You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

So Much For The Taxpayer Profit In Citi: Treasury Shares To Be Offloaded Over 12 Months After Investors Balk At Overpriced Toxic Holdings

Tyler Durden's picture




It was just a matter of time before the administration's covert plan of rewarding bank execs for massive failure by allowing them to load up their balance sheets with record risk once again, while paying out historic bonuses, blew up in Larry Summers' face. Today's attempt by the government to not only allow the failed Citi management team to pay itself an infinite amount of money more than it deserves for destroying one of America's landmark companies (why the hell is Vikram Pandit still in charge of the Titanic?) but to pretend that it "generated" another taxpayer win by selling off its shares at a profit, was aborted after hours, when Citi could barely find enough interest to sell $17 billion at the embarrassingly low price of $3.15, below that government's cost basis. This will preclude Obama from making a TV appearance tomorrow of how the US taxpayer made even more money by backstopping Moral Hazard. What the US taxpayer however did do, is funnel money straight out of its pocket, into that of Vikram's worthless lackeys. We somehow doubt this will make the teleprompter of whatever it is Obama will be praising in his TeeVeethon tomorrow.

More from the WSJ:

The U.S. government reversed plans to begin reducing its trimming its 34% stake in Citigroup Inc. (C) after investors balked at buying the bank's shares, according to people familiar with the situation.

Citigroup was nearing completion late Wednesday on the sale of about $17 billion of newly issued shares. But the offering encountered such a lukewarm response that Treasury Department officials decided to hold off on selling any of its shares until next year, these people said.

At the expected sale price of $3.15 a share, the U.S. government would have suffered a loss of 10 cents per share on its 7.7 billion-share stake in Citigroup, or about $770 million.

Treasury officials also agreed not to sell the government's shares for at least 90 days. The 90-day lockup is a significant concession because the government previously could sell its Citigroup shares whenever it wanted.

Citigroup said Wednesday evening that it plans to go forward with repaying the financial lifelines it got under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. That includes unwinding a deal in which the government shields Citigroup from most losses on $301 billion of assets held by the company.

As Citigroup gauged interest in its huge offering, announced Monday, some investors said they were willing to buy shares only if the company extracted an agreement from the Treasury Department to hold off on any future stock sales for at least 90 days, according to people familiar with the matter.

The government now plans to unload its Citigroup stock gradually over the next 12 months, people familiar with the situation said. That is a major shift from the Treasury Department's announcement Monday that it planned to dispose of the shares over six to 12 months.

Is this merely one of the ever increasing cracks in the economic team's bailout plan, which as all investors are fully aware are completely unsustainable in the long run, yet sufficiently plausible over the next 90 or so days (until QE presumably ends) that one more day of buying by various algos may be warranted. Perhaps the 90 days will end up being a far too optimistic expectation.




Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:13 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 03:06 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:20 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

Here's a 90 day buy and hold signal from Uncle Sugar ......the nervous holder of 7.7 BILLION shares.

Is this a clusterfuk or what ?? 

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:25 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

hmmm...so, by around March 1 or so we can expect the Fed to have a really strong bid under these bad boys.....

maybe they can reinstall one of those effective short selling bans?

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:57 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:21 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:22 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

This is just phucking beautiful.

Just beautiful.

What the phuck Obama?  Can you please get rid of Summers, Geithner, and Bernanke and get some financial people in there that are NOT sucking up to the banks and are willing to put a plan in motion to fix the banking mess?

The financial system can be saved but not in the fashion that is being conducted by these guys and their masters at the banks and on wall street.

 

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:32 | Link to Comment JohnKing
JohnKing's picture

The only way to fix these free market failures is to simply let them fail. From the ashes will come innovation, not from shit-for-brains economists and Wall Street insiders that are pushing Obama (really us) around. They are only interested in self-preservation.

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:48 | Link to Comment DonnieD
DonnieD's picture

Amen. They need to go the way of the dinosaur. The sooner the better.

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:52 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 21:28 | Link to Comment FLETCH
FLETCH's picture

BINGO!!!

 he has no idea that hope doesn't work with numbers

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:27 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

not to forget that the U.S. gave up billions in tax money in deal for Citigroup's bailout repayment  

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/15/AR200912...

 

The Internal Revenue Service on Friday issued an exception to long-standing tax rules for the benefit of Citigroup and a few other companies partially owned by the government. As a result, Citigroup will be allowed to retain billions of dollars worth of tax breaks that otherwise would decline in value when the government sells its stake to private investors.

Perhaps this has now changed - since the gov is not selling hmmm

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:33 | Link to Comment nicholsong
nicholsong's picture

It fucking better have changed; it would buy time to stoke more anger and perhaps prevent it entirely since it's apparently going to be sold within 12 months--most likely at a loss.

