsibility back for what they are and run that part of your life the way you want to.

>>>>Achieve<<<<

and then they will be irrelevant for you.

Sat, 03/20/2010 - 13:12 | 270925 Kayman
Kayman's picture

Benny and the Inkjets ought to become the centerpiece of the November elections. Someone ought to be able to "sex up" the $2 Trillion Benny and the Banksters stole from the American people.  "Systemic failure" equals my friends have run out of OPM, so let's rob the Neighbors.

I think, and I hope that ZH is chipping away at the (weak) foundation of this financial sleeze, thereby providing readers with the intellectual power, righteousness, and tools to bring down this outrageous theft.

Benny and the Inkjets are truly on the horns or a dilemma. If they abandon the appeal, the monstrous truth will topple them and their thieving ilk, but if they become the centerpiece of the November election, the pressure to kick down the doors of this Authoritarian Money Monster will be insurmountable.

Madoff will look like a piker compared to the Board Members at the Fed.

 

Wed, 04/14/2010 - 08:14 | 299719 mark456
mark456's picture

ucvhost is a leading web site hosting service provider that is known to provide reliable and affordable hosting packages to customers. The company believes in providing absolute and superior control to the customer as well as complete security and flexibility through its many packages. windows vps Moreover, the company provides technical support as well as customer service 24x7, in order to enable its customers to easily upgrade their software, install it or even solve their problems. ucvhost offers the following different packages to its customers

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!