You're now on the archive server. Commenting has been disabled.

Sprott Surreality Check Part Two: Dead Government Walking

Tyler Durden's picture







Similar Articles You Might Enjoy:

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 13:30 | Link to Comment anynonmous
anynonmous's picture

Dimon is on Bloomberg TV right now (SIFMA conference)

 

'Wall Street is a peculiar term because everyone who invests, everyone who deals with a bank is part of Wall Street...Wall Street is us"

and on personal responsibility

"... some people cheat on their taxes and shame on them"

 

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:35 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 15:25 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 13:56 | Link to Comment SDRII
SDRII's picture

How is it that all the Citi retreads (krawcheck, Dimon etc) - who all happen to somehow be discpiles/linked (whether through business or politics) of Rubin toxicity - end up being taken seriously?  

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:20 | Link to Comment BorisTheBlade
BorisTheBlade's picture

If guys like David Walker, a former comptroller general knew how 'unsustainable' financial situation was 2 years ago, then there's no way guys in the Fed, Treasury or elsewhere don't know this today.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OS2fI2p9iVs

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:36 | Link to Comment Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

Then you should not be surprised at all why they are issuing TRILLIONS in Treasuries - especially for all the eager Prechterites. They know it's all - including the currency itself - headed down the shitter so they are getting all they can while the going is good.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 15:46 | Link to Comment BorisTheBlade
BorisTheBlade's picture

I'm not, and it looks more and more like "Vandals looting Rome" story all over again.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:45 | Link to Comment Cistercian
Cistercian's picture

 +1000

 Yes, the looting is reaching a truly frenzied pace!

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:47 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

"Hurry up, I hear that there's still some copper wiring left in Rhode Island!"

(Rahm overheard in the Oval Office.)

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:55 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Dude,

You leave my little Rhody alone. Connecticut has much nicer copper wiring and more homes to boot. And Boston is just up the road a piece. Move along, nothing to steal here.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:01 | Link to Comment Rainman
Rainman's picture

Interesting, but not surprising, that FDIC claims to be funded by the premiums of the insured banks. Yet FDIC is in the same boat as the SSTF.......sitting there with a fistful of government IOUs like everyone else. And the tsunami of depositor claims is just over the horizon.

That " full faith and credit " theme is getting awful shaky.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:50 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

Just wait until the Social Security "Trust Fund" tries collecting on all those Teasuries it has in it's "lock-box".

 

 

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 19:04 | Link to Comment Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance's picture

Up until about 6 or 7 years ago, the Social Security web site had an actual picture of the filing cabinet that contained the Social Security Trust Fund. No shit.

I was doing some research one day on the web site and I clicked on a link claiming to be a picture of the trust fund in West Virginia. Yup, West Virginia. I couldn't resist because I knew the "surplus fund" was a bunch of IOUs.

Imagine my surprise when this picture came up of a 4 drawer legal size fire rated filing cabinet and a full page description of who, what, when and why. An honest to goodness armed guard had the top drawer open and was displaying some ornate Treasury bonds.

I saved the link and always showed it to people as a joke. One day it disappeared. The picture, the page, everything was gone. Those were the days when you knew your retirement was safe.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:15 | Link to Comment Argos
Argos's picture

Wow, I guess I need to buy more gold and silver.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:19 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Basically a good summary and synthesis of the looming disaster that likely most ZH readers knew about.  I'm not insulting this piece, just saying that it shouldn't be brand new "news" to those following everything.

Of course, the more respectable and prominent the sources making such statements, the more quickly things will unravel.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 21:33 | Link to Comment Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

Agree, it was all rehash from www.24hgold.com which is the greatest goldbug site ever.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:28 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:35 | Link to Comment milbank
milbank's picture

"i have been warning of this since the 1970s and not a g-d soul paid a lick of attention....."

Perhaps if you changed your name.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:32 | Link to Comment chet
chet's picture

Wow, that was a bummer.

Genuine question:  What is to keep the Fed from simply keeping toxic assets forever?  What is the practical impacts of that?

Here's my thought: effectively write off all the MBS they have taken in, but maybe keeping it on the books with some value of appearance sake (seems like they'll have to do this anyway).

If/when inflation looks to kick in, simply confiscate some portion of the excess reserves they're holding, or raise capital reserve requirements significantly.

As you can tell, I'm not an expert on central banking.  I guess what I want to know is, what's keeping the Fed from simply making the "toxic waste" go poof?

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:39 | Link to Comment Gordon_Gekko
Gordon_Gekko's picture

"What is to keep the Fed from simply keeping toxic assets forever?  What is the practical impacts of that?"

Umm...people losing confidence in the currency? It is a con(fidence) game after all. It has happened you know - only about hundreds of times in history.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:47 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

The toxic waste can't just go poof.  If the Fed holds it forever, that is itself a form of monetization aka currency devaluation.  It's also in violation of federal law, but that doesn't seem to slow anyone down any more.