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:29 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 01:20 | Link to Comment Reductio ad Absurdum
Reductio ad Absurdum's picture

An actual Dec. 15 headline on CNBC website:

"Buy Bank Stocks Even If You Don't Want To: Strategist"

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:36 | Link to Comment MinnesotaNice
MinnesotaNice's picture

Don't you love it when a bad plan goes really bad... couldn't of happened to a nicer bunch of guys...

Not sure if the 90-day lock-up is going to be quite long enough... Citigroup has really taken a dive since it had an interim peak at $5/share on 10/14/09... even during after-hours trading tonight it is off ~6.5% down to $3.22...

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:44 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

I just wish the nicer bunch of guys didn't include US.....the lowly taxpayers.

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 21:49 | Link to Comment deadhead
deadhead's picture

"bad plan goes really bad.."

nice Minnesota....best laugh i have had today!

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:30 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 23:59 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

Directive 10-289 is coming.  You just watch.

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:32 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:58 | Link to Comment AN0NYM0US
AN0NYM0US's picture

he could have been in <$2.75 and out >$4.50 - the next 13f will tell some of the tale

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:45 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:50 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 01:14 | Link to Comment Reductio ad Absurdum
Reductio ad Absurdum's picture

Americans like "Vikram Pandit", CEO of CITI?

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 20:54 | Link to Comment Cursive
Cursive's picture

"Treasury officials also agreed not to sell the government's shares for at least 90 days. The 90-day lockup is a significant concession because the government previously could sell its Citigroup shares whenever it wanted."

What.  The.  Phuck?

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 21:09 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 21:10 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 21:24 | Link to Comment Lothar the Rott...
Lothar the Rottweiler's picture

Ruff.

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 21:24 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 21:33 | Link to Comment The Axe
The Axe's picture

Is is the craziest thing  I have ever seen..Other then Jim Cramer telling me to fill my 401K with Citibank

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 21:41 | Link to Comment QuantTrader
QuantTrader's picture

Cramer called it a lottery ticket.  I think I rather take my 1 in 10000000000 chance in winning $50M that own this POS

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 22:05 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 01:09 | Link to Comment GoldmanSux
GoldmanSux's picture

e) Tyler Woods before answering a call on his cell.

Thu, 12/17/2009 - 04:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 21:40 | Link to Comment QuantTrader
QuantTrader's picture

This deal is toxic.  My sales guy couldnt keep a straight face when trying to pitch this BS.  So wtf happens in 90 days?  Does that give Obama enough time to impose a no shorting rule on banks that the govt owns and is trying to sell?

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 21:47 | Link to Comment laughing_swordfish
laughing_swordfish's picture

let this bad boy fail

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 21:54 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 22:02 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 22:20 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 22:51 | Link to Comment Tripps
Tripps's picture

this is why zerohedge sucks now, everything is spun negatively at all costs

 

the secondary was 17 times oversubscribed at this price

 

CIti was shorted starting about 2 weeks ago and who knows how many naked shorts are in this

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 23:32 | Link to Comment Molon Labe
Molon Labe's picture

BS.  Back to the Yahoo! message board with you.

Thu, 12/17/2009 - 00:29 | Link to Comment Tripps
Tripps's picture

dude, i've been reading and posting on zerohedge for 8 months. i just don't post often anymore because this blog continually focuses on the negatives

 

you all should be CHEERING that Citigroup is paying back all the TARP, which is US taxpayers. the rest of the stakes can be dealt with over time

 

this is almost as bad as the bashers on yahoo who bash biotech companies who just got FDA approval....its pathetic. 

Thu, 12/17/2009 - 09:38 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Wed, 12/16/2009 - 23:42 | Link to Comment reading
reading's picture

17% over-subscribed at $3.15?  Umm, quick I am going to go get me some before it goes to $2.00.  They make an elequoently good risk now that they are still stuffed full of ever-rotting toxic assets and have decided to pull the plug on life support so they can have free reign to pay bonuses like they are going out of style.  I guess they better get those bonuses quick, cause they likely won't be in business in a year.

Wed, 12/16/2009 - 23:31 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

So your saying that IPO, bond auctioning, capital raising channels are having a cognitive disconnect where they assume we want to invest in them and not profit with them when we really mean JUST DIE!!!

Is that the miscomunication?

And where is cramer's psychic who was channeling the... All the banks are going to buy 'something' and this 'something' is going to make them alot of money....

Equipment to gold coat tungsten?

Thu, 12/17/2009 - 00:58 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Thu, 12/17/2009 - 04:25 | Link to Comment Gubbmint Cheese
Gubbmint Cheese's picture

Note to Ben, Timmy et al - you need 'real' investors to take down stock. Your HFT and PPT won't be able to do it - oops.. got caught believing your own hype about this bullshit rally.. nice rookie move.

 

 

Thu, 12/17/2009 - 05:05 | Link to Comment Rick64
Rick64's picture

Sell are you crazy. Loan them some more money first, then reverse split it so it doesn't go to zero.

Thu, 12/17/2009 - 06:43 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!