- advertisements -
This is great and all but most people don't have the money to plant multiple flags. I have talked to multiple lawyers and barristers and the cheapest cost of an economic citizenship is $130k. You can give everything up in the US and move to New Zealand or Chile and wait 5 years for citizenship, but you have to do little things first like selling your assets here in a terrible market, find a job there that will support you, and saying goodbye to family and friends.
On opening a bank account somewhere else I agree, though that is literally getting harder by the day as many banks close to Americans.
What you say is true - ACTUALLY opening companies, etc, is considerably harder than writing newsletters about it.
I emigrated as a student with 0$ in my pocket, I studied and worked in that country than I moved to another having my money stashed away in a 4th country, no you dont have to be rich just have the balls to do it
My wife's family emigrated from Cambodia after escaping the communist camps. But the only way they did it was being sponsored by an American family so they could earn their citizenship.
I don't have a 'balls' problem, but I do have 3 dependents and I need to make sure I can feed them. So there is no way I am going to just hop a plane and hope for the best. There has to be a strategy in place, and it takes years and $$ to make happen.
Not impossible, but not practcal for many with families.
One idea for people with children, who are sort of 'rooted' and can't make major shifts, is to encourage their children to think of other countries as places to live, do business, become educated, and have investment accounts. Parents could get their kids interested in setting up futures for themselves here, there, there, in small ways; making internet connections (pen-friends, etc) in other countries, etc.
Who knows? Maybe one day your kids will bring you over somewhere. Or, less drastically, you could use your children's experience of, say, their Swiss bank account to open up your own investment account in Switzerland. For example.
Obviously, as you point out, 'multiple flags' for most of us would take at least a few years of careful research and getting to know the people and culture of other countries. It's not exactly a great plan for emergency, I-need-out-this-year situations.
But for the longer term, not such a bad plan for a family to be trained toward, I would guess.
The only problem is that you no longer have years to do it, the sky is falling (in slow-motion) and the more you wait the more you loose untill a point when running away will be either impossible or pointless
For sure, redrob25. Who is this guy anyhow, pedalling Cadillacs to a bunch Schwinn-riding weiner-heads like most of us?
He reminds me of 'The Continental' with his oo-la-la wine, (pardon, vino), eagerly pawing everything he can reach. Or maybe 'The Ladies' Man' with his cognac and Euro-trash scank in tow.
This joker is just regurgitating the normal "P.T." ("perpetual traveller" -- as well as other expansions) newslatter material from the 1980s.
What a chump.
And the "best" bottle of "Primitivo" costs much more than "9 euros". A pointless and Wrong opening anecdote always sets the tone. And for the record, "Primitivo" is generally thought to be the same grape as "Zinfandel" - not a "distant cousin".
Any Italian - the land of stunning Barolos, Brunellos, etc. - would be shocked to hear anyone talking up lame zinf table wine.
Australians who finally see other parts of the planet are often so naive - sorry if you are from Australia and don't fall in this category.
"Paging Julian Assange... Mr. Julian Assange..."
+1 snarky shark
I believe Mr. Black is American and once served in the armed forces in Iraq. He also still maintains his American citizenship for personal reasons (family lives in Dallas).
This is more of that "nice idea on paper" type stuff.
If you have enough money to actually do the international citizen stuff he proposes, you (1) probably have some political influence that would protect you at home anyway, and (2) very likely have assets in your existing domicile that can't readily be pulled up and relocated - either at all for physical businesses, or just without an enormous tax hit if all you own is paper wealth.
If you have a personal background that gives you the personal freedom to do what he proposes, chances are you don't have nearly enough money to do it in a way that will actually give you more freedom instead of more worry and risk.
It only really works if you have a bunch of paper wealth and no real personal or business ties to your existing domicile. And any minor children makes it at least ten times more difficult. So I guess if you're a single trust fund kid of some robber baron, it may work for you.
I say this as a regular international traveler who knows hundreds of expats from various countries living in various other countries.
"single trust fund kid of some robber baron, it may work for you"
isn't all financial advise targeted to this demographic?
What? You mean all those unemployed real estate agents with 0 retirement accounts can't globetrot to a brighter future? You mean China doesn't need any expat American lawyers? India doesn't need any American engineers?
Maybe Simon travels so much because he is a drug mule and is currently getting 'packed' in South America. Now there's a career opportunity for people with US passports.