Put simply, bad money was created when those dubious mortgage loans were issued, and unless the property magically regains value equal to the loan amounts (tell me another fairy tale!) then either you recognize the loss somewhere or you play this complicated hide-and-devalue game that is going on.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 17:00 | Link to Comment Miles Kendig
Miles Kendig's picture

The concept of laws that regulate human action no longer applies to certain members of society under the process of judicial exclusion. The rule of law no longer rules.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 21:33 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:44 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:14 | Link to Comment Mark Beck
Mark Beck's picture

The financial types, do not want to shut down SS, many have already contributed. They just acknowledge the fact that in 2010 we will reach parity in SS, every cent taken in will be sent out, pay as you go. Because of the aging population, there after (FY2011) we will need to draw on IOUs which are increasingly worthless.

Let me explain the best way I know how.

When you tax payroll on labor, it has real value, real worth. If you take this tax, this money, and exchange it with an IOU, or debt instrument, there is no guarantee it will maintain value. If for example you purchased gold with the tax money, something separate from your currency, that maintains relative worth, it is an asset and not a debt. 

You cannot take true value, tax money on labor (asset), exchange it for debt (Treasury Bond, IOU), then spend the money through the general fund (financing government), and magically maintain the asset. You see, these kinds of money games only occur at the sovereign nation level where normal GAAP accounting rules are violated. Trying to say this is workable in a country with a fiat currency, controlled by a central private bank (FED), with massive amounts of debt is laughable. Most financial people understand this. We are not against retirees getting benefits, but we are obligated to advise our clients on expected future income streams.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 21:14 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:26 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:46 | Link to Comment Danz Gambit
Danz Gambit's picture

"Closing Social Security to new entrants ..." How the hell would they do that?

As with all great ponzi schemes, new entrants are the only thing keeping the ship afloat.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:48 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Visualize closing the benefit portion of SS while expanding the tax portion to all earned income, not just the first $100k (or so) it is now.  Then visualize the political fallout - oh wait, the young generation is too dumb, thanks to TV and our public school disastersystem, to realize how they're being screwed.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 16:08 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 16:54 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

I'm part of Gen X and have a lot of friends in Gen Y.  You, me, and three others below 40 who care about this stuff must be the exception.  I am regularly amazed at the ignorance of political and economic events I find among people in those generations who have college degrees, even graduate and professional degrees, and white collar jobs.

I work with a lot of people from around the British Commonwealth and expatration is almost the norm among educated young people in the Commonwealth - though those from Canada and NZ at least have something to go back to (no such luck for UK and SA expats, in my opinion).  But the US makes it far harder to be an expat in various ways, including taxation on worldwide income regardless of where you live (and the very nasty TD Form 90-22.1 requirement) and frankly I don't think the US education "system" prepares people all that well for coping outside their original environment.  Not to mention no one else has quite the same system of law or accounting and Commonwealth-type professional credentials are generally more portable than comparable US credentials.  Just my 2 pieces of lightly copper plated zinc, of course.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:21 | Link to Comment Stars-n-Bars-In...
Stars-n-Bars-In-Texas's picture

Tru Dat!

I'm Gen-X, and I manage an IT group that consists of a few boomers, Gen-X, and Gen-Y.  Most of the folks in our profession havn't a clue about the goings on politically and economically outside of the blurbs they catch on the MSM outlets.  They think they're 'informed' by what they caught on 'Kramer's show.'  I believe this is a general and very common side effect caused by the vast complexity put in place across the board by the financial institutions and government in general.  People are sheeple, especially when confronted with something complex that they don't understand but 'fear' looking stupid by questioning it.

In my staff meetings, I to bring up macro economic issues that are impacting our industry, and try to get them 'thinking' about the big picture.  I don't understand half of the stuff that is discussed here in any great detail, but it doesn't take too much focus to realize the whole friggin system is borked up and on a path to disaster.  I've found I've developed a team that is trending towards massive degrees of skepticism towards the two party system, and while they come from vastly different social tendencies (liberal vs. conservative), they're united in disliking the Republi-bankers and Demo-bankers.

Nuking SS participation, changing the Medicare rules, flattening spending on military spending, nationalizing the banks that are/have been TARP recipients, undoing the crazy pension plans for all governmental employees - all need to be game for discussion to see if there IS a way out. 

Getting people to wake up and 'turn off ostrich mode' is a hard thing to do...

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 14:59 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:15 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 15:25 | Link to Comment B9K9
B9K9's picture

To paraphrase Willie S., "What's in a name? That which we call a default by any other name (devaluation) would smell as bitter."

It's not a surprise to anyone, other than the truly brain dead, that the US is heading towards default. And it's not really a mystery as to which form it fill take: devaluation.

So we all know the score. Since financial assets, including equities, MBS and Ts will appreciate in proportion to $USD devaluation, these assets classes no longer provide any meaningful measurement of economic health.

At this point, it's really just a waiting game till the SHTF. Actually, it's a good time to continue making preparations for the upcoming social chaos.

At a macro level, someone really had to hate us pretty badly to treat us this poorly. What did we ever do to them? Or do stupid victims, like our typical US citizens, deserve their fate because they are so pitifully stupid? What goes through the minds of psychopaths who enjoy torturing others just because they can? Will there be justice or will they get away with their crimes against humanity?

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 17:06 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

Since financial assets, including equities, MBS and Ts will appreciate in proportion to $USD devaluation,

I'm not the most expert here, but how would MBS and Treasuries appreciate in proportion to devaluation of the USD?  They are fixed denomination assets.  I assume that the official inflation rate will continue to be cooked so that TIPS don't keep up with reality either.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 15:41 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:20 | Link to Comment Hephasteus
Hephasteus's picture

It's not the cost. It's the graft. You realize it costs the US government 400 dollars. not 4 dollars 400 dollars a gallon to supply gas to afghanistan. Now that's a margin.

Thu, 10/29/2009 - 07:26 | Link to Comment Herr Morgenholz
Herr Morgenholz's picture

Shut down military spending to save Socialist Security?  WTF?  No matter your disagreements with the country's foreign policy, has it ever crossed your mind that military spending is actually a legitimate function of government?  Is your belief that grandma having enough money for her Vegas trip is also a legitimate function?  The problem is socialism, dumbass.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 15:49 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 16:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 19:20 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

Sweet.  A little tast of the Garet Garett.

Pound for pound one of the top thinkers of he 20th century.

 

Do yourself a favor everybody, and read him.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 16:16 | Link to Comment exportbank
exportbank's picture

A large dose of inflation is the only cure. It will be somewhere in the teens. We may be in a deflationary environment but you can be certain that since inflation is the only way out they'll keep the presses churning. There is no option because inflation fixes everything for the people that got us here. If you're a saver, watch out. 

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 19:24 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

 

"If you're a saver, watch out."

 

Unless your savings are shiney and yellow.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 23:56 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 16:46 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:06 | Link to Comment Oxytan
Oxytan's picture

Why do you want to know?

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:22 | Link to Comment maff
maff's picture

Tomorrow.

In the absence of any more information it is perfectly reasonable to assume that each day is equivalent. With that assumption the probability that the S has not H TF a given date at a time t in the future is p=exp(-t/tbar)/tbar (known as a Poisson distribution) with a mean time to the event tbar. The important point, if you look, is that independent of the value of tbar the most likely day for this to happen is tomorrow. Buckle up.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 18:44 | Link to Comment maff
maff's picture

I gave the equation for the probability that the event occurs on day t, which best illustrates my point, rather than the probability that it had not occured by day t (as written). Sorry but I am in bed with swine flu and not thinking straight.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 16:51 | Link to Comment Mark Beck
Mark Beck's picture

Who is advising Obama??? Obama had the opportunity to issue a strong message to the world in slashing costs in the FY2010 budget. But, he did no slashing what so ever, and switched gears to the health bill initiative. So while Obama is helping me keep a Doctor I already have, the currency becomes worthless. 

Its been said before, the current administrations actions, are just rearranging the deck chairs on the sinking Titanic.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 17:04 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

It would appear that Obama is a puppet and Manchurian Candidate of the banksters and other financial elites.  All that slick PR in his campaign was just that.  It will get more entertaining as his populist, union, quasi-socialist base increasingly comes into active conflict with his bankster handlers.  Have you noticed how much "riot control" equipment is being bought up by police departments lately?

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 17:54 | Link to Comment bonddude
bonddude's picture

This is essentialy correct with an addendum that we really have just one party with the bankers allowing the political fun and games to swing like a pendulum between Ds & Rs because it serves as a good distraction.

In actuality, it's all bullshit.

As Deep Throat said "follow the money."

The only difference being it was a little more about parties back then...just a little.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 19:35 | Link to Comment Rusty_Shackleford
Rusty_Shackleford's picture

As Deep Throat said "follow the money."

 

Really?  I thought I heard her say "How would you like it if you had balls in your ears?"

[answer] I guess I could hear myself coming!

 

Sorry.  70's porn flashback.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 21:26 | Link to Comment trillion_dollar...
trillion_dollar_deficit's picture

In the meantime, the democrats in congress are increasing discretionary spending by 12.1% in next year's budget.

Tue, 10/27/2009 - 21:40 | Link to Comment Spitzer
Spitzer's picture

This is so www.24hgold.com. Go 100% gold ? why not?

Wed, 10/28/2009 - 00:59 | Link to Comment dot_bust
dot_bust's picture

Just before the Reign of Terror in France, the aristocracy became incredibly arrogant, stealing everything in sight and starving the people. Then the people promptly removed the heads of state...literally. :)

It's fair to say something similar could happen in the U.S. 

 

 

Wed, 10/28/2009 - 09:10 | Link to Comment Mad Max
Mad Max's picture

And yet the French Revolution didn't turn out all that well for the common people either.  No desire for a repeat of that ugly spectacle.  Could we just hire some aliens (not the south of the border kind) to permanently kidnap all the banksters and their puppets in DC instead?

Wed, 10/28/2009 - 04:01 | Link to Comment Anonymous
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!