What I like about this article is the idea of the "sovereign individual". I like the idea that in a sense we are all our own country which is to say that we each own ourselves. If we own ourselves then no one can use us to serve their purposes without our consent. This is the antithesis of all governments for the last 5,000 years. The fundamental proposition of all governments is that we are ruled by divinely appointed people (most monarchs), by the strongest (Somalia, Zimbabwe, most of Africa), or even by collectivist ideals (democratic or autocratic). In all cases, we are subjects and serve the state and the purposes of those in the state. America was the first and best (arguably maybe the Greeks) reversal of this trend. America has failed miserably in sustaining this during the last century but it was an excellent idea that still won't die.
Free people are strong, decent and ultimately happier and more prosperous than others. However, you have to be brave, self reliant and fairly well educated in the necessities and virtues of liberty versus the foibles of statism. Those are not taught in government controlled education.
So, the author may be wrong in the details of wine but he is onto something in terms of liberty and self reliance. I enjoy his thinking even though it is impractical for 99% of us. Someday, we "sheeple" as some her term us may take up our liberty again, but not until the current system fails and unveils its lies and shortcomings to the general public.
Let's hope for a surviveable if not happy new year in 2011.
I like that too. The sovereign individual. We don't think often enough about the trust involved, choosing which country we live in.
Osric: "The borders of my country run around the soles of my feet." One of my favourite saws.
And, this is indeed difficult but needs must. It is probably a lot harder for people with children; but more than one citizenship/perm-res is certainly desirable. Just having some business dealings (e.g., trading or investment accounts) in other countries isn't impractical at all. Not even all that hard for Americans who share a border with Canada. Many are the comments I've seen on this blog wondering if now's the time to pick up, pack up, and move somewhere else. I hear now of heaps of Americans moving to Aus, the country we just left for its high inflation and bad prospects (in the short term anyway). It does require a fair bit of research and very careful planning.
(PS: New Years Resolution for ZH: Fix the damn 3-figure captcha...)
It takes guts to pick up and move to another country, maybe except Canada. I give credit to those who doit. At least they don't whine about America and do nothing to fix it. Some of these foreigners (that are our guests here) have the nerve to complain about their rights when back in their own country they would be taken off the street to never be seen again if they said the same thing they say here. America is still the best, but we are unfortunately lowering ourselves to the rest of the runners-up.
And YES, fix the damned captcha!!
In 10 years America won't be better than today's Mexico, and Mexico might be better than today's America, so I would not be moving to the States now it's too late
That is so true, most people I talk to would not even have the idea that their needs might come before the nations/societies/country needs, they have a total slave mentality they can demonstrate before their masters for more food but never would they demonstrate for freedom
It is not the government I find my self constantly running away from it's the people on the street who knowingly and willingly enslave them selves and would even give MY freedom away without asking, they take it for granted that if you live in the same country as they and that country is a democracy than they can force you to do things you are with your body and mind opposed to
I think you are exactly right, Azzannotth! That is an observation very few people seem to make. I have observed that if you ask people about liberty and rules they will tell you they personally don't need more laws and rules. They are of course presumably good honest citizens. It's that "other guy" who needs another 2000 pages of rules and regulations. They unwittingly sell not only you but themselves into servitude as that "other guy" also has rules for them. Presumably there is some point where there are enough rules to make life perfect.
To be free we have to limit or even reject rules for our neighbor and ourselves. To be free this has become my motto,
"Believe in yourself.
Trust you neighbor.
Vote for liberty."
Here is another unsolvable problem you can throw at the rules-people, too. When they advocate more regulation of any sort, ask them how many pages, paragraphs, pounds, etc. of regulation do we need before society is perfect? Next, ask them how many rules and regulations before we are all thoroughly miserable and dominated by government in every important aspect of our lives. Which number is lower?
You can also ask the same thing about tax rates, too. What percentage of total personal and even national income is required until there is absolute "fairness" and all social ills are cured? If you have a typical hardcore modern liberal (not classical liberal)-statist-collectivist he/she will abandon all pretense of intellectual debate and begin calling you names or saying you don't care enough.
I prefer the real benefits of liberty to the theoretical benefits of collectivism and statism.
You are mistaken. No man can be free of himself. He is subject to all the forces of nature and all the depredations of other men. You can delude yourself that you are free because others have fought and died and are vigilant up to and including this moment for that freedom; that freedom, that you think is in the air you breath and yours because you are you. No, it is there because of America and what it stands for and how it got to where it is, warts and all.
You stand in a room alone and imagine that you are a god. Outside that room massive forces, natural and artificial, roil and pound, and men contend and struggle and bend those forces to keep the walls of that room of yours in place, so that you can continue to manufacture your fiction and strut and fret and preen and crow.
But you are mistaken. Because what you really are is merely the kept thing, the prized possession of a anxious loving parent that does not know that his child is an ungrateful monster that only loves himself.
The founding fathers believed that knowledgable men would form the sinews of a people that would be a shining city on the hill, a free nation. They reasoned that a free people would cherish their nation, and love it IN GOOD TIMES AND BAD.
They could not have foreseen that that people would someday exalt themselves to godhood (the 'sovereign individual' an oxymoron and a profound idiocy), turn away from their own roots and denounce the common good; that the freedom long ago discovered and enshrined in law would become an end in itself and not the hallmark of enlightened man.
And here we have in the disgusting drivel excreted on this website the idea that the nation of one's birth, the source of every citizen's identity and the fountain of each being's endowment of freedom; is a place to be abandoned for wealth and 'individual freedom'.
Well, rave on, but you are dead. You cease to live the moment you cut yourself off from the source of your life, and that is your land.
"Be there a man with soul so dead,
That never to himself has said,
This is my home, my native land."
-Sir Walter Scott
I cannot speak for Azzanoth but I suspect you take the wrong meaning. Our forefathers created a government to protect our rights and liberties, not consume them. In fact, in the Declaration of Independence it states that if the government fail to do this they should be dissolved and a better one formed to that end. Now, I have not yet seen the government that is willing to dissolve itself. We all should fight the good fight so to speak in terms of making our country better. However, "the common good" is not to be confused with collectivism or even an all powerful state of any sort. King George could have and did make arguments as to the greater good of the empire. Second, the sovereign individual is absolutely and completely a concept in the founding of our country. It underlies the idea that the governing derive their power from the governed. We come together as individuals to form governments not serve governments.
It may surprise you, but all the original settlers came here to create something better than they had back at home, whether escaping religious persecutions or to enhance their lives, fortunes and personal treasuries. It was the idea of making their own individual situations better in a land where you could be the captain of your own ship leaving the lands they called "home" that drew them. There was no America, yet. It was dangerous and uncertain here, yet they came. They in fact abandoned home and family for a chance here...not to be subjects of some new state, but to chart their own path. That is profoundly individualistic and yet appeals to many worldwide for the last four centuries.
Sorry I could not read your comment to the end because the 1st paragraph made me nauseous
Because what you really are is merely the kept thing, the prized possession of a anxious loving parent that does not know that his child is an ungrateful monster that only loves himself.
The 'anxious loving parent' here would be the government, correct? The same government that will take away my freedom if I choose to smoke one weed rather than another, that will tell me lies to get me to kill foreigners so that my 'leaders' will get bigger bribes from the companies that make the munitions? That will sell my children's future to keep bankers rich?
And then I realised you were being satirical!
What a sigh of relief I breathed, when I realised you weren't just some slavemaster's troll.
Actually America only failed in the last 35 years or so, when money finally poisoned politics to the extent that now very little can be done to change course. I agree, many of these ideas are very hard to pull off for the average person. I have some modest resources, but I'm at the age where most countries wouldn't want me, nor do I care to abandon parents and grown children by moving 1000s of miles away when the shit hits the fan.
needing foreign language skills, stands in my way. or i would be some place else for sure.
Canada actually isn't anywhere near as French as it likes to claim... ;-)
Actually, you can do much of what he talks about cheaply. Just join the military. Request an overseas assignment. Meet a nice local gal. She'll be more than happy to help you get set up "on the economy". Rest assured, it happens all the time and is not that daunting a task. Even the language barrier is not that big an obstacle. You would be surprised how many people speak a little English. It is the international language.
You've got many locations to choose from -- Far East, Middle East, South America (to a limited extent), Europe. Some places more exciting than others. Go for it!
The military is not really much of an option for most people.
The big downside to joining the military is that you might have to go around killing people for the very same government that f*cked up your own country so badly that you want to emigrate from it.
How does a owning a foreign corporation figure one? owning an internet biz hosted and incorporated offshore, accumulating profits offshore just repatriating enough for a living in the US (paying taxes on it) to eventually get a dual passport etc?? or would you have to relinquish citizenship fully?
Imagine an asteroid demolishing the Earth along with all your scattered assets. Now imagine that you are lounging at your summer house on the moon when the asteroid hits.....sweeet.
Best comment ever!
A reoccuring suggestion in all his post is an "overseas private vault for your gold" and it only takes a few MINUTES to lease it. and just a COUPLE of hours to open a business in Singapore.....how many hours does it take to fly from Buenos Aires to Singapore?
I think he can arrange that for you for a price.... This guy is always trying to sell something.
Absolutely. WTF. For a small consulting fee and your time and effort to go to Panama you can meet with his netwrok of advisors. Perhaps the advice will be to fork over more money to get set up.
Imagine getting sued, losing the case, and having your financial assets commandeered by the court.
Imagine.... your email archives turned over to the authorities. N
Imagine being robbed (taxed) by the government
Imagine having everything in your home country taken from theft, coercion, and litigation.
Imagine the social decay in your city getting so bad that riots and violent crime are a common occurrence. Now imagine having property overseas.
All discussed things are certainly possible, but unless you're one of the wealthiest people in the country (like Mr. Khodorkovskiy in Russia), you will not be alone with your problems: there will be thousands, if not millions of people in the "same boat" as you. Some will be armed with the law degrees, others with AR-15s...
Now, tell me why the same calamities cannot happen in a foreing country? They can, they are, and they will. Except over there you will be a "gaijin", or "el gringo extranjero" and there will be nobody on your side. Your property will be taken away and there will be no court that would care to listen your case. And most countries are much further down the "social decay" path than most think. It's not uncommon to get a bullet in the back of the head during an all-too-common robbery in any of the "famous" Caribbean tax havens than anywhere in the USA outside of the Chicago's South Side.
Yeah, having a backup/escape plan is nice.... Just don't think that foreign countries will be any safer.
They won't be safer. They will be different. Years of research and getting to know people in other countries helps...
I think that the concept of having a base of some kind in more than one country is very sound. You can't escape all danger but you're confining the risk of any one country to less than 100% of your [assets]. And, if you have to fly from one place, this gives you a "To".
1500 people died on the Titanic, a few survived, which group do you want to belong to ?
They're all dead, Dave.
Have you ever been sued?
Imagine spending your entire life waiting for a Doomsday that never comes and then one day when you're 75 years old you have a massive stroke and can only speak gibberish and watch helplessly as your children ridicule you for being a dumbass who spent his life hoarding ammo and gold (gold now back at $250, S&P at 10k) while everyone else was out having fun.
Now imagine that Doomsday actually does arrive and you are proven to be a prescient genius, but your equally paranoid neighbor gets in a lucky shot and sends you to the morgue before you have a chance to do any bartering with your huge supply of gold.
And your alternative would be .. ?
Stashing away 1$ bills under the mattress or partying like there is no tomorrow ?
Why would you be dumb enough to advertise the fact you're hoarding a 'huge supply of gold' to your paranoid neighbour in the first place?
And if by 'equally paranoid', you mean someone who also saw the storm clouds gathering, then he's more likely to be an ally... an ally against the hoards of wasters and dumbf*cks who believed their 'leaders'' lies and took no precautions.
For the various naysayers: This is the first I've heard of this concept, but my family has been working toward this for about 3 years. It's good to see that I'm not the first to think of it.
We already own a house out of the US, and are in the process (easier than you’d imagine) of setting up a series of corporations to contain our assets. Corporations can be set up for just a few thousand each, and are a great way to get your foot in the door to be able to bank in that country.
Employment can be an issue, obviously, but in our case my wife works on the internet and can be located anywhere.
We are doing this, while living in the US, on an income of about $65,000/year. Not exactly trust fund.
Ok so you own a house in another country. How did you carry the second mortgage? Most people will not be able to afford it without some serious financial restructuring. While that is their fault, it does not change the reality. Land is not cheap in many places unless they are fraught with risk.
Second, did you setup a second citizenship? If not, then you have to deal with renewing visas and therefore will have to have a strong business relationship or job in the other country to keep you there until you own full citizenship.
Thirdly, most people here would have to setup an Internet business that is actually successful, and that is no easy task. Businesses take years to setup and run successfully.
Not saying it cannot be done, but it is certainly not something you can make happen in 2011 unless you pay for an economic citizenship outright.
" MicrosoftInternetExplorer4" .. are you using MSIE4 ???
What cave are you writing this from ?
I certainly appreciate many of the commenters reticence to these ideas - at first blush the idea of planting multiple flags can seem quite overwhelming. There are certainly many obstacles. However as the old saying goes, nothing worthwhile is easy.
I am attending Mr. Black's seminar in Panama in February (I convinced the wife to turn it into a vacation). So I will know a lot more then about whether or not to continue down this path. Right now though, maximizing economic and political freedom, protecting one's assets, diversifying risk - just makes too much sense to me.
Post a summary of what you find out for the rest of us, lol! Have a great trip!
Thanks - I definitely will post a summary when I get back.
Tips: tips [ at ] zerohedge.com
General: info [ at ] zerohedge.com
Legal: legal [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertising: ads [ at ] zerohedge.com
Abuse/Complaints: abuse [ at ] zerohedge.com
Advertise With Us
Make sure to read our "How To [Read/Tip Off] Zero Hedge Without Attracting The Interest Of [Human Resources/The Treasury/Black Helicopters]" Guide
How to report offensive comments
Notice on Racial Discrimination